Faculty Bibliography

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a prototypical autoimmune disease, characterised by flares of rampant inflammation that can threaten, in an unpredictable manner, almost any organ in the body. Current standard of care is largely empiric, involving the use of corticosteroids and toxic immune suppressive agents that are widely acknowledged to have unacceptable side effects for long-term use. Recently, there have been significant advances in understanding the nature of some fundamental immune imbalances underlying the complicated clinical manifestations of SLE. Nevertheless attempts to develop and test more targeted, and potentially safer immune-modulating drugs for lupus have encountered significant obstacles, due to the lack of validated biological markers for disease flare and remission, and difficulties in the clinical assessment of the heterogeneous patients. In support of renewed interest in drug development for lupus, large collaborative groups have formed, and efforts are underway to develop objective biomarkers for SLE as well as to improve the standardisation and reproducibility of clinical outcome measures in multi-centre trials

The major impediment to drug development for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is its heterogeneity. The unpredictable manner in which lupus targets different organs at varying intensity makes the study of new drugs and the optimization of their administration extremely difficult. With the advent of novel, targeted biologic agents for SLE, it can be hoped that more strategic, lupus-relevant immune modulation will lead to safer and more effective treatments. Two alternative new approaches to lupus treatment are reviewed. The first involves selective inhibition of a single protein (BLyS), which may play a central role in host defense and in the pathogenesis of SLE. Although this approach is finely targeted to the inhibition of a single protein which is known to be upregulated in SLE patients, the positioning of BLyS at a critical hub in the immune response suggests that more global adverse repercussions on immunity might still occur. The second strategy is the use of peptides designed to specifically induce tolerance in limited autoreactive immune responses. Immune repercussions might, at least in theory, be almost nonexistent with this kind of approach. Concerns that limited induction of tolerance might have equally limited impact on the complex immune disorder of SLE are not borne out in preliminary murine data. Specific development programs are ongoing using both of these strategies and have recently entered human trials.

It is now widely accepted that the current standard of care for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients is inadequate. There has not been a new medication approved for this disease in thirty years. Attempts to develop and test new drugs have been ongoing since the mid-1990s, but have encountered formidable obstacles. Current models for lupus pathogenesis have provided a theoretical framework for understanding how heterogeneous genetic defects might combine in various ways to increase susceptibility to SLE in different individuals, and could have important implications for new drug development. With the current burst of drug discovery and increased public awareness of SLE, the impetus to overcome these obstacles has never been greater

The past decade has seen an evolution in the way that thrombophilic conditions are diagnosed and understood. This has largely evolved through the detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms in critical regulating proteins that are thought to confer significant structural-functional changes at key points in the coagulation cascade. The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a complex hypercoagulable disorder that as yet defies the possibility of simple, predictive testing

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or fetal loss and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Genetic factors are thought to play a role in the susceptibility to APS. Similar to many other polygenic autoimmune diseases, human leukocyte antigen associations have been reported. The genetics of b(2)-glycoprotein I, one of the most representative target antigens of aPL, has been extensively studied. Additional genetic risk factors for the development of thrombosis in patients with aPL have also been discussed. However, the genes involved in APS have not been identified because antigen specificity of aPL and the pathophysiology of APS are highly heterogeneous and multifactorial. Genome-wide linkage analysis and larger cohort studies would lead to better understanding of the genes that might be involved in APS

OBJECTIVE: In a preliminary attempt to develop a drug responder index for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 2 validated disease activity instruments were studied for their responsiveness and compared to a physician visual analog scale (VAS) assessment of disease activity. We attempted to determine whether these validated instruments were useful components in characterizing response in the setting of a clinical trial. METHODS: Eighty paper patients were assessed using the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) and Systemic Lupus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and by physician's assessment of global activity. The cases were arranged in random order and divided into groups of 20 patients and each group was assessed by 20 lupus experts; change in disease activity was recorded at 3 and 6 months compared to baseline using a physician VAS. RESULTS: Four different lupus experts assessed disease activity in all 80 patients at baseline and 3 and 6 months after initiation of therapy using the BILAG and SLEDAI instruments. BILAG and SLEDAI scores correlated well over time; however, in a regression analysis where average physician VAS were chosen as the outcome variable, a significant amount of variation in the average physician VAS not related to the SLEDAI and BILAG scores was noted. CONCLUSION: The physician VAS may be too blunt to assess response in SLE, because even among experienced lupus assessors, there were considerable differences in what influenced scoring decisions

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prasterone administration results in improvement or stabilization of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity and its symptoms. METHODS: Women with active SLE were treated with prasterone 200 mg/day plus standard SLE treatments or with placebo plus standard SLE treatments for up to 12 months in this randomized, double-blind investigation conducted at 27 centers. Standard SLE treatments included prednisone (</=10 mg/day), antimalarials, and immunosuppressive agents; dosages were required to be stable for >/=6 weeks prior to enrollment and remain unchanged during protocol treatment. Responders were patients who experienced no clinical deterioration and had improvement or stabilization over the duration of the study in 2 disease activity measures (the SLE Disease Activity Index [SLEDAI] and the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure) and 2 quality of life measures (patient's global assessment and the Krupp Fatigue Severity Scale). RESULTS: A total of 381 women with SLE were enrolled. Among patients with clinically active disease at baseline (SLEDAI score >2), 86 of 147 in the prasterone group (58.5%) demonstrated improvement or stabilization without clinical deterioration, as compared with 65 of 146 in the placebo group (44.5%) (P = 0.017). Acne and hirsutism were reported in 33% and 16%, respectively, of the prasterone group and in 14% and 2%, respectively, of the placebo group (P < 0.05 for both comparisons). However, most cases of acne and hirsutism were mild and did not require withdrawal from therapy. Myalgias and oral stomatitis were reported less frequently in the prasterone group (22% and 15%, respectively) than in the placebo group (36% and 23%, respectively) (P < 0.05 for both comparisons). Serum levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and C3 complement significantly decreased, while levels of testosterone and, to a lesser extent, estradiol increased in the prasterone group. CONCLUSION: In adult women with active SLE, administration of prasterone at a dosage of 200 mg/day improved or stabilized signs and symptoms of disease and was generally well tolerated

The predictive value (PV) and association of 4 antiphospholipid antibodies with clinical manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) were evaluated in 90 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and 100 with APS. Patients with APS were classified into arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis, and pregnancy morbidity subgroups. IgG, IgM, and IgA anticardiolipin (aCL), antiphosphatidylserine (aPS), anti-beta 2-glycoprotein I (anti-B2GPI), and antiprothrombin (aPT) antibodies were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Individually, anti-B2GPI and aPS antibodies had the strongest PV for APS (86.4%-94.1%; P < .001) in patients with SLE. The PV for APS reached 100% when 2 or more antibodies were present. Similarly, anti-B2GPI and aPS antibodies had a stronger PV and association for arterial thrombosis (87%-95%; P < .001) compared with venous thrombosis (80%-92%; P = .01). Weak PV and association with pregnancy morbidity were seen with all antibodies. These results suggest an important pathogenic role of anti-B2GPI antibodies in arterial thrombosis. In addition, anti-B2GPI and aPS antibodies seem to provide the best diagnostic value for the laboratory assessment of APS