Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Better research data management (RDM) provides the means to analyze data in new ways, effectively build on another researcher's results, and reproduce the results of an experiment. Librarians are recognized by many as a potential resource for assisting researchers in this area, however this potential has not been fully realized in the biomedical research community. While librarians possess the broad skill set needed to support RDM, they often lack specific knowledge and time to develop an appropriate curriculum for their research community. The goal of this project was to develop and pilot educational modules for librarians to learn RDM and a curriculum for them to subsequently use to train their own research communities. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:We created online modules for librarians that address RDM best practices, resources and regulations, as well as the culture and practice of biomedical research. Data was collected from librarians through questions embedded in the online modules on their self-reported changes in understanding of and comfort level with RDM using a retrospective pre-post design. We also developed a Teaching Toolkit which consists of slides, a script, and an evaluation form for librarians to use to teach an introductory RDM class to researchers at their own institutions. Researchers' satisfaction with the class and intent to use the material they had learned was collected. Actual changes in RDM practices by researchers who attended was assessed with a follow-up survey administered seven months after the class. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:The online curriculum increased librarians' self-reported understanding of and comfort level with RDM. The Teaching Toolkit, when employed by librarians to teach researchers in person, resulted in improved RDM practices. This two-tiered curriculum provides concise training and a ready-made curriculum that allows working librarians to quickly gain an understanding of RDM, and translate this knowledge to researchers through training at their own institutions.

OBJECTIVE:To provide evidence for the validity of an Introductory Clinical Experience (ICE) that was implemented as a baseline assessment of medical students' clinical communication skills to support progression of skills over time. METHODS:In this longitudinal study of communication skills, medical students completed the ICE, then a Practice of Medicine (POM) Objective Structured Clinical Exam 8 months later, and the Comprehensive Clinical Skills Exam (CCSE) 25 months later. At each experience, trained Standardized Patients assessed students, using the same behaviorally anchored checklist in 3 domains: Information Gathering, Relationship Development, and Patient Education and Counseling (PEC) with good internal reliability (.70-.87). Skills development patterns were described. ICE as a predictor of later performance was explored. Students' perspectives were elicited. RESULTS: = .48, large effect), in 4 patterns. ICE and POM scores predicted future communication skills. Most students recognized the educational value of ICE. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Entering medical students' clinical communication skills increase over time on average and may predict future performance. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Implementing an ICE is likely a valid strategy for monitoring progress and facilitating communication skills development.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To determine practices and opinions among study investigators in the Zoster Eye Disease Study (ZEDS) regarding suppressive valacyclovir treatment for recent-onset and chronic herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO). METHODS:An Internet-based survey was distributed to 170 ZEDS study investigators with questions regarding treatment practices for stromal keratitis in HZO and opinions regarding the efficacy of prolonged antiviral prophylaxis. RESULTS:The response rate was 72.4% (123/170). Topical steroids and oral antivirals were used by the majority of respondents for stromal keratitis in both recent-onset (69.1%, 85/123) and chronic HZO (63.4%, 78/123) (P = 0.86). The duration of treatment was similar in both recent-onset and chronic HZO (P = 0.58) with 50.4% (124/246) of ZEDS investigators using prolonged treatment for stromal keratitis due to recent-onset or chronic HZO. The majority of ZEDS respondents believe that oral antivirals are effective during treatment (70.7%, 87/123). CONCLUSIONS:Approximately half of ZEDS investigators treat HZO with prolonged oral antivirals, in addition to topical steroids, and two-thirds believe that it is effective. Completion of ZEDS is feasible and necessary to determine whether or not these practices are effective. Participation in this study is necessary to obtain evidence to support treatment that many ophthalmologists use and believe is effective.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Despite evidence that biological and genetic factors contribute strongly to obesity, many healthcare providers still attribute obesity more to controllable behavioral issues rather than factors outside a person's control. We evaluated whether medical school students' beliefs about obesity correlate with ability to effectively counsel patients with obesity. Methods/UNASSIGNED:Clerkship-year medical students at NYU School of Medicine completed an Objective Structured Clinical Experience (OSCE) that tests ability to effectively counsel standardized actor-patients with obesity. We surveyed these students to evaluate their beliefs about the causes of obesity and their attitudes towards people with obesity. We analyzed correlations between student beliefs, negative obesity attitudes, and OSCE performance. Results/UNASSIGNED: < 0.05). Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Attribution of obesity to external factors correlated with greater ability to counsel patients with obesity, suggesting that educating providers on the biological causes of obesity could help reduce bias and improve provider care.

Introduction: Veterans with mental health disorders smoke at high rates, but encounter low rates of tobacco treatment. We sought to understand barriers and facilitators to treating tobacco use in VA mental health clinics. Methods: This qualitative study was part of a trial evaluating a telephone care coordination program for smokers using mental health services at 6 VA facilities. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 staff: 12 mental health clinic staff working at the parent study's intervention sites (n=6 psychiatrists, 3 psychologists, 2 social workers, 1 NP), as well as one psychiatrist and one psychologist on the VA's national tobacco advisory committee. Interviews were transcribed and inductively coded to identify themes. Results: Five "barriers" themes emerged: 1) competing priorities, 2) patient challenges/resistance, 3) complex staffing/challenging cross-discipline coordination, 4) mixed perceptions about whether tobacco is a mental health care responsibility, and 5) limited staff training/comfort in treating tobacco. Five "facilitators" themes emerged: 1) reminding mental health staff about tobacco, 2) staff belief in the importance of addressing tobacco, 3) designating a cessation medication prescriber, 4) linking tobacco to mental health outcomes and norms, and 5) limiting mental health staff burden. Conclusions: VA mental health staff struggle with knowing that tobacco use is important, but they face competing priorities, encounter patient resistance, are conflicted on their role in addressing tobacco, and lack tobacco training. They suggested strategies at multiple levels that would help overcome those barriers that can be used to design interventions that improve tobacco treatment delivery for mental health patients. IMPLICATIONS: This study builds upon the existing literature on the high rates of smoking, but low rates of treatment, in people with mental health diagnoses. This study is one of the few qualitative evaluations of mental health clinic staff perceptions of barriers and facilitators to treating tobacco. The study results provide a multi-level framework for developing strategies to improve the implementation of tobacco treatment programs in mental health clinics.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and practice patterns of primary care physicians regarding administration of the herpes zoster (HZ) vaccine at NYU Langone Health (NYULH). METHODS:A cross-sectional online survey was distributed from January to March 2017 to all physicians in the Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation at NYULH across 5 different practice settings. RESULTS:The response rate was 26% (138 of 530). Of the surveyed physicians, 76% (100/132) agreed that the HZ vaccine was an important clinical priority, compared with 93% and 94% for influenza and pneumococcal vaccination, respectively (P < 0.001). Only 35% (47/132) strongly agreed that it was important, compared with 68% (90/132) and 74% (98/132) who strongly agreed that pneumococcal and influenza vaccines, respectively, were important. Respondents estimated that 43% of their immunocompetent patients aged 60 or older received the HZ vaccine, whereas only 11% of patients aged 50 to 59 received the HZ vaccine (P < 0.001). The rate of HZ vaccination was lower in public hospitals (26%) than in the NYULH faculty group practice (46%) (P = 0.007). A greater percent (67% and 72%) of their patients have received influenza and pneumococcal vaccines, respectively (P < 0.001). Almost all doctors (99%, 131/132) consider the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations important in determining vaccination practices. CONCLUSIONS:HZ vaccination rates remain relatively low compared with rates of influenza and pneumonia vaccination. The recommendation for vaccination against zoster by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for individuals aged 50 years and older and stronger recommendations by primary care physicians for administration of zoster vaccines are needed to increase HZ vaccination rates.

Background /UNASSIGNED:Physicians across specialties need to be skilled at diagnosing and treating depression, yet studies show underrecognition and inadequate treatment. Understanding the reasons requires specifying the influence of patient presentation, screening, and physician competence. Objective /UNASSIGNED:We deployed an unannounced standardized patient (SP) case to assess clinic screening and internal medicine (IM) residents' practices in identifying, documenting, and treating depression. Methods /UNASSIGNED:The SP represented a new patient presenting to the outpatient clinic, complaining of fatigue, with positive Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) items 2 and 9 and a family history of depression. The SPs assessed clinic screening and IM resident practices; appropriate treatment was assessed through chart review and defined as the resident doing at least 1 of the following: prescribing a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), making a referral, or scheduling a 2-week follow-up. Results /UNASSIGNED:< .001). Conclusions /UNASSIGNED:The use of unannounced SPs helps identify targets for training residents to provide evidence-based treatment of depression.

OBJECTIVE:Medical student knowledge about brain death determination is limited. We describe an educational initiative to improve medical student awareness about brain death and assess the impact of this initiative. SUBJECTS AND METHODS/METHODS:Beginning in July 2016, students at our medical school were required to attend a 90-min brain death didactic and simulation session during their neurology clerkship. Students completed a test immediately before and after participating in the initiative. RESULTS:Of the 145 students who participated in this educational initiative between July 2016 and June 2017, 124 (86%) consented to have their data used for research purposes as part of a medical education registry. Students correctly answered a median of 53% of questions (IQR 47-58%) on the pretest and 86% of questions (IQR 78-89%) on the posttest (p < .001). Comfort with both performing a brain death evaluation and talking to a family about brain death improved significantly after this initiative (18% of students were comfortable performing a brain death evaluation before the initiative and 86% were comfortable doing so after the initiative, p < .001; 18% were comfortable talking to a family about brain death before the initiative and 76% were comfortable doing so after the initiative, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS:Incorporation of simulation in undergraduate medical education is high-yield. At our medical school, knowledge about brain death and comfort performing a brain death exam or talking to a family about brain death was limited prior to development of this initiative, but awareness and comfort dealing with brain death improved significantly after this initiative.

Background: Te Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has identifed six core competencies in which trainees are expected to demonstrate profciency. Milestones have been developed to provide a framework for evaluating trainee performance within these competencies. We used an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) focused on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to assess the milestones in gastroenterology (GI) fellows. METHODS: Ten second-year fellows from six GI fellowship programs participated in a four case OSCE. In the "Transition of CareTM case the fellow was to assess a patient's readiness on the planned transition from child-centered to adult-centered care. In the "Shared Decision MakingTM case the fellow was to evaluate a patient with Crohn's disease who would beneft from combination therapy. In the "ER FlareTM case the fellow was to triage and suggest management of a flaring ulcerative colitis patient. In the "IBS in IBDTM case the fellow was asked to discuss irritable bowel syndrome in the context of quiescent IBD. Previously validated OSCE checklists were used to assess the GI fellows' performance using a 3-and 5-point behaviorally-anchored Likert Scale. Checklists were scored by the standardized patient. Checklist items were mapped to appropriate ACGME milestones by a GI medical educator. Scores within each milestone were normalized on a scale from 0-9 as utilized by the ACGME in the Next Accreditation System milestone initiative. Fellows were provided feedback on their performance. RESULTS: Te majority of fellows scored between 6 and 9 in the milestones assessing patient care (PC), medical knowledge (MK), interpersonal and communication skills (ICS), professionalism (Prof), and systems-based practice (SBP). Composite average scores for all participants were as follows: PC1 7. 7, PC2 6. 9, MK1 6. 9, MK2 7. 0, ICS1 7. 4, Prof1 7. 6, Prof3 6. 9, and SBP4 6. 4. Fellows scored highest in the "Shared Decision MakingTM case and scored lowest in the "Transitions of CareTM case. CONCLUSION(S): In this OSCE GI fellows performed well in the majority of milestones evaluated, however areas of less optimal performance were identifed, providing areas for future focus in fellow training. Te OSCE is a well-validated standardized tool for evaluating trainees, and with appropriate mapping of checklists to ACGME milestones, it can serve as an objective method to assess GI fellows' progress in the core competencies