Faculty Bibliography

Background Anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1) therapies have improved long-term survival across many advanced cancers. However, chronic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are not well-defined. We sought to determine the incidence, time-course, spectrum, and predictors of chronic irAEs arising from adjuvant anti-PD-1. Methods In this retrospective cohort, we analyzed patients from 8 academic medical centers with stage III-IV melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 in the adjuvant setting. Acute and chronic (persisting at least 3 months after therapy cessation) irAEs were characterized by type, time-course, management, and incidence. Results Among 387 patients, most were male (60.7%) with a median age of 63 years, had cutaneous primaries (85.8%), BRAF/NRAS WT (51.2%), and resected stage IIIb (33.1%) or IIIc (39.5%) melanomas. Median overall survival and relapsefree survival (RFS) were not reached. 359 patients (93.0%) were alive at median follow-up of 529 days. Patients with acute (p<0.009) or chronic (p<0.001) irAEs had superior RFS compared with patients lacking irAEs. Treatment was discontinued for therapy completion (50.0%), irAEs (25.3%), and disease progression (20.9%). 267 patients (69.0%) had any acute irAE, including 19.5% (n=52) with grade 3-5 events. Acute irAEs were most commonly dermatitis/pruritis (25.8%), thyroiditis/hypothyroid (16.3%), arthralgias (10.6%), colitis/ diarrhea (9.8%) and required glucocorticoids in 109 patients (28.2%). Of these, 167 patients (43.2%) developed chronic irAEs; 82 (49.1%) were symptomatic, 55 (32.9%) required glucocorticoids, and most were grade 1-2 (96.4%). Endocrinopathies (73/88, 83.0%) arthritis (22/45, 48.9%), xerostomia (9/17, 52.9%), neurotoxicities (8/8, 100.0%), and ocular events (5/8, 63.0%) were likely to become chronic events. In contrast, colitis (6/44, 13.6%), hepatitis (4/25, 16.0%), pneumonitis (6/18, 33.3%) were less likely to become chronic. Overall, the most common chronic irAEs were hypothyroidism (14.0%), dermatitis/pruritis (6.6%) arthralgias (5.7%), adrenal insufficiency (3.1%), and xerostomia (2.3%). Age (p=0.67), gender (p=0.31), time of onset of acute irAEs (p=0.95), and initial need for glucocorticoids (p=0.15) were not associated with chronicity. Only 24 (14.4%) of chronic irAEs ultimately resolved during the median 529-day follow-up. In particular, endocrinopathies (100%) arthralgias (100%) ocular events (100%), xerostomia (88.9%), and cutaneous events (89.5%) had high rates of persistence at last follow-up. Conclusions Chronic irAEs to anti-PD-1 were more common than previously recognized and frequently persisted even with prolonged follow-up, although most were low-grade. The risks of chronic toxic effects should be integrated into treatment decision making

Melanoma disseminates to the skeletal system where it is then difficult to treat. Yet, there remains limited research investigating metastatic bone disease (MBD) in melanoma. Here, we evaluate whether there are distinct clinicopathologic variables at the time of primary melanoma diagnosis that predispose metastases to engraft bone, and we test the hypothesis that patients with MBD have different responses to treatment. Cutaneous melanoma patients enrolled in a prospective database were studied. Individuals with metastatic melanoma and bone metastases (M-Bone) were compared to those with metastatic disease but no M-Bone. Of the 463 (42.7%) patients, 198 with unresectable metastatic melanoma had M-Bone and 98 developed bone metastasis (bone mets) as first site. Progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly worse in patients with M-Bone compared to those without M-Bone (P < 0.001) independent of treatment modalities, and in patients whose melanoma spread to bone first, compared to those who developed first mets elsewhere (P < 0.001). Interestingly, patients with bone mets presented with primary tumors that had more tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (P < 0.001) and less often a nodular histologic subtype compared to patients without M-Bone (P < 0.001). Our data suggest that melanoma bone metastasis is a distinct clinical and biological entity that cannot be explained by generalized metastatic phenotype in all patients. The observed dichotomy between more favorable primary histopathologic characteristics and a grave overall prognosis requires more studies to elucidate the molecular processes by which melanomas infiltrate bone and to build a mechanistic understanding of how melanoma bone metastases yield such detrimental outcomes.

The melanoma treatment landscape changed in 2011 with the approval of the first anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA)-4 checkpoint inhibitor and of the first BRAF-targeted monoclonal antibody, both of which significantly improved overall survival (OS). Since then, improved understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and tumor immune-evasion mechanisms has resulted in new approaches to targeting and harnessing the host immune response. The approval of new immune and targeted therapies has further improved outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma and other combination modalities are also being explored such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, electrochemotherapy and surgery. In addition, different strategies of drugs administration including sequential or combination treatment are being tested. Approaches to overcome resistance and to potentiate the immune response are being developed. Increasing evidence emerges that tissue and blood-based biomarkers can predict the response to a therapy. The latest findings in melanoma research, including insights into the tumor microenvironment and new biomarkers, improved understanding of tumor immune response and resistance, novel approaches for combination strategies and the role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, were the focus of discussions at the Melanoma Bridge meeting (5-7 December, 2019, Naples, Italy), which are summarized in this report.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Melanoma is one of the most common malignancies diagnosed during pregnancy. This study examined the impact of pregnancy on management decisions of melanoma patients treated at NYU Langone Health (NYULH). METHODS:We analyzed data for patients who were pregnant at initial or recurrent melanoma diagnosis at NYULH from 2012 to 2019 with prospective protocol-driven follow-up. RESULTS:Of the 900 female patients accrued during this period, 11 women in the childbearing range were pregnant at melanoma diagnosis. Six patients presented with early (stage 0 or I) disease and five with advanced (stage III or IV) melanoma. Women with early stage disease had normal deliveries and minimal changes to their treatment timeline and regimen. However, patients with more advanced stage disease opted for either termination of the pregnancy or early delivery and altered treatment timelines because of pregnancy. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Both melanoma stage and gestational age at diagnosis contribute to the differences in the therapeutic management of melanoma in pregnant women. Given the complexity and variety of each case of melanoma during pregnancy, informed discussion between patients and physicians allows for individualized treatment plans that address each patient's unique situation.

BACKGROUND:The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) maintains that the eighth edition of its Staging Manual (AJCC8) has improved accuracy compared to the seventh (AJCC7). However, there are concerns that implementation may disrupt analysis of active clinical trials for stage III patients. We used an independent cohort of melanoma patients to test the extent to which AJCC8 has improved prognostic accuracy compared to AJCC7. METHODS:We analyzed a cohort of 1,315 prospectively enrolled patients. We assessed primary tumor and nodal classification of stage I-III patients using AJCC7 and AJCC8 to assign disease stages at diagnosis. We compared recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. We then compared concordance indices of discriminatory prognostic ability and area under the curve (AUC) of 5-year survival to predict RFS/OS. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS:Stage IIC continued to have worse outcomes than those for stage IIIA patients, with 5-year RFS of 26.5% (95%CI=12.8-55.1%) vs. 56.0% (95%CI=37.0-84.7%) by AJCC8 (P = 0.002). For stage I, removing mitotic index as T classification factor decreased its prognostic value, although not statistically significantly (RFS C-index=0.63 [95%CI=0.56-0.69] to 0.56 [95%CI=0.49-0.63], P = 0.07; OS C-index=0.48 [95%CI=0.38-0.58] to 0.48 [95%CI=0.41-0.56], P = 0.90). For stage II, prognostication remained constant (RFS C-index=0.65 [95%CI=0.57-0.72]; OS C-index=0.61 [95%CI=0.50-0.72]), and. For stage III, AJCC8 yielded statistically significantly enhanced prognostication for RFS (C-index=0.65 [95%CI=0.60-0.70] to 0.70 [95%CI=0.66-0.75], P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Compared with AJCC7, we demonstrate that AJCC8 enables more accurate prognosis for patients with stage III melanoma. Restaging a large cohort of patients can enhance the analysis of active clinical trials.

The dynamics of viral load (VL) of the 2019 novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) and its association with different clinical parameters remain poorly characterized in the US patient population. Herein, we investigate associations between VL and parameters, such as severity of symptoms, disposition (admission versus direct discharge), length of hospitalization, admission to the intensive care unit, length of need for oxygen support, and overall survival in a cohort of 205 patients from a tertiary care center in New York City. VL was determined using quantitative PCR and log10 transformed for normalization. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to test these associations. We found that diagnostic viral load is significantly lower in hospitalized patients than in patients not hospitalized (log10 VL = 3.3 versus 4.0; P = 0.018) after adjusting for age, sex, race, body mass index, and comorbidities. Higher VL was associated with shorter duration of the symptoms in all patients and hospitalized patients only and shorter hospital stay (coefficient = -2.02, -2.61, and -2.18; P < 0.001, P = 0.002, and P = 0.013, respectively). No significant association was noted between VL, admission to intensive care unit, length of oxygen support, and overall survival. Our findings suggest a higher shedding risk in less symptomatic patients, an important consideration for containment strategies in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Furthermore, we identify a novel association between viral load and history of cancer. Larger studies are warranted to validate our findings.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Metastasectomy for melanoma provides durable disease control in carefully selected patients. Similarly, BRAF-targeted and immune checkpoint inhibition has improved median overall survival (OS) in metastatic patients. We hypothesized that there is an increasing role for metastasectomy in melanoma patients responding to these therapies. METHODS:Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database identified 128 patients with stage IV melanoma who received targeted molecular and/or checkpoint inhibitors at an academic institution from 2006 to 2017. Records were reviewed to characterize clinicopathologic characteristics, response to treatment, and intent of surgery for those who underwent metastasectomy. OS was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS:Median OS from stage IV diagnosis was 31.3 months. A total of 81 patients received checkpoint inhibitors, 11 received targeted inhibitors, and 36 received both. A total of 73 patients underwent metastasectomy. Indications for surgery included the intent to render disease-free (54%), palliation (34%), and diagnostic confirmation (11%). Responders to systemic therapy who underwent metastasectomy had improved OS compared to responders who did not (84.3 vs. 42.9 months, P = .018). CONCLUSIONS:Metastasectomy for melanoma is associated with improved OS in patients that respond to targeted molecular or immunotherapy. Resection should be strongly considered in this cohort as multimodality treatment results in excellent OS.

Effective public response to a pandemic relies upon accurate measurement of the extent and dynamics of an outbreak. Viral genome sequencing has emerged as a powerful approach to link seemingly unrelated cases, and large-scale sequencing surveillance can inform on critical epidemiological parameters. Here, we report the analysis of 236 SARS-CoV2 sequences from cases in the New York City metropolitan area during the initial stages of the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak. The majority of cases throughout the region had no recent travel history or known exposure, and genetically linked cases were spread throughout the region. Comparison to global viral sequences showed that the majority were most related to cases from Europe. Our data are consistent with numerous seed transmissions from multiple sources and a prolonged period of unrecognized community spreading. This work highlights the complementary role of real-time genomic surveillance in addition to traditional epidemiological indicators.

Mutational heterogeneity can contribute to therapeutic resistance in solid cancers. In melanoma, the frequency of inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity is controversial. We examined mutational heterogeneity within individual melanoma patients using multi-platform analysis of commonly mutated driver and non-passenger genes. We analyzed paired primary and metastatic tumors from 60 patients, and multiple metastatic tumors from 39 patients whose primary tumors were unavailable (n=271 tumors). We used a combination of multiplex SNaPshot assays, Sanger Sequencing, Mutation-specific PCR, or droplet digital PCR to determine the presence of BRAF^V600, NRAS^Q61, and TERT^-124C>T and TERT^-146C>T mutations. Mutations were detected in BRAF (39%), NRAS (21%) and/or TERT (78%). Thirteen patients had TERT^mutant discordant tumors; seven of these had a single tumor with both TERT^-124C>T and TERT^-146C>T mutations present at different allele frequencies. Two patients had both BRAF and NRAS mutations; one in different tumors and the other had a single tumor with both mutations. One patient with a BRAF^mutant primary lacked mutant BRAF in least one of their metastases. Overall, we identified mutational heterogeneity in 18/99 (18%) patients. These results suggest that some primary melanomas may be comprised of subclones with differing mutational profiles. Such heterogeneity may be relevant to treatment responses and survival outcomes.

The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.07.001. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.