Faculty Bibliography

AIMS: The development of imaging and measurement techniques has brought the prospect of greater objectivity in the measurement of optic disc features, and therefore better agreement between observers. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the variation between observers using two measurement devices. METHODS: Optic disc photographs and images from the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT) of 30 eyes of 30 subjects were presented to six observers for analysis, and to one observer on five separate occasions. Agreement between observers was studied by comparing the analysis of each observer with the median result of the other five, and expressed as the mean difference and standard deviation of differences between the observer and the median. Inter- and intraobserver variation was calculated as a coefficient of variation (mean SD/mean x 100). RESULTS: For planimetry, agreement between observers was dependent on observer experience, for the HRT it was independent. Agreement between observers (SD of differences as a percentage of the median) for optic disc area was 4.0% to 7.2% (planimetry) and 3.3% to 6.0% (HRT), for neuroretinal rim area it was 10.8% to 21.0% (planimetry) and 5.2% to 9.6% (HRT). The mean interobserver coefficient of variation for optic disc area was 8.1% (planimetry) and 4.4% (HRT), for neuroretinal rim area it was 16.3% (planimetry) and 8.1% (HRT), and (HRT only) for rim volume was 16.3%, and reference height 9.1%. HRT variability was greater for the software version 1.11 reference plane than for version 1.10. The intraobserver coefficient of variation for optic disc area was 1.5% (planimetry) and 2.4% (HRT), for neuroretinal rim area it was 4.0% (planimetry) and 4.5% (HRT). CONCLUSIONS: Variation between observers is greatly reduced by the HRT when compared with planimetry. However, levels of variation, which may be clinically significant, remain for variables that depend on the subjective drawing of the disc margin.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to define the confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph [HRT]) parameters that best separate patients with early glaucoma from normal subjects. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 80 normal subjects and 51 patients with early glaucoma participated (average visual field mean deviation = -3.6 dB). INTERVENTION: Imaging of the optic nerve head with the HRT and analysis using software version 1.11 were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The relation between neuroretinal rim area and optic disc area, and cup-disc area ratio and optic disc area, was defined by linear regression of data derived from the normal subjects. The normal ranges for these two parameters were defined by the 99% prediction intervals of the linear regression between the parameter and optic disc area, for the whole disc, and for each of the predefined segments. Normal subjects and patients were labeled as abnormal if the parameter for either the whole disc or any of the predefined segments was outside the normal range. The sensitivity and specificity values of the method were calculated. RESULTS: The highest specificity (96.3%) and sensitivity (84.3%) values to separate normal subjects and those patients with early glaucoma were obtained using the 99% prediction interval from the linear regression between the optic disc area and the log of the neuroretinal rim area. Similar specificity (97.5%) and lower sensitivity (74.5%) values were obtained with the 99% prediction interval derived from regression between the disc area and cup-disc area ratios. Poor separation between groups was obtained with the other parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The HRT, using the technique of linear regression to account for the relationship between optic disc size and rim area or cup-disc area ratio, provides good separation between control subjects and patients with early glaucoma in this population.

AIMS: To determine the age related changes in optic nerve head structure in a group of normal subjects and assess the significance of any changes in relation to those found in open angle glaucoma. METHODS: A group of 88 white volunteers and friends and spouses of patients with a normal visual field and normal intraocular pressure was studied. Two different imaging and measurement devices were used (computer assisted planimetry and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy), and the results from each were compared. Measurements were made of the optic disc, optic cup, and neuroretinal rim areas, and the vertical optic disc diameter and cup/disc diameter ratio. RESULTS: Neuroretinal rim area declined at the rate of between 0.28% and 0.39% per year. Vertical optic cup diameter and optic cup area increased with age. The mean cup/disc diameter ratio increased by about 0.1 between the ages of 30 and 70 years. CONCLUSIONS: Age related changes are significant and measurable, and should be taken into account when assessing the glaucoma suspect, and when estimating the rate of progression of glaucomatous optic neuropathy in patients with established disease.