Faculty Bibliography

Quetiapine is often prescribed at doses higher than those approved by regulatory authorities, with limited evidence from controlled trials. The objective of this study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of high-dose quetiapine (1200 mg/d) compared with a standard dose of 600 mg/d among patients with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder hospitalized at 2 state-operated psychiatric facilities. In order to be eligible for randomization, subjects were required to prospectively fail to demonstrate an initial therapeutic response during a 4-week run-in phase with quetiapine at 600 mg/d (immediate release and dosed twice a day). Lack of an adequate initial response was defined a 15% or lower decrease in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. Patients were then randomized to either continue quetiapine at 600 mg/d for an additional 8 weeks or to receive 1200 mg/d quetiapine instead. No significant differences were observed between the high dose (n = 29) and standard dose (n = 31) groups in change from baseline to endpoint on extrapyramidal symptoms, electrocardiographic changes, or most laboratory measures between groups. There was a significant difference between groups for triglycerides (P = 0.035), and post hoc tests revealed a decrease in triglycerides from baseline (mean [SD], 162.7 [59.3] mg/dL) to endpoint (mean [SD], 134.8 [62.7] mg/dL) for the 600 mg/d group (P = 0.019). The mean change in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score did not differ between groups. In conclusion, quetiapine at 1200 mg/d, although reasonably tolerated, did not confer any advantages over quetiapine at 600 mg/d among patients who had failed to demonstrate an adequate response to a prospective 4-week trial of 600 mg/d

The Job Decision Factors Survey used policy capturing to measure the influence of 7 factors on job decisions. Data from 400 undergraduate students at a large university, 88% 18-25 years of age, 12% 25-65 years of age, 82% female, 54% White, 21% Asian, 10% Black, 10% Hispanic, 1% American Indian, were included in a regression analysis. Hypothesis 1, the significance of the 7-factor model, was supported (Rsuperscript 2 = .02). Hypothesis 2, opportunities to learn accounting for more variance than compensation, was supported (beta = .11, beta = .06, respectively). Job counselors should consider highlighting learning opportunities when counseling or interviewing similar populations.

OBJECTIVE: Metabolic syndrome and elevated lipids, related to cardiovascular risk factors, are more prevalent in schizophrenia and there has been much debate about the extent to which specific antipsychotics contribute more to the increased risk of developing hyperlipidemia and metabolic syndrome. Most studies have concentrated on fasting levels in patients recently started on medication. Randomized prospective studies of metabolic effects of 2nd generation antipsychotics using both fasting measures and provocative tests may provide results that are more informative. We present results of a randomized prospective study of lipid metabolism and metabolic syndrome in chronic schizophrenic patients using both fasting and post-prandial lipid measures. METHOD: Hospitalized patients with chronic schizophrenia, most of whom had been treated with multiple antipsychotics in the past, were randomly assigned to treatment with a single antipsychotic, olanzapine or risperidone, for a period of 5 months. At baseline and every treatment month thereafter, fasting levels of lipids, free fatty acid (FFA) and leptin were assessed. At baseline and end of month 2 of treatment patients had a fatty meal test (FMT) in which postprandial lipids were measured at several time points before and after meal ingestion. Weight was assessed monthly and waist measures were taken at baseline and month 5. Data was analyzed on 23 patients randomized to risperidone and 23 patients randomized to olanzapine. RESULTS: Overall, there were no differential drug effects on any fasting lipid measure and fasting triglycerides did not increase in olanzapine treated patients after 5 months of treatment. However, at 2 months of drug treatment the FMT revealed a significantly greater increase in triglycerides, and very low density (VLDL) cholesterol and triglycerides, in olanzapine compared to risperidone patients (Ps=.05-.01). There was no difference between treatments with olanzapine vs. risperidone on development of metabolic syndrome during the 5 month treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic schizophrenic patients treated for years with first and second generation antipsychotics may have developed tolerance to the effects of olanzapine on increasing fasting triglycerides and other lipids, but some underlying metabolic abnormalities may be revealed in postprandial tests of lipid metabolism. These findings suggest that the development of standardized tests and criteria for measurement of postprandial triglycerides and related lipid levels, in addition to fasting levels, may be helpful in identifying metabolic effects of olanzapine and other second generation antipsychotics in chronically treated schizophrenics. In some reports postprandial increases in triglycerides have been identified as important risk factors for cardiovascular disease, but the actual differential consequences of these lipid metabolic differences for development of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease in patients treated with different antipsychotics need more objective outcome measures to determine and quantify cardiovascular risk outcomes

Medication non-adherence in patients with schizophrenia continues to be a significant problem and threatens successful treatment outcomes. Medication non-adherence is often associated with negative consequences, including symptom exacerbation, more frequent emergency room visits, re-hospitalizations and relapse. Long-acting injectable (LAI) forms of antipsychotics allow for rapid identification of non-adherence, obviate the need for the patient to take the medication on a daily basis and increase adherence to some significant degree. Eli Lilly has developed a long-acting depot formulation of olanzapine, olanzapine pamoate, which has recently been approved by the FDA for the US market, and which will be reviewed here. Olanzapine LAI appears to be an effective antipsychotic at dosages of 210 mg every 2 weeks, 300 mg every 2 weeks and 405 mg every 4 weeks in patients with acute schizophrenia, and at 150 mg every 2 weeks, 300 mg every 2 weeks and at 405 mg every 4 weeks for the maintenance treatment of stable patients. Oral supplementation appears not to be needed, particularly not at the onset of treatment with the LAI as is necessary with risperidone LAI. Its efficacy is in general comparable to the efficacy seen with oral olanzapine at a corresponding dose. The side effect profile is also comparable to the side effects observed with oral olanzapine, including lower rates of extrapyramidal symptoms, prolactin elevation and cardiovascular side effects, but significant metabolic effects. The latter include significant weight gain, lipid abnormalities and glucose dysregulation. While the injection site adverse events are overall mild, the most significant serious adverse event is the post-injection delirium sedation syndrome (PDSS). While rare, this syndrome results from inadvertent intravascular injection of olanzapine LAI and can cause a range of olanzapine overdose-type of symptoms. Olanzapine LAI needs therefore to be administered by trained personnel in settings where a post-injection observation period for at least 3 hours by medical personnel is available. The overall use of olanzapine LAI will probably be limited by the possibility of a PDSS event. Patients who have a history of good response to oral olanzapine and are in need of assured medication administration may present a good indication for its use, provided that the appropriate mental health delivery setting is available

This study assessed the efficacy and the safety of a dosing regimen that was revised from earlier studies for the investigational injectable atypical antipsychotic paliperidone palmitate (approved in the USA, August 2009) for adult patients with acutely exacerbated schizophrenia. The patients (N = 652) were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to paliperidone palmitate at 25, 100, or 150 mg eq. or placebo in this 13-week double-blind study. The patients received an injection of paliperidone palmitate at 150 mg eq. or placebo in the deltoid muscle on day 1 and the assigned fixed dose or placebo in the deltoid or muscle on day 8 and then once monthly (days 36 and 64). No oral supplementation was used. Target plasma levels were achieved by day 8 in all paliperidone palmitate groups. The mean change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score from baseline to end point improved significantly (P < or = 0.034) in all the paliperidone palmitate dose-groups versus placebo. Paliperidone palmitate treatment with this revised dosing regimen led to the achievement of rapid and consistent therapeutically effective plasma levels that were maintained by once-monthly dosing in either the deltoid or gluteal muscle. Common treatment-emergent adverse events (> or =2% of patients in any of the treatment groups) that occurred more frequently in the total paliperidone palmitate group versus the placebo group (with > or =1% difference) were injection-site pain (7.6% vs 3.7%), dizziness (2.5% vs 1.2%), sedation (2.3% vs 0.6%), pain in the extremity (1.6% vs 0.0%), and myalgia (1.0% vs 0.0%). The paliperidone palmitate treatment was efficacious and generally tolerated across the dose range (25, 100, or 150 mg eq.) in adult patients with acutely exacerbated schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess efficacy and safety of paliperidone extended-release (ER) in patients with schizoaffective disorder. METHOD: A randomized, 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted. Subjects with a Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score >or= 60, score >or= 4 on >or= 2 PANSS items (hostility, excitement, tension, uncooperativeness, poor impulse control), and Young Mania Rating Scale and/or Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 21-item version scores >or= 16 were eligible. Subjects received higher-dose (12 mg/d) or lower-dose (6 mg/d) paliperidone ER. Dose adjustments by 3-mg increments were allowed until day 15. The study was conducted from October 2006 through February 2008. RESULTS: A total of 316 subjects were randomly assigned to paliperidone ER lower dose (n = 109), higher dose (n = 100), or placebo (n = 107). Mean +/- SD modal dose in lower- and higher-dose groups: 5.7 +/- 0.9 and 11.6 +/- 1.0 mg/d, respectively. Mean +/- SE PANSS total score (primary outcome) improved significantly with higher-dose paliperidone ER versus placebo (-32.4 +/- 2.1 versus -24.1 +/- 2.1; P = .003). Change with lower-dose paliperidone ER (-27.7 +/- 2.1) was not significantly different from placebo (P = .187). No new safety issues were identified; common adverse events were headache (placebo: 16.8%; paliperidone ER: lower dose, 13.9%, higher dose, 13.3%) and tremor (3.7%, 12.0%, 11.2%, respectively). Mean prolactin and weight changes were greater with active treatment than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Higher-dose paliperidone ER was effective and well tolerated in patients with acute schizoaffective disorder. These findings and those from a companion study constitute the first registration program for antipsychotic treatment in schizoaffective disorder. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clincaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00397033

This 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated paliperidone extended-release (ER) as both monotherapy and adjunctive therapy to mood stabilizers and/or antidepressants (MS/ADs) for schizoaffective disorder. Included subjects had a schizoaffective disorder diagnosis; a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score of 60 or higher; a score of 4 or higher on 2 or more of the PANSS items for hostility, excitement, tension, uncooperativeness, or poor impulse control; and prominent mood symptoms (>/=16 on the Young Mania Rating Scale and/or the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression). Subjects were randomized to 6 mg/d paliperidone ER or placebo with flexible dosing (3-12 mg/d) until day 15. Randomization was stratified by use of MS/AD and study site. The primary analysis outcome was change in PANSS total score at week 6 last observation carried forward end point. A total of 311 subjects received paliperidone ER (n = 216) or placebo (n = 95); 52.0% received MS/AD. The mean (SD) modal dose of paliperidone ER was 8.6 (2.5) mg/d. Greater improvement was observed with paliperidone ER than placebo on mean (SE) PANSS total scores: -20.0 (1.3) and -10.8 (1.9), respectively. Subjects with prominent manic or depressive symptoms showed greater improvement with paliperidone ER versus placebo: mean (SE) Young Mania Rating Scale (-10.6 [0.9] vs -5.7 [1.2], respectively) and 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (-10.2 [0.7] vs -6.2 [1.1], respectively). The most common adverse events with paliperidone ER were headache, akathisia, dizziness, insomnia, and dyspepsia. Paliperidone ER improved psychotic and affective symptoms both as monotherapy and as an adjunct to MS/AD. No new safety findings were observed in this population