Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The fractional curve is the curve below the major curve of a lumbar or thoracolumbar scoliosis, and while it is often the primary driver of the adult spinal deformity patient's decision to proceed with surgery, a treatment strategy to identify and address the fractional curve is not widely examined. There is a paucity of data evaluating the ideal strategy to correct the lumbosacral fractional curve in ASD surgery. PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the impact of interbody fusion at L4-L5 and/or L5-S1 compared with posterior fusion alone on fractional curve correction, and rate of instrumentation related complications at the lumbosacral junction. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of prospectively collected single center database. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 592 ASD patients (Age: 48 +/- 23 y; mFI:.4 +/-.7; Levels fused: 10.3 +/- 4.1). OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes evaluated were fractional curve correction, overall deformity correction and rates of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis or rod fracture at the lumbosacral junction.
METHOD(S): A total of 592 ASD patients (Age: 48 +/- 23 y; mFI:.4 +/-.7; Levels fused: 10.3 +/- 4.1), lumbosacral fractional curve > 10degree, mean followup 39.5 months, were divided into 2 groups: PSF alone (PSF, n=382) and interbody fusion (IBF, n=210; ALIF: 31, TLIF: 179). Outcomes evaluated were fractional curve correction, overall deformity correction and rates of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis or rod fracture at the lumbosacral junction.
RESULT(S): A significantly greater number of patients in the IB cohort had underlying osteoporosis (63% versus 33%, p < 0.001); otherwise, there were no significant difference in patient comorbidities. There was significantly greater EBL (2.3 L vs. 1.3 L, p < 0.0001), intraoperative pRBCs transfused (2.3 U vs. 1.3 U, p < 0.001), and longer operative time (7.1 vs. 6.3 hours, p < 0.0001) in the IBF group compared with PSF. Both groups had similar magnitude of fractional curve correction (7.0 +/-7.1degree in IB vs. 6.3 +/- 6.9degree in PSF, p=0.26) and final coronal alignment (23.5 mm vs. 19.8 mm, p=0.08). Patients in the IBF group had a higher magnitude of SVA change (-30.6 mm vs -19.5 mm, p < 0.05) and increase in lumbar lordosis (11.5degree vs 5.6degree, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of revision surgery at minimum 2-year followup for rod fracture, pseudarthrosis, or any instrumentation related complication. Sub-analysis demonstrated that there were no significant differences in magnitude of fractional curve correction, or improvement in lumbar lordosis, coronal, or sagittal alignment in the ALIF group compared to the TLIF group. There was no significant impact of number of levels at which a lumbar interbody fusion was performed on the degree of fractional curve correction.
CONCLUSION(S): At minimum 2-year followup, patients had comparable fractional curve and coronal alignment correction when treated with interbody fusion at L4-S1 versus posterior fusion alone. There was no difference in rod fracture and pseudarthrosis rates at 2-year followup. These data suggest that utilization of interbody technique at the lumbosacral junction is not clearly superior to posterior fusion alone for treatment of the fractional curve. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Patients with coronal malalignment with trunk shift toward the convexity of the main coronal curve, and oblique takeoff at the lumbosacral junction, present a unique problem for deformity correction. PURPOSE: To evaluate fractional curve and coronal malalignment correction, and rate of complications and unplanned revision in Bao Type C patients, compared to Bao Type A and B patients. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of prospectively collected singlecenter database. PATIENT SAMPLE: This study included 1039 ASD patients (age: 46 +/- 23 y; mFI:.4 +/-.7; levels fused: 10.0 +/- 4.2). OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes evaluated were coronal alignment and fractional curve correction, and rates of revision surgery at two-year follow-up.
METHOD(S): A total of 1039 adult spinal deformity patients (age: 46 +/- 23 y; mFI:.4 +/-.7; levels fused: 10.0 +/- 4.2), with minimum five levels fused for thoracolumbar scoliosis were divided into three groups, as proposed by Bao et al: type A: CSVL 3cm and C7 plumb shifted to scoliosis' concavity (n=126); type C: CSVL > 3cm and C7 plumb shifted to scoliosis' convexity (n=30). Outcomes evaluated were coronal alignment and fractional curve correction, and rates of revision surgery at two-year follow-up.
RESULT(S): Type C patients more often had fractional curves, and the preoperative magnitude was significantly greater (15.7degree Type C, 12.9degree Type B, 9.6degree Type A, p <0.0001). Of the Type C patients, 50% had pedicle subtraction osteotomy performed, compared with 13.4% Type B, and 13.4% Type A (p <0.0001). Postoperatively, Type C patients continued to have persistently greater fractional curves (7.4degree Type C, 6.7degree Type B, 5.6degree Type A, p=0.026), and worse coronal malalignment (37.8 mm Type C, 34.1 mm Type B, 17.0 mm type A, p<0.0001), though equivalent results with regards to improvement in sagittal alignment, lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, and Cobb angle of the major curve. There rate of neurologic complications was higher in the Type C patients, specifically related to TLIF or PSO procedure performed. ALIF procedure in the Type C patients did not confer significant improvement in fractional curve correction, coronal or sagittal alignment correction, or greater lumbar lordosis, compared with TLIF procedure in these patients. There was no difference in the rate of 90-day unplanned readmission or reoperation between the groups. There was no difference in rates of rod fracture or pseudarthrosis at the interbody or PSO site in Type C patients, compared with Type A and B patients. There was no difference in rates or rod fracture, pseudarthrosis, adjacent segment disease, proximal junctional kyphosis, or reoperation for recurrent or persistent malalignment between the two groups at two-year follow-up.
CONCLUSION(S): At two-year follow-up, Type C coronal malalignment patients continue to have worse coronal deformity and fractional curve magnitude compared with Type A and B patients, with no difference, however, in long-term rod fracture, pseudarthrosis or revision surgery rates. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: It has been shown that smoking is associated with delayed fusion and pseudarthrosis after spine surgery. The impact of smoking on both short- and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing spine surgery has been described. There are limited data on the impact of smoking status on outcomes after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. We sought to analyze a large cohort of in a single center, to add more to our understanding of the effect of smoking both on mortality and postoperative complications. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of smoking on 90-day complications after ASD surgery as well as pseudarthrosis and unplanned revision at long term follow up. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of prospectively collected database. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 1,013 ASD patients (Age: 46 +/-23 years; mFI: 0.44 +/- 0.70; levels fused: 10.1 +/- 4.2). OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures studied included perioperative complications, and long-term revision surgery rates.
METHOD(S): A total of 1,013 ASD patients (Age: 46 +/-23 ye ars; mFI: 0.44 +/- 0.70; levels fused: 10.1 +/- 4.2) were stratified based on smoking status into three groups. Current smokers group (n = 72) included all patients who were active smokers and those who quit smoking within 4 weeks of surgery. Former smokers group (n = 265) included all patients who quit smoking more than 4 weeks before surgery. Nonsmokers (n = 676) included all patients who had never smoked in their lives before surgery. Outcome measures studied included perioperative complications and long-term revision surgery rates.
RESULT(S): With regards to early complications, the readmission rate at 90 days was significantly higher in the current (12.7%) and former smokers (12.0%), compared with nonsmokers (6.1%) (p=0.007). There was a significantly higher rate of postoperative epidural hematoma in smokers (5%), compared to former and nonsmokers (0%) (p<0.001). There was a higher rate of postoperative pneumonia in smokers (4.5%) compared to former smokers (1.4%) and nonsmokers (0.07%) (p=0.038). There was no significant difference in length of stay between the groups. At minimum one-year follow up, there was a significantly higher rate of pseudarthrosis (smokers: 15.6%, former: 6.7%, non: 4.5%, p=0.041) with no significant difference in rate of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis. Smokers had a significantly higher rate of neurologic complications (29% vs 18.5%, p=0.001) compared to nonsmokers. Smokers who did not experience any resolution of the neurologic injury had greater pack year history (28.5 +/-22) versus smokers who experienced complete resolution (21.2 +/- 39.3) (p=0.02).
CONCLUSION(S): Smoking is associated with higher 90-day readmission rate, and higher rates of epidural hematoma, neurologic complication and postoperative pneumonia after ASD surgery. At one year, smokers have a higher rate of pseudarthrosis, and those with greater pack year history were less likely to experience resolution of the neurologic injury sustained at the index surgery. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Copyright

BACKGROUND:Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery can entail complex reconstructive procedures. It is unclear whether there is any effect of case start time on outcomes. We sought to evaluate the effects of case start time and day of the week on 90-day complication, readmission, and revision rates after ASD surgery. METHODS:This is a retrospective study of 1040 ASD patients from a single institution. We collected start times and day of the week for cases from 2011 to 2018. Early start was designated as any case starting either before or at 7:30 am or between 7:30 and 11 am; late start was designated as any case starting at 11 am or later. Outcome measures include 90-day complication, revision, and readmission rates. RESULTS:= 0.046). CONCLUSIONS:A late OR start time was predictive of increased risk for neurologic complication, 90-day readmission, and unplanned reoperation. The well-established protocols for first start OR times for elective ASD surgery may decrease outcome risk and reduce variability in complication rates. CLINICAL RELEVANCE/CONCLUSIONS:Understanding the impact of start time on outcomes and complications after ASD surgery is helpful for surgeons in preoperative planning and for institutions and hospitals' allocation of operating room staff and resources. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:3.

BACKGROUND:Interbody fusion at the caudal levels of long constructs for adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery is used to promote fusion and secure a solid foundation for maintenance of deformity correction. We sought to evaluate long-term pseudarthrosis, rod fracture, and revision rates for TLIF performed at the base of a long construct for ASD. METHODS:We reviewed 316 patients who underwent TLIF as a component of ASD surgery for medical comorbidities, surgical characteristics, and rate of unplanned reoperation for pseudarthrosis or instrumentation failure at the TLIF level. Fusion grading was assessed after revision surgery for pseudarthrosis at the TLIF level. RESULTS:Rate of pseudarthrosis at the TLIF level was 9.8% (31/316), and rate of rod fractures was 7.9% (25/316). The rate of revision surgery at the TLIF level was 8.9% (28/316), and surgery was performed at a mean of 20.4 ± 16 months from the index procedure. Current smoking status (odds ratio 3.34, P = 0.037) was predictive of pseudarthrosis at the TLIF site. At a mean follow-up of 43 ± 12 months after revision surgery, all patients had achieved bony union at the TLIF site. CONCLUSIONS:At 3-year follow-up, the rate of pseudarthrosis after TLIF performed at the base of a long fusion for ASD was 9.8%, and the rate of revision surgery to address pseudarthrosis and/or rod fracture was 8.9%. All patients were successfully treated with revision interbody fusion or posterior augmentation of the fusion mass, without need for further revision procedures at the TLIF level.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective review of a single-center spine database. OBJECTIVE:Investigate the intersections of chronological age and physiological age via frailty to determine the influence of surgical invasiveness on patient outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Frailty is a well-established factor in preoperative risk stratification and prediction of postoperative outcomes. The surgical profile of operative adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients who present as elderly and not frail has yet to be investigated. Our aim was to examine the surgical profile and outcomes of ASD patients who were not frail and elderly. METHODS:Included: ASD patients≥18 years old, ≥4 levels fused, with baseline(BL) and follow up data. Patients were categorized by ASD frailty index: Not Frail[NF], Frail[F], Severely Frail [SF]. An elderly patient was defined as ≥70 years. Patients were grouped into NF/elderly and F/elderly. SRS-Schwab modifiers were assessed at baseline and 1-year(0, +, ++). Logistic regression analysis assessed the relationship between increasing invasiveness, no reoperations, or major complications, and improvement in SRS-Schwab modifiers[Good Outcome]. Decision tree analysis assessed thresholds for an invasiveness risk/benefit cutoff point. RESULTS:598 ASD pts included(55.3yrs, 59.7%F, 28.3 kg/m2). 29.8% of patients were above age 70. At baseline, 51.3% of patients were NF, 37.5% F, and 11.2% SF. 66(11%) of patients were NF and elderly. 24.2% of NF-Elderly patients improved in SRS-Schwab by 1-year and had no reoperation or complication postoperatively. Binary regression analysis found a relationship between worsening SRS-Schwab, postop complication, and reoperation with invasiveness score(OR: 1.056[1.013-1.102], p = 0.011). Risk/benefit cut-off was 10(p = 0.004). Patients below this threshold were 7.9[2.2-28.4] times more likely to have a Good Outcome. 156 patients were elderly and F/SF with 16.7% having Good Outcome, with a risk/benefit cut-off point of <8 (4.4[2.2-9.0], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Frailty status impacted the balance of surgical invasiveness relative to operative risk in an inverse manner, while the opposite was seen amongst elderly patients with a frailty status less than their chronologic age. Surgeons should perhaps consider incorporation of frailty status over age status when determining realignment plans in patients of advanced age.Level of Evidence: ???

OBJECTIVE:The goal of this study was to reliably predict sagittal and coronal spinal alignment with clinical photographs by using markers placed at easily localized anatomical landmarks. METHODS:A consecutive series of patients with adult spinal deformity were enrolled from a single center. Full-length standing radiographs were obtained at the baseline visit. Clinical photographs were taken with reflective markers placed overlying C2, S1, the greater trochanter, and each posterior-superior iliac spine. Sagittal radiographic parameters were C2 pelvic angle (CPA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), and pelvic tilt. Coronal radiographic parameters were pelvic obliquity and T1 coronal tilt. Linear regressions were performed to evaluate the relationship between radiographic parameters and their photographic "equivalents." The data were reanalyzed after stratifying the cohort into low-body mass index (BMI) (< 30) and high-BMI (≥ 30) groups. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was assessed for clinical measures via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS:A total of 38 patients were enrolled (mean age 61 years, mean BMI 27.4 kg/m2, 63% female). All regression models were significant, but sagittal parameters were more closely correlated to photographic parameters than coronal measurements. TPA and CPA had the strongest associations with their photographic equivalents (both r2 = 0.59, p < 0.001). Radiographic and clinical parameters tended to be more strongly correlated in the low-BMI group. Clinical measures of TPA and CPA had high intraobserver reliability (all ICC > 0.99, p < 0.001) and interobserver reliability (both ICC > 0.99, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:The photographic measures of spinal deformity developed in this study were highly correlated with their radiographic counterparts and had high inter- and intraobserver reliability. Clinical photography can not only reduce radiation exposure in patients with adult spinal deformity, but also be used to assess deformity when full-spine radiographs are unavailable.

OBJECTIVE:Although short-term adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis (ASLS) studies favor operative over nonoperative treatment, longer outcomes are critical for assessment of treatment durability, especially for operative treatment, because the majority of implant failures and nonunions present between 2 and 5 years after surgery. The objectives of this study were to assess the durability of treatment outcomes for operative versus nonoperative treatment of ASLS, to report the rates and types of associated serious adverse events (SAEs), and to determine the potential impact of treatment-related SAEs on outcomes. METHODS:The ASLS-1 (Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis-1) trial is an NIH-sponsored multicenter prospective study to assess operative versus nonoperative ASLS treatment. Patients were 40-80 years of age and had ASLS (Cobb angle ≥ 30° and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] ≥ 20 or Scoliosis Research Society [SRS]-22 subscore ≤ 4.0 in the Pain, Function, and/or Self-Image domains). Patients receiving operative and nonoperative treatment were compared using as-treated analysis, and the impact of related SAEs was assessed. Primary outcome measures were ODI and SRS-22. RESULTS:The 286 patients with ASLS (107 with nonoperative treatment, 179 with operative treatment) had 2-year and 5-year follow-up rates of 90% (n = 256) and 74% (n = 211), respectively. At 5 years, compared with patients treated nonoperatively, those who underwent surgery had greater improvement in ODI (mean difference -15.2 [95% CI -18.7 to -11.7]) and SRS-22 subscore (mean difference 0.63 [95% CI 0.48-0.78]) (p < 0.001), with treatment effects (TEs) exceeding the minimum detectable measurement difference (MDMD) for ODI (7) and SRS-22 subscore (0.4). TEs at 5 years remained as favorable as 2-year TEs (ODI -13.9, SRS-22 0.52). For patients in the operative group, the incidence rates of treatment-related SAEs during the first 2 years and 2-5 years after surgery were 22.38 and 8.17 per 100 person-years, respectively. At 5 years, patients in the operative group who had 1 treatment-related SAE still had significantly greater improvement, with TEs (ODI -12.2, SRS-22 0.53; p < 0.001) exceeding the MDMD. Twelve patients who received surgery and who had 2 or more treatment-related SAEs had greater improvement than nonsurgically treated patients based on ODI (TE -8.34, p = 0.017) and SRS-22 (TE 0.32, p = 0.029), but the SRS-22 TE did not exceed the MDMD. CONCLUSIONS:The significantly greater improvement of operative versus nonoperative treatment for ASLS at 2 years was durably maintained at the 5-year follow-up. Patients in the operative cohort with a treatment-related SAE still had greater improvement than patients in the nonoperative cohort. These findings have important implications for patient counseling and future cost-effectiveness assessments.

BACKGROUND:Data on timing of complications are important for accurate quality assessments. We sought to better define pre- and postdischarge complications occurring within 90 days of adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery and quantify the effect of multiple complications on recovery. METHODS:We performed a review of 1040 patients who underwent ASD surgery (age: 46 ± 23; body mass index: 25 ± 7, American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score: 2.5 ± 0.6, levels: 10 ± 4, revision: 9%, 3-column osteotomy: 13%). We assessed pre- and postdischarge complications and risk factors for isolated versus multiple complications, as well as the impact of multiple complications. RESULTS:= .02). Patients who developed multiple complications (9.3%) had a longer length of stay, and increased risk for readmission and unplanned reoperation. CONCLUSIONS:Knowledge regarding timing of postoperative complications in relation to discharge may better inform quality improvement measures. PE and implant-related complications play a prominent role in perioperative complications and need for readmission, with several modifiable risk factors identified. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level 3. CLINICAL RELEVANCE/CONCLUSIONS:Advances in surgical techniques and instrumentation have improved postoperative radiographic and clinical outcomes after ASD surgery. The rate of complications after complex ASD surgery remains high, both at early postoperative and long term follow-up. This study reviews complications within 90 days of surgery, with an assessment of patient and surgical risk factors. We found that modifiable risk factors for early complications after ASD surgery include COPD, and current smoking. The data presented in this study also provide surgeons with knowledge of the most common complications encountered after ASD surgery, to aid in preoperative patient discussion.

BACKGROUND:Adult sagittal spinal deformity (SSD) leads to the recruitment of compensatory mechanisms to maintain standing balance. After regional spinal compensation is exhausted, lower extremity compensation is recruited. Knee flexion, ankle flexion, and sacrofemoral angle increase to drive pelvic shift posterior and increase pelvic tilt. We aim to describe 2 summary angles termed ankle-pelvic angle (APA) and global lower extremity angle (GLA) that incorporate all aspects of lower extremity and pelvic compensation in a comprehensive measurement that can simplify radiographic analysis. METHODS:Full-body sagittal stereotactic radiographs were retrospectively collected and digitally analyzed. Spinal and lower extremity alignment were quantified with existing measures. Two angles-APA and GLA-were drawn as geometrically complementary angles to T1-pelvic angle (TPA) and global sagittal axis (GSA), respectively. Regression analysis was used to represent the predictive relationship between TPA and APA and between GSA and GLA. RESULTS:= .005). CONCLUSIONS:TPA and GSA are measures of global spinal alignment and APA and GLA, respectively, and are geometrically complementary angles that vary proportionately to SSD and balance the body. APA and GLA increase in SSD patients with lower extremity compensation and decrease with corrective surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:4. CLINICAL RELEVANCE/CONCLUSIONS:APA and GLA offer a concise and simple method of communicating pelvic and lower extremity compensation.