Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implants (CIs) attempt to mimic the tonotopicity of the normal ear by stimulating more basal regions of the cochlea in response to higher frequencies. However, there may be a mismatch between the normal place-frequency map and that implemented by a CI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Aiming to measure this potential mismatch and its changes over time, the present study used a method-of-adjustment procedure where CI users and normal-hearing listeners selected synthetic vowels to match prespecified vowel targets. Data from CI users were obtained longitudinally, starting on the day of initial stimulation and continuing for 2 years. RESULTS: CI users showed a significant amount of initial mismatch with respect to the normal-hearing listeners, but they also showed significant learning and adaptation over time and achieved nearly normal performance after some experience with the CI. CONCLUSION: In general, the adaptation process took several months, suggesting that some CI users may benefit from alternative signal processing or rehabilitation procedures designed to facilitate perceptual learning after cochlear implantation

This study examined the effects of perceptual learning on nonword repetition performance of normal-hearing listeners who were exposed to severely degraded auditory conditions that were designed to simulate the auditory input of a cochlear implant. Twenty normal-hearing adult listeners completed a nonword repetition task using an eight-band, frequency-shifted cochlear implant simulation strategy both before and after training on open- and closed-set word recognition tasks. Feedback was provided during training. The nonword responses obtained from each participant were digitally recorded and played back to normal-hearing listeners. These listeners rated the nonword repetition accuracy in comparison to the original unprocessed target stimuli using a seven-point scale. The mean nonword accuracy ratings were significantly higher for the non words repeated after training than for non words repeated prior to training. These results suggest that the word recognition training tasks encouraged auditory perceptual learning that generalized to novel, nonword auditory stimuli. The present findings also suggest that adaptation and learning from the degraded auditory stimuli produced by a cochlear implant simulation can be achieved even in a difficult perceptual-motor task such as nonword repetition which involves both speech perception and production of an auditory stimulus that lacks any lexical or semantic representation

As with any surgery requiring anesthesia, cochlear implantation in the first few years of life carries potential risks, which makes it especially important to assess potential benefits. In this study, we compared speech perception outcomes in children who received cochlear implants in the first, second, third, or fourth year of life. Among the latter three groups of age at implantation, it was found that earlier implantation resulted in spoken word recognition advantages. Speech perception performance of children implanted during the first year of life was similar to that of the children implanted in the second year of life. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

It is hypothesized that for postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant (CI) users, a significant source of their perceptual performance variability is attributable to differences in their ability to discriminate the basic perceptual cues that are important in speech recognition. Previous research on 'electric hearing' has identified consistent perceptual cues for vowel recognition. However, the results on consonant perception by CI users are less clear. The primary purpose of this study is to present a quantitative method of evaluating potential 'electric cues' used by CI users in consonant identification. Since the actual input signals to the auditory periphery of CI users are electric in nature, we elected to measure the CI electric discharge patterns in addition to the original acoustic waveforms. The characteristics of the electric discharge patterns in response to intervocalic consonants were quantified and correlated with the dimensions of CI patients' perceptual spaces, which were computed from multidimensional scaling analyses of their consonant confusion matrices. The results agree with most, but not all, commonly accepted acoustic cues used by normal-hearing listeners. The correlation findings also suggest that CI users employ different sets of 'electric cues' in perceiving consonants that differ in their manner of articulation. Specifically, spectral and temporal cues associated with slowly changing formant structures and transitions, and features associated with frication and high-frequency noise, are all highly correlated with the perceptual dimensions of all CI users. However, rapidly changing formant transitions, such as those present in stop consonants, did not appear to play a significant role in consonant recognition by more poorly performing CI subjects. The perceptual results were consistent with our physical findings that the SPEAK coding strategy partially degraded the rapidly changing formant transitions

HYPOTHESES: Do cochlear implants provide enough information to allow adult cochlear implant users to understand words in ways that are similar to listeners with acoustic hearing? Can we use a computational model to gain insight into the underlying mechanisms used by cochlear implant users to recognize spoken words? BACKGROUND: The Neighborhood Activation Model has been shown to be a reasonable model of word recognition for listeners with normal hearing. The Neighborhood Activation Model assumes that words are recognized in relation to other similar-sounding words in a listener's lexicon. The probability of correctly identifying a word is based on the phoneme perception probabilities from a listener's closed-set consonant and vowel confusion matrices modified by the relative frequency of occurrence of the target word compared with similar-sounding words (neighbors). Common words with few similar-sounding neighbors are more likely to be selected as responses than less common words with many similar-sounding neighbors. Recent studies have shown that several of the assumptions of the Neighborhood Activation Model also hold true for cochlear implant users. METHODS: Closed-set consonant and vowel confusion matrices were obtained from 26 postlingually deafened adults who use cochlear implants. Confusion matrices were used to represent input errors to the Neighborhood Activation Model. Responses to the different stimuli were then generated by the Neighborhood Activation Model after incorporating the frequency of occurrence counts of the stimuli and their neighbors. Model outputs were compared with obtained performance measures on the Consonant-Vowel Nucleus-Consonant word test. Information transmission analysis was used to assess whether the Neighborhood Activation Model was able to successfully generate and predict word and individual phoneme recognition by cochlear implant users. RESULTS: The Neighborhood Activation Model predicted Consonant-Vowel Nucleus-Consonant test words at levels similar to those correctly identified by the cochlear implant users. The Neighborhood Activation Model also predicted phoneme feature information well. CONCLUSION: The results obtained suggest that the Neighborhood Activation Model provides a reasonable explanation of word recognition by postlingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation. It appears that multichannel cochlear implants give cochlear implant users access to their mental lexicons in a manner that is similar to listeners with acoustic hearing. The lexical properties of the test stimuli used to assess performance are important to spoken-word recognition and should be included in further models of the word recognition process

The purpose of this study was to determine whether 2 speech measures (peak intraoral air pressure [IOP] and IOP duration) obtained during the production of intervocalic stops would be altered as a function of the presence or absence of auditory stimulation provided by a cochlear implant (CI). Five pediatric CI users were required to produce repetitions of the words puppy and baby with their CIs turned on. The CIs were then turned off for 1 hr, at which time the speech sample was repeated with the CI still turned off. Seven children with normal hearing formed a comparison group. They were also tested twice, with a 1-hr intermediate interval. IOP and IOP duration were measured for the medial consonant in both auditory conditions. The results show that auditory condition affected peak IOP more so than IOP duration. Peak IOP was greater for /p/ than /b/ with the CI off, but some participants reduced or reversed this contrast when the CI was on. The findings suggest that different speakers with CIs may use different speech production strategies as they learn to use the auditory signal for speech

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits of cochlear implantation in infancy and compare them to those obtained in children implanted at a slightly older age. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using standard language measurement tools, including the Grammatical Analysis of Elicited Language--Presentence Level (GAEL-P) and the Reynell Developmental Language Scales, progress was documented in a child who received a cochlear implant in infancy and compared to that achieved in children implanted at older ages. A new measurement tool, the Visual Habituation Procedure, was used to document early skills and the results were compared to those obtained in normal-hearing infants. RESULTS: By the age of 2 years the subject implanted in infancy achieved scores on the GAEL-P which were nearly equivalent to those achieved at the age of 5 1/2 years by children implanted at later ages. Age-equivalent scores on the Reynell Developmental Language Scales were achieved by the subject implanted in infancy and the ability to discriminate speech patterns was demonstrated using the Visual Habituation Procedure. CONCLUSION: This report demonstrates enhanced language development in an infant who received a cochlear implant at the age of 6 months