Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:While morbidity and mortality related to synthetic opioids such as illicitly manufactured fentanyl (IMF) are monitored in the U.S., there has been a lack of national survey data focusing on use. Survey data are important as self-report can help estimate prevalence of use among living persons. METHODS:Data were examined from the 2022 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, a nationally representative probability sample of noninstitutionalized individuals age ≥12 in the U.S. (N=59,069). Prevalence and correlates of past-year use of IMF were estimated. Data were analyzed in 2024. RESULTS:The estimated prevalence of past-year IMF use was 0.23% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.31). Compared to no past-year use, individuals were at increased odds for IMF use if proxy-diagnosed with use disorder involving use of cannabis (aOR=3.72, 95% CI: 1.34-10.32), cocaine (aOR=11.96, 95% CI: 4.78-29.93), methamphetamine (aOR=5.60, 95% CI: 1.65-19.02), heroin (aOR=20.56, 95% CI: 8.90-47.52), and/or prescription opioids (aOR=10.65, 95% CI: 3.54-32.03). (Mis)use without use disorder was only significant for prescription opioids (aOR=5.77, 95% CI: 2.55-13.06). Those receiving treatment for substance use in the past year were also at increased odds for use (aOR=5.79, 95% CI: 2.58-13.00). CONCLUSIONS:Prevalence of IMF use is rare in the general U.S. POPULATION/METHODS:While past-year (mis)use of other drugs (without use disorder) was not consistently associated with IMF use, cannabis, cocaine, methamphetamine, heroin, and prescription opioid use disorder was associated with higher odds of IMF use, suggesting that more "severe" use of various drugs is more of a risk factor than use.

BACKGROUND:Psilocybin, the principle psychoactive component in "shrooms", is regaining acceptance in therapeutic settings, leading to media coverage of medical benefits associated with use. Possession is also becoming increasingly decriminalized throughout the United States. There is a lack of data on prevalence of shroom use, but trends in law enforcement seizure data can provide one indicator of shroom availability in US communities. We determined whether seizures of shrooms have shifted between 2017 and 2022. METHODS:This study examined national and regional trends in counts and total weight of shroom seizures reported to High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas in the US between 2017 and 2022 (N=4526). RESULTS:There were 402 seizures in 2017 compared to 1396 in 2022 with the plurality occurring in the Midwest (36.0%), followed by the West (33.5%). Between 2017 Quarter 1 (Q1) and 2022 Quarter 4 (Q4), the number of seizures increased by 368.9% (AQPC=7.0; 95 CI: 5.9-8.1) and there were significant increases in all four regions. In terms of weight, 226.0kg was seized in 2017 vs. 844.0kg in 2022, and the greatest total weight in seizures was in the West (1864.2kg, 42.6%), followed by the South (1831.9kg, 41.8%). Between 2017 Q1 and 2022 Q4, the total weight seized in the US increased by 2749.7% (AQPC=6.2, 95% CI: 0.3-12.4) and there were significant increases in all four regions. CONCLUSIONS:Seizures of shrooms have increased, suggesting that availability may be escalating; thus, increases in prevention efforts and harm reduction education are warranted.

A new class of synthetic cannabinoids called OXIZIDs has emerged in recent years. This class consists of compounds with oxindole cores and hydrazide/hydrazone linker moieties and has often been described as being designed to circumvent a Chinese class-wide ban that was effective as of July 1, 2021. However, through hair testing of nightclub attendees in New York City-a high-risk population for recreational drug use-we have evidence suggesting exposures to an OXIZID called BZO-4en-POXIZID (4en-pentyl MDA-19) prior to the effective ban. Through analysis of 6 cm segmented hair samples from attendees collected in 2021, we detected five cases of exposure. Specifically, we detected a cluster of three cases based on hair samples collected on June 20, 2021, and then two additional cases from samples collected on July 16, 2021. Four of these hair samples were long enough to analyze two 6 cm hair segments (representing approximately two six-month timeframes) and three of four of these cases tested positive for repeated exposure (for an estimated exposure over six months prior to hair collection). All cases included young adult females reporting past-year cannabis use but all tested negative for THC exposure. Three cases also reported past-year use of cocaine, ecstasy, and/or ketamine, and four cases tested positive for exposure to cocaine, MDMA, MDA, methamphetamine, and/or eutylone. These subjects were exposed to BZO-4en-POXIZID-likely as an adulterant in other drugs, and these cases are among the first documented cases which occurred approximately half a year before the Chinese legislative ban.

Research suggests that hair color, hair dyeing, and perspiration can bias hair test results regarding drug exposure, but research is needed to examine such associations in a multivariable manner. In this epidemiology study, adults were surveyed entering nightclubs and dance festivals in New York City, and 328 provided hair samples, which were analyzed using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to determine the level of detection of cocaine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA). Reporting use was not an inclusion criterion for analysis. We used two-part multivariable models to delineate associations of hair color, past-year hair dyeing, and frequency of past-month hat wearing (which may increase perspiration) in relation to any vs. no detection of cocaine and MDMA as well as level of detection, controlling for hair length, self-reported past-year cocaine/ecstasy/MDMA use, and age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Those reporting having dyed their hair were at increased odds of having any level of cocaine detected (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.75, 95% CI confidence interval [CI]: 1.85-6.70), and compared to those with brown hair, those with blond(e) hair on average had lower levels of cocaine (ng/mg) detected (beta = -7.97, p = 0.025). Those reporting having dyed their hair were at increased odds of having any level of MDMA detected (aOR = 3.05, 95% CI: 1.44-6.48), and compared to those who reported never wearing a hat, those who reported wearing a hat daily or almost daily on average had lower levels of MDMA (ng/mg) detected (beta = -6.61, p = 0.025). This study demonstrates the importance of using multivariable models to delineate predictors of drug detection.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Research investigating adverse effects from drug use has focused extensively on poisonings and mortality. This study focuses on drug-related adverse effects not necessarily resulting in hospitalization or death among a population known for high prevalence of party drug use-electronic dance music (EDM) nightclub and festival attendees. METHODS/UNASSIGNED: = 1952). Those reporting past-month use of a drug were asked whether they had experienced a harmful or very unpleasant effect after use. We examined 20 drugs and drug classes with a particular focus on alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, and ecstasy. Prevalence and correlates of adverse effects were estimated. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Almost half (47.6%) of adverse effects involved alcohol and 19.0% involved cannabis. 27.6% of those using alcohol reported an adverse effect, while 19.5%, 15.0%, and 14.9% of participants reported an effect from use of cocaine, ecstasy, and cannabis, respectively. Use of less prevalent drugs, such as NBOMe, methamphetamine, fentanyls, and synthetic cathinones, tended to be associated with higher prevalence of adverse effects. The most consistent risk factor was younger age, while past-month use of a greater number of drugs was often a protective factor against adverse effects. For most drugs, taking too much was the most common perceived reason for the adverse effect, and visiting a hospital after use was most prevalent among those experiencing an adverse effect from cocaine (11.0%). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Adverse drug effects are common in this population and results can inform prevention and harm reduction in this population and the general population.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:There has been an increase in methamphetamine use across the globe, despite widespread control of the drug, prevention, and treatment. Community-based approaches have proven effective in tackling diverse health-related challenges including substance use; however, little is known regarding community programs targeting methamphetamine use. We conducted a systematic literature review on community programs aimed at tackling the use of methamphetamine across the globe. METHOD/UNASSIGNED:Relevant literature from peer-reviewed and gray literature sources were systematically identified. A grid template was used to extract and synthesize findings from retrieved literature regarding themes of actors, actions, and outcomes related to identified programs. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 19 documents met our inclusion criteria. Some of the dominant actors in efforts to reduce methamphetamine use in communities were local councils, drug enforcement units, influential persons in the community, people who use or had used methamphetamine, business corporations, and already-existing health promoting platforms. Actions taken were typically education/awareness/information campaigns. Drug enforcement agencies appeared to make little gains when acting alone, and appeared to drive dealers and users underground. Many of the efforts made at the community level were alluded to be beneficial; however, it was difficult to quantify the impact of programs. Community-level efforts also tended to cascade to other drugs. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Community-based actors and actions are diverse and critical to the prevention of methamphetamine use. There is a need to better coordinate and integrate different actors and interventions so that outcomes can be better monitored and evaluated for greater effectiveness in reducing methamphetamine use.