Faculty Bibliography

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To survey emergency medical services (EMS) providers on a national level to determine and describe their perspective regarding their initial and continuing education (CE) needs in pediatrics. METHODS: A 10-question survey was developed, pilot-tested, and sent to EMS providers as a part of their National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians reregistration materials. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 18,218 EMS providers, a response rate of 67%. During a typical month, 60% of emergency medical technician-paramedics (EMT-Ps), 84% of EMT-intermediates (EMT-Is), and 87% of basic EMTs (EMT-Bs) care for 0 to 3 pediatric patients. CE was identified by all provider levels as the main source of their pediatric knowledge and skills. A state or national mandate for required CE in pediatrics was supported by 76% of surveyed providers. More than 70% of all providers responded they were comfortable to some degree with their own ability and their EMS system's ability when confronted with a critical pediatric call. Cost, availability, and travel distance were identified by all levels as the primary barriers to obtaining pediatric CE. All levels identified infants as the age of greatest concern if the provider was called to manage a critical case. CONCLUSION: Surveyed practicing nationally registered EMS providers have infrequent contact with pediatric patients and have acquired most of their pediatric knowledge and skills from CE. In general, these providers are comfortable with their personal and their system's ability to care for children, but clearly support the need for required pediatric CE and identify the birth to 3-year age range as the priority for an educational focus. Cost, travel distance, and availability of pediatric CE are barriers that should be considered if pediatric CE is to be required of EMS providers

Immobilizing a child presents a unique challenge for emergency medical services (EMS) personnel in addition to those challenges faced when immobilizing an adult. Most equipment commonly carried by EMS personnel is sized for adult use and as a result does not routinely provide adequate static or dynamic immobilization of a child. In addition, children often resist immobilization and can free themselves from standard strapping techniques. These problems have led to the modification of existing equipment and the development of several pediatric-specific devices. An ideal pediatric immobilization device would be one that uses an existing piece of equipment, is of limited additional cost, is routinely used by EMS providers, could be easily modified to immobilize a child, could easily be taught to EMS providers, and provides excellent static and dynamic immobilization. The Kendrick extrication device (KED) used as the authors describe meets these goals of an ideal pediatric immobilization device

BACKGROUND: Research on utilization of ambulances by pediatric patients lacks an objective, reproducible tool for the evaluation of patterns of ambulance use by both the providers and the users of this resource. OBJECTIVES: 1) To develop an objective, diagnosis-based measure of appropriateness of ambulance utilization. 2) To use the measure to evaluate whether Municipal Ambulance Service dispatchers assign ambulances appropriately, and whether parents/caretakers request ambulances appropriately. STUDY DESIGN: 1) Development of the pediatric ambulance need evaluation (PANE) tool: The consensus of an expert panel was used to assign patients arriving by ambulance to three levels of prehospital transport need based upon their ultimate hospital discharge diagnoses, and were as follows: required advanced life support ambulance (ALS); required basic life support ambulance (BLS); required a less acute mode of transport (LAT). 2) Assessment of appropriateness of ambulance assignments by EMS call-receiving operators (CRO) and of ambulance requests by parents/caretakers: Comparison of actual type of ambulance assigned and of need for ambulance, using the PANE tool and hospital admission rates as gold standards. DATA COLLECTION: Level of prehospital transport provided (ALS vs BLS), ultimate ED diagnosis, and ED disposition (admission vs discharge) was collected for each patient from information abstracted from the prehospital and ED records. SETTING: Bellevue Hospital Center and Harlem Hospital Center, two level I trauma centers in New York City, both with Pediatric Emergency Departments staffed 24 hours a day by attending physicians and residents. PATIENT SELECTION: Consecutive sample of 2633 patients, birth to 18 years of age, who arrived to either hospital by ambulance as primary transports from the field over a one-year period. RESULTS: 1) Development of PANE tool: At Bellevue Hospital, 7% of ED visits arrived by ambulance; at Harlem Hospital, 5% arrived by ambulance. Using these ambulance arrivals, 215 diagnoses were identified for inclusion in the PANE tool. An expert panel categorized each diagnosis as requiring ALS, BLS, or LAT, with a high level of interobserver agreement (weighted kappa = 0.793). As a measure of external validity of the PANE, admission rates were highest in the ALS group, next highest in the BLS group, and lowest in the LAT group (chi2 for trend, P < 0.05). 2) Assessment of ambulance assignments and requests: According to the PANE tool, the sensitivity of dispatcher assignment of ALS ambulances was 72 %. Therefore, 28 % of patients who required an ALS ambulance received BLS care. 50% of patients assigned to an ALS ambulance did not require that level of care, and 1/3 of these were categorized by the PANE as not requiring an ambulance at all. CONCLUSIONS: The PANE tool compared favorably to admission rates as a measure of the severity of illness of patients arriving by ambulance. Applying the PANE tool, we conclude that the majority of requests for ambulances are appropriate, and that the majority of the time dispatchers were able to dispatch the appropriate level of care. However, there is room for significant improvement in utilization of ambulances, and tools like the PANE will be useful in achieving this goal

The purpose of this document is to present a general approach to educating the First Responder in Emergency Pediatric Care. The First Responder is especially important in the emergency care of the sick or injured child. The majority of mortality and morbidity associated with pediatric emergencies is a result of airway and ventilatory compromise. In addition, most airway and ventilation problems can be corrected with only basic life support interventions that are within the scope of practice of the First Responder. As a result, it is of paramount importance to assure that the First Responder is adequately trained in the initial care of the pediatric patient. This document will review some of the key objectives and topics which the First Responder needs to understand in order to adequately care for children until further emergency care arrives. Templates for lesson plans and suggested activities for training the First Responder are also presented

OBJECTIVE. On January 25, 1990, a jetliner crashed on Long Island, New York. Twenty-two children survived the crash. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the emergency medical system's response to these pediatric survivors. METHODS. A questionnaire was sent to all local, acute care hospitals to determine their specific pediatric capabilities and to rank them as level I, II, or III pediatric centers; level I centers are tertiary care facilities. A second questionnaire was sent to all hospitals that received pediatric survivors to collect specific clinical information for each patient. Based on this clinical information a Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS) was assigned to each patient. Children with a PTS < or = 8 are considered to be at increased risk of trauma-related mortality. The assigned PTS was compared to the level of the pediatric center to which each patient was transported. RESULTS. Of 25 children on board the plane, 22 (88%) survived the crash; of 135 adults on board, 70 (52%) survived (chi 2 = 9.9, P = .002). Seven children had a PTs < or = 8; only 1 of these high-risk patients was transported directly to a level I pediatric center, and only 2 of the 5 high-risk children initially transported to level III facilities were transferred to higher level pediatric centers. CONCLUSIONS. Pediatric survivors were neither adequately triaged nor transported to appropriate facilities which could optimize their care. Possible explanations for this include: (1) unique features of the rescue operation, (2) limited pediatric training of prehospital personnel, and (3) deficiencies of the regional disaster plan. Emergency medical services systems and disaster plans can be made more responsive to children's needs by: (1) acknowledging that children have special needs requiring referral, (2) improving the training of prehospital personnel in pediatric emergency care, (3) classifying ill and injured children according to appropriate triage criteria, (4) recognizing existing tertiary care pediatric centers as the optimal location for the treatment of critically ill and injured children, and (5) designating these centers as the appropriate transport destination for critically ill and injured children

Status epilepticus is a common pediatric emergency that may result in significant morbidity and mortality. This article provides a clinical update on generalized tonic-clonic status epilepticus in children and a practical approach to their initial stabilization and pharmacologic management. Only an organized approach to the initial stabilization and management of the child in status epilepticus will help prevent unnecessary complications and death

A rapid latex agglutination (LA) method was evaluated in 2401 consecutive pediatric patients presenting to an emergency service with suspected group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis. LA tests were performed by the treating physicians, who were not blinded to the clinical condition of the children and who made therapeutic decisions based on the results of the tests. When compared with anaerobic culture, the LA method had a sensitivity of 91%, a specificity of 82%, and a positive predictive value of 43%. There was a marked seasonal variation in the positive predictive value: 62% in winter and 16% in summer. However, even in peak streptococcal pharyngitis season (January to March), basing therapy on a positive LA test leads to the unnecessary treatment of a large number of patients. Therefore, we cannot recommend the routine performance of this test by all practitioners in all clinical settings