Searched for: in-biosketch:yes
person:shorer01
Low-dose radiation knowledge worth the cost [Letter]
Barcellos-Hoff, Mary Helen; Brenner, David J; Brooks, Antone L; Formenti, Silvia; Hlatky, Lyn; Locke, Paul A; Shore, Roy; Tenforde, Thomas; Travis, Elizabeth L; Williams, Jacqueline
PMID: 21493843
ISSN: 1095-9203
CID: 140490
Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), and breast cancer risk: Pooled individual data analysis of 17 prospective studies
Key, T J; Appleby, P N; Reeves, G K; Roddam, A W; Helzlsouer, K J; Alberg, A J; Rollison, D E; Overvad, K; Kaaks, R; Trichopoulos, D; Clavel-Chapelon, F; Vineis, P; Chirlaque, M -D; Peeters, P H M; Rinaldi, S; Riboli, E; Allen, N E; Allen, D S; Fentiman, I S; Holly, J M; Vatten, L J; Gunnell, D; Tretli, S; Gronbaek, H; Tjonneland, A; Krajcik, R; Manjer, J; Lenner, P; Hallmans, G; Baglietto, L; English, D R; Giles, G G; Severi, G; Morris, H A; Hankinson, S E; Schernhammer, E S; Koenig, K; Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, A; Arslan, A A; Toniolo, P; Shore, R E; Krogh, V; Micheli, A; Berrino, F; Muti, P; Schairer, C; Ziegler, R G; Berg, C D; McCarty, C A; Bueno-de-Mesquita, H B; Cauley, J A; Lui, L Y; Cummings, S R; Gunter, M J; Rohan, T E; Strickler, H D
Background: Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) stimulates mitosis and inhibits apoptosis. Some published results have shown an association between circulating IGF1 and breast-cancer risk, but it has been unclear whether this relationship is consistent or whether it is modified by IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), menopausal status, oestrogen receptor status or other factors. The relationship of IGF1 (and IGFBP3) with breast-cancer risk factors is also unclear. The Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group was established to analyse pooled individual data from prospective studies to increase the precision of the estimated associations of endogenous hormones with breast-cancer risk.
Method(s): Individual data on prediagnostic IGF1 and IGFBP3 concentrations were obtained from 17 prospective studies in 12 countries. The associations of IGF1 with risk factors for breast cancer in controls were examined by calculating geometric mean concentrations in categories of these factors. The odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs of breast cancer associated with increasing IGF1 concentrations were estimated by conditional logistic regression in 4790 cases and 9428 matched controls, with stratification by study, age at baseline, and date of baseline. All statistical tests were two-sided, and a p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Finding(s): IGF1 concentrations, adjusted for age, were positively associated with height and age at first pregnancy, inversely associated with age at menarche and years since menopause, and were higher in moderately overweight women and moderate alcohol consumers than in other women. The OR for breast cancer for women in the highest versus the lowest fifth of IGF1 concentration was 1.28 (95% CI 1.14-1.44; p<0.0001). This association was not altered by adjusting for IGFBP3, and did not vary significantly by menopausal status at blood collection. The ORs for a difference in IGF1 concentration between the highest and lowest fifth were 1.38 (95% CI 1.14-1.68) for oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours and 0.80 (0.57-1.13) for oestrogen-receptor-negative tumours (p for heterogeneity=0.007).
Interpretation(s): Circulating IGF1 is positively associated with breast-cancer risk. The association is not substantially modified by IGFBP3, and does not differ markedly by menopausal status, but seems to be confined to oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours.
Funding(s): Cancer Research UK.
EMBASE:50912290
ISSN: 1470-2045
CID: 4245042
Intakes of vitamins A, C, and E and use of multiple vitamin supplements and risk of colon cancer: a pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies
Park, Yikyung; Spiegelman, Donna; Hunter, David J; Albanes, Demetrius; Bergkvist, Leif; Buring, Julie E; Freudenheim, Jo L; Giovannucci, Edward; Goldbohm, R Alexandra; Harnack, Lisa; Kato, Ikuko; Krogh, Vittorio; Leitzmann, Michael F; Limburg, Paul J; Marshall, James R; McCullough, Marjorie L; Miller, Anthony B; Rohan, Thomas E; Schatzkin, Arthur; Shore, Roy; Sieri, Sabina; Stampfer, Meir J; Virtamo, Jarmo; Weijenberg, Matty; Willett, Walter C; Wolk, Alicja; Zhang, Shumin M; Smith-Warner, Stephanie A
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the associations between intakes of vitamins A, C, and E and risk of colon cancer. METHODS: Using the primary data from 13 cohort studies, we estimated study- and sex-specific relative risks (RR) with Cox proportional hazards models and subsequently pooled RRs using a random effects model. RESULTS: Among 676,141 men and women, 5,454 colon cancer cases were identified (7-20 years of follow-up across studies). Vitamin A, C, and E intakes from food only were not associated with colon cancer risk. For intakes from food and supplements (total), the pooled multivariate RRs (95% CI) were 0.88 (0.76-1.02, >4,000 vs. = 1,000 mug/day) for vitamin A, 0.81 (0.71-0.92, >600 vs. = 100 mg/day) for vitamin C, and 0.78 (0.66-0.92, > 200 vs. = 6 mg/day) for vitamin E. Adjustment for total folate intake attenuated these associations, but the inverse associations with vitamins C and E remained significant. Multivitamin use was significantly inversely associated with colon cancer risk (RR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Modest inverse associations with vitamin C and E intakes may be due to high correlations with folate intake, which had a similar inverse association with colon cancer. An inverse association with multivitamin use, a major source of folate and other vitamins, deserves further study.
PMCID:3091388
PMID: 20820901
ISSN: 1573-7225
CID: 992302
Breast cancer risk 55+ years after irradiation for an enlarged thymus and its implications for early childhood medical irradiation today
Adams, M Jacob; Dozier, Ann; Shore, Roy E; Lipshultz, Steven E; Schwartz, Ronald G; Constine, Louis S; Pearson, Thomas A; Stovall, Marilyn; Winters, Paul; Fisher, Susan G
BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy during childhood increases long-term cancer risk, but the risk from radiation as a result of relatively higher dose diagnostic procedures remains less well known. This study, which evaluates breast cancer incidence in a cohort treated with "lower dose" chest radiotherapy over 50 years ago, can assist with estimating lifetime breast cancer risk in young children exposed to radiation from procedures such as chest computed tomography (CT) or treatment with recent "lower dose" chest radiotherapy protocols. METHODS: A population-based, longitudinal cohort of subjects exposed to thymic irradiation during infancy from 1926 to 1957 and of their unexposed siblings was re-established. Previously followed until 1987, we resurveyed cohort members from 2004 to 2008. Poisson regression models compared breast cancer incidence rates between women in the cohort by treatment and dose category groups. RESULTS: Breast cancer occurred in 96 treated (mean breast dose, 0.71 Gy) and 57 untreated women during 159,459 person-years of follow-up. After adjusting for attained age and treatment/birth cohort, the rate ratio was 3.01 (2.18-4.21). The adjusted excess relative risk per Gy was 1.10 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.86). Traditional breast cancer risk factors did not contribute significantly to multivariate model fit. CONCLUSION: Our results show that at radiation doses between those received by the breast from chest CT and cancer therapy during early childhood, breast cancer incidence rates remain elevated >50 years after exposure. This implies that increased breast cancer risk will remain a lifelong concern in females treated during childhood with currently reduced radiotherapy doses and for infants receiving multiple chest CTs.
PMCID:2939494
PMID: 20056622
ISSN: 1055-9965
CID: 899542
Radiation-related heart disease: current knowledge and future prospects
Darby, Sarah C; Cutter, David J; Boerma, Marjan; Constine, Louis S; Fajardo, Luis F; Kodama, Kazunori; Mabuchi, Kiyohiko; Marks, Lawrence B; Mettler, Fred A; Pierce, Lori J; Trott, Klaus R; Yeh, Edward T H; Shore, Roy E
PMCID:3910096
PMID: 20159360
ISSN: 0360-3016
CID: 899562
Radiation exposure and circulatory disease risk: Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb survivor data, 1950-2003
Shimizu, Yukiko; Kodama, Kazunori; Nishi, Nobuo; Kasagi, Fumiyoshi; Suyama, Akihiko; Soda, Midori; Grant, Eric J; Sugiyama, Hiromi; Sakata, Ritsu; Moriwaki, Hiroko; Hayashi, Mikiko; Konda, Manami; Shore, Roy E
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the degree to which ionising radiation confers risk of mortality from heart disease and stroke. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with more than 50 years of follow-up. SETTING: Atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. PARTICIPANTS: 86 611 Life Span Study cohort members with individually estimated radiation doses from 0 to >3 Gy (86% received <0.2 Gy). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality from stroke or heart disease as the underlying cause of death and dose-response relations with atomic bomb radiation. RESULTS: About 9600 participants died of stroke and 8400 died of heart disease between 1950 and 2003. For stroke, the estimated excess relative risk per gray was 9% (95% confidence interval 1% to 17%, P=0.02) on the basis of a linear dose-response model, but an indication of possible upward curvature suggested relatively little risk at low doses. For heart disease, the estimated excess relative risk per gray was 14% (6% to 23%, P<0.001); a linear model provided the best fit, suggesting excess risk even at lower doses. However, the dose-response effect over the restricted dose range of 0 to 0.5 Gy was not significant. Prospective data on smoking, alcohol intake, education, occupation, obesity, and diabetes had almost no impact on the radiation risk estimates for either stroke or heart disease, and misdiagnosis of cancers as circulatory diseases could not account for the associations seen. CONCLUSION: Doses above 0.5 Gy are associated with an elevated risk of both stroke and heart disease, but the degree of risk at lower doses is unclear. Stroke and heart disease together account for about one third as many radiation associated excess deaths as do cancers among atomic bomb survivors.
PMCID:2806940
PMID: 20075151
ISSN: 0959-8146
CID: 899552
Thyroid cancer risk 40+ years after irradiation for an enlarged thymus: an update of the Hempelmann cohort
Adams, Michael Jacob; Shore, Roy E; Dozier, Ann; Lipshultz, Steven E; Schwartz, Ronald G; Constine, Louis S; Pearson, Thomas A; Stovall, Marilyn; Thevenet-Morrison, Kelly; Fisher, Susan G
Although ionizing radiation is a known carcinogen, the long-term risk from relatively higher-dose diagnostic procedures during childhood is less well known. We evaluated this risk indirectly by assessing thyroid cancer incidence in a cohort treated with "lower-dose" chest radiotherapy more than 55 years ago. Between 2004 and 2008, we re-surveyed a population-based cohort of subjects treated with radiation for an enlarged thymus during infancy between 1926 and 1957 and their unexposed siblings. Thyroid cancer occurred in 50 irradiated subjects (mean thyroid dose, 1.29 Gy) and in 13 nonirradiated siblings during 334,347 person-years of follow-up. After adjusting for attained age, Jewish religion, sex and history of goiter, the rate ratio for thyroid cancer was 5.6 (95% CI: 3.1-10.8). The adjusted excess relative risk per gray was 3.2 (95% CI: 1.5-6.6). The adjusted excess absolute risk per gray was 2.2 cases (95% CI: 1.4-3.2) per 10,000 person-years. Cumulative thyroid cancer incidence remains elevated in this cohort after a median 57.5 years of follow-up and is dose-dependent. Although the incidence appeared to decrease after 40 years, increased risk remains a lifelong concern in those exposed to lower doses of medical radiation during early childhood.
PMCID:3080025
PMID: 21128799
ISSN: 0033-7587
CID: 899572
Epidemiological studies of cataract risk at low to moderate radiation doses: (not) seeing is believing
Shore, Roy E; Neriishi, Kazuo; Nakashima, Eiji
The prevailing belief for some decades has been that human radiation-related cataract occurs only after relatively high doses; for instance, the ICRP estimates that brief exposures of at least 0.5-2 Sv are required to cause detectable lens opacities and 5 Sv for vision-impairing cataracts. For protracted exposures, the ICRP estimates the corresponding dose thresholds as 5 Sv and 8 Sv, respectively. However, several studies, especially in the last decade, indicate that radiation-associated opacities occur at much lower doses. Several studies suggest that medical or environmental radiation exposure to the lens confers risk of opacities at doses well under 1 Sv. Among Japanese A-bomb survivors, risks for cataracts necessitating lens surgery were seen at doses under 1 Gy. The confidence interval on the A-bomb dose threshold for cataract surgery prevalence indicated that the data are compatible with a dose threshold ranging from none up to only 0.8 Gy, similar to the dose threshold for minor opacities seen among Chernobyl clean-up workers with primarily protracted exposures. Findings from various studies indicate that radiation risk estimates are probably not due to confounding by other cataract risk factors and that risk is seen after both childhood and adult exposures. The recent data are instigating reassessments of guidelines by various radiation protection bodies regarding permissible levels of radiation to the eye. Among the future epidemiological research directions, the most important research need is for adequate studies of vision-impairing cataract after protracted radiation exposure.
PMID: 21128813
ISSN: 0033-7587
CID: 899582
Radiation exposure, the ATM Gene, and contralateral breast cancer in the women's environmental cancer and radiation epidemiology study
Bernstein, Jonine L; Haile, Robert W; Stovall, Marilyn; Boice, John D Jr; Shore, Roy E; Langholz, Bryan; Thomas, Duncan C; Bernstein, Leslie; Lynch, Charles F; Olsen, Jorgen H; Malone, Kathleen E; Mellemkjaer, Lene; Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise; Rosenstein, Barry S; Teraoka, Sharon N; Diep, Anh T; Smith, Susan A; Capanu, Marinela; Reiner, Anne S; Liang, Xiaolin; Gatti, Richard A; Concannon, Patrick
BACKGROUND: Ionizing radiation is a known mutagen and an established breast carcinogen. The ATM gene is a key regulator of cellular responses to the DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation. We investigated whether genetic variants in ATM play a clinically significant role in radiation-induced contralateral breast cancer in women. METHODS: The Women's Environmental, Cancer, and Radiation Epidemiology Study is an international population-based case-control study nested within a cohort of 52,536 survivors of unilateral breast cancer diagnosed between 1985 and 2000. The 708 case subjects were women with contralateral breast cancer, and the 1397 control subjects were women with unilateral breast cancer matched to the case subjects on age, follow-up time, registry reporting region, and race and/or ethnicity. All women were interviewed and underwent full mutation screening of the entire ATM gene. Complete medical treatment history information was collected, and for all women who received radiotherapy, the radiation dose to the contralateral breast was reconstructed using radiotherapy records and radiation measurements. Rate ratios (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by using multivariable conditional logistic regression. All P values are two-sided. RESULTS: Among women who carried a rare ATM missense variant (ie, one carried by <1% of the study participants) that was predicted to be deleterious, those who were exposed to radiation (mean radiation exposure = 1.2 Gy, SD = 0.7) had a statistically significantly higher risk of contralateral breast cancer compared with unexposed women who carried the wild-type genotype (0.01-0.99 Gy: RR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.2 to 6.5; > or =1.0 Gy: RR = 3.3, 95% CI = 1.4 to 8.0) or compared with unexposed women who carried the same predicted deleterious missense variant (0.01-0.99 Gy: RR = 5.3, 95% CI = 1.6 to 17.3; > or =1.0 Gy: RR = 5.8, 95% CI = 1.8 to 19.0; P(trend) = .044). CONCLUSIONS: Women who carry rare deleterious ATM missense variants and who are treated with radiation may have an elevated risk of developing contralateral breast cancer. However, the rarity of these deleterious missense variants in human populations implies that ATM mutations could account for only a small portion of second primary breast cancers
PMCID:2902825
PMID: 20305132
ISSN: 1460-2105
CID: 133494
DNA methylation in pre-diagnostic serum samples of breast cancer cases: Results of a nested case-control study
Brooks, Jennifer D; Cairns, Paul; Shore, Roy E; Klein, Catherine B; Wirgin, Isaac; Afanasyeva, Yelena; Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Anne
Background: Promoter methylation of tumor suppressor genes is a frequent and early event in breast carcinogenesis. Paired tumor tissue and serum samples from women with breast cancer show that promoter methylation is detectable in both sample types, with good concordance. This suggests the potential for these serum markers to be used for breast cancer detection. Methods: The current study was a case-control study nested within the prospective New York University Women's Health Study cohort aimed to assess the ability of promoter methylation in serum to detect pre-clinical disease. Cases were women with blood samples collected within the 6 months preceding breast cancer diagnosis (n=50). Each case was matched to 2 healthy cancer-free controls and 1 cancer-free control with a history of benign breast disease (BBD). Results: Promoter methylation analysis of four cancer-related genes: -RASSF1A, GSTP1, APC and RARbeta2, - was conducted using quantitative methylation-specific PCR. Results showed that the frequency of methylation was lower than expected among cases and higher than expected among controls. Methylation was detected in the promoter region of: RASSF1A in 22.0%, 22.9% and 17.2% of cases, BBD controls and healthy controls respectively; GSTP1 in 4%, 10.4% and 7.1% respectively; APC in 2.0%, 4.4% and 4.2% respectively and RARbeta2 in 6.7%, 2.3% and 1.1% respectively. Conclusion: Methylation status of the four genes included in this study was unable to distinguish between cases and either control group. This study highlights some methodological issues to be addressed in planning prospective studies to evaluate methylation markers as diagnostic biomarkers
PMCID:2956002
PMID: 20627767
ISSN: 1877-783x
CID: 114817