Faculty Bibliography

Meptazinol, m-(3-ethyl-1-methyl-hexahydro-1-H-azepin-3-yl) phenol hydrochloride is a centrally active opioid analgesic with a specificity for the mu-1 receptor. It has been reported to lack many of the side effects commonly observed with morphine and morphinelike drugs in man. The objective of this study was to assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of meptazinol (50 mg and 100 mg) relative to morphine (5 mg and 10 mg) when administered intramuscularly for the treatment of postoperative pain. In addition, a new clinical method for measuring onset and duration and a statistical technique for evaluating the study data are presented. One hundred and seventeen patients were evaluated for 6 hours in a randomized double blind, single dose, parallel-groups trial. Estimates of relative potency for hourly pain and relief parameters, and the summary variables sum of pain intensity differences (SPID) and total pain relief (TOTPAR) were performed. The estimate of relative potency of meptazinol to morphine for pain relief was 0.19 at 1/2 hour (i.e. 100 mg of meptazinol was approximately equivalent to 20 mg of morphine). Thereafter, there was a rapid decline of efficacy for meptazinol, with a relative potency estimate of 0.12 at 1 hour and 0.06 at 2 hours. The distribution functions for several time related events were estimated including time to onset, duration and time to remedication. The two drugs had approximately equal onset, but meptazinol had significantly shorter duration. More patients on meptazinol required remedication with a rescue analgesic and at an earlier time than patients on morphine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The authors surveyed pharmacotherapy in a group of hospitalized 18 to 35-year-old young adult patients (N = 286) with a DSM-III diagnosis of schizophrenia. Drug use comparisons were made between patients with a 180 day or less hospitalization (short-stay, N = 226) and those with a 366+ day hospitalization (long-stay, N = 60). Psychotropic drug usage during the initial 180 and most-recent 180 days of treatment of the long-stay group was compared with the total episode of the short-stay group. Antiepileptic, antidepressant, lithium and anxiolytic/sedative/hypnotic agents, were used in significantly more of the long-stay than short-stay patients. This increase was not observed between the two groups for the initial 180 days of the long-stay group but was observed during the most recent 180 days of treatment. Antipsychotic mean daily doses and patterns of use in the two length of stay groups were similar. Chlorpromazine (CPZ) dosage was significantly increased in long-stay patients compared with short-stay patients (P less than .05)

Two randomized, double-blind, single-dose studies were conducted to assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of piroxicam for the treatment of moderate or severe postoperative pain. Study 1 evaluated the analgesic efficacy of piroxicam 20 mg compared with that of codeine sulfate 60 mg and placebo. A final patient population of 149 subjects rated pain intensity and pain relief at one half hour and one hour following treatment and then hourly for six hours, with a global assessment made at the completion of 24 hours. Piroxicam 20 mg was significantly more efficacious than placebo for all analgesic variables, including the sum of the pain intensity differences (SPID), total pain relief (TOTAL), percent SPID, duration of effect, and time to remedication. Codeine 60 mg was significantly superior to placebo for percent SPID and some hourly measures. Piroxicam 20 mg was significantly more effective than codeine 60 mg for percent SPID and a few hourly measures including time to remedication. Study 2 assessed the efficacy of piroxicam 20 mg or 40 mg compared with aspirin 648 mg and placebo. Sixty patients rated their pain intensity and relief hourly for 12 hours and at 24 hours after administration of study medication. Both doses of piroxicam were significantly more effective than placebo from Hours 2 to 12 for pain intensity difference (PID) and relief scores, as well as for SPID and TOTAL. Aspirin was significantly more effective than placebo from Hours 2 to 8 for relief and Hours 2 to 10 for PID as well as SPID and TOTAL. Piroxicam 40 mg was significantly more effective than aspirin 648 mg for SPID, TOTAL, and hourly measures beginning with Hour 6 through Hour 12. Piroxicam 20 mg was significantly better than aspirin for a few hourly measures: Hours 7 to 9 for relief and Hour 7 for PID. In addition, effects of piroxicam 20 mg had a significantly longer duration than aspirin. Similarly, piroxicam 20 mg had a significantly longer time to remedication compared with aspirin and placebo. The results of these studies provide evidence in support of the longer duration of analgesic efficacy of piroxicam compared with codeine or aspirin in patients with postoperative pain