Faculty Bibliography
Searched for:
in-biosketch:yes
person:liangp01
Total Results:
90
Assessing the impact of lowering the colorectal cancer screening age to 45 years
PMID: 32416860
ISSN: 2468-1253
CID: 4446602
Trends in Sociodemographic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Staging and Survival: A SEER-Medicare Analysis
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status are known to influence staging and survival in colorectal cancer (CRC). It is unclear how these relationships are affected by geographic factors and changes in insurance coverage for CRC screening. We examined the temporal trends in the association between sociodemographic and geographic factors and staging and survival among Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS:We identified patients 65 years or older with CRC using the 1991-2010 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database and extracted area-level sociogeographic data. We constructed multinomial logistic regression models and the Cox proportional hazards models to assess factors associated with CRC stage and survival in 4 periods with evolving reimbursement and screening practices: (i) 1991-1997, (ii) 1998-June 2001, (iii) July 2001-2005, and (iv) 2006-2010. RESULTS:We observed 327,504 cases and 102,421 CRC deaths. Blacks were 24%-39% more likely to present with distant disease than whites. High-income areas had 7%-12% reduction in distant disease. Compared with whites, blacks had 16%-21% increased mortality, Asians had 32% lower mortality from 1991 to 1997 but only 13% lower mortality from 2006 to 2010, and Hispanics had 20% reduced mortality only from 1991 to 1997. High-education areas had 9%-12% lower mortality, and high-income areas had 5%-6% lower mortality after Medicare began coverage for screening colonoscopy. No consistent temporal trends were observed for the associations between geographic factors and CRC survival. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Disparities in CRC staging and survival persisted over time for blacks and residents from areas of low socioeconomic status. Over time, staging and survival benefits have decreased for Asians and disappeared for Hispanics.
PMCID:7145046
PMID: 32352722
ISSN: 2155-384x
CID: 4438612
Interventions to ensure follow-up of positive fecal immunochemical tests: An international survey of screening programs
PMID: 32054392
ISSN: 1475-5793
CID: 4304572
Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.). 2020:13(4):395-402.DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0440
Low colorectal cancer screening uptake and persistent disparities in an underserved urban population
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has increased substantially in New York City in recent years. However, screening uptake measured by telephone surveys may not fully capture rates among underserved populations. We measured screening completion within one year of a primary care visit among previously unscreened patients in a large urban safety-net hospital and identified sociodemographic and health-related predictors of screening. We identified 21,256 patients aged 50-75 who were seen by primary care providers (PCPs) in 2014, of whom 14,425 (67.9%) were not up-to-date with screening. Since PCPs facilitate the majority of screening, we compared patients who received screening within one year of an initial PCP visit to those who remained unscreened using multivariable logistic regression. Among patients not up-to-date with screening at study outset, 11.5% (1,658 patients) completed screening within one year of a PCP visit. Asian race, more PCP visits, and higher area-level income were associated with higher screening completion. Factors associated with remaining unscreened included morbid obesity, ever smoking, Elixhauser comorbidity index of 0, and having Medicaid/Medicare insurance. Age, sex, language, and travel time to the hospital were not associated with screening status. Overall, 39.9% of patients were up-to-date with screening by 2015. In an underserved urban population, CRC screening disparities remain, and overall screening uptake was low. Since more PCP visits were associated with modestly higher screening completion at one year, additional community-level education and outreach may be crucial to increase CRC screening in underserved populations.
PMID: 32015094
ISSN: 1940-6215
CID: 4301272
Artificial Intelligence and Polyp Detection
PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:This review highlights the history, recent advances, and ongoing challenges of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in colonic polyp detection. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:Hand-crafted AI algorithms have recently given way to convolutional neural networks with the ability to detect polyps in real-time. The first randomized controlled trial comparing an AI system to standard colonoscopy found a 9% increase in adenoma detection rate, but the improvement was restricted to polyps smaller than 10Â mm and the results need validation. As this field rapidly evolves, important issues to consider include standardization of outcomes, dataset availability, real-world applications, and regulatory approval. AI has shown great potential for improving colonic polyp detection while requiring minimal training for endoscopists. The question of when AI will enter endoscopic practice depends on whether the technology can be integrated into existing hardware and an assessment of its added value for patient care.
PMID: 31960282
ISSN: 1092-8472
CID: 4273832
Polyp Detection Rate Correlates Strongly with Adenoma Detection Rate in Trainee Endoscopists
BACKGROUND:The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a widely accepted quality benchmark for screening colonoscopy but can be burdensome to calculate. Previous studies have shown good correlation between polyp detection rate (PDR) and ADR, but this has not been validated in trainees. Additionally, the correlation between PDR and detection rates for sessile serrated polyps (SSPDR) and advanced neoplasia (ANDR) is not well studied. AIMS/OBJECTIVE:We investigated the relationship between PDR and ADR, SSPDR, and ANDR in trainees. METHODS:We examined 1600 outpatient colonoscopies performed by 24 trainees at a VA hospital from 2014 to 2017. Variables collected included patient demographics, year of fellowship, colonoscopy indication, and endoscopic and histologic findings. We calculated the overall ratios of PDR to ADR, SSPDR, and ANDR to assess the correlation between measured and calculated ADR, SSPDR, and ANDR, which is equivalent to the correlation between PDR and measured ADR, SSPDR, and ANDR. RESULTS:The overall PDR, ADR, SSPDR, and ANDR were 72%, 52%, 2%, and 14%. PDR (48%) was highest in the left colon, while ADR (32%) and ANDR (7%) were highest in the right colon (p < 0.001 for all). The overall ADR/PDR, SSPDR/PDR, and ANDR/PDR ratios were 0.73, 0.03, and 0.20. Correlation between PDR and ADR was highly positive overall (r = 0.87, p < 0.0001) and stronger in the right (r = 0.91) and transverse (r = 0.94) colon than the left colon (r = 0.80). Correlation between PDR and overall SSPDR and ANDR were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS:PDR can serve as a surrogate measure of ADR to monitor colonoscopy quality in gastroenterology fellowship.
PMID: 31927766
ISSN: 1573-2568
CID: 4264202
Cumulative Burden of Colorectal Cancer-Associated Genetic Variants is More Strongly Associated With Early-onset vs Late-onset Cancer
BACKGROUND & AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC, in persons younger than 50 years old) is increasing in incidence; yet, in the absence of a family history of CRC, this population lacks harmonized recommendations for prevention. We aimed to determine whether a polygenic risk score (PRS) developed from 95 CRC-associated common genetic risk variants was associated with risk for early-onset CRC. METHODS:We studied risk for CRC associated with a weighted PRS in 12,197 participants younger than 50 years old vs 95,865 participants 50 years or older. PRS was calculated based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with CRC in a large-scale genome-wide association study as of January 2019. Participants were pooled from 3 large consortia that provided clinical and genotyping data: the Colon Cancer Family Registry, the Colorectal Transdisciplinary study, and the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium and were all of genetically defined European descent. Findings were replicated in an independent cohort of 72,573 participants. RESULTS:). When we compared the highest with the lowest quartiles in this group, risk increased 4.3-fold for early-onset CRC (95% CI, 3.61-5.01) vs 2.9-fold for late-onset CRC (95% CI, 2.70-3.00). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with these findings. CONCLUSIONS:In an analysis of associations with CRC per standard deviation of PRS, we found the cumulative burden of CRC-associated common genetic variants to associate with early-onset cancer, and to be more strongly associated with early-onset than late-onset cancer-particularly in the absence of CRC family history. Analyses of PRS, along with environmental and lifestyle risk factors, might identify younger individuals who would benefit from preventative measures.
PMID: 31866242
ISSN: 1528-0012
CID: 4243992
Risk Factors Associated With Early-onset Colorectal Cancer
BACKGROUND & AIMS/OBJECTIVE:The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in individuals younger than 50 years, who do not usually undergo screening if they are of average risk. We sought to identify risk factors for CRC in this population. METHODS:We compared sociodemographic and medical characteristics of patients who received a diagnosis of CRC at an age of 18-49 years (early-onset) with patients who received a diagnosis of CRC at an age of 50 years or older (late-onset) and with age-matched, cancer-free individuals (controls) at a tertiary academic hospital. We collected data from all adult patients with a diagnosis of CRC from January 1, 2011 through April 3, 2017 from electronic health records. Associations with risk factors were assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS:We identified 269 patients with early-onset CRC, 2802 with late-onset CRC, and 1122 controls. Compared with controls, patients with early-onset CRC were more likely to be male (odds ratio [OR], 1.87; 95% CI, 1.39-2.51), have inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (3% vs 0.4% for controls; univariable P<.01), and have a family history of CRC (OR, 8.61; CI, 4.83-15.75). Prevalence values of well-established modifiable CRC risk factors, including obesity, smoking, and diabetes, were similar. Compared to patients with late-onset CRC, patients with early-onset CRC were more likely to be male (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.11-1.87), black (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.08-2.65) or Asian (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.57-4.15), and have IBD (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.16-6.63) or a family history of CRC (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.89-4.25). Sensitivity analyses excluding IBD and family history of CRC showed comparable results. Early-onset CRC was more likely than late-onset disease to be detected in the left colon or rectum (75% vs 59%, P=.02) and at a late stage of tumor development (77% vs 62%, P=.01). CONCLUSIONS:In a retrospective study of patients with early-onset CRC vs late-onset CRC or no cancer, we identified non-modifiable risk factors, including sex, race, IBD, and family history of CRC, to be associated with early-onset CRC.
PMID: 31622737
ISSN: 1542-7714
CID: 4140642
A Theory-based Educational Pamphlet With Low-residue Diet Improves Colonoscopy Attendance and Bowel Preparation Quality
GOALS/BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE:Patients who "no-show" for colonoscopy or present with poor bowel preparation waste endoscopic resources and do not receive adequate examinations for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Using the Health Belief Model, we modified an existing patient education pamphlet and evaluated its effect on nonattendance rates and bowel preparation quality. STUDY/METHODS:We implemented a color patient education pamphlet to target individual perceptions about CRC and changed bowel preparation instructions to include a low-residue diet instead of the previous clear liquid diet. We compared the nonattendance rate over a 2-month period before and after the introduction of the pamphlet, allowing for a washout period during which pamphlet use was inconsistent. We compared the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) in 100 consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy during each of the 2 periods. RESULTS:Baseline characteristics between the 2 groups were similar, although patients who received the pamphlet were younger (P=0.03). The nonattendance rate was significantly lower in patients who received the pamphlet (13% vs. 21%, P=0.01). The percentage of patients with adequate bowel preparation increased from 82% to 86% after introduction of the pamphlet, although this was not statistically significant (P=0.44). The proportion of patients with a BBPS score of 9 was significantly higher in the pamphlet group (41% vs. 27%, P=0.03). There was no difference in adenoma and sessile serrated adenoma detection rates before and after pamphlet implementation. CONCLUSIONS:After implementing a theory-based patient education intervention with a low-residue diet, our absolute rate for colonoscopy nonattendance decreased by 8% and the proportion of patients with a BBPS score of 9 increased by 14%. The Health Belief Model appears to be a useful construct for CRC screening interventions.
PMID: 30439762
ISSN: 1539-2031
CID: 3457682
CORRELATING QUANTITATIVE FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST (FIT) VALUES WITH HISTOLOGIC FINDINGS ON FOLLOW-UP COLONOSCOPY [Meeting Abstract]
ISI:000467106003186
ISSN: 0016-5085
CID: 5526512
