Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Despite the extensive use of cellular bone matrices (CBMs) in spine surgery, there is little evidence to support the contribution of cells within CBMs to bone formation. The objective of this study was to determine the contribution of cells to spinal fusion by direct comparisons among viable CBMs, devitalized CBMs, and cell-free demineralized bone matrix (DBM). METHODS:Three commercially available grafts were tested: a CBM containing particulate DBM (CBM-particulate), a CBM containing DBM fibers (CBM-fiber), and a cell-free product with DBM fibers only (DBM-fiber). CBMs were used in viable states (CBM-particulatev and CBM-fiberv) and devitalized (lyophilized) states (CBM-particulated and CBM-fiberd), resulting in 5 groups. Viable cell counts and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) content on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) within each graft material were measured. A single-level posterolateral lumbar fusion was performed on 45 athymic rats with 3 lots of each product implanted into 9 animals per group. After 6 weeks, fusion was assessed using manual palpation, micro-computed tomography (μ-CT), and histological analysis. RESULTS:The 2 groups with viable cells were comparable with respect to cell counts, and pairwise comparisons showed no significant differences in BMP-2 content across the 5 groups. Manual palpation demonstrated fusion rates of 9 of 9 in the DBM-fiber specimens, 9 of 9 in the CBM-fiberd specimens, 8 of 9 in the CBM-fiberv specimens, and 0 of 9 in both CBM-particulate groups. The μ-CT maturity grade was significantly higher in the DBM-fiber group (2.78 ± 0.55) compared with the other groups (p < 0.0001), while none of the CBM-particulate samples demonstrated intertransverse fusion in qualitative assessments. The viable and devitalized samples in each CBM group were comparable with regard to fusion rates, bone volume fraction, μ-CT maturity grade, and histological features. CONCLUSIONS:The cellular component of 2 commercially available CBMs yielded no additional benefits in terms of spinal fusion. Meanwhile, the groups with a fiber-based DBM demonstrated significantly higher fusion outcomes compared with the CBM groups with particulate DBM, indicating that the DBM component is probably the key determinant of fusion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE/CONCLUSIONS:Data from the current study demonstrate that cells yielded no additional benefit in spinal fusion and emphasize the need for well-designed clinical studies on cellular graft materials.

PURPOSE:To evaluate the reliability and validity of the multi-positional magnetic resonance imaging in measuring occipitocervical parameters using the standard cervical dynamic radiographs as a reference. METHODS:Patients were included if they underwent both dynamic radiograph and cervical multi-positional MRI within a 2-week interval from January 2013 to December 2016. Twelve occipitocervical parameters were measured on both image modalities in all positions (neutral, flexion and extension): Posterior Atlanto-Dental Interval, Anterior Atlanto-Dental Interval (AADI), Dens-to-McRae distance, Dens-to-McGregor distance, Occipito-atlantal Cobb angle (C01 angle), Occipito-axis Cobb angle (C02 Cobb angle), Atlas-axis Cobb angle (C12 angle), Redlund-Johnell, Modified Ranawat, Clivus canal angle, Occiput inclination, and Occiput cervical distance. Pearson correlation and linear regression analysis were used to evaluate the correlation of both modalities for each parameter. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS:Cervical images of 70 patients were measured and analyzed. There was a significant positive correlation between dynamic X-ray and multi-positional MRI for all parameters (p < 0.05) except AADI. Dens-to-McGregor distance and Redlund-Johnell parameter demonstrated a very strong correlation in the neutral position (r = 0.72, r = 0.79 respectively) and moderate to very strong correlation(r > 0.4) for Modified Ranawat, Clivus canal angle, C02 Cobb angle and C02 distance in all neck position. The intra-class correlation (ICC) of intra- and inter-observer showed good to excellent reliability, and ICCs were 0.67-0.98. CONCLUSIONS:Multi-positional MRI can be a reliable imaging option for diagnosis of occipitocervical instability or basilar invagination compared to standard dynamic radiographs.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective database study. OBJECTIVE:To assess the intra- and postoperative complications of cervical laminoplasty and to evaluate the effect of intraoperative neuromonitoring use on postoperative limb paralysis incidence. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Cervical laminoplasty is a known procedure for the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). METHODS:This was a retrospective study of 532 patients with CSM who underwent cervical laminoplasty between 2007 and the first quarter of 2016 using the Humana subset of the PearlDiver Database. The database was queried using the relevant International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9 and ICD-10) codes for CSM and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for cervical laminoplasty. The intra- and postoperative incidence of surgical and medical complications and reoperations was then determined and was compared with a propensity score-matched cohort of patients who had posterior laminectomy and fusion (490 patients in each group), using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS:Laminoplasty was associated with a lower incidence of dysphagia (odds ratio [OR] = 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.16-0.79; P = 0.014), 30-day readmission (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.35-0.75; P < 0.001), urinary tract infection (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.37-0.93; P = 0.023), and incision and drainage, exploration or evacuation (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.08-0.79; P = 0.026). The use of intraoperative neuromonitoring was associated with a non-significant lower incidence of limb paralysis within 1 and 3 months postoperatively (OR = 0.52 and 0.51, 95% CI = 0.23-1.19 and 0.23-1.11; P = 0.119 and 0.091, respectively). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Compared with posterior laminectomy and fusion, laminoplasty had lower rates of dysphagia, urinary tract infection, and 30-day readmission. The use of intraoperative neuromonitoring was associated with a lower risk of postoperative limb paralysis, but it did not achieve statistical significance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:4.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective review of insurance database. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To investigate national trends, complications, and costs after cervical disc replacement (CDR) using an administrative insurance database representative of the United States population. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE/BACKGROUND:As CDR continues to be used to treat patients with cervical stenosis, it is important to gain a better understanding of its use on a national level, potential complications, and cost. This information will allow for optimal patient counseling, risk stratification, and healthcare cost assessments. Several prior studies have investigated complications associated with CDR, but they have been limited by small sample size, single institution experiences, limited follow-up, and potential conflicts of interest. METHODS:Patients who underwent single or multilevel CDR between 2007 and 2015 were identified using an insurance database. We collected data on annual trends, reimbursement costs, patient demographic information, hospital information, and information on complications from the time of operation to 1 year postoperative. RESULTS:Total of 293 patients underwent either single or multilevel CDR. The number of procedures increased nonlinearly over time at an average of 17% per year, with a greater increase seen in the outpatient setting. Less than 3.7% of patients had new onset pain within 1 year after CDR. Within 1 year, 12.3% of patients reported a mechanical and/or bone-related complication. There were no patients who indicated a new nerve injury within 6 months of follow-up. Less than 3.7% of patients presented with dysphagia or dysphonia within 6 months, infection within 3 months, or a revision or reoperation within 1 year. Average reimbursement for single-level inpatient versus outpatient CDR was US $33,696.28 and US $34,675.12, respectively (p=0.29). CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrated that the use of CDR continued to increase. The most common complication was mechanical and/or bone-related, and cost analysis demonstrated no significant difference between inpatient and outpatient CDR.

STUDY DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Classification development. OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:The aim of our study was to develop a 3-tier classification for the levels of evidence for osteobiologics and provide a description of the principles by which osteobiologics can be evaluated. BOnE (Bone Osteobiologics and Evidence) classification evaluates each osteobiologic based on the available evidence, and if the published evidence is based on clinical, in vivo or in vitro studies. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:The process of establishing the BOnE classification included 5 face-to-face meetings and 2 web calls among members of the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Degenerative. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The 3 levels of evidence were determined based on the type of data on osteobiologics: level A for human studies, level B for animal studies, and level C for in vitro studies, with level A being the highest level of evidence. Each level was organized into 4 subgroups (eg, A1, A2, A3, and A4). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:The use and the variety of osteobiologics for spine fusion has dramatically increased over the past few decades; however, literature on their effectiveness is inconclusive. Several prior systematic reviews developed by AOSpine Knowledge Forum Degenerative reported low level of evidence primarily due to the high risk of bias, small sample size, lack of control groups, and limited patient-reported outcomes. BOnE classification will provide a universal platform for research studies and journal publications to classify a new or an existing product and will allow for creating decision-making algorithms for surgical planning.

PURPOSE:This study aimed to evaluate facet joint parameters and osteoarthritis grades, and segmental angular and translational motions among different grades of L5/S1 intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration. METHODS:This retrospective study analysed kinematic magnetic resonance imaging (kMRI) images of the lumbar spine of 214 patients with low back pain. Degenerations of the L5/S1 IVDs and facet joints osteoarthritis were assessed using the Pfirrmann and Pathria grading scales, respectively. Facet joint parameters included facet joint angle and facet joint space width. Angular and translation segmental motions were measured using MRI Analyzer software. RESULTS:The mean age of the studied patients was 44.1 ± 13.9 years. Patients with L5/S1 disc degeneration were associated with higher odds of facet joint osteoarthritis (odds ratio = 2.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.23-4.23, P = 0.008). There was a positive correlation between L5/S1 disc degeneration grade and the facet joint grade (r = 0.365, P > 0.001). Grade IV facet joint osteoarthritis did not appear in grades I or II disc degeneration (P > 0.001). The average facet joint width decreased significantly with increasing Pfirrmann grading (P = 0.017). The difference in facet joint angle between groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.532). The differences in the angular and translational motions were not statistically significant (P = 0.530, and 0.510, respectively). CONCLUSION:A positive correlation exists between L5/S1 disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis grades. The facet joint space width decreases significantly with increasing grade of disc degeneration.

STUDY DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Systematic literature review. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Our primary objective was to compare reported fusion rates after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using structural allograft versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody devices in patients with cervical spine degeneration. Our secondary objectives were to compare differences in rates of subsidence and reoperation and in patient-reported outcomes between the 2 groups. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Through a systematic review of the English-language literature using various databases, we identified 4702 articles. After we applied inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 articles (7 randomized controlled trials, 4 prospective studies, and 3 retrospective studies) reporting fusion rates of structural allograft or PEEK interbody devices were eligible for our analysis. No randomized controlled trials compared outcomes of structural allograft versus PEEK interbody devices. Extracted data included authors, study years, study designs, sample sizes, patient ages, duration of follow-up, types of interbody devices used, fusion rates, definition of fusion, reoperation rates, subsidence rates, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Fusion rates were 82% to 100% for allograft and 88% to 98% for PEEK interbody devices. The reported data were insufficient to perform meta-analysis. Structural allograft had the highest reported rate of reoperation (14%), and PEEK interbody devices had the highest reported subsidence rate (18%). Patient-reported outcomes improved in both groups. There was insufficient high-quality evidence to compare the associations of various PEEK modifications with fusion rates. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Fusion rates were similar between structural allograft and PEEK interbody devices when used for ACDF for cervical spine degeneration. Currently, there is insufficient high-quality evidence to assess associations of PEEK modifications with fusion rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/UNASSIGNED:II.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:To provide information on characteristics and use of various ceramics in spine fusion and future directions. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:In most recent years, focus has been shifted to the use of ceramics in minimally invasive surgeries or implementation of nanostructured surface modification features to promote osteoinductive properties. In addition, effort has been placed on the development of bioactive synthetics. Core characteristic of bioactive synthetics is that they undergo change to simulate a beneficial response within the bone. This change is based on chemical reaction and various chemical elements present in the bioactive ceramics. Recently, a synthetic 15-amino acid polypeptide bound to an anorganic bone material which mimics the cell-binding domain of type-I collagen opened a possibility for osteogenic and osteoinductive roles of this hybrid graft material. Ceramics have been present in the spine fusion arena for several decades; however, their use has been limited. The major obstacle in published literature is small sample size resulting in low evidence and a potential for bias. In addition, different physical and chemical properties of various ceramics further contribute to the limited evidence. Although ceramics have several disadvantages, they still hold a great promise as a value-based graft material with being easily available, relatively inexpensive, and non-immunogenic.

The purpose of this study was to assess trends in the use of perioperative single and continuous peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) and their associations with emergency department (ED) visits after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) surgery. The authors used a large database from a private insurer to identify patients who received perioperative PNBs for arthroscopic RCR surgeries from 2007 to 2015. They analyzed patient demographics as well as trends in perioperative PNB use. They also assessed rates of single shot vs continuous PNB use and compared rates of postoperative ED visits according to PNB type. The rate of perioperative PNB for arthroscopic RCR was higher than previously reported (65.9%) and increased over time (52.8% in 2007 to 64.6% in 2015; P=.029). Single shot PNBs were more common than continuous, catheter-mediated PNBs (60.0% vs 6.6%; P<.001), although the use of continuous blocks increased at a greater rate during the study period. Patients who received a perioperative continuous PNB were significantly more likely to visit an ED within 7 days of their surgery than those who received a single shot PNB or no PNB (6.71% vs 4.78% vs 4.74%; P<.02). The rates of ED visits within each group did not change significantly over time. Continuous PNBs are increasingly common for patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR surgery but are associated with increased rates of postoperative ED visits. Studies are needed to identify the reasons for this increased rate of ED visits and strategies to decrease ED use. [Orthopedics. 2020; 43(2): 127-131.].