Faculty Bibliography

METHODS: A cohort of children younger than 18 years presenting to an urban pediatric emergency department (PED) who underwent psychiatric consultation was analyzed. A standardized data collection sheet was prospectively completed and included: patient characteristics, extent of medical evaluation and findings, ancillary diagnostic studies, resources utilized, dangerous behaviors, and disposition. RESULTS: Two hundred ten patients required psychiatric evaluation. Median age was 14 years; 51.9% were boys; 71.9% had a past psychiatric history; 39.0% had prior psychiatric admission(s), and 40.5% were on psychiatric medications. The admission rate was 49.5%. Patients spent a median of 5.7 hours in the PED. Hospital police monitored 51.9% patients. Forty-five patients had 91 dangerous behaviors. Those patients presenting with a complaint of aggressive behavior (P = 0.00006), a past psychiatric history (P = 0.003), or a history of prior psychiatric hospitalization (P = 0.005) were more likely to have dangerous behaviors. Two hundred nine patients underwent a complete medical evaluation, and 207 were considered medically cleared. Patients who had diagnostic evaluations for medically indicated reasons were significantly more likely to have abnormal results than those requested by the psychiatric consultant for screening purposes (43.6% vs. 9.2%; relative risk, 2.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-4.08) but were not statistically more likely to result in medical intervention (5.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.243). CONCLUSIONS: PED patients requiring psychiatric consultation and psychiatric admission had a prolonged PED stay and a high incidence of dangerous behaviors requiring intervention. History and physical examination adequately identified medical illness. Laboratory evaluation obtained for psychiatric transfer or admission purposes was of low yield

OBJECTIVES: 1) To evaluate the ability to train emergency medical technicians-basic (EMT-Bs) to accurately identify bronchospasm and, based on a treatment protocol, administer albuterol sulfate via nebulization as a standing order. 2) To measure the improvement in patient condition after treatment. METHODS: Following approval by the Commissioner of Health and Institutional Review Board, EMS agencies were enrolled to participate in the study and EMT-Bs were trained using a four-hour curriculum. For each patient, a prehospital data collection form was completed including identifying data for the EMT-B, patient assessment, and history information; and pre- and posttreatment assessments and a hospital data collection form were completed including the emergency department physician's diagnosis, assessment of bronchospasm, number of albuterol treatments received in the emergency department, and final disposition of the patient. RESULTS: During a one-year study period, EMT-Bs treated 190 patients as part of the project. Across all values patients showed a clinical improvement as a result of the therapy. Concurrence in the assessment of bronchospasm by the EMT-B with an emergency department physician was found in 87.4% of the cases. When including allergic reaction, anaphylaxis, bronchiolitis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the diagnosis list of bronchospasm, the accuracy rate increased to more than 94%. CONCLUSION: This study indicated EMT-Bs were highly successful in their evaluation of bronchospasm. Based on this level of accuracy, the authors suggest that it is safe for emergency medical service systems and medical directors to develop protocols that allow EMT-Bs to administer albuterol via nebulizer for bronchospasm based on their assessment

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether emergency medical technicians-basic can accurately assess children and whether this ability varies with the patient's age or diagnosis. This determination is important for educational program design for emergency medical technicians in pediatrics and for evaluation of the possibility of expanding their scope of practice. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Pediatric emergency department in a large, urban hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 2430) presenting to the pediatric emergency department via basic life support ambulance during a 12-month period. MEASUREMENTS: Data collected were name, age, field assessment (FA), and emergency department (ED) diagnosis. Patient's ages were organized into five groups: infant (0-1 y), toddler (1-3 y), preschool (3-6 y), school-aged (6-11 y), and adolescent (> 11 y), and the ED diagnoses were divided into seven categories. The accuracy of the FA was compared with the ED diagnosis. We then analyzed FA accuracy by patient's age and type of diagnosis. The chi(2) contingency table analysis was used for dichotomous variables (P < 0.05). In addition, logistic regression and stratified analysis were used. Both ambulance and hospital charts were available for 2064 patients. Age ranged from birth to 19 years with a bimodal distribution at the extremes of patient age and a mean age of 8.25 (SD, 5.64). The distribution was 11.7% (241) infants, 14.7% (303) toddlers, 14.9% (307) preschool, 21.2% (437) school-aged, and 37.6% (776) adolescents. RESULTS: Overall emergency medical technician-basic assessment was accurate 81.5% (1683) of the time. There was a statistically significant variation in accuracy with both age group (chi(2) = 40.07, P < 0.05) and diagnostic category (chi(2) = 185.7, P < 0.05). By age group, the accuracy of field assessment was 69.7% (168) infants, 75.9% (230) toddlers, 82.7% (254) preschool, 86.7% (379) school-aged, and 84.0% (652) adolescents. By category of diagnosis, the accuracy of the field assessment was 92.4% (292) major trauma, 91.4% (478) minor trauma, 88.9% (112) psychologic and social, 85.1% (229) major medical, 81.1% (180) wheezing-associated respiratory illness, 65.4% (350) minor medical, and 57.5% (42) non-wheezing-associated respiratory illness. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency medical technicians-basic were highly successful in assessing children with wheezing, serious illness, injuries, and psychologic and social conditions. Consideration should be given to expanding their scope of practice in these areas. They were less successful in assessing minor medical conditions and respiratory emergencies other than wheezing. They require additional training in these areas