Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: It has been reported that patients with macular disease have difficulties with face perception. Some of this difficulty may be caused by the sensory and perceptual consequences of using peripheral retina. However, strong correlations have not always been found between performance on face tasks and clinical measure of function. Based on the evidence of abnormal eye movements by patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), we explored whether abnormal fixation patterns occur when these patients view an image of a face. METHODS: An OPKO OCT/SLO was used to collect structural and functional data. For each subject, the structural location of disease was determined, and the locus and stability of fixation were quantified. A SLO movie of fundus movements was recorded while the subject viewed an image of a face. RESULTS: The number of fixations on internal (eyes, nose, and mouth) and external features were measured. A two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance found significant differences between the control and patient groups and among locations. A significant interaction between group and location was also found. Post hoc comparisons found a significantly greater proportion of fixations on external features for the AMD group than that in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The observed patterns of fixations of our subjects with AMD were similar to those observed in other groups of patients who have difficulties with face perception. For example, individuals with social phobias, Williams syndrome, autism, schizophrenia, or prosopagnosia have altered face perceptions and also have a significantly greater proportion of fixations on external features of faces. Abnormal eye movement patterns and fixations may contribute to deficits in face perception in AMD patients.

PURPOSE.: To assess the influences of stimulus parameters (physics) on measures of visual field sensitivity (psychophysics). METHODS.: Subjects' thresholds were measured on three different clinically available perimeters: the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA), the Nidek MP1 (MP1), and the Opko OCT/SLO (OSLO). On all machines, visual field testing was done with a 10-2 spatial distribution of test points, using Goldmann Size III and Size I stimuli, with a presentation time of 200 ms, and using a 4-2 threshold algorithm. RESULTS.: All the MP1 and OSLO data fell below the values for the corresponding points on the HFA. For the Goldmann Size III target, the HFA median threshold was 33 dB, whereas the MP1 median threshold was 19 dB and the OLSO, 18 dB. Using the increment intensity values at each dB level for each microperimeter, the data were converted to equivalent HFA dB. Using this conversion, the smallest increment displayed in the MP1 (1.27 cd/m) was equivalent to 34 HFA dB, and the brightest increment displayed by the MP1 was 14 HFA dB (127 cd/m). The smallest increment displayed in the OSLO (1.56 cd/m) was equivalent to 33.1 HFA dB, and the brightest increment displayed by the OSLO was 13.6 HFA dB (137 cd/m). There was good correspondence among these results when compared using equivalent increment threshold units. However, discrepancies in our findings made us acutely aware of the importance of evaluating the consequences of design choices made by the manufacturers. CONCLUSIONS.: The findings underscore the need for users to check their assumptions about what the equipment is doing and to always evaluate the psychophysical consequences of the stimuli that are used by a particular instrument.

PURPOSE: To quantify the effects of three vision rehabilitation training approaches on improvements in reading performance. METHODS: Thirty subjects with AMD participated in the training portion of the study. The median age of the subjects was 79 years (range, 54-89 years). The three training modules were: Visual Awareness and Eccentric Viewing (module 1), Control of Reading Eye Movements (module 2), and Reading Practice with Sequential Presentation of Lexical Information (module 3). Subjects were trained for 6 weekly sessions on each module, and the order of training was counterbalanced. All subjects underwent four assessments: at baseline and at three 6-week intervals. Reading performance was measured before and after each training module. A separate group of 6 subjects was randomly assigned to a control condition in which there was no training. These subjects underwent repeated assessments separated by 6 weeks. RESULTS: Reading speeds decreased by an average of 8.4 words per minute (wpm) after training on module 1, increased by 27.3 wpm after module 2, and decreased by 9.8 wpm after module 3. Only the increase in reading speed after module 2 was significantly different from zero. Sentence reading speeds for the control group, who had no reading rehabilitation intervention, was essentially unchanged over the 18 weeks (0.96 +/- 1.3 wpm). CONCLUSIONS: A training curriculum that concentrates on eye movement control increased reading speed in subjects with AMD. This finding does not suggest that the other rehabilitation modules have no value; it suggests that they are simply not the most effective for reading rehabilitation

PURPOSE: To establish normative values for macular light sensitivity and to determine the intrasession fluctuation of perimetric responses using the OPKO/OTI microperimeter. METHODS: A total of 32 visually normal subjects participated in the study. A standardized grid pattern was used for testing, which consisted of 28 points arranged concentrically in three circles that occupied an area of 11 degrees (in diameter) within the central macula. Each subject participated in at least two tests. Parameters evaluated included: overall mean macular sensitivity for test 1 and 2, overall difference in mean macular sensitivity between tests, and the mean sensitivity for each circle. The relationship between sensitivity and age was also examined. RESULTS: The overall median sensitivity for test 1 was 16.8 decibels (dB) and for test 2 was 16.9 dB. The median sensitivities for test 1 and test 2 were not significantly different (P = 0.72). The mean intrasession sensitivity difference was 0.13 dB. The variability of the sensitivity difference between tests decreased as mean sensitivity increased. The sensitivity values averaged across the two tests for inner, middle, and outer circles ranged from 14.3 to 18.8 dB (median value of 16.9 dB), 13.8-18.3 dB (median value of 17.2 dB), and 11.3-18.3 dB (median value of 16.6 dB), respectively. Linear regression analysis showed a 0.5 dB sensitivity loss for each decade of life. CONCLUSION: We documented a narrow range of intrasession fluctuation using the OPKO/OTI microperimeter. The establishment of normative sensitivity values will facilitate monitoring the loss of macular visual function in patients with retinal disease

PURPOSE:: To investigate a relationship between the inner segment-outer segment (IS-OS) junctional layer integrity and the overlying retinal sensitivity assessed by Spectral OCT/SLO (spectral-domain optical coherence tomography) and microperimetry testing in patients with dry and wet forms of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS:: Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography examination and microperimetry testing were performed in 55 eyes of 43 consecutive patients with AMD. Microperimetry maps were registered onto three-dimensional retinal topography maps, and point-to-point analysis of correlation between microperimetric retinal sensitivities and corresponding status of the underlying IS-OS junctional layer was performed. In addition, the analysis of correlation between the best-corrected visual acuity and the integrity of IS-OS layer in the center of fovea was also performed. RESULTS:: Retinal sensitivity was inversely and strongly correlated with the integrity of IS-OS layer in both dry and wet forms of AMD (correlation coefficient [r] = -0.75 [95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.88], P < 0.001, and -0.79 [95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.89], P < 0.001, respectively). The correlation between the best-corrected visual acuity and the integrity of IS-OS layer in the center of fovea was less significant (r = -0.58 [95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.79], P = 0.02, for dry AMD, and r = -0.6 [95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.78], P = 0.015, for wet AMD). CONCLUSION:: Retinal sensitivity consistently correlated with the status of underlying IS-OS junctional layer in both dry and wet forms of AMD. Loss of IS-OS layer is significantly associated with poor retinal sensitivity, assessed by microperimetry. Compared with visual acuity, functional testing with microperimetry appears to more consistently correlate with changes in the outer retina, such as IS-OS junctional integrity, especially, in patients with wet AMD

To investigate the relationship between depression and quantitative measures of visual function, we recruited 18 subjects with central scotomas from macular degeneration who were enrolled in a reading rehabilitation program. Psychological batteries and reading assessments were administered prior to rehabilitation; reading assessments and a measure of adaptation to vision loss were administered following rehabilitation. We investigated relationships between reported levels of depressive symptoms and reading and adaptation outcome measures by using Pearson product moment correlation analysis. Results revealed a significant relationship between depression levels and reading acuity difference scores (r(16) = 0.54, p = 0.02) and changes in adaptation to vision loss levels (r(16) = 0.62, p = 0.01), suggesting that those who reported greater depressive symptoms did not respond as well functionally to reading rehabilitation but reported greater improvement in levels of adaptation to vision loss following rehabilitation. Future research should focus on defining standard methods to assess and remediate depression as part of the rehabilitation process.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We correlated retinal sensitivity as determined by scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry (SLO-MP) in glaucomatous eyes with paracentral visual field (VF) defects detected by standard automated perimetry (SAP). METHODS: Twenty eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy and a SAP VF defect involving the central 16 test points (at least one point with p<1% in the 24-2 VF) were enrolled. Eyes with diseases other than glaucoma were excluded. All patients underwent SLO-MP and SAP of the central 10 degrees. Results from each eye were divided into 4 quadrants for analysis. Normal and abnormal quadrants by SAP were compared to the corresponding normal and abnormal quadrants by SLO-MP. Regression analysis was used to correlate the mean threshold values (dB) of SLO-MP and SAP in each quadrant. Macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed when there was a disagreement between functional tests. RESULTS: Mean age and VF mean deviation were 60.8+/-13.4 years and -7.3+/-6.1 dB, respectively. There was a significant correlation between SLO-MP and SAP results in all quadrants (r2>/=0.68, p<0.001). All abnormal SAP quadrants had a corresponding abnormal SLO-MP quadrant. However, 21% of the normal SAP quadrants had an abnormal corresponding microperimetry result; a corresponding significant reduction in total macular thickness measured by OCT was present in 75% of these quadrants. CONCLUSIONS: Macular sensitivity evaluated by SLO-MP correlates significantly with SAP paracentral VF defects. SLO-MP detected retinal sensitivity reduction in areas of OCT structural damage with normal SAP and suggests that subtle paracentral functional deficits may be present in many more eyes with established glaucoma than generally assumed

AIMS: To investigate the combination of 3D optical coherence tomography (OCT) retinal thickness measurements and superimposed scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) microperimetry obtained using a Spectral OCT/SLO and to test the correlation between retinal thickness and retinal sensitivity in retinal diseases grouped according to anatomic locations. METHODS: Patients with various retinal diseases and subjects with normal fundi underwent microperimetry testing and imaging with the Spectral OCT/SLO. Based on the Spectral OCT/SLO findings, the participants were divided into 4 groups: patients with retinal thickening due to the outer retina pathology (group I); patients with retinal thickening due to the cystic changes observed in the inner retina (group II); patients with macular neurosensory retina thinning associated with geographic atrophy or underlying subretinal cicatricial changes (group III), and subjects with unremarkable fundus appearance and normal appearing retina on Spectral OCT/SLO (group IV). The primary outcome was the correlation coefficient (r) between Spectral OCT/SLO-measured macular thickness and microperimetry values. RESULTS: Correlations between retinal thickness and psychophysical thresholds were calculated for each patient, and these values were averaged within groups. The mean correlation values (Pearson product movement) were as follows: for group I (n = 21 eyes) r = 0.04; for group II (n = 24 eyes) r = -0.53; for group III (n = 16 eyes) r = 0.41, and for group IV (n = 15 eyes) r = 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of 3D OCT images and superimposed SLO microperimetry obtained by Spectral OCT/SLO demonstrated that thickening due to cystic changes of the inner retinal layers or thinning of the neurosensory retina on OCT correlated most significantly with decreases in psychophysical threshold sensitivities

PURPOSE:: To investigate the location and fixation stability of preferred retinal locations (PRLs) in patients with macular disease, and the relationship among areas of abnormal fundus autofluorescence, the PRL and visual sensitivity. METHODS:: Fifteen patients (15 eyes) were studied. Seven had Stargardt disease, 1 bull's eye maculopathy, 5 age-related macular degeneration, 1 Best disease, and 1 pattern dystrophy. All tested eyes had areas of abnormal fundus autofluorescence. The PRL was evaluated with fundus photography and the Nidek microperimeter. Visual field sensitivity was measured with the Nidek microperimeter. RESULTS:: Of the 15 eyes, 4 had foveal and 11 had eccentric fixation. Eccentric PRLs were above the atrophic lesion and their stability did not depend on the degree of eccentricity from the fovea. Visual sensitivity was markedly decreased in locations corresponding to hypofluorescent areas. Sensitivity was not decreased in hyperfluorescent areas corresponding to flecks but was decreased if hyperfluorescence was in the form of dense annuli. CONCLUSION:: Eccentric PRLs were in the superior retina in regions of normal fundus autofluorescence. Fixation stability was not correlated with the degree of eccentricity from the fovea. To assess the outcomes of treatment trials it is important to use methods that relate retinal morphology to visual function