Faculty Bibliography

The purpose of this study was to determine whether 2 speech measures (peak intraoral air pressure [IOP] and IOP duration) obtained during the production of intervocalic stops would be altered as a function of the presence or absence of auditory stimulation provided by a cochlear implant (CI). Five pediatric CI users were required to produce repetitions of the words puppy and baby with their CIs turned on. The CIs were then turned off for 1 hr, at which time the speech sample was repeated with the CI still turned off. Seven children with normal hearing formed a comparison group. They were also tested twice, with a 1-hr intermediate interval. IOP and IOP duration were measured for the medial consonant in both auditory conditions. The results show that auditory condition affected peak IOP more so than IOP duration. Peak IOP was greater for /p/ than /b/ with the CI off, but some participants reduced or reversed this contrast when the CI was on. The findings suggest that different speakers with CIs may use different speech production strategies as they learn to use the auditory signal for speech

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits of cochlear implantation in infancy and compare them to those obtained in children implanted at a slightly older age. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using standard language measurement tools, including the Grammatical Analysis of Elicited Language--Presentence Level (GAEL-P) and the Reynell Developmental Language Scales, progress was documented in a child who received a cochlear implant in infancy and compared to that achieved in children implanted at older ages. A new measurement tool, the Visual Habituation Procedure, was used to document early skills and the results were compared to those obtained in normal-hearing infants. RESULTS: By the age of 2 years the subject implanted in infancy achieved scores on the GAEL-P which were nearly equivalent to those achieved at the age of 5 1/2 years by children implanted at later ages. Age-equivalent scores on the Reynell Developmental Language Scales were achieved by the subject implanted in infancy and the ability to discriminate speech patterns was demonstrated using the Visual Habituation Procedure. CONCLUSION: This report demonstrates enhanced language development in an infant who received a cochlear implant at the age of 6 months

The goal of this study was to test 2 hypotheses about language development in pediatric cochlear implant (CI) users. The 'language instinct' hypothesis states that children with CIs will develop language in the same sequence as children with normal hearing, but in a delayed fashion. In other words, noun plurals will develop first, and the use of the uncontractible copula and regular past tense will follow. An alternative hypothesis (the 'perceptual prominence' hypothesis) is that the pattern of language development in CI users will be strongly affected by the perceptual prominence of the relevant morphological markers. This hypothesis predicts that the uncontractible copula will develop first, followed by noun plurals, and then by regular past tense. A sentence completion task was used to measure the performance of 9 pediatric CI users and compare it to that of several groups of children with normal hearing. The results from the CI users were consistent with the perceptual prominence hypothesis. In particular, the scores for the copula probe were higher than those for the noun plural probe for 8 of the 9 CI users. This result represents a rather striking inversion with respect to the usual development pattern in children with normal hearing and even in children with specific language impairment. If the perceptual prominence hypothesis receives further support in future studies, clinicians who work in language rehabilitation of CI users may choose to target those aspects of grammar that are less acoustically prominent to these children. In addition, and from a theoretical standpoint, these results suggest that although there may well be an innate language acquisition mechanism, patterns of language development can be strongly affected by the acoustic input. $$:

A method is presented for analyzing cochlear implant stimulations and typical representations used in simulations. Filtered "white-noise" bands are modulated using sinusoids, representing differing stimulation channels. These representations, along with their corresponding envelopes, are used to generate neural activation patterns (NAPs), which represent "normal-hearing" responses in the auditory nerve to these stimuli. Additionally, NAPs are generated to represent the neural activity induced by cochlear implant stimulation strategies, assuming exponential rolloff from the electrodes. The mean squared error is measured between NAPs both directly, and after compensation for perceptual resolution. Results suggest that the noise-band approximation of the CIS implant signal actually has more in common with the original source than with the implant stimulation patterns.

Children with profound congenital or prelingual deafness encounter significant difficulties in the development of skills in an oral language such as English. Their language development, however, can be accelerated if they receive a cochlear implant-a sensory aid that facilitates language acquisition by providing important auditory information. The present study used the Reynell Developmental Language Scales (RDLS) to assess language skills pre- and postimplant in 44 pediatric cochlear implant users. All users were profoundly to totally deaf, either at birth or before the age of 3 years. They all received cochlear implants before the age of 6 and were programmed with state-of-the-art stimulation strategies (CIS or SPEAK) since the day of initial stimulation. The main finding was that postimplantation language development proceeded at a pace that was not significantly different from normal. Thus, the language gap present at implantation did not increase after children started using the device, as it would if they had not received cochlear implants. Nevertheless, it is important to conduct further studies to determine whether these conclusions apply when other language skills, such as the use of grammar, are measured