Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:To correlate qualitative and quantitative diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) characteristics of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) with histopathologic tumour grade and fibrosis content. METHODS:Fifty-one patients (21M/30F; mean age 61y) with ICC and MRI including DWI were included in this IRB-approved multicentre retrospective study. Qualitative tumour features were assessed. Tumour apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mean, minimum, and normalized (nADCliver) values were computed. Tumour grade [well(G1), moderately(G2), or poorly differentiated(G3)] and tumour fibrosis content [minimal(1), moderate(2), or abundant(3)] were categorized pathologically. Imaging findings and ADC values were compared with pathologic measures. Utility of ADC values for predicting tumour grade was assessed using ROC analysis. RESULTS:51 ICCs (mean size 6.5±1.1 cm) were assessed. 33/51(64%) of ICCs demonstrated diffuse hyperintensity and 15/51(29%) demonstrated target appearance on DWI. Infiltrative morphology (p=0.02) and tumour size (p=0.04) were associated with G3. ADCmean and nADCmean of G3 (1.32±0.47x10-3 mm2/sec and 0.97±0.95) were lower than G1+G2 (1.57±0.39x10-3 mm2/sec and 1.24±0.49; p=0.03 and p=0.04). ADCmean and nADCmean were inversely correlated with tumour grade (p<0.025). No correlation was found between ADC and tumour fibrosis content. AUROC, sensitivity and specificity of nADCmean for G3 versus G1+G2 were 0.71, 89.5% and 55.5%. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:ADC quantification has reasonable accuracy for predicting ICC grade. KEY POINTS/CONCLUSIONS:• ADC quantification was useful for predicting ICC tumour grade. • Infiltrative tumour morphology and size were associated with poorly differentiated ICCs. • ADC values depended more on ICC tumour grade than fibrosis content. • Ability to predict ICC tumour grade non-invasively could impact patient management.

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) combining different techniques such as MR elastography (MRE) has emerged as a noninvasive approach to diagnose and stage liver fibrosis with high accuracy allowing for anatomical and functional information. PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of mpMRI including qualitative and quantitative assessment of MRE, liver surface nodularity (LSN) measurement, hepatic enhancement ratios postgadoxetic acid, and serum markers (APRI, FIB-4) for the detection of liver fibrosis. STUDY TYPE: IRB-approved retrospective. SUBJECTS: Eighty-three adult patients. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T and 3.0T MR systems. MRE and T1 -weighted postgadoxetic acid sequences. ASSESSMENT: Two independent observers analyzed qualitative color-coded MRE maps on a scale of 0-3. Regions of interest were drawn to measure liver stiffness on MRE stiffness maps and on pre- and postcontrast T1 -weighted images to measure hepatic enhancement ratios. Software was used to generate LSN measurements. Histopathology was used as the reference standard for diagnosis of liver fibrosis in all patients. STATISTICAL TESTS: A multivariable logistic analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of liver fibrosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis evaluated the performance of each imaging technique for detection of fibrosis, in comparison with serum markers. RESULTS: Liver stiffness measured with MRE provided the strongest correlation with histopathologic fibrosis stage (r = 0.74, P < 0.001), and the highest diagnostic performance for detection of stages F2-F4, F3-F4, and F4 (areas under the curve [AUCs] of 0.87, 0.91, and 0.89, respectively, P < 0.001) compared to other methods. Qualitative assessment of MRE maps showed fair to good accuracy for detection of fibrosis (AUC range 0.76-0.84). Multivariable logistic analysis identified liver stiffness and FIB-4 as independent predictors of fibrosis with AUCs of 0.90 (F2-F4), 0.93 (F3-F4) and 0.92 (F4) when combined. DATA CONCLUSION: Liver stiffness measured with MRE showed the best performance for detection of liver fibrosis compared to LSN and gadoxetic acid uptake, with slight improvement when combined with FIB-4. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017.

BACKGROUND: Screening breast MRI has been shown to preferentially detect high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive carcinoma, likely due to increased angiogenesis resulting in early initial uptake of contrast. As interest grows in abbreviated screening breast MRI (AB-MRI), markers of early contrast washin that can predict tumor grade and potential aggressiveness are of clinical interest. PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of using the initial enhancement ratio (IER) as a surrogate marker for tumor grade, hormone receptor status, and prognostic markers, as an initial step to being incorporated into AB-MRI. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: In all, 162 women (mean 55.0 years, range 32.8-87.7 years) with 187 malignancies imaged January 2012-November 2015. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Images were acquired at 3.0T with a T1 -weighted gradient echo fat-suppressed-volume interpolated breath-hold sequence. ASSESSMENT: Subjects underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI with a 7-channel breast coil. IER (% signal increase over baseline at the first postcontrast acquisition) was assessed and correlated with background parenchymal enhancement, washout curves, stage, and final pathology. STATISTICAL TESTS: Chi-square test, Spearman rank correlation, Mann-Whitney U-tests, Bland-Altman analysis, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: IER was higher for invasive cancer than for DCIS (R1/R2, P < 0.001). IER increased with tumor grade (R1: r = 0.56, P < 0.001, R2: r = 0.50, P < 0.001), as ki-67 increased (R1: r = 0.35, P < 0.001; R2 r = 0.35, P < 0.001), and for node-positive disease (R1/R2, P = 0.001). IER was higher for human epidermal growth factor receptor two-positive and triple negative cancers than for estrogen receptor-positive / progesterone receptor-positive tumors (R1 P < 0.001-0.002; R2 P = 0.0.001-0.011). IER had higher sensitivity (80.6% vs. 75.5%) and specificity (55.8% vs. 48.1%) than washout curves for positive nodes, higher specificity (48.1% vs. 36.5%) and positive predictive value (70.2% vs. 66.7%) for high ki-67, and excellent interobserver agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.82). DATA CONCLUSION: IER, a measurement of early contrast washin, is associated with higher-grade malignancies and tumor aggressiveness and might be potentially incorporated into an AB-MRI protocol. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017.

BACKGROUND: Potential clinical implications of the level of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on breast MRI are increasing. Currently, BPE is typically evaluated subjectively. Tests of concordance between subjective BPE assessment and computer-assisted quantified BPE have not been reported. PURPOSE OR HYPOTHESIS: To compare subjective radiologist assessment of BPE with objective quantified parenchymal enhancement (QPE). STUDY TYPE: Cross-sectional observational study. POPULATION: Between 7/24/2015 and 11/27/2015, 104 sequential patients (ages 23 - 81 years, mean 49 years) without breast cancer underwent breast MRI and were included in this study. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T; fat suppressed axial T2, axial T1, and axial fat suppressed T1 before and after intravenous contrast. ASSESSMENT: Four breast imagers graded BPE at 90 and 180 s after contrast injection on a 4-point scale (a-d). Fibroglandular tissue masks were generated using a phantom-validated segmentation algorithm, and were co-registered to pre- and postcontrast fat suppressed images to define the region of interest. QPE was calculated. STATISTICAL TESTS: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses and kappa coefficients (k) were used to compare subjective BPE with QPE. RESULTS: ROC analyses indicated that subjective BPE at 90 s was best predicted by quantified QPE 50.0 = d, and at 180 s by quantified QPE 74.5 = d. Agreement between subjective BPE and QPE was slight to fair at 90 s (k = 0.20-0.36) and 180 s (k = 0.19-0.28). At higher levels of QPE, agreement between subjective BPE and QPE significantly decreased for all four radiologists at 90 s (P