Faculty Bibliography

Motor behaviors are the primary means by which animals interact with their environment, forming the final output of most central nervous system (CNS) activity. The neural circuits that govern basic locomotor functions appear to be genetically hard wired and are comprised of discrete groups of neurons residing within the spinal cord. These local microcircuits coordinate simple reflexive behaviors in response to sensory stimuli and underlie the generation of rhythmic patterns of neural activity necessary for walking. In recent years there have been significant advances in understanding the genetic and molecular programs that determine the specificity of neural connections within the spinal cord that are critical for the emergence of coordinate motor behaviors. The assembly of circuits within the spinal cord requires the generation of diverse cell types to accommodate the intricate sets of interconnections between motor neurons, sensory neurons, interneurons, and muscle. The first and most critical aspect of this process is that motor neurons select their appropriate muscle targets in the periphery with fidelity and precision. All of the subsequent steps in motor neuron connectivity, such as their descending inputs from higher brain centers, their circuits with sensory neurons and interneurons are constrained by the early connections formed between motor neurons and their muscle targets. The actions of a single family of transcription factors, encoded by the chromosomally clustered Hox genes, appear to have a central role in defining the specificity of motor neuron-muscle connectivity. The emerging logic of Hox protein function in motor neuron specification may provide more general insights into the programs that determine synaptic specificity in other CNS regions

The precision with which motor neurons innervate target muscles depends on a regulatory network of Hox transcription factors that translates neuronal identity into patterns of connectivity. We show that a single transcription factor, FoxP1, coordinates motor neuron subtype identity and connectivity through its activity as a Hox accessory factor. FoxP1 is expressed in Hox-sensitive motor columns and acts as a dose-dependent determinant of columnar fate. Inactivation of Foxp1 abolishes the output of the motor neuron Hox network, reverting the spinal motor system to an ancestral state. The loss of FoxP1 also changes the pattern of motor neuron connectivity, and in the limb motor axons appear to select their trajectories and muscle targets at random. Our findings show that FoxP1 is a crucial determinant of motor neuron diversification and connectivity, and clarify how this Hox regulatory network controls the formation of a topographic neural map

The control of movement relies on the precision with which motor circuits are assembled during development. Spinal motor neurons (MNs) provide the trigger to signal the appropriate sequence of muscle contractions and initiate movement. This task is accommodated by the diversification of MNs into discrete subpopulations, each of which acquires precise axonal trajectories and central connectivity patterns. An upstream Hox factor-based regulatory network in MNs defines their competence to deploy downstream programs including the expression of Nkx and ETS transcription factors. These interactive transcriptional programs coordinate MN differentiation and connectivity, defining a sophisticated roadmap of motor circuit assembly in the spinal cord. Similar principles using modular interaction of transcriptional programs to control neuronal diversification and circuit connectivity are likely to act in other CNS circuits

Spinal motor neurons acquire specialized 'pool' identities that determine their ability to form selective connections with target muscles in the limb, but the molecular basis of this striking example of neuronal specificity has remained unclear. We show here that a Hox transcriptional regulatory network specifies motor neuron pool identity and connectivity. Two interdependent sets of Hox regulatory interactions operate within motor neurons, one assigning rostrocaudal motor pool position and a second directing motor pool diversity at a single segmental level. This Hox regulatory network directs the downstream transcriptional identity of motor neuron pools and defines the pattern of target-muscle connectivity

The organization of neurons into columns is a prominent feature of central nervous system structure and function. In many regions of the central nervous system the grouping of neurons into columns links cell-body position to axonal trajectory, thus contributing to the establishment of topographic neural maps. This link is prominent in the developing spinal cord, where columnar sets of motor neurons innervate distinct targets in the periphery. We show here that sequential phases of Hox-c protein expression and activity control the columnar differentiation of spinal motor neurons. Hox expression in neural progenitors is established by graded fibroblast growth factor signalling and translated into a distinct motor neuron Hox pattern. Motor neuron columnar fate then emerges through cell autonomous repressor and activator functions of Hox proteins. Hox proteins also direct the expression of genes that establish motor topographic projections, thus implicating Hox proteins as critical determinants of spinal motor neuron identity and organization

Pituitary gland development is controlled by signals that guide expression of specific combinations of transcription factors that dictate serial determination and differentiation events. One class of factors is paired-like homeodomain factors. Two that have been investigated are the repressor Hex1/Rpx and activator prophet of Pit-1 (Prop-1), which exert selective roles during pituitary development. The opposing actions of these factors provide one aspect of pituitary organogenesis

Understanding the functional significance of the coordinate expression of specific corepressors and DNA-binding transcription factors remains a critical question in mammalian development. During the development of the pituitary gland, two highly related paired-like homeodomain factors, a repressor, Hesx1/Rpx and an activator, Prop-1, are expressed in sequential, overlapping temporal patterns. Here we show that while the repressive actions of Hesx1/Rpx may be required for initial pituitary organ commitment, progression beyond the appearance of the first pituitary (POMC) lineage requires both loss of Hesx1 expression and the actions of Prop-1. Although Hesx1 recruits both the Groucho-related corepressor TLE1 and the N-CoR/Sin3/HDAC complex on distinct domains, the repressor functions of Hesx1 in vivo prove to require the specific recruitment of TLE1, which exhibits a spatial and temporal pattern of coexpression during pituitary organogenesis. Furthermore, Hesx1-mediated repression coordinates a negative feedback loop with FGF8/FGF10 signaling in the ventral diencephalon, required to prevent induction of multiple pituitary glands from oral ectoderm. Our data suggest that the opposing actions of two structurally-related DNA-binding paired-like homeodomain transcription factors, binding to similar cognate elements, coordinate pituitary organogenesis by reciprocally repressing and activating target genes in a temporally specific fashion, on the basis of the actions of a critical, coexpressed TLE corepressor

During the development of the pituitary gland, distinct hormone-producing cell types arise from a common population of ectodermal progenitors, providing an instructive model system for elucidating the molecular mechanisms of patterning and cell type specification in mammalian organogenesis. Recent studies have established that the development of the pituitary occurs through multiple sequential steps, allowing the coordinate control of the commitment, early patterning, proliferation, and positional determination of pituitary cell lineages in response to extrinsic and intrinsic signals. The early phases of pituitary development appear to be mediated through the activities of multiple signaling gradients emanating from key organizing centers that give rise to temporally and spatially distinct patterns of transcription factor expression. The induction of these transcriptional mediators in turn acts to positionally organize specific pituitary cell lineages within an apparently uniform field of ectodermal progenitors. Ultimately, pituitary cell types have proven to be both specified and maintained through the combinatorial interactions of a series of cell-type-restricted transcription factors that dictate the cell autonomous programs of differentiation in response to the transient signaling events

The development of the pituitary gland has provided an instructive model system for exploring the mechanisms by which differentiated cell types arise from a common primordium in response to extrinsic and intrinsic signals. Recent studies have established that organ commitment, early patterning, proliferation and positional determination of cell types in the developing pituitary are mediated through the integral actions of multiple signaling gradients acting on an initially uniform ectodermal cell population. Studies of the cell-autonomous transcriptional mediators of the transient signaling events have also provided insight into the molecular mechanisms by which overlapping patterns of transcription factor expression can positionally specify pituitary cell lineages. There is emerging evidence for a morphogenetic code for the development of the pituitary gland based on the cooperative and opposing actions of multiple signaling gradients, mediated by corresponding expression patterns of temporally and spatially induced transcription factors

The development of the hormone-secreting cell types in the pituitary gland provides an excellent model system in which to explore the complex transcriptional mechanisms underlying the specification and maintenance of differentiated cell types in mammalian organogenesis. Pituitary development is orchestrated through the combinatorial actions of a repertoire of signaling-gradient-induced transcription factors which, on the basis of their distinct and overlapping expression patterns, and functional interactions, ultimately has led to the generation of functionally distinct cell phenotypes from a common ectodermal primordium