Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: There is controversy regarding the treatment of young patients with unilateral craniofacial microsomia and moderate dysmorphism. The relative indication for mandibular distraction in such patients poses several questions: Is it deleterious in the context of craniofacial growth and appearance? This study was designed to address these questions. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing mandibular distraction by a single surgeon between 1989 and 2010 was conducted. Patients with "moderate" unilateral craniofacial microsomia (as defined by Pruzansky type I or IIa mandibles) and follow-up until craniofacial skeletal maturity were included for analysis. Patients were divided into two cohorts: satisfactory and unsatisfactory results based on photographic aesthetic evaluation by independent blinded observers at the initial presentation and at the age of skeletal maturity. Clinical variables were analyzed to detect predictors for satisfactory distraction. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included for analysis. The average age at distraction was 68.2 months and the average age at follow-up was 19.55 years. Thirteen patients (68.4 percent) had Pruzansky type IIA and six patients (31.6 percent) had Pruzansky type I mandibles. Twelve patients (63.2 percent) had satisfactory outcomes, whereas seven patients (36.8 percent) had unsatisfactory outcomes. Comparing the two cohorts, patients with satisfactory outcomes had distraction at an earlier age (56.4 months versus 89.8 months; p = 0.07) and a greater percentage overcorrection from craniofacial midline (41.7 percent versus 1.8 percent; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Mandibular distraction is successful in patients with mild to moderate dysmorphism, provided that there is a comprehensive clinical program emphasizing adequate mandibular bone stock, proper vector selection, planned overcorrection, and comprehensive orthodontic management. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

BACKGROUND: Cleft and craniofacial centers require significant investment by medical institutions, yet variables contributing to their academic productivity remain unknown. This study characterizes the elements associated with high academic productivity in these centers. METHODS: The authors analyzed cleft and craniofacial centers accredited by the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. Variables such as university affiliation; resident training; number of plastic surgery, oral-maxillofacial, and dental faculty; and investment in a craniofacial surgery, craniofacial orthodontics fellowship program, or both, were obtained. Craniofacial and cleft-related research published between July of 2005 and June of 2015 was identified. A stepwise multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to measure outcomes of total publications, summative impact factor, basic science publications, total journals, and National Institutes of Health funding. RESULTS: One hundred sixty centers were identified, comprising 920 active faculty, 34 craniofacial surgery fellowships, and eight craniofacial orthodontic fellowships; 2356 articles were published in 191 journals. Variables most positively associated with a high number of publications were craniofacial surgery and craniofacial orthodontics fellowships (beta = 0.608), craniofacial surgery fellowships (beta = 0.231), number of plastic surgery faculty (beta = 0.213), and university affiliation (beta = 0.165). Variables most positively associated with high a number of journals were craniofacial surgery and craniofacial orthodontics fellowships (beta = 0.550), university affiliation (beta = 0.251), number of plastic surgery faculty (beta = 0.230), and craniofacial surgery fellowship (beta = 0.218). Variables most positively associated with a high summative impact factor were craniofacial surgery and craniofacial orthodontics fellowships (beta = 0.648), craniofacial surgery fellowship (beta = 0.208), number of plastic surgery faculty (beta = 0.207), and university affiliation (beta = 0.116). Variables most positively associated with basic science publications were craniofacial surgery and craniofacial orthodontics fellowships (beta = 0.676) and craniofacial surgery fellowship (beta = 0.208). The only variable associated with National Institutes of Health funding was craniofacial surgery and craniofacial orthodontics fellowship (beta = 0.332). CONCLUSION: Participation in both craniofacial surgery and orthodontics fellowships demonstrates the strongest association with academic success; craniofacial surgery fellowship, university affiliation, and number of surgeons are also predictive.

OBJECTIVE: To report the associations of oro-nasal fistulae on the patient-centered outcomes oral health-related quality of life and self-reported speech outcomes in school aged-children. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized multicenter design. SETTING: Six ACPA-accredited cleft centers. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with cleft palate at the age of mixed dentition. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of fistula and location of fistula (Pittsburgh Classification System). Patients were placed into one of three groups based on the following criteria: alveolar cleft present, no previous repair (Group 1); alveolar cleft present, previously repaired (Group 2); no congenital alveolar cleft (Group 3). Presence of fistula and subgroup classification were correlated to oral health-related quality of life (Child Oral Health Impact Profile [COHIP]) and perceived speech outcomes. RESULTS: The fistula rate was 5.52% (62 of 1198 patients). There was a significant difference in fistula rate between the three groups: Group 1 (11.15%), Group 2 (4.44%), Group 3 (1.90%). Patients with fistula had significantly lower COHIP scores (F1,1188 = 4.79; P = .03) and worse self-reported speech scores (F1,1197 = 4.27; P = .04). Group 1 patients with fistula had the lowest COHIP scores (F5,1188 = 4.78, P =.02) and the lowest speech scores (F5,1188 = 3.41, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Presence of palatal fistulas was associated with lower oral health-related quality of life and perceived speech among youth with cleft. The poorest outcomes were reported among those with the highest fistula rates, including an unrepaired alveolar cleft.

Background/Purpose: Multidisciplinary Cleft and Craniofacial Centers require significant investment and maintenance by medical schools and/or departments, and yet the variables contributing to their academic productivity remain unknown. This study characterizes the elements that result in high academic productivity in Cleft and Craniofacial Centers. Methods/Descriptions: All cleft and craniofacial centers accredited by American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association were included. Vari-ables such as university affiliation (UNI); resident training (RES); number of active surgical and orthodontic faculty (FAC); and investment in a craniofacial surgery (CF) or craniofacial orthodontics (CO) fellowship program, or both (CF+CO), were obtained for each center. All craniofacial and cleft-related research published between July 2005 and June 2015 was identified using the National Library of Medicine database; for each article, journal of publication and impact factor were also recorded. A stepwise multivariable linear regression analysis was performed on the listed variables to outcome measures of total publications, summative impact factor, and basic science publications. Results: A total of 160 centers were identified, comprising 690 active faculty, 29 craniofacial fellowships and 9 orthodontic fellowships; 2,093 articles were published in 199 journals within the study period. Variables most positively associated to a high number of publications were, in order: CF+CO (beta, CF+CO = 0.555, p < 0.001), CF (beta, CF= 0.248, p < 0.001), RES (beta, RES = 0.198, p = 0.003). Variables most positively associated to a high summative impact factor are, in order: CF+CO (beta, CF+CO = 0.551, p < 0.001), CF (beta, CF = 0.313, p < 0.001), FAC (beta, FAC = 0.183, p = 0.006). Variables most positively associated to basic science publications are, in order: CF+CO (beta, CF+CO=0.491, p < 0.001), CF (beta, CF=0.322, p < 0.001), and RES (beta, RES = 0.164, p = 0.032). Conclusions: Participation in both craniofacial surgery and orthodontic fellowships demonstrate the strongest association with academic success; craniofacial fellowship alone, residency programs and number of active faculty are also predictive. Cleft and Craniofacial Centers interested in academic performance should allocate funds and resources into these variables, particularly interdisciplinary partnerships between surgery and dentistry

Background/Purpose: NasoAlveolar molding (NAM) is employed to reduce the severity of nasolabial deformity in the weeks prior to the primary surgical repair of patients with UCLP and BCLP. There is considerable interest among clinicians as to the impact that NAM may have on mid face growth. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of NAM on growth of the mid face in patients with nonsyndromic UCLP at approximately 9 years of age. Methods/Descriptions: This retrospective cohort study includes 61 consecutive non syndromic Caucasian patients with UCLP, ages 6-11 years, treated with NAM. 28 cephalometric hard and soft tissue landmarks were identified and measured by two examiners. For comparison, cephalometric measurements were obtained from the Eurocleft centers (n=56) that did not utilize pre-surgical infant orthopedics (Non-PSIO). Meta-analysis was used to derive an average expected result from these trials. Student's t-tests were used to compare means from NAM-prepared patients with meta-analytic averages derived from the Eurocleft centers that did not utilize presurgical infant orthopedics (n=56). Results: On average, no significant differences were found between the NAM-prepared group and the Eurocleft centers that did not utilize NAM on the following hard and soft tissue cephalometric relationships: SNA, ANB, A'N'B' (soft tissue), nasolabial angles (CT-Sn-LS), and ANS-Me/N-Me% measurements. Conclusions: On average, no significant differences were found between the NAM prepared group and the Eurocleft centers that did not utilize presurgical infant orthopedics in the SNA, ANB, A'N'B', nasolabial angles (CT-Sn-LS), and ANS-Me/N-Me% measurements. An in depth comparison of all corresponding variables for the NAM and Non-PSIO groups will be reported. In conclusion, NAMhas no apparent long-term (age 9 years) negative or positive effect on skeletal or soft tissue facial growth in this comparison to the outcomes of Eurocleft non-PSIO treatment centers for children with non-syndromic UCLP

The Asher-McDade system is a 5-point ordinal scale frequently used to rate the components of nasolabial appearance, including nasal form and nasal symmetry, in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Although reference photographs illustrating this scale have been identified for the frontal and right profile view, no reference photographs exist for the basal view. The aim of this study was to identify reference photographs for nasal form and nasal symmetry from the basal view to illustrate this scale and facilitate its use. Four raters assessed nasolabial appearance (form and symmetry) on basal view photographs of 50 children (average age 8 years) with a repaired cleft lip. Intraclass correlation coefficients show fair to moderate inter-rater reliability. Cronbach alpha indicated strong agreement between raters (0.77 nasal form; 0.78 nasal symmetry; 0.80 overall), along with low duplicate measurement error and strong internal consistency between the measures. The photographs with the highest agreement among raters were selected to illustrate each point on the 5-point scale for nasal form and for nasal symmetry, resulting in the selection of 10 reference photographs. The basal view reference photograph set developed from this study may complement existing reference photograph sets for other views and facilitate rating tasks.

Background & Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare 3D symmetry of the nose in patients with UCLP, subsequent to rotation advancement (Millard) without primary nasal repair and the NAM/Cutting primary nasal repair. Methods & Description: Nasal casts were made for 12 consecutively appearing patients with UCLP, in each of two groups. Group 1 patients had a Millard repair without primary nasal repair (Bardach) while Group 2 patients had NAM and primary nasal repair. Patients were 6 to 18 years of age (mean=12.04). Surgery was performed at the mean age of 3.8 months. None of patients in Group 1 had primary nasal surgery as it was believed at the time by the surgeon that nasal growth might be inhibited. A two flap palatoplasty was performed at 12-24 months (mean age 19.75). All operations were performed by one surgeon in Group 1 and another surgeon in Group 2. Nasal casts were scanned using the 3Shape e scanner. All noses were scaled to the same size prior to evaluation. Procrustes analysis of 3D nasal symmetry was performed using 3dMD Vultus software. The Procrustes technique, determines nasal symmetry by performing a superimposition of its surface with its mirror image (ref Maull 1999). 4 linear measurements including columellar height, nasal dome height, alar base and nasal projections were performed on cleft and non-cleft side in both groups (ref Cutting 1984). For 3D analysis, student's t-test was used to determine the difference between the mean asymmetry index for each group. If symmetry is perfect the asymmetry index is zero. For linear analysis, student's T test was utilized to compare the differences. SPSS was used to perform a descriptive analysis of the groups. Results: The mean asymmetry index in the Millard rotation advancement repair was 4.41 and the NAM plus primary nasal repair was 2.45. The difference was statistically significant (P=0.006). In linear measurements, columellar length and alar base were significantly different when cleft side was compared to non-cleft side in Millard group (P=0.04 and 0.005). There was no significant difference in columellar length, nasal dome height, alar base and nasal projection in cleft versus non-cleft side in NAM group. Inter-group analysis showed that alar base in cleft and non-cleft side is significantly different in Millard versus NAM group (P=0.02). Conclusions: To our knowledge this is the first long-term, quantitative 3D study to analyze the asymmetry of the nose in the Millard rotation advancement versus NAM plus primary nasal repair in patients with complete UCLP. This study shows that the NAM plus primary nasal repair results in significantly less asymmetry of the nose compared to the Millard rotation advancement without nasal correction

The present study aims to determine the risk of early secondary nasal revisions in patients with complete unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate (U/BCLP) treated with and without nasoalveolar molding (NAM) and examine the associated costs of care. A retrospective cohort study from 1990 to 1999 was performed comparing the risk of early secondary nasal revision surgery in patients with a CLP treated with NAM and surgery (cleft lip repair and primary surgical nasal reconstruction) versus surgery alone in a private practice and tertiary level clinic. The NAM treatment group consisted of 172 patients with UCLP and 71 patients with BCLP, whereas the non-NAM-prepared group consisted of 28 patients with UCLP and 5 with BCLP. The risk of secondary nasal revision for patients with UCLP was 3% in the NAM group and 21% in the non-NAM group. The risk of secondary nasal revision for patients with BCLP was 7% in the NAM group compared with 40% in the non-NAM group. Using multicenter averages, the non-NAM revision rates were calculated at 37.8% and 48.5% for U/BCLP, respectively. Applying these risks of revision, NAM treatment led to an estimated savings of between $491 and $4893 depending on the type of cleft. In conclusion, NAM can reduce the number of early secondary nasal revision surgeries and, therefore, reduce the overall cost of care.

Obtaining an esthetic and functional primary surgical repair in patients with complete cleft lip and palate (CLP) can be challenging because of tissue deficiencies and alveolar ridge displacement. This study aimed to describe surgeons' assessments of presurgical deformity and predicted surgical outcomes in patients with complete unilateral and bilateral CLP (UCLP and BCLP, respectively) treated with and without nasoalveolar molding (NAM). Cleft surgeon members of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association completed online surveys to evaluate 20 presurgical photograph sets (frontal and basal views) of patients with UCLP (n = 10) and BCLP (n = 10) for severity of cleft deformity, quality of predicted surgical outcome, and likelihood of early surgical revision. Five patients in each group (UCLP and BCLP) received NAM, and 5 patients did not receive NAM. Surgeons were masked to patient group. Twenty-four percent (176/731) of surgeons with valid e-mail addresses responded to the survey. For patients with UCLP, surgeons reported that, for NAM-prepared patients, 53.3% had minimum severity clefts, 58.9% were anticipated to be among their best surgical outcomes, and 82.9% were unlikely to need revision surgery. For patients with BCLP, these percentages were 29.8%, 38.6%, and 59.9%, respectively. Comparing NAM-prepared with non-NAM-prepared patients showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.001), favoring NAM-prepared patients. This study suggests that cleft surgeons assess NAM-prepared patients as more likely to have less severe clefts, to be among the best of their surgical outcomes, and to be less likely to need revision surgery when compared with patients not prepared with NAM.