Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Concerns about the cardiovascular safety of medications used for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) remain. We aimed to compare the effects of pharmacological treatments for ADHD on haemodynamic values and electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters in children, adolescents, and adults. METHODS:For this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched 12 electronic databases, including Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, from database inception to Jan 18, 2024, for published and unpublished randomised controlled trials comparing amphetamines, atomoxetine, bupropion, clonidine, guanfacine, lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate, modafinil, or viloxazine against each other or placebo. Primary outcomes were change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), measured in mm Hg, and pulse, measured in beats per minute, at timepoints closest to 12 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks. Summary data were extracted and pooled in random-effects network meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed with the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021295352. Before study initiation, we contacted representatives of a UK-based charity of people with lived experience of ADHD-the ADHD Foundation-regarding the relevance of the topic and the appropriateness of the outcomes chosen. FINDINGS/RESULTS:102 randomised controlled trials with short-term follow-up (median 7 weeks [IQR 5-9]) were included, encompassing 13 315 children and adolescents (aged ≥5 years and <18 years; mean age 11 years [SD 3]; of available data, 9635 [73%] were male and 3646 [27%] were female; of available data, 289 [2%] were Asian, 1719 [15%] were Black, and 8303 [71%] were White) and 9387 adults (≥18 years, mean age 35 years [11]; of available data, 5064 [57%] were male and 3809 [43%] were female; of available data, 488 [6%] were Asian, 457 [6%] were Black, and 6372 [79%] were White). Amphetamines, atomoxetine, lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate, and viloxazine led to increments in haemodynamic values in children and adolescents, adults, or both. In children and adolescents, mean increase against placebo ranged from 1·07 (95% CI 0·36-1·79; moderate CINeMA confidence) with atomoxetine to 1·81 (1·05-2·57; moderate) with methylphenidate for SBP; from 1·93 (0·74-3·11; high) with amphetamines to 2·42 (1·69-3·15; low) with methylphenidate for DBP; and from 2·79 (1·05-4·53; moderate) with viloxazine to 5·58 (4·67-6·49; high) with atomoxetine for pulse. In adults, mean increase against placebo ranged from 1·66 (95% CI 0·38-2·93; very low) with methylphenidate to 2·3 (0·66-3·94; very low) with amphetamines for SBP; from 1·60 (0·29-2·91; very low) with methylphenidate to 3·07 (0·69-5·45; very low) with lisdexamfetamine for DBP; and from 4·37 (3·16-5·59; very low) with methylphenidate to 5·8 (2·3-9·3; very low) with viloxazine for pulse. Amphetamines, lisdexamfetamine, or methylphenidate were not associated with larger increments in haemodynamic values compared with atomoxetine or viloxazine in either children and adolescents or adults. Guanfacine was associated with decrements in haemodynamic values in children and adolescents (mean decrease against placebo of -2·83 [95% CI -3·8 to -1·85; low CINeMA confidence] in SBP, -2·08 [-3 to -1·17; low] in DBP, and -4·06 [-5·45 -2·68; moderate] in pulse) and adults (mean decrease against placebo of -10·1 [-13·76 to -6·44; very low] in SBP, -7·73 [-11·88 to -3·58; very low] in DBP, and -6·83 [-10·85 to -2·81; very low] in pulse). Only four RCTs informed on effects in the medium term and none on the long term. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:Practitioners should monitor blood pressure and pulse in patients with ADHD treated with any pharmacological intervention, and not stimulants only. Given the short duration of available randomised controlled trials, new research providing insights on the causal effects of ADHD medications on cardiovascular parameters in the longer term should be funded. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Children presenting comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and depression symptoms have higher risks of later suicidal ideation and attempt. However, it is unclear to what extent this risk stems from individual differences in the genetic predisposition for ADHD and/or depression. We investigated the unique and combined contribution of genetic predisposition to ADHD and depression to suicidal ideation and attempt by early adulthood. Data were from two longitudinal population-based birth cohorts, the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development and the Quebec Newborn Twin Study (total N = 1207). Genetic predisposition for ADHD and depression were measured using polygenic scores. Suicidal ideation and attempt by age 20 years were self-reported via questionnaires. Across the two cohorts, suicidal ideation and attempt were reported by 99 (8.2%) and 75 (6.1%) individuals, respectively. A higher polygenic score for depression was associated with significantly higher risk of suicidal ideation and attempt, while no significant associations were found for ADHD polygenic score. However, we found an interaction between polygenic scores for depression and ADHD in the association with suicide attempt (P = 0.012), but not suicidal ideation (P = 0.897). The association between polygenic score for depression and suicide attempt was significantly stronger for individuals with a higher polygenic score for ADHD. Individuals scoring ≥ 1-SD above the mean for both polygenic scores were at increased risk for suicide attempt compared to individuals with lower scores (OR 4.03, CI 1.64-9.90), as well as compared to individuals scoring ≥ 1-SD above the mean in only depression (OR 2.92, CI 1.01-8.50) or only ADHD (OR 4.88, CI 1.56-15.26) polygenic scores. Our findings suggest that genetic predisposition for ADHD and depression contributes to increase the risk of suicide attempt in a multiplicative, rather that additive, way. Our results contribute to our understanding of the etiology of suicide risk and may inform screening and risk stratification.

The use of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) medications during pregnancy is increasing, raising concerns about potential long-term effects on offspring. This study investigates in utero exposure to methylphenidate, amphetamines and atomoxetine and risk of offspring neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). The population-based cohort study identified from Swedish registers included 861,650 children born by 572,731 mothers from 2008-2017. We categorized exposure based on redeemed medication during pregnancy and compared exposed children to those whose mothers discontinued medication before conception. Main outcomes were any NDD, including ADHD and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Cox proportional hazards regression estimated hazard ratios (HRs), adjusting for maternal psychiatric and sociodemographic factors. Sensitivity analyses included stratifications by medication type, timing, and duration of exposure, and sibling comparisons. We also performed a meta-analysis combining data from the present study with those from a previous Danish study. Results showed no increased risk for any NDD (HR_adjusted 0.95, 95% CI 0.82-1.11), ADHD (HR_adjusted 0.92, 95% CI 0.78-1.08), or ASD (HR_adjusted 0.86, 95% CI 0.63-1.18). Sensitivity analyses showed consistent patterns of no increased risks across different exposure durations, medication types and between siblings. Meta-analyses further supported the findings (pooled HR for any NDD 1.00, 95% CI 0.83;1.20). Our study provides evidence that in utero exposure to ADHD medications does not increase the risk of long-term NDDs in offspring. This study replicates safety data for methylphenidate and extends it with new safety data on amphetamines and atomoxetine. These findings are crucial for informing clinical guidelines and helping healthcare providers and expectant mothers make informed decisions.

BACKGROUND:Numerous studies support the association of exercise training, physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) with both mortality and morbidity outcomes. The results across studies have been inconsistent, and no umbrella reviews have yet been conducted on this topic. METHODS:We conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies by screening articles in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases from inception to 30 April 2024. Quality appraisal of each included meta-analysis was done using the AMSTAR 2 tool, with evidence certainty evaluated based on statistical significance, study size, heterogeneity, small-study effects, prediction intervals (PI) and potential biases. RESULTS:Frothy-eight meta-analyses were included (AMSTAR 2 ratings: high 25, moderate 10, low 2 and critically low 11). No evidence was highly suggestive or convincing. Suggestive evidence linked any PA and SB to lower and higher risks of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality. Suggestive evidence indicated a significant association between self-reported and device-measured total PA (equivalent odds ratio [eOR] 0.78 [0.70-0.86] and eHR = 0.50 [0.38-0.65], respectively), self-reported leisure time PA (eHR = 0.73 [0.66-0.80]), device-measured daily steps (eHR = 0.44 [0.35-0.56]) and aerobic plus resistance training (eHR = 0.60 [0.56-0.64]) with lower all-cause mortality. Weak evidence supported links between self-reported and device-measured SB and higher mortality (eHR = 1.3 [1.22-1.38] and eHR = 2.16 [1.09-4.28], respectively). Suggestive evidence was noted for the association between self-reported leisure time PA (eHR = 0.74 [0.69-0.80]) and resistance training (eHR = 0.82 [0.81-0.84]) with cardiovascular mortality. Suggestive evidence was also found for the association between self-reported leisure time PA (eHR = 0.87 [0.83-0.91]) with cancer mortality. Associations between self-reported running time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and cancer did not reach statistical significance nor did the association between low skeletal muscle mass and all-cause mortality. Meta-regression analyses showed that physical activity reduces mortality risk, with age reducing the protective effects against all-cause, CVD and cancer mortality. We also found that combined exercise training (aerobic plus resistance) most effectively reduces all-cause and CVD mortality. CONCLUSIONS:Converging evidence supports that physical activity and sedentary behaviour are associated with lower and higher rates of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality. More high-quality prospective studies are needed for a better understanding of the associations between running time and also TV-viewing time and health-related outcomes.

OBJECTIVE:We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the effect of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication on quality of life (QoL), and to understand whether this effect differs between stimulants and nonstimulants. METHOD/METHODS:February 2023 (https://med-adhd.org/), we identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ADHD medications for individuals aged 6 years or more with a diagnosis of ADHD based on the DSM (from third to fifth editions) or the International Classification of Diseases (ICD; ninth or tenth revision), reporting data on QoL (measured with a validated scale). The risk of bias for each RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2. Multilevel meta-analytic models were conducted with R 4.3.1. RESULTS:We included 17 RCTs (5,388 participants in total; 56% randomized to active medication) in the meta-analyses. We found that amphetamines (Hedge's g = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.08, 0.94), methylphenidate (0.38; 0.23, 0.54), and atomoxetine (0.30; 0.19, 0.40) were significantly more efficacious than placebo in improving QoL in people with ADHD, with moderate effect size. For atomoxetine, these effects were not moderated by the length of intervention, and did not differ between children/adolescents and adults. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In addition to being efficacious in reducing ADHD core symptom severity, both stimulant and nonstimulant medications are efficacious in improving QoL in people with ADHD, albeit with lower effect sizes. Future research should explore whether, and to what degree, combining pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions is likely to further improve QoL in people with ADHD. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS:From a prior dataset of a network meta-analysis, 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in a meta-analysis to investigate if attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication improves quality of life (QoL) in people with ADHD. The analysis showed that medications such as amphetamines, methylphenidate, and atomoxetine improved QoL compared to placebo, with moderate effect sizes. This study underscores the importance of ADHD medications, both stimulants and nonstimulants, not only in alleviating core ADHD symptoms but also in enhancing overall QoL for individuals with ADHD. STUDY PREREGISTRATION INFORMATION/UNASSIGNED:Effects of pharmacological treatment for ADHD on quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis; https://osf.io/; qvgps.

This editorial focuses on the seven studies published in the BMJ Mental Health topic collection Advances in Clinical Psychopharmacology in Children and Young People. Collectively, these articles provide evidence that informs key steps in the psychopharmacological management of children and adolescents with mental health or neurodevelopmental conditions. Papers in this collection contribute to strengthen evidence-based psychopharmacological practice. We look forward to further developments in the field, supported by adequate research funding.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Expectancy effects are significant confounding factors in psychiatric randomized clinical trials (RCTs), potentially affecting the interpretation of study results. This narrative review is the first, to our knowledge, to explore the relationship between expectancy effects, compromised blinding integrity, and the effects of active treatment/placebo in psychiatric RCTs. Additionally, we present statistical and experimental approaches that may help mitigate the confounding impact of expectancy effects. The review concludes with recommendations to enhance the reliability of RCTs in psychiatry. OBSERVATIONS/UNASSIGNED:The placebo response comprises both specific and nonspecific elements, with expectation being a key specific component. Evidence from experimental and clinical studies suggests that expectancy can influence treatment responses in RCTs. Blinding integrity may be compromised by perceived treatment efficacy and adverse effects, introducing bias into outcome assessments. Treatment expectations can lead to unblinding during RCTs, and meta-analytic data from studies in the fields of psychedelics and anxiety disorders indicate that this can influence effect sizes. Therefore, controlling for expectancy effects is essential when interpreting RCT results. Novel statistical methods, though still in need of further validation, offer strategies to address this issue. Another approach may involve experimental medicine models, which aim to develop objective improvement markers (readouts) less affected by expectancy effects. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:Expectancy effects represent a significant confound in psychiatric RCTs. We recommend collecting data on treatment expectations alongside monitoring blinding integrity to more accurately interpret study results. Additionally, developing objective readouts that are less confounded by expectancy effects offers another promising avenue for mitigating these confounding influences in psychiatric RCTs.

BACKGROUND:It is unknown whether there is a general factor that accounts for the propensity for both physical and mental conditions in different age groups and how it is associated with lifestyle and well-being. METHODS:factor, lifestyles, and well-being was further explored. RESULTS:factor scores significantly correlated with lifestyle and well-being, suggesting healthier lifestyles were associated with a reduced likelihood of physical and mental health comorbidities, which in turn improved well-being. CONCLUSIONS:Contrary to the traditional dichotomy between mental and physical conditions, our study showed a general factor underlying the comorbidity across mental and physical diseases, related to lifestyle and well-being. Our results inform the conceptualization of mental and physical illness as well as future research assessing risk and pathways of disease transmission, intervention, and prevention. Our results also provide a strong rationale for a systematic screening for mental disorders in individuals with physical conditions and vice versa, and for integrated services addressing multimorbidity.

We investigated whether there is an emotional processing deficit in ADHD and whether this only applies to specific emotional categories. In this PRISMA-compliant systematic review based on a pre-registered protocol ( https://osf.io/egp7d ), we searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ERIC, Scopus and Web of Science databases until 3rd December 2023, to identify empirical studies comparing emotional processing in individuals meeting DSM (version III to 5-TR) or ICD (version 9 or 10) criteria for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and in a non-psychiatric control group. Study quality was assessed with the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS). Eighty studies were included and meta-analysed (encompassing 6191 participants and 465 observations). Bayesian meta-analyses were conducted to compare individuals with ADHD and non-psychiatric controls on overall emotional processing measures (meta-analysis 1) and across emotional categories (meta-analysis 2). The type of stimulus employed, outcome measurement reported, age, sex, and medication status were analysed as moderators. We found poorer performance in both overall emotion processing (g =  - 0.65) and across emotional categories (anger g =  - 0.37; disgust g =  - 0.24; fear g =  - 0.37; sadness g =  - 0.34; surprise g =  - 0.26; happiness/positive g =  - 0.31; negative g =  - 0.20; neutral g =  - 0.25) for individuals with ADHD compared to non-psychiatric controls. Scales items and accuracy outcome being the most effective moderators in detecting such differences. No effects of age, sex, or medication status were found. Overall, these results show that impaired emotional processing is a relevant feature of ADHD and suggest that it should be systematically assessed in clinical practice.

The differential influence of sex on premature mortality in schizophrenia is unclear. This study assessed the differences in all-cause and specific cause mortality risks in people with schizophrenia compared to several control groups stratified by sex. We conducted a PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of cohort studies assessing mortality relative risk (RR) for people with schizophrenia, comparing by sex. We measured publication bias and conducted a quality assessment through the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We meta-analyzed 43 studies reporting on 2,700,825 people with schizophrenia. Both males and females with schizophrenia had increased all-cause mortality vs. comparison groups (males, RR=2.62, 95%CI 2.35-2.92; females, RR=2.56, 95%CI 2.27-2.87), suicide (males, RR=9.02, 95%CI 5.96-13.67; females, RR=12.09, 95%CI 9.00-16.25), and natural cause mortality (males, RR=2.11, 95%CI 1.88-2.38; females, RR=2.14, 95%CI 1.93-2.38). No statistically significant differences in sex-dependent mortality risk emerged. There was an age-group-dependent increased mortality risk in females < 40 years vs. >/=40 years old (RR=4.23/2.17), and significantly higher risk of death due to neurological disorders (dementia) in males vs. females (RR=5.19/2.40). Increased mortality risks were often associated with specific modifiable risk factors. The increased mortality risk did not improve over time, calling for more studies to identify modifiable factors, and for better physical healthcare for males and females with schizophrenia.