Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To delineate the trend of use of botulinum toxin, including onabotulinum toxinA (OTA), in active military personnel and veterans with the diagnoses of migraine and post-traumatic headache (PTH) and describe the efficacy of botulinum toxin administration. BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Service members and veterans represent a unique population in the medical management of headache disorders, particularly migraine. They exhibit higher susceptibility to pain of greater intensity and longer durations, possibly due to their history of exposure to combat, trauma, and the associated psychological stresses. Given the burden and morbid nature of these headache disorders, prophylactic measures to reduce migraine attacks and disability are imperative. Specifically, the use of OTA for migraine prophylaxis has been well validated in chronic migraine. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:The scoping review conformed to guidelines delineated by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). The databases Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar were accessed for our literature search, and the time frame of the search was set from database inception to April 1, 2024. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 8 articles meeting the inclusion criteria were obtained after screening a total of 43 papers. Studies were primarily conducted in the United States (87.5%), with a single article published on veterans from Taiwan. Study types were mainly retrospective chart reviews with the exception of 2 randomized controlled trials. Chronic migraine was the most common headache diagnosis examined, being assessed in 6 studies, followed by PTH, which was represented in the remaining 2 studies. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:The occupational exposure of service members appears to result in a higher incidence of headache disorders such as chronic migraine and PTH, which are amenable to preventative management such as that with botulinum toxin. Despite its effectiveness, the use of botulinum toxin in treating headaches and craniofacial pain in service members remains under-researched, warranting further exploration in this population, specifically.

BACKGROUND:Since the initial introduction in 1967 of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the field of neuromodulation, SCS has been utilized to treat a multitude of chronic pain disorders refractory to both conservative and surgical management. Although efficacious when indicated, SCS has associated risks. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The goals of this study are to explore the trend of rates of SCS complications in 2 approximately equally sized cohorts (1999-2015 and 2016-2021) within a single institution over a 22-year period. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:A retrospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:A tertiary care academic hospital. METHODS:A retrospective chart review with pre-existing institutional review board approval was performed on 2 cohorts, one comprising 257 patients between 2016 and 2021 and the other comprising 262 patients between 1999 and 2015, who underwent percutaneous SCS implantation provided by 2 experienced interventional chronic pain specialists. The patients' demographics and complications were recorded in the REDCAP database. Data were collected on complications of both the biological (allergic/foreign-body reactions, dural puncture/leaks, infections, pain over implantation site, poor wound healing, skin erosions, neurological injuries, and subcutaneous/epidural hematomas) and device-related (electrical leaks, inadequate pain coverage, lead fractures, lead migrations, ligamentum flavum stimulation, recharging/battery failures, and unwanted stimulation) varieties. The chart review included records that started 6 months prior to SCS placement and ended at a period of at least one year of follow-up after placement. RESULTS:Of the patients studied between 2016 and 2021, the mean age was 58.5 ± 13.0 years, with men representing 46.3% and women 53.7% of the patients studied. Of those studied between 1999 and 2015, the mean age was 50.6 +/- 12.3 years, with men representing 42.4% of the patients and women 57.6%. The overall complication rates were 14.0% (36/257) and 38.9% (102/262) for 2016-2021 and 1999-2015, respectively. The rate of biological complications was nearly 3 times lower in the 2016-2021 group than in the 1999-2015 group (4.3% [11/257] vs 12.2% [32/262], P < 0.001). In the 1999-2015 group, the leading biological complication was infection, the rate of which decreased in the 2016-2021 group (3.4% [9/262] vs 1.9% [5/257], P < 0.42). The rate of device complications was nearly 3 times lower in the 2016-2021 group than in the 1999-2015 group (9.7% [25/257] vs. 26.7% [70/262], P < 0.0001). The leading device complication was inadequate pain coverage (12.2% [32/262] vs 7.4% [19/257], P < 0.08). No serious neurological injury or death occurred in either cohort. LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Limitations were inherent to this study's design, since it was a retrospective cohort study. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The rate of SCS-related complications decreased from one group to the next, with the most recent group demonstrating a statistically significant decrease in both device and biological complications. Our results are consistent with SCS literature trends that demonstrate decreasing complications, which may be due to technological advancements in SCS device technology and improved complication mitigation strategies. Further prospective research utilizing multicenter data is needed to better define the overall trend of SCS complications.

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified a significant gap in resources and guidelines that aim to educate healthcare providers for best practices when engaging on social media. As part of the broader initiatives on Spine and Nerve practice, the executive board of ASPN has decided it would be beneficial to include comprehensive guidance for healthcare providers when engaging on social media. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A panel of experts was chosen based on expertise, publications, diversity, and their social media presence. Along with expert guidance, the committee conducted an extensive analysis of peer-reviewed literature in communication and medical journals to determine best practices for healthcare practitioners on social media. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Social media messages significantly impact patients' and colleagues' perceptions and actions regarding medical issues. As such, providers and their teams must be aware of legal and ethical considerations in healthcare while maintaining a consistent, educational, and digestible persona online. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:The advancement of communication and medical technologies and systems necessitates continued education and resources to adapt to our rapidly changing media and medical landscape.

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in patient pain medicine education has the potential to revolutionize pain management. By harnessing the power of AI, patient education becomes more personalized, interactive, and supportive, empowering patients to understand their pain, make informed decisions, and actively participate in their pain management journey. AI tailors the educational content to individual patients' needs, providing personalized recommendations. It introduces interactive elements through chatbots and virtual assistants, enhancing engagement and motivation. AI-powered platforms improve accessibility by providing easy access to educational resources and adapting content to diverse patient populations. Future AI applications in pain management include explaining pain mechanisms, treatment options, predicting outcomes based on individualized patient-specific factors, and supporting monitoring and adherence. Though the literature on AI in pain medicine and its applications are scarce yet growing, we propose avenues where AI may be applied and review the potential applications of AI in pain management education. Additionally, we address ethical considerations, patient empowerment, and accessibility barriers.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:This review provides medical practitioners with an overview of the present and emergent roles of telehealth and associated virtual reality (VR) applications in chronic pain (CP) management, particularly in the post-COVID-19 healthcare landscape. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:Accumulated evidence points to the efficacy of now well-established telehealth modalities, such as videoconferencing, short messaging service (SMS), and mobile health (mHealth) applications in complementing remote CP care. More recently, and although still in early phases of clinical implementation, a wide range of VR-based interventions have demonstrated potential for improving the asynchronous remote management of CP. Additionally, VR-associated technologies at the leading edge of science and engineering, such as VR-assisted biofeedback, haptic technology, high-definition three-dimensional (HD3D) conferencing, VR-enabled interactions in a Metaverse, and the use of wearable monitoring devices, herald a new era for remote, synchronous patient-physician interactions. These advancements hold the potential to facilitate remote physical examinations, personalized remote care, and innovative interventions such as ultra-realistic biofeedback. Despite the promise of VR-associated technologies, several limitations remain, including the paucity of robust long-term effectiveness data, heterogeneity of reported pain-related outcomes, challenges with scalability and insurance coverage, and demographic-specific barriers to patient acceptability. Future research efforts should be directed toward mitigating these limitations to facilitate the integration of telehealth-associated VR into the conventional management of CP. Despite ongoing barriers to widespread adoption, recent evidence suggests that VR-based interventions hold an increasing potential to complement and enhance the remote delivery of CP care.

The last decade has seen a boom in pain medicine, basic science and interventional pain management. Concomitantly, there is a need to educate trainees, young attendings, and seasoned attendings on these innovations. There has been a growth in the number of societies that represent pain medicine physicians, each with its own philosophy and guiding principles. The variety of thought within pain management, within the various groups that practice this field, and amongst the societies which protect those missions inherently creates divergence and isolation within these different communities. There is the enormous opportunity for our field to grow, but we need the voices of all different specialties and sub-specialties which practice pain medicine to collectively design the future of our emerging field. The explosion of revolutionary percutaneous surgeries, medications, psychotherapy, and research and development in our field has outpaced the ability of payers to fully embrace them. There is an increased number of pain practitioners using novel therapies, postgraduate training programs do not adequately train users in these techniques thereby creating a potential for sub-optimal outcomes. In part, this is a reason why payers for many of our more novel treatments have decreased patient access or eliminated remuneration for some of them. We believe that society-based collaborative regulation of education, research, and treatment guidelines is needed to improve visibility for payers and end users who provide these treatments. Furthermore, postgraduate chronic pain fellowship education has been deemed by many to be insufficient to educate on all of the necessary requirements needed for the independent practice of pain medicine, especially the consummation of newer technologies. Here, we draw comparison with this tenuous stage in pain management history with the last United States recession to remind us of how poor institutional regulation and neglect for long-term growth hampers a community.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a leading cause of pain and disability globally with a lack of consensus on the appropriate treatment of those suffering from this condition. Recent advancements in both pharmacotherapy and interventional approaches have broadened the treatment options for PDN. There exists a need for a comprehensive guideline for the safe and effective treatment of patients suffering from PDN. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:The SWEET Guideline was developed to provide clinicians with the most comprehensive guideline for the safe and appropriate treatment of patients suffering from PDN. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified an educational need for a comprehensive clinical guideline to provide evidence-based recommendations for PDN. A multidisciplinary group of international experts developed the SWEET guideline. The world literature in English was searched using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, BioMed Central, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Current Contents Connect, Meeting Abstracts, and Scopus to identify and compile the evidence for diabetic neuropathy pain treatments (per section as listed in the manuscript) for the treatment of pain. Manuscripts from 2000-present were included in the search process. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:After a comprehensive review and analysis of the available evidence, the ASPN SWEET guideline was able to rate the literature and provide therapy grades for most available treatments for PDN utilizing the United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:The ASPN SWEET Guideline represents the most comprehensive review of the available treatments for PDN and their appropriate and safe utilization.