Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:yes

person:garabm01

Total Results:

170


Glucocorticoid receptor DNA binding decoy is a gas

Garabedian, Michael J; Logan, Susan K
The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a paradigmatic DNA binding transcription factor and was described over 20 years ago as one of the first proteins identified to bind the enhancer region of genes called 'response elements.' Since that time, an immense amount of work has revealed that GR transcriptional regulation is controlled at virtually every step of its activity: ligand binding, nuclear translocation, transcriptional cofactor binding, and DNA binding. Just when the major modes of GR regulation appear known, a new study provides yet another mechanism whereby GR transcriptional activity is controlled under conditions of cell growth arrest. In this case, GR activity is repressed by a small noncoding RNA (ncRNA) from the growth arrest-specific transcript 5 gene that folds into a soluble glucocorticoid response element-like sequence and serves as a decoy for GR DNA binding. This unexpected mode of regulation by nucleic acid molecular mimicry is probably not confined to GR and should spark interest in the hunt for other ncRNAs that regulate transcription factor binding to DNA
PMID: 20145207
ISSN: 1937-9145
CID: 106599

Genomic determination of the glucocorticoid response reveals unexpected mechanisms of gene regulation

Reddy, Timothy E; Pauli, Florencia; Sprouse, Rebekka O; Neff, Norma F; Newberry, Kimberly M; Garabedian, Michael J; Myers, Richard M
The glucocorticoid steroid hormone cortisol is released by the adrenal glands in response to stress and serves as a messenger in circadian rhythms. Transcriptional responses to this hormonal signal are mediated by the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). We determined GR binding throughout the human genome by using chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by next-generation DNA sequencing, and measured related changes in gene expression with mRNA sequencing in response to the glucocorticoid dexamethasone (DEX). We identified 4392 genomic positions occupied by the GR and 234 genes with significant changes in expression in response to DEX. This genomic census revealed striking differences between gene activation and repression by the GR. While genes activated with DEX treatment have GR bound within a median distance of 11 kb from the transcriptional start site (TSS), the nearest GR binding for genes repressed with DEX treatment is a median of 146 kb from the TSS, suggesting that DEX-mediated repression occurs independently of promoter-proximal GR binding. In addition to the dramatic differences in proximity of GR binding, we found differences in the kinetics of gene expression response for induced and repressed genes, with repression occurring substantially after induction. We also found that the GR can respond to different levels of corticosteroids in a gene-specific manner. For example, low doses of DEX selectively induced PER1, a transcription factor involved in regulating circadian rhythms. Overall, the genome-wide determination and analysis of GR:DNA binding and transcriptional response to hormone reveals new insights into the complexities of gene regulatory activities managed by GR
PMCID:2792167
PMID: 19801529
ISSN: 1549-5469
CID: 120741

LEF1 in androgen-independent prostate cancer: regulation of androgen receptor expression, prostate cancer growth, and invasion

Li, Yirong; Wang, Longgui; Zhang, Miao; Melamed, Jonathan; Liu, Xiaomei; Reiter, Robert; Wei, Jianjun; Peng, Yi; Zou, Xuanyi; Pellicer, Angel; Garabedian, Michael J; Ferrari, Anna; Lee, Peng
A major obstacle in treating prostate cancer is the development of androgen-independent disease. In this study, we examined LEF1 expression in androgen-independent cancer as well as its regulation of androgen receptor (AR) expression, prostate cancer growth, and invasion in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells. Affymetrix microarray analysis of LNCaP and LNCaP-AI (androgen-independent variant LNCaP) cells revealed 100-fold increases in LEF1 expression in LNCaP-AI cells. We showed that LEF1 overexpression in LNCaP cells resulted in increased AR expression and consequently enhanced growth and invasion ability, whereas LEF1 knockdown in LNCaP-AI cells decreased AR expression and, subsequently, growth and invasion capacity. Chromatin immunoprecipitation, gel shift, and luciferase assays confirmed LEF1 occupancy and regulation of the AR promoter. Thus, we identified LEF1 as a potential marker for androgen-independent disease and as a key regulator of AR expression and prostate cancer growth and invasion. LEF1 is highly expressed in androgen-independent prostate cancer, potentially serving as a marker for androgen-independent disease
PMCID:3182465
PMID: 19351848
ISSN: 1538-7445
CID: 99128

Genome-wide impact of androgen receptor trapped clone-27 loss on androgen-regulated transcription in prostate cancer cells

Nwachukwu, Jerome C; Mita, Paolo; Ruoff, Rachel; Ha, Susan; Wang, Qianben; Huang, S Joseph; Taneja, Samir S; Brown, Myles; Gerald, William L; Garabedian, Michael J; Logan, Susan K
The androgen receptor (AR) directs diverse biological processes through interaction with coregulators such as AR trapped clone-27 (ART-27). Our results show that ART-27 is recruited to AR-binding sites by chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis. In addition, the effect of ART-27 on genome-wide transcription was examined. The studies indicate that loss of ART-27 enhances expression of many androgen-regulated genes, suggesting that ART-27 inhibits gene expression. Surprisingly, classes of genes that are up-regulated upon ART-27 depletion include regulators of DNA damage checkpoint and cell cycle progression, suggesting that ART-27 functions to keep expression levels of these genes low. Consistent with this idea, stable reduction of ART-27 by short-hairpin RNA enhances LNCaP cell proliferation compared with control cells. The effect of ART-27 loss was also examined in response to the antiandrogen bicalutamide. Unexpectedly, cells treated with ART-27 siRNA no longer exhibited gene repression in response to bicalutamide. To examine ART-27 loss in prostate cancer progression, immunohistochemistry was conducted on a tissue array containing samples from primary tumors of individuals who were clinically followed and later shown to have either recurrent or nonrecurrent disease. Comparison of ART-27 and AR staining indicated that nuclear ART-27 expression was lost in the majority of AR-positive recurrent prostate cancers. Our studies show that reduction of ART-27 protein levels in prostate cancer may facilitate antiandrogen-resistant disease
PMCID:2702238
PMID: 19318562
ISSN: 1538-7445
CID: 99292

Atherosclerosis Regression Promoted by an LXR Agonist is Dependent on the Chemokine Receptor CCR7 and Requires Both LXR alpha and LXR beta: Insights into Reducing Stroke Incidence [Meeting Abstract]

Feig, JE; Pineda-Torra, I; Garabedian, MJ; Tontonoz, P; Fisher, EA
ISI:000264709500267
ISSN: 0039-2499
CID: 97792

Lef1 Expression in Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer [Meeting Abstract]

Zhang, M; Li, YR; Wang, LG; Melamed, J; Liu, XM; Wei, JJ; Peng, Y; Pellicer, A; Garabedian, MJ; Ferrari, A; Lee, P
ISI:000262486300922
ISSN: 0023-6837
CID: 104576

Development of phosphorylation site-specific antibodies to nuclear receptors

Torra, Ines Pineda; Staverosky, Julia A; Ha, Susan; Logan, Susan K; Garabedian, Michael J
Protein phosphorylation is a versatile posttranslational modification that can regulate nuclear receptor function. Although the precise role of receptor phosphorylation is not fully understood, it appears that it functions to direct or refine receptor activity in response to particular physiological requirements. Identifying and characterizing specific nuclear receptor phosphorylation sites is an important step in elucidating the role(s) receptor phosphorylation plays in function. Although traditional methods of metabolic labeling and in vitro protein phosphorylation have been informative, receptor phosphorylation site-specific antibodies are simple and reliable tools to study receptor phosphorylation. This chapter will discuss how to develop nuclear receptor phosphorylation site-specific antibodies to elucidate function
PMID: 19117148
ISSN: 1064-3745
CID: 92774

Lef1 Expression in Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer [Meeting Abstract]

Zhang, M; Li, YR; Wang, LG; Melamed, J; Liu, XM; Wei, JJ; Peng, Y; Pellicer, A; Garabedian, MJ; Ferrari, A; Lee, P
ISI:000262371500922
ISSN: 0893-3952
CID: 104577

Modulation of estrogen receptor activity by multivalent estradiol-peptidomimetic conjugates [Meeting Abstract]

Holub, Justin M; Garabedian, Michael J; Kirshenbaum, Kent
ISI:000207861908293
ISSN: 0065-7727
CID: 2055532

Decrease in stromal androgen receptor associates with androgen-independent disease and promotes prostate cancer cell proliferation and invasion

Li, Yirong; Li, Caihong X; Ye, Huihui; Chen, Fei; Melamed, Jonathan; Peng, Yi; Liu, Jinsong; Wang, Zhengxin; Tsou, Hui C; Wei, Jianjun; Walden, Paul; Garabedian, Michael J; Lee, Peng
Androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in both stromal and epithelial cells of the prostate. The majority of studies on AR expression and function in prostate cancer is focused on malignant epithelial cells rather than stromal cells. In this study, we examined the levels of stromal AR in androgen-dependent and -independent prostate cancer and the function of stromal AR in prostate cancer growth and invasion. We showed that stromal AR levels were decreased in the areas surrounding cancerous tissue, especially in androgen-independent cancer. Using two telomerase-immortalized human stromal cell lines, one AR-positive and the other AR-negative, we demonstrated that stromal cells lacking AR stimulated cell proliferation of co-cultured prostate cancer cells in vitro and enhanced tumour growth in vivo when co-injected with PC3 epithelial cells in nude mice. In contrast, stromal cells expressing AR suppressed prostate cancer growth in vitro and in vivo. In parallel with cancer growth, in vitro invasion assays revealed that stromal cells lacking AR increased the invasion ability of PC3 cell by one order of magnitude, while stromal cells expressing AR reduced this effect. These results indicate a negative regulation of prostate cancer growth and invasion by stromal AR. This provides potentially new mechanistic insights into the failure of androgen ablation therapy, and the reactivation of stromal AR could be a novel therapeutic approach for treating hormone refractory prostate cancer.
PMCID:3828892
PMID: 18266956
ISSN: 1582-1838
CID: 159213