Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: To examine if vision in subjects with macular heterotopia (MH) secondary to retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is related to anatomical macular structure. METHODS: Six subjects with MH who were between 18 years and 65 years of age and three age-matched subjects with normal vision were recruited for the study. Vision and macular structure of the better eye of the subjects with MH and the dominant eye of age-matched subjects with normal vision were assessed. High contrast visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were measured using Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study and Pelli-Robson charts, respectively. The Micro Perimeter (Nidek Technologies MP-1) was used to assess macular sensitivity and fixation stability. Using optical coherence tomography, macular thickness and relative retinal thickness at fixation were measured. RESULTS: Subjects with MH had significantly reduced visual acuity and macular sensitivity compared with age-matched subjects with normal vision. In comparison with their age-matched counterparts, subjects with MH had significantly increased macular thickness and increased relative retinal thickness at fixation. A normal foveal architecture was absent in three subjects with MH (50%). CONCLUSION: Patients with MH secondary to ROP have increased macular thickness and reduced vision.

PURPOSE: To test whether choroideremia carriers have a mosaic pattern of retinal dysfunction, as noted in carriers of X-linked recessive retinitis pigmentosa and X-linked retinoschisis. DESIGN: Prospective observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Seven obligate choroideremia carriers (age range, 18-72) with visual acuity (VA) of 20/25 or better were recruited into the study. METHODS: The carriers underwent VA testing (Snellen chart), ophthalmic examination, Humphrey visual field (VF), and multifocal electroretinographic testing. The amplitude and implicit time scales were measured by the algorithm of Hood and Li. The amplitude measures (a scales) and implicit time measures (t scales) were reported abnormal when they were >2 standard deviations above the mean of age-similar normally sighted control subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mapping of local 103 electroretinographic response amplitudes and implicit times. RESULTS: Only 1 of the 7 carriers showed abnormal Humphrey VF thresholds, whereas 6 of the 7 carriers showed a mosaic pattern of retinal dysfunction measured by multifocal electroretinographic testing. All 6 carriers showed statistically significant implicit time delays, whereas 4 carriers showed statistically significant amplitude reductions and implicit time delays (P<0.05 to P<0.0006). One carrier with a normal-appearing macula and normal Humphrey VF showed a cluster of statistically significant implicit time delays within the macula (P<0.05 to P<0.0006). The overall extent of local electroretinographic abnormalities corresponded to the severity of ophthalmoscopically apparent pigmentary changes. The one carrier with mild threshold elevation on Humphrey VF testing showed the most ophthalmoscopically apparent extensive fundus pigmentary changes. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a mosaic pattern of retinal cone dysfunction in carriers of choroideremia. Our findings are consistent with the Lyon hypothesis of random X-chromosome inactivation. Multifocal electroretinographic testing is potentially sensitive to detect local retinal dysfunction in choroideremia carriers even in those with a normal-appearing macula and good VA

PURPOSE:: To investigate the location and fixation stability of preferred retinal locations (PRLs) in patients with macular disease, and the relationship among areas of abnormal fundus autofluorescence, the PRL and visual sensitivity. METHODS:: Fifteen patients (15 eyes) were studied. Seven had Stargardt disease, 1 bull's eye maculopathy, 5 age-related macular degeneration, 1 Best disease, and 1 pattern dystrophy. All tested eyes had areas of abnormal fundus autofluorescence. The PRL was evaluated with fundus photography and the Nidek microperimeter. Visual field sensitivity was measured with the Nidek microperimeter. RESULTS:: Of the 15 eyes, 4 had foveal and 11 had eccentric fixation. Eccentric PRLs were above the atrophic lesion and their stability did not depend on the degree of eccentricity from the fovea. Visual sensitivity was markedly decreased in locations corresponding to hypofluorescent areas. Sensitivity was not decreased in hyperfluorescent areas corresponding to flecks but was decreased if hyperfluorescence was in the form of dense annuli. CONCLUSION:: Eccentric PRLs were in the superior retina in regions of normal fundus autofluorescence. Fixation stability was not correlated with the degree of eccentricity from the fovea. To assess the outcomes of treatment trials it is important to use methods that relate retinal morphology to visual function

PURPOSE: To determine whether retinal dysfunction in obligate carriers of X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS) could be observed in local electroretinographic responses obtained with the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). METHODS: Nine obligate carriers of XLRS (mean age, 46.2 years) were examined for the study. Examination of each carrier included an ocular examination and mfERG testing. For the mfERG, we used a 103-scaled hexagonal stimulus array that subtended a retinal area of approximately 40 degrees in diameter. The amplitudes and implicit times in each location for the mfERG were compared with the corresponding values determined for a group of 34 normally-sighted, age-similar control subjects. RESULTS: Mapping of 103 local electroretinographic response amplitudes and implicit times within a central 40 degrees area with the mfERG showed regions of reduced mfERG amplitudes and delayed implicit times in two of nine carriers. CONCLUSIONS: The mfERG demonstrated areas of retinal dysfunction in two carriers of XLRS. When present, retinal dysfunction was evident in the presence of a normal-appearing fundus. Multifocal ERG testing can be useful for identifying some carriers of XLRS.

PURPOSE: To investigate possible adverse effects of a yellow-tinted intraocular lens (IOL) on scotopic sensitivity and hue discrimination. SETTING: Departments of Ophthalmology, Columbia University and New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. METHODS: Nine patients with a yellow-tinted IOL in 1 eye and a colorless ultraviolet IOL in the fellow eye and 9 young phakic subjects with and without a yellow-tinted clip-on lens were tested. Hue discrimination was measured with the Farnsworth-Munsell (FM) 100-hue test. Dark-adapted thresholds to 440 nm, 500 nm, and 650 nm lights were measured at 23 locations using a modified Humphrey perimeter, and dark-adapted thresholds to white light were measured at 15 degrees temporal retina. RESULTS: In the 9 patients, there were no significant differences in dark-adapted sensitivities to 440, 500, 650 nm, or white-light stimuli and no differences in FM 100-hue error scores between eyes with yellow-tinted IOLs and those with colorless IOLs. Similarly, in young phakic subjects, there were no significant differences in FM 100-hue error scores or dark-adapted sensitivity to the white light with and without the yellow-tinted clip-on lens. However, with the clip-on lens, mean sensitivities to the 440 nm, 500 nm, and 650 nm stimuli were significantly decreased by 2.7 to 2.8 dB, 0.7 to 1.0 dB, and 0 to 1.2 dB, respectively. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that implantation of a yellow-tinted IOL has non-significant effect on scotopic sensitivity and hue discrimination

Shinoda and colleagues hypothesized that patients with cone dystrophy (CD) might suffer from a selective ON-system deficit, based on the local nature of the disease [Shinoda, K, Ohde, H, Inoue, R, Ishida, S, Mashima, Y, & Oguchi, Y (2002). ON-pathway disturbance in two siblings. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, 80, 219-223]. The purpose of the current study was to test this hypothesis by examining onset and offset responses as a function of eccentricity in a group of patients with CD using long-duration LED stimuli. Nine patients with CD participated in this study (mean age of 36.1 years and visual acuity 20/200). For this study, the following measures were obtained: Humphrey threshold visual fields, standard multifocal ERGs (mfERGs) as well as mfERGs to long duration stimuli recorded using the Retiscan stimulator (Roland Instruments). This display contained 61 scaled hexagons and the LEDs were on for 100ms (180cd/m(2)) and off for 100ms. In addition, standard full-field photopic and flicker ERGs using Ganzfeld stimulation were obtained. For the control subjects, the onset responses were larger than the offset responses at all eccentricities; whereas for the patients, there was overlap between the amplitudes of the onset and offset responses. For the patients, the amplitude ratios (relative to the control data) indicated that the difference between the onset and offset responses was greatest for the central-most ring and this difference decreased with increasing eccentricity. For the onset responses, Humphrey thresholds and mfERG amplitudes, performance was poorest for the center ring and best for the most peripheral ring; for the offset responses, the opposite pattern of results was obtained. The differences in the pattern of results in the long duration mfERG data are consistent with a selective loss of the onset responses in our patient population

PURPOSE: To determine whether retinal dysfunction in obligate carriers of the Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) could be observed in local electroretinographic responses obtained with the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). METHODS: Six obligate carriers of the BBS were examined for the study. Examination of each carrier included an ocular examination and mfERG testing of one eye. For the mfERG, we used a 103-scaled hexagonal stimulus array that subtended a retinal area of approximately 40 degrees in diameter. The amplitudes and implicit times in each location for the mfERG were compared with the corresponding values determined for a group of 34 normally sighted, age-similar control subjects. RESULTS: Mapping of 103 local electroretinographic response amplitudes within a central 40 degrees area with the mfERG showed regions of reduced mfERG amplitudes in three of six carriers. Implicit time measurements in the 6 carriers were all normal except for those locations associated with abnormal amplitude reductions in 3 of the carriers. When present, retinal dysfunction was evident in the presence of a normal-appearing fundus. CONCLUSIONS: Multifocal ERG testing can demonstrate areas of retinal dysfunction in carriers of the BBS. This test may therefore be useful for identifying some heterozygous carriers of this disease

PURPOSE: To quantify the extent of visual function losses in patients with North Carolina Macular Dystrophy (NCMD) and to demonstrate the importance of accounting for eccentric fixation when making comparisons with normal data. METHODS: Five patients with NCMD who were from a single family were examined. Multifocal electroretinograms (mfERGs) and psychophysical assessments of acuity and luminance visual field sensitivities were measured throughout the central retina. Comparisons of responses from equivalent retinal areas were accomplished by shifting normal templates to be centered at the locus of fixation for each patient. RESULTS: Losses of psychophysically measured visual function in patients with NCMD extend to areas adjacent to the locations of visible lesions. The multifocal ERG amplitude was reduced only within the area of visible lesion. Multifocal ERG implicit times were delayed throughout the entire central retinal area assessed. CONCLUSIONS: ERG timing is a sensitive assay of retinal function, and our results indicate that NCMD has a widespread effect at the level of the mid and outer retina. The findings also demonstrated that it is necessary to account for fixation locus and to ensure that equivalent retinal areas are compared when testing patients with macular disease who have eccentric fixation

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To identify clinical vision measures that are associated with the driving performance of glaucoma patients who have visual field loss and visual acuity better than 20/100 and to compare the driving performance of glaucoma patients with the driving performance of a group of age- and sex-equivalent individuals without eye disease. PATIENTS/METHODS:Forty patients with glaucoma and 17 normally sighted control subjects participated in this study. METHODS:Clinical vision data, consisting of visual acuity, letter contrast sensitivity, and visual fields, were collected. Driving performance was assessed by (1) an interactive driving simulator that measured 7 indices of performance (including number of accidents) and (2) the self-reported accident involvement for the past 5 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Driving simulator performance and real-world, self-reported accident involvement. RESULTS:The number of accidents as measured on the driving simulator in the glaucoma group was significantly correlated with three Goldmann visual field measures: combined horizontal extent (rho = -0.47, P = 0.01), total horizontal extent (rho = -0.49, P = 0.007), and total peripheral extent (rho = -0.55, P = 0.002). There were no statistically significant correlations between the driving performance of the glaucoma group and the visual acuity or contrast sensitivity measures. When compared with the control group, a significantly greater proportion of the glaucoma group reported having at least one real-world accident within the past 5 years (Fisher exact test, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS:Visual field reduced to less than 100 degrees of horizontal extent may place patients with peripheral field loss at greater accident risk. A higher incidence of real-world and simulator accidents was found for the group with glaucoma.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate acuity and multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) responses from the macula in affected and unaffected fellow eyes of patients with macular holes. METHODS:We tested 10 eyes with macular hole and 10 fellow eyes from 11 patients. We measured local visual acuity thresholds at 27 discrete locations within 21 degrees diameter using the Functional Fundus Imaging System (FFIS), a psychophysical system that measures visual acuity as a function of visual field location, and local ERG responses within 45 degrees diameter using the mfERG. RESULTS:In the affected eyes, the mean FFIS visual acuity thresholds were significantly elevated within the central 21 degrees diameter area, compared to a group of control eyes. No significant differences were found between the acuities of the fellow eyes compared to those of the control group. The amplitudes of the first positive peak of the mfERG were reduced in the central 7.8 degrees in affected eyes. In the central 2 degrees , 4 out of 10 affected eyes showed non-measurable ERG signals. The remaining six eyes showed significantly reduced mean amplitudes, but not delayed implicit times, when compared to the control group. For the fellow eyes, the mean amplitudes of the mfERG and implicit times did not differ from the means of the control eyes. CONCLUSIONS:Both local psychophysical and electrophysiological testing demonstrated retinal dysfunction extending beyond the site of the macular holes in some patients (three of the patients had central mfERG amplitudes falling within the normal range).