Faculty Bibliography

Rituximab plus intravenous bolus chemotherapy is a standard treatment for immunocompetent patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Some studies have suggested that rituximab is associated with excessive toxicity in HIV-associated NHL, and that infusional chemotherapy may be more effective. We performed a randomized phase 2 trial of rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) given either concurrently before each infusional etoposide, vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (EPOCH) chemotherapy cycle or sequentially (weekly for 6 weeks) after completion of all chemotherapy in HIV-associated NHL. EPOCH consisted of a 96-hour intravenous infusion of etoposide, doxorubicin, and vincristine plus oral prednisone followed by intravenous bolus cyclophosphamide given every 21 days for 4 to 6 cycles. In the concurrent arm, 35 of 48 evaluable patients (73%; 95% confidence interval, 58%-85%) had a complete response. In the sequential arm, 29 of 53 evaluable patients (55%; 95% confidence interval, 41%-68%) had a complete response. The primary efficacy endpoint was met for the concurrent arm only. Toxicity was comparable in the 2 arms, although patients with a baseline CD4 count less than 50/microL had a high infectious death rate in the concurrent arm. We conclude that concurrent rituximab plus infusional EPOCH is an effective regimen for HIV-associated lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of weekly paclitaxel (Taxol) in advanced esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and two patients with advanced esophageal cancer were treated with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly over a 1-h infusion. One cycle was defined as 4 weeks of therapy. Ninety-five patients were assessable for toxicity and 86 patients who completed at least two cycles of treatment were assessable for response. Sixty-six patients had adenocarcinoma (66%) and 65 patients (68%) had no prior chemotherapy. RESULTS: A median of three cycles was delivered (range 1-11). Partial responses (PRs) were seen in 11 patients [13%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6% to 20%]. In patients without prior chemotherapy, PRs were seen in 10 patients (15%, 95% CI 6% to 24%), with comparable response in adenocarcinoma (8/50, 16%) and squamous carcinoma (2/15, 13%). Limited response was seen in patients with prior chemotherapy (1/21, 5%). The median duration of response was 172 days. The median survival was 274 days. Therapy was well tolerated with minimal hematologic or grade 3 or 4 toxicity. CONCLUSION: Weekly paclitaxel has limited activity in esophageal cancer. The median survival, modest activity, and tolerance of therapy indicate that weekly paclitaxel may be an option in patients unable to tolerate combination chemotherapy.

With a goal of identifying relations between gene expression and response (mucosal or pathological) or survival in esophageal cancer patients (stages II to IV) receiving oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and radiation, we measured in endoscopic primary tumor biopsies from 38 patients, the expression of seven genes (gammaGCS, gammaGT, MRP-2, ERCC-1, XPA, TS and DPD) prior to treatment, 1 week following oxaliplatin alone and at the end of the combined radio-chemotherapy cycle using real time QRT-PCR. A higher pretreatment level of XPA was related to shorter survival with a hazard ratio of 2.43 (90% confidence interval 1.09 to 5.43) using Cox regression modeling. However, multivariate analysis with a Cox model indicated low expression of XPA or TS and combined stages II and III had a higher probability of survival (for XPA: hazard ratio 3.0 and 90% C.I. of 1.3 to 6.9, with adjustment for stage included; for TS: hazard ratio is 1.98 with 90% C.I. of 0.94 to 4.20. The expression of TS, gammaGCS, ERCC-1 and MRP-2 declined from D 1 to the end of the cycle (p<0.05, sign test). A validation and further understanding of the findings need to be carried out in a larger study with a more homogeneous population of patients.

This article gives a brief discussion of "state-of-the-art" therapeutic strategies for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction tumors, with an emphasis on combined-modality therapy. In addition, we review the results of a multimodality trial conducted using a new agent against esophageal cancer, oxaliplatin. In this trial, the emphasis was on the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin in combination with protracted infusion 5-fluorouracil and radiation. A secondary endpoint of the study was the relationship between efficacy and toxicity to specific intratumoral gene expressions within the primary esophageal tumor.

BACKGROUND: Advanced pancreatic cancer has limited treatment options. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is frequently used in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Preclinical studies suggest synergism between trimetrexate (TMTX),5-FU, and leucovorin (NFL). AIM: We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the activity and safety of NFL in pancreatic cancer. METHOD: Eligible patients (n = 21) with untreated advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with 110 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) THTX on day 1 and 200 mg/m2 IV leucovorin prior to 500 mg/m2 IV 5-FU on day 2. Oral leucovorin (15 mg every 6 h for seven doses) started intravenous 24 h later. RESULTS: Treatment was administered for 6 wk followed by a 2-wk rest period. Response was evaluated every 8 wk. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Most patients (80%) had distant metastases. Forty-five cycles of chemotherapy were administered. The most common serious toxicities were Grade 3 diarrhea (23.8%) and nausea and vomiting (14.2%). The response rate was 4.1% (95% CI, 0-23%), median survival was 6.8 mo, and 1-yr survival was 19%. CONCLUSION: Treatment with NFL is well-tolerated in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The median survival and 1-yr survival in these patients with poor prognosis compares favorably with other treatment options.

PURPOSE: The pulmonary effects of concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy were studied in patients enrolled in a phase I trial for esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pulmonary function tests were performed prospectively before and after combined-modality therapy (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and radiation therapy) in 20 patients with esophageal cancer. Cumulative and differential lung DVH analysis from 0 to 5400 cGy in 25-cGy intervals was performed for the last 15 patients. Correlation between radiation exposure in various dose ranges and percent reduction in pulmonary function tests was calculated as an exploratory analysis. RESULTS: Significant reductions in carbon monoxide diffusion capacity corrected for hemoglobin (12.3%) and total lung capacity (2.5%) were evident at a median of 15.5 days after radiation therapy. DVH analysis revealed that the single dose of maximum correlation between lung volume radiation exposure and lung function reduction was less than 1000 cGy for all pulmonary functions. The percent lung volume that received a total dose between 700 and 1000 cGy maximally correlated with the percent reductions in total lung capacity and vital capacity, and the absolute lung volume that received a total dose between 700 and 1000 cGy maximally correlated with the percent reductions in total lung capacity, vital capacity, and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity. DISCUSSION: Significant declines in carbon monoxide diffusion capacity and total lung capacity are evident immediately after the administration of conformal radiation therapy, oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for esophageal cancer. Other lung functions remain statistically unchanged. The percent or absolute lung volume that received a total dose between 700 and 1000 cGy may be significantly correlated with the percent decline of carbon monoxide diffusion capacity, total lung capacity, and vital capacity. These associations will be evaluated further in a follow-up study.

PURPOSE: To identify a dose and schedule of oxaliplatin (OXP) to be safely administered in combination with protracted-infusion (PI) fluorouracil (5-FU) and external-beam radiation therapy (XRT) for patients with primary esophageal carcinoma (EC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility included therapeutically naive EC patients with clinical disease stages II, III, or IV. Initial doses and schedules for cycle 1 consisted of OXP 85 mg/m(2) on days 1, 15, and 29; PI 5-FU 180 mg/m(2) for 24 hours for 35 days; and XRT 1.8 Gy in 28 fractions starting on day 8. At completion of cycle 1, eligible patients could undergo an operation or begin cycle 2 without XRT. Postoperative patients were eligible for cycle 2. Stage IV patients were allowed three cycles in the absence of disease progression. OXP and 5-FU increases were based on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) encountered in cohorts of three consecutive patients. RESULTS: Thirty-eight eligible patients received therapy: 22 noninvasively staged as IV and 16 noninvasively staged as II and III. Thirty-six patients completed cycle 1, 29 patients started cycle 2, and 24 patients completed cycle 2. The combined-modality therapy was well tolerated, but DLT prevented OXP and 5-FU escalation. No grade 4 hematologic toxicity was noted. Eleven grade 3 and two grade 4 clinical toxicities were noted in eight patients. After cycle 1, 29 patients (81%) had no cancer in the esophageal mucosa. Thirteen patients underwent an operation with intent to resect the esophagus; five patients (38%) exhibited pathologic complete responses. CONCLUSION: OXP 85 mg/m(2) on days 1, 15, and 29 administered with PI 5-FU and XRT is safe, tolerable, and seems effective against primary EC. The role of OXP in multimodality regimens against EC deserves further evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy represents the standard treatment for patients with metastatic stomach cancer. Conflicting results have been published regarding the activity of paclitaxel in this setting. Therefore, we developed a phase II study to evaluate an outpatient 3 h infusion of paclitaxel. METHODS: Patients with chemonaive metastatic stomach cancer received paclitaxel 210 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. Patients with esophageal cancer were not eligible. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled. The median age was 55.5 years (range 37-81 years). Two partial responses were observed among the 18 patients evaluable for response and toxicity (response rate 11%, 95% CI: 2-33%). The median time to progression was 10.5 weeks and median survival 23 weeks. There was only one episode of grade IV neutropenia and no episodes of grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity were observed. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel exhibited minimal activity in this patient population.

We had previously shown that high gene expressions (mRNA levels) of thymidylate synthase (TS; Leichman et al., J. Clin. Oncol., 15: 3223-3229, 1997) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP; Metzger et al., Clin. Cancer Res., 4: 2371-2376, 1998) in pretreatment tumor biopsies could identify tumors that would be nonresponsive to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based therapy. In this study, we investigated the association between intratumoral gene expression of the pyrimidine catabolism enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and the response of colorectal tumors to the same 5-FU-based protocol. DPD expressions were measured by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR in 33 pretreatment biopsies of colorectal tumors from patients who went on to receive treatment with 5-FU and leucovorin (LV). The range of DPD gene expression in those tumors that were nonresponsive to 5-FU was much broader than that of the responding tumors. None of the tumors with basal-level DPD expressions above a DPD:beta-actin ratio of 2.5 x 10(-3) (14 of 33) were responders to 5-FU/LV therapy, whereas those tumors with DPD gene expressions below DPD: beta-actin ratio of 2.5 x 10(-3) had a response rate of 50%. There was no correlation among DPD, TS, and TP expression values in this set of colorectal tumors, which indicated that these gene expressions are independent variables. All of the tumors that responded to 5-FU therapy (11 of 33) had expression values of all three of the genes, TS, TP, and DPD, below their respective nonresponse cutoff values, whereas, in each of the nonresponding tumors, at least one of these gene expressions was high. The patients with low expression of all three of the genes had significantly longer survival than patients with a high value of any one of the gene expressions. The results of this study show that intratumoral gene expression level of DPD is associated with tumor response to 5-FU and that the use of more than one independent determinant of response permits the identification of a high percentage of responding patients.