Faculty Bibliography

A sequence variation in the pigment epithelial protein RPE65 has been shown to correlate with RPE65 protein levels, rhodopsin regeneration kinetics and light damage susceptibility in different mouse strains. Here, we tested whether such a correlation can also be found in rats. We examined four rat strains for RPE65 protein levels and the Rpe65 gene sequence. In two strains, we additionally determined Rpe65 mRNA levels, rhodopsin regeneration and light damage susceptibility (LDS).RPE65 protein levels were higher in Lewis and Brown Norway rats compared to Wistar and Long Evans. The albino strains Wistar and Lewis were investigated further. Lewis had higher Rpe65 mRNA levels than Wistar. Sequence analysis of the coding region of the Rpe65 cDNA revealed no relevant sequence variations in the two strains. Content and regeneration of rhodopsin were comparable in both strains. However, Wistar rats were more susceptible to light damage than Lewis. We conclude that lower RPE65 protein levels in Wistar may have been caused by decreased gene expression and not by a sequence variation as suggested for mice. In rats, RPE65 may not be a limiting factor for rhodopsin regeneration. Since LDS in rats did not directly correlate with RPE65 protein levels and rhodopsin regeneration, other yet unidentified (genetic) factors may account for the susceptibility differences observed in rats.

Lack of the AP-1 member c-Fos protects photoreceptors against light-induced apoptosis, a model for retinal degeneration. In mice, light damage increases the activity of the transcription factor AP-1, while pharmacological suppression of AP-1 prevents apoptosis, suggesting the involvement of pro-apoptotic AP-1 target genes. Recently, however, it was shown that photoreceptors expressing Fra-1 in place of c-Fos (Fos (Fosl1/Fosl1) ) are apoptosis competent despite the lack of transactivation domains in Fra-1. Here, we show that morphological features of light-induced apoptosis were indistinguishable in Fos (Fosl1/Fosl1) and wild-type mice. Furthermore, light exposure comparably increased AP-1 activity in both genotypes. Opposite to wild-type mice, Fra-1, but not c-Fos, was detectable in AP-1 complexes of Fos (Fosl1/Fosl1) mice. Importantly, AP-1 responsiveness for glucocorticoid receptor-mediated inhibition was preserved in Fos (Fosl1/Fosl1) mice. Thus, Fra-1 takes over for c-Fos in pro- and anti-apoptotic signal transduction. As Fra-1 lacks transactivation domains, AP-1 may not induce, but rather suppress genes in retinal light damage.

Apoptosis is essential for retinal development but it is also a major mode of cell loss in many human retinal dystrophies. High levels of visible light induce retinal apoptosis in mice and rats. This process is dependent on the induction of the transcription factor AP-1, a dimeric complex composed of c-Fos and c-Jun/JunD phosphoproteins. While c-Fos is essential, JunD is dispensable for light-induced photoreceptor apoptosis. Here we show that N-terminal phosphorylation of c-Jun, the other main partner of c-Fos in induced AP-1 complexes is not required for programmed cell death during retinal development in vivo and is also dispensable for photoreceptor apoptosis induced by the exogenous stimuli "excessive light" and N-nitroso-N-methylurea (MNU). Mice expressing a mutant c-Jun protein (JunAA) that cannot be phosphorylated at its N-terminus are apoptosis competent and their retina is not distinguishable from wild-type mice. Accordingly, Jun kinase, responsible for phosphorylation of wild-type c-Jun protein is at best only marginally induced by the apoptotic stimuli "light" and MNU. Complex composition of light-induced AP-1 complexes is similar in wild-type and JunAA mice. This shows that the mutant c-Jun protein can be part of the DNA binding complex AP-1 and demonstrates that induction of the DNA binding activity of AP-1 after light insult does not depend on N-terminal phosphorylation of c-Jun. Our results suggest that transactivation of target genes by phosphorylated c-jun/AP-1 is not required for MNU- or light-induced apoptosis of photoreceptor cells.

BACKGROUND:Chamber angle changes due to trauma represent a diagnostic challenge in modern ophthalmology and two examination techniques are compared: gonioscopy which has been used in ophthalmology for almost a century and is still undergoing continuous improvements and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) which was introduced into clinical ophthalmology in 1991. CASE REPORT/METHODS:We report the case of a 14-year-old boy with ocular trauma caused by a soft gun projectile. Gonioscopy showed a large goniosynechia in the presence of ocular hypotension, therefore, cyclodialysis was suspected. However, a control investigation using UBM showed an intact and circularly attached but anteverted ciliary body behind the synechia, a circular choroidal effusion and an anterior displacement of the iris-lens diaphragm. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In ocular trauma, UBM may under certain conditions clearly be of a higher diagnostic value than gonioscopy. Therefore, UBM should not only be considered as an additional examination technique in the evaluation of traumatic ocular pathologies but rather as the technique of choice.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Evidence has accumulated that excessive light exposure may promote age-related and inherited retinal degeneration, in which photoreceptor death by apoptosis leads to loss of vision. In the current study, the effect of elevated corticosteroid levels on light-induced apoptosis of photoreceptors was determined. METHODS:Photoreceptor apoptosis was induced in retinas of BALB/c mice by exposure to diffuse white light. High levels of corticosteroids were induced, either endogenously (fasting-mediated stress) or by a single intraperitoneal injection of dexamethasone (DEX). Photoreceptor damage was assessed morphologically and by electroretinography. Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and activator protein (AP)-1 activities were shown by Western blot analysis and electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) of retinal nuclear extracts. RESULTS:Fasting and injection of DEX led to an activation of GR in the retina, as judged by its translocation to the nucleus of retinal cells. On induction of GR activity before light exposure, AP-1 activity, normally induced by damaging doses of light, remained at basal levels. Both treatments completely prevented photoreceptor apoptosis and preserved retinal function. CONCLUSIONS:Activity of the transcription factor AP-1 is associated with light-induced apoptosis. In the current study, pharmacologic suppression of AP-1 activity protected against light damage. Inhibition of AP-1 activity may have occurred by the protein-protein interaction of GR and AP-1.

BACKGROUND:Idiopathic sclerochoroidal calcification is a rare benign disorder of the choroid and sclera which has initially been described twelve years ago. Clinically, it is often mistaken for osteoma, choroidal metastasis or infiltration in lymphoma leading to exentsive further investigations. CASE REPORT/METHODS:A 68-year-old patient had been referred to our outpatient clinic because of unusual fundus changes on both eyes. Ophthalmoscopic examination revealed a yellowish placoid-like lesion in the superotemporal quandrant of the fundus of both eyes, the left lesion being more discrete. Flurescein angiography and echography led to the diagnosis of bilateral ISC. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Although idiopathic sclerochoroidal calcification can easily be diagnosed by echographic and angiopraphic examination, it is frequently misdiagnosed for malignant tumors thus initiating excessive further investigation.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To determine whether the volatile anesthetic halothane protects against light-induced photoreceptor degeneration in the rodent retina. METHODS:Albino mice and rats were anesthetized with halothane and exposed to high levels of white or blue light. Nonanesthetized animals served as controls. Retinal morphology was assessed by light microscopy, and apoptosis of photoreceptor cells was verified by detection of fragmented genomic DNA and in situ staining of apoptotic nuclei (TUNEL assay). Rhodopsin regeneration after bleaching was determined by measuring rhodopsin levels in retinas of mice or rats at different time points in darkness. RESULTS:Halothane anesthesia reversibly inhibited metabolic rhodopsin regeneration and thus prevented rhodopsin from absorbing high numbers of photons during light exposure. Consequently, photoreceptors of mice and rats anesthetized with halothane were completely protected against degeneration induced by white light. In remarkable contrast, however, halothane anesthesia did not protect against blue-light-induced photoreceptor cell death. CONCLUSIONS:After the initial bleach, halothane impeded photon absorption by rhodopsin by inhibiting metabolic rhodopsin regeneration. Apparently, the rhodopsin-mediated uptake of the critical number of photons to initiate white light-induced retinal degeneration was prevented. In contrast, halothane did not protect the retina against blue light. Blue light can efficiently restore functional rhodopsin from bleaching intermediates through a process termed photoreversal of bleaching. This process does not depend on the visual cycle via the pigment epithelium but nevertheless enables rhodopsin molecules to absorb the critical number of photons required to induce retinal degeneration.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Acute white-light damage to rods depends on the amount of rhodopsin available for bleaching during light exposure. Bleached rhodopsin is metabolically regenerated through the visual cycle involving the pigment epithelium, or photochemically by deep blue light through photoreversal of bleaching. Because photoreversal is faster than metabolic regeneration of rhodopsin by several orders of magnitude, the photon catch capacity of the retina is significantly augmented during blue-light illumination, which may explain the greater susceptibility of the retina to blue light than to green light. However, blue light can also affect function of several blue-light-absorbing enzymes that may lead to the induction of retinal damage. Therefore, this study was conducted to test whether rhodopsin and its bleaching intermediates play a role in blue-light-induced retinal degeneration. METHODS:Eyes of anesthetized rats and mice that did or did not contain rhodopsin were exposed to green (550 +/- 10 nm) or deep blue (403 +/- 10 nm) light for up to 2 hours. Rats with nearly rhodopsinless retinas were obtained by bleaching rhodopsin in animals with inhibited metabolic rhodopsin regeneration-that is, under halothane anesthesia. In addition, Rpe65(-/-) mice that are completely without rhodopsin were used to test the susceptibility to blue-light damage of a rodent retina completely devoid of the visual pigment. Effects of illumination on photoreceptor morphology were assessed 24 hours or 10 days thereafter by morphologic and biochemical methods. RESULTS:Exposure to blue light resulted in severe retinal damage and activation of the transcription factor AP-1 in rats. In contrast, green light had no effect. When rhodopsin was almost completely bleached by short-term green-light exposure while metabolic regeneration (but not photoreversal) was prevented by halothane anesthesia, blue-light exposure induced distinct lesions in rat retinas. When both metabolic rhodopsin regeneration and photoreversal of bleaching were almost completely inhibited, blue-light exposure caused only very moderate lesions. When mice without rhodopsin were exposed to blue light, no damage occurred, in contrast to wild-type control mice. CONCLUSIONS:Short time exposure to blue light has deleterious effects on retinal morphology. Because damage was observed only in the presence of the visual pigment, blue-light-induced retinal degeneration is rhodopsin mediated. Absorption of blue light by other proteins is not sufficient to induce light damage. Photoreversal of bleaching, which occurs only in blue but not in green light, increases the photon-catch capacity of the retina and may thus account for the difference in the damage potential between blue and green light.