Faculty Bibliography

The stabilization period that follows the exacerbation of a schizophrenic illness represents a critical point in the course of the illness. Successful stabilization is a prerequisite to long-term tenure in the community and the possibility of improvement in functional outcome. In this paper we present an operational definition of stabilization, developed in the context of a study of long-term maintenance treatment that incorporates time, symptomatic equilibrium and consistency of medication dosage. Patients were identified at the time of hospitalization and followed prospectively to determine whether or not they met stabilization criteria. Characteristics that predicted successful stabilization included measures drawn from the domains of patient personal characteristics and psychiatric history, symptoms of psychopathology and side effects in response to initial treatment and family judgments. These patients were treated primarily with fluphenazine decanoate, and five distinct dosing strategies with this agent were identified retrospectively. The dosing strategies distinguished the length of time to subsequent stabilization. The implications of these findings for clinical management of schizophrenia are discussed.

The comorbidity of DSM-III-R axis II personality disorders in patients with bipolar disorder has received less attention than for unipolar depression perhaps because of the potential confounding of state vs. trait qualities. The current study took steps to separate pathological traits of personality from behaviors evidenced during discrete affective episodes in a sample of married, outpatient bipolar patients. Data indicated that 22% of our patients met criteria for a categorical diagnosis of personality disorder. Axis II pathology as represented by both categorical and dimensional scores was associated with increased psychiatric symptoms during subsequent treatment and poorer social adjustment.

The authors review recent controlled studies on the interrelationship of the family and its members with borderline disorder and propose a new model for understanding and managing this relationship. The focus of the model is on psychopathology, evaluation, and treatment of patient and family as they influence each other. In the authors' view this illness originates in cerebral dysfunction, in the patient in combination with impaired relationships among family members. When the family is available, we believe that the treatment of choice is a multimodal approach involving family psychoeducation and family systems or dynamic intervention where possible, in combination with medications, individual psychotherapy, or both.

This hypothesis-generating study had the objective of dissecting the process of psychiatric care in an attempt to understand outcomes for patients and their families. In all, 24 patients who carried a DSM-III diagnosis of major affective disorder were identified 12-18 months after hospital admission. The patients, their families, and their doctors were interviewed using instruments measuring delivery of treatment and achievement of treatment goals; findings were then correlated with resolution of the index episode and patient global outcome. Delivery of patient and family psychoeducation was associated with better resolution of the index episode and better global outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether the statistically significant results of a randomized clinical trial of an inpatient family intervention were clinically significant for hospital practice, the authors reanalyzed outcome data using a measure of clinical significance based on the extent to which patients had recovered during the course of the intervention. METHODS: A total of 169 hospitalized subjects and their families were randomly assigned to a psychoeducational inpatient family intervention or to a comparison group. Patient and family outcome measures were assessed at admission, discharge, and six and 18 months after admission. Analyses of statistically significant differences in outcome suggested that inpatient family intervention was effective for certain patient subgroups identified by gender and diagnosis. Global Assessment Scale scores two or more standard deviations above the pretreatment (admission) mean were used as indicators for clinically significant improvement. RESULTS: The reanalysis confirmed that inpatient family intervention was associated with clinically significant improvement at discharge, especially for female patients and patients with chronic schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. These effects were maintained six months after admission before attenuating at 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient family intervention results in clinically meaningful outcomes for certain subgroups of patients and their families.

OBJECTIVE: To improve treatment of schizophrenic patients in short-term inpatient units, the authors review studies of interventions that have been implemented with schizophrenic patients during brief hospitalizations and suggest areas for future research. METHODS: The review is organized around seven general treatment domains, including the therapeutic alliance, continuity of care, family involvement, procurement of community services, psychosocial rehabilitation, medication compliance, and substance abuse treatment. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Because schizophrenic patients have traditionally been treated in long-term settings, little literature exists to inform interventions on short-term units. The authors suggest that general hospital staff strengthen the treatment alliance between patients and outpatient clinicians, aggressively pursue community supports, work to ensure patients' follow-up with outpatient care, and consider depot medications and patient education to promote medication compliance.

Although effective medications for the treatment of Axis I disorders have been developed, achieving adequate, let alone, optimal medication regimens has been difficult. This hypothesis-generating study had the objective of dissecting the process of medication-management among 24 previously hospitalized affective disorder patients, their families, and their doctors in Italy, Japan, and the United States as well as identifying their outcomes. The data demonstrated significant positive associations between outcome and delivery of adequate medication as well as psychoeducation (about the illness and its treatment) to both patient and family. These results suggested that, regardless of country, medication was necessary but insufficient without the practitioner delivering a family intervention and psychoeducation.