Faculty Bibliography

Sexual dysfunction after female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is poorly characterized, limiting targeted clinical intervention. In a concentrated FGM/C referral population, we aimed to characterize patterns of sexual dysfunction and evaluate associations with organ-specific genital anatomy, trauma history, and psychiatric comorbidities among women with FGM/C. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of adults with FGM/C evaluated between 2014 and 2025 in an obstetrics and gynecology clinic specializing in sexual trauma. Using standardized abstraction tools, we obtained sexual symptoms, genital examination findings, demographics, and trauma-related and psychiatric variables from the electronic medical record. Associations between these variables and three primary outcomes (loss of libido, loss of sexual pleasure, dyspareunia) were assessed using univariate logistic regression. A composite arousal-pleasure dysfunction outcome was evaluated in secondary analyses adjusted for age and organ-specific genital anatomy. Among 135 women with FGM/C, approximately two-thirds reported sexual dysfunction, most commonly dyspareunia (45.9%), loss of sexual pleasure (28.9%), and loss of libido (25.9%). Absence or attenuation of the clitoris, labia minora, or labia majora was not associated with these outcomes. In contrast, depression (odds ratio [OR] 2.80), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (OR 3.86), and intact memory of the FGM/C event (OR 2.82) were associated with loss of libido. Depression was also associated with loss of sexual pleasure (OR 4.67). After adjustment for age and genital anatomy, depression (adjusted OR 3.87) and PTSD (adjusted OR 3.67) remained associated with composite arousal-pleasure dysfunction. In this well-documented cohort with FGM/C, sexual dysfunction was more closely associated with trauma-related and psychiatric factors than with genital tissue loss. These findings support prioritizing mental health and trauma-focused interventions for sexual health after FGM/C and underscore the need for prospective multicenter studies.

OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:To evaluate prevalence of sugar dating among undergraduate students and assess the demographics and motivations of sugar babies. PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This study included 1582 undergraduate students 18 years or older in an urban, private university in the U.S. (82 sugar participants and 1500 controls). METHODS/UNASSIGNED:From October 2019 to May 2020, a cross-sectional, online survey asked participants about sugar dating experiences, substance use history, and childhood traumas. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Prevalence of sugar dating was 5.2%. Sugar babies were 2 to 5 times more likely to have experienced childhood trauma defined by the 10 item ACE questionnaire. Sugar babies were more likely to have financial support (loans, scholarships, Federal Pell grants, work-study), use illegal drugs, and have greater daily alcohol consumption. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Many sugar babies have experienced vulnerabilities (financial need, childhood traumas) that could heighten their risk of exploitation by sugar sponsors. Future studies should explore the dynamics of sugar relationships among undergraduate students and the risks accompanying these relationships.

Limited data indicates that homelessness during pregnancy is linked to adverse outcomes for both mothers and newborns, but there is an information gap surrounding pregnant individuals struggling with homelessness. In a landscape of increasing healthcare disparities, housing shortages and maternal mortality, information on this vulnerable population is fundamental to the creation of targeted interventions and outreach. The current study investigates homelessness as a risk factor for adverse obstetrical, neonatal, and postpartum outcomes. We reviewed more than 1000 deliveries over 1 year at a large public hospital in New York City, comparing homeless subjects to a group of age-matched, stably housed controls. Multiple outcomes were assessed regarding obstetrical, neonatal, and postpartum outcomes along with social stressors. Homeless pregnant individuals were more likely to experience numerous adverse outcomes, including cesarean delivery and preterm delivery. Their neonates were more likely to undergo an extended stay in the intensive care unit and evaluation by the Administration for Children's Services, suggesting that they may be at an increased risk for family separation. After delivery, patients were less likely to exclusively breastfeed or return for their postpartum visit. Regarding personal history, they were more likely to endorse a history of violence or abuse, use illicit substances, and carry a psychiatric diagnosis. These findings indicate that homelessness is linked to numerous adverse obstetrical, neonatal, and postpartum outcomes that worsen health indices and exacerbate pre-existing disparities. Initiatives must focus on improved outreach and care delivery for homeless pregnant individuals.

Human trafficking occurs in a cycle of coercion and exploitation of vulnerable people; yet, little is known about those who are trafficked more than one time (re-trafficked). Our study sought to describe the trafficking experiences and explore vulnerabilities to re-trafficking in an urban, majority immigrant, population. This study is part of a parent cohort study that enrolls patients at the EMPOWER Center in New York City, which provides trauma-informed obstetric and gynecologic services to victims of sexual- and gender-based violence. Retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with a history of sex trafficking who were evaluated at the EMPOWER Center from February 2013 to January 2021. A total of 87 patients were enrolled in this study, 23 (26.4%) of whom had been re-trafficked. All were women. Most (88.5%) were victims of international trafficking, most often from Mexico or the Caribbean/Central America. Nine (10.3%) reported contraceptive use and six (6.9%) experienced forced substance use while trafficked. The most reported barriers that women faced in escaping trafficking were threat of violence (28.7%) and financial dependence (19.5%). Re-trafficked patients were more likely to have a history of being undocumented (odds ratio [OR] = 5.29; 95% confidence intervals [CI] [1.34, 20.94]) and experienced childhood sexual abuse (OR = 2.99; 95% CI [1.10, 8.16]), experienced childhood physical abuse (OR = 3.33; 95% CI [1.18, 9.39]), and lived with a non-parent family member (OR = 6.56; 95% CI [1.71, 25.23]). Although these vulnerabilities were no longer significant when analyzed in a parsimonious multivariate logistic regression model adjusting for the other significant variables, likely due to the limited sample size. Almost half (46.0%) reported ongoing emotional effects from being trafficked, which did not vary by re-trafficking status. Our study highlights potential pre-trafficking vulnerabilities, illustrates the complexity of the trafficking experience, and presents potential risk factors for being re-trafficked.

The purpose of this narrative review is to elucidate the ways the clinicians working on forensic medical evaluations can engage with asylum proceedings. We compare the legal and medical perspectives on different aspects of forensic medical evidence, asylum evaluations, and asylum applications. As asylum seekers must demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution in order to receive asylee status, legal and medical professionals often need to collaborate in asylum cases. Although significant evidence has demonstrated that an objective expert medical opinion can support asylum claims, few studies have analyzed how the medical professional's role complements or is at odds with the goals of the legal system. This review summarizes and compares key aspects of the medical and legal perspectives on trauma, credibility, autobiographical memory, and medical evidence to better comprehend the role that medical professionals can play in writing medical affidavits for asylum applications. We dissect legal misconceptions surrounding trauma and the consequences of such misunderstandings and make recommendations for medical evaluators who are working in a forensic capacity.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Although many screening tools, resources, and programs for identifying victims of human trafficking exist, consensus is lacking on which tools are most useful, which have been validated, and whether they are effective. The objectives of this study were to determine what tools exist to identify or screen for victims of human trafficking in health care settings and whether these tools have been validated. METHOD/UNASSIGNED:We conducted a scoping review of the literature on human trafficking identification in health care settings following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) protocol for scoping reviews. We searched the MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Embase, and Scopus databases without language or date limitations. Two independent reviewers screened each citation. We included human research studies in English with populations of all ages, all genders, all geographic locations, and using quantitative and/or qualitative research methods. We excluded studies that were not conducted in a health care setting, review articles, and meta-analyses. We summarized additional screening tools available online and identified through hand-searching. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Database searches yielded 8730 studies, of which 4806 remained after removing duplicates. We excluded 4720 articles based on title/abstract review, we reviewed 85 full-text studies for eligibility, and we included 8 articles. Hand-searching revealed 9 additional screening tools not found in the literature. Through our search for validated screening tools, only 6 had been studied for validation in health care settings. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Few studies have evaluated screening tools for identifying victims of human trafficking in health care settings. The absence of a gold standard for human trafficking screening and lack of consensus on the definition of human trafficking make screening tool validation difficult. Further research is required for the development of safe, effective approaches to patient screening.

Female Genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is associated with enduring psychiatric complications. In this study, we investigate the rates of co-morbid abuses and polyvictimization experienced by survivors of FGM/C. This is a sub-analysis of a cohort study examining the patient population at the EMPOWER Center for Survivors of Sex Trafficking and Sexual Violence in New York City. A retrospective chart-review of electronic medical records was conducted for all consenting adult patients who had FGM/C and had an intake visit between January 16, 2014 and March 6, 2020. Of the 80 participants, ages ranged from 20 to 62 years with a mean of 37.4 (SD = 9.1) years. In addition to FGM/C, participants were victims of physical abuse (43; 53.8%), emotional abuse (35; 43.8%), sexual abuse (35; 43.8%), forced marriage (20; 25%), child marriage (13; 16.3%), and sex trafficking (1; 1.4%). There was a high degree of polyvictimization, with 41 (51.2%) experiencing 3 or more of the aforementioned abuses. Having FGM/C on or after age 13 or having a higher total abuse score was also found to be strong predictors of depression and PTSD. The high rates of polyvictimization among survivors of FGM/C are associated with development of depression and PTSD. Despite co-morbid abuses, patients still attribute substantial psychiatric symptoms to their FGM/C. Health care providers should understand the high risk of polyvictimization when caring for this patient population.

Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) affects millions of girls and women globally each year despite widespread criminalization of the practice. Eradication efforts have focused on the health risks associated with FGM/C however, it is important to understand the sociocultural context in which this practice exists. We conducted a cross-sectional study using retrospective chart review and structured interviews with women recruited through the Bellevue/New York University Program for Survivors of Torture. Of the 43 participants enrolled in the study, 88.4% initially indicated there is no benefit of undergoing FGM/C but when prompted, agreed that social acceptance (16.3%), religious approval (11.6%), and better marriage prospects (9.3%) are possible benefits. More sexual pleasure for the women (46.5%), avoiding pain (30.2%), and fewer medical problems (16.3%) were stated as benefits of not undergoing FGM/C. Overall, 40 (93%) participants believed the practice should be discontinued. This study highlights that there may be a perception of social benefit of undergoing FGM/C. Although most participants believed the practice should be discontinued, the complex social milieu within which this practice exists must be addressed.