Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Thiopurines are considered immunosuppressive agents and may be associated with an increased risk for infections. However, few inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are appropriately vaccinated, and data on their ability to mount an immune response are vague. We evaluated the effects of the thiopurines, azathioprine (AZA) and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), on cellular and humoral immune responses in IBD patients. METHODS: A prospective clinical investigation was conducted on IBD patients referred for thiopurine treatment. Immune competence was evaluated by assessing lymphocyte counts and phenotype, response to mitogen and antigen stimulation, immunoglobulin levels, and response to pneumococcal and tetanus vaccines (before treatment, week 0), and to Haemophilus influenza type b vaccine (at week 24). RESULTS: Thirty-one Crohn's disease and 12 ulcerative colitis patients who completed at least 24 weeks of therapy were included. The posttherapy average 6-MP dose was 1.05 +/- 0.30 mg/kg, and white blood cell counts had decreased significantly from baseline values (P < 0.002). The posttreatment response to mitogens and antigens and the immunoglobulin levels were unchanged. Responses to vaccines were normal both in thiopurine-naive and thiopurine-treated patients, suggesting that these patients were immunologically intact while on thiopurine therapy and capable of generating normal immune responses in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence for any intrinsic systemic immunodeficiency in IBD patients. Thiopurines at the doses used for treating IBD showed no significant suppressive effect on the systemic cellular and humoral immune responses evaluated. Thiopurine-treated IBD patients can be safely and efficiently vaccinated. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;)

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine (CSA) is effective in the short-term for severe, steroid refractory ulcerative colitis; but its use has been limited by concerns about safety and colectomy-sparing rates. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term colectomy-sparing effects and safety of CSA in patients hospitalized for ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Review of the patients who underwent intravenous CSA for ulcerative colitis between 1989 and 2003. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients with severe ulcerative colitis were treated with IV CSA. The median length of follow-up was 1.5 years (mean=3 y) (range 1 mo to 14 y) (IQR 0.6 to 4.6). Eighty-five percent (60/71) of patients responded to IV CSA and were discharged on oral CSA. Of these 60 patients, 26 were transitioned from CSA to 6MP. Of the 26 patients who were transitioned from CSA to 6MP, only 1 patient (4%) ultimately required colectomy; whereas colectomy was carried out in 76% (26/34) of the patients who were not transitioned from CSA to 6MP. Only concomitant 6MP therapy was associated with a reduced risk of colectomy (OR 0.01, 95% CI 0.001, 0.09, P<0.0001) on long-term follow-up in this group. Cumulative colectomy rates for the entire cohort were 39% (28/71) at 1 year, 42% (30/71) at 2 years, and 46% (33/71) at 5 years. Side effects were noted in two-thirds of the patients, the majority of which were mild. CONCLUSION: CSA is an effective therapy for severe ulcerative colitis. Long-term efficacy is improved with transition to 6MP. Adverse events with CSA are frequent, but most are mild