Faculty Bibliography

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective prevention strategy, yet awareness, knowledge, and willingness to use it among people who inject drugs (PWID) remains inadequate despite widespread eligibility. Stigma, particularly HIV-stigmatizing beliefs and attitudes, may be a key barrier to engagement at early stages of the PrEP care continuum. We examine how HIV-stigmatizing beliefs and attitudes affect PrEP awareness, knowledge, and willingness among PWID. We surveyed 262 HIV-negative PWID in Los Angeles and Denver (2021-2023) and used structural equation modeling to examine associations between HIV-stigmatizing beliefs and attitudes (11-item validated scale with α = 0.899 and 1-factor structure) and three early PrEP outcomes: awareness, knowledge, and willingness, while controlling for race/ethnicity, gender, housing status, and conducted sub-analyses on willingness to use long-acting injectable PrEP. HIV-stigmatizing beliefs and attitudes were significantly associated with lower PrEP awareness (β - 0.212, p < 0.001) and less accurate knowledge (β - 0.179, p = 0.006). Accurate knowledge was associated with greater willingness to use PrEP (β 0.175, p = 0.027). Black, Indigenous, and Other Persons of Color (BIPOC) participants reported higher HIV-stigmatizing beliefs and attitudes than non-Hispanic White participants (β 0.196, p = 0.003). Over half (56%) of participants were willing to take daily oral PrEP once informed, and many were interested in long-acting injectable PrEP. HIV-stigmatizing beliefs and attitudes are associated with lower PrEP care continuum engagement among PWID, particularly through limiting awareness and understanding of PrEP. BIPOC participants reported higher levels of stigmatizing attitudes, suggesting that broader structural and intersectional stigma may shape PrEP engagement, consistent with prior research. Interventions to increase PrEP uptake should address both individual- and structural-level stigma and consider leveraging peer networks and community supports to foster resilience and improve equitable access to HIV prevention tools.

Stigma in healthcare settings is a critical barrier to HIV prevention and treatment among people who inject drugs (PWID). While previous tools have measured anticipated stigma, few account for the intersectional and provider-specific experiences of PWID-particularly from syringe service programs (SSPs). We developed and validated the Substance Use Anticipated Provider Stigma Scale (SU-APSS), a multidimensional instrument assessing anticipated stigma from four provider types: healthcare workers, substance use treatment staff, pharmacists, and SSP personnel. Data were drawn from a cross-sectional survey of 264 PWID who were 18 or older, HIV-negative, had injected drugs and used opioids within the past 30 days, and showed visible signs of recent injection. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on responses from 218 participants to evaluate structural validity and used Cronbach's alpha to assess internal consistency. The CFA supported a four-factor structure with strong model fit indices (CFI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.09 [0.07, 0.11], SRMR = 0.04). All items significantly loaded onto their respective factors (loadings: 0.62-1.06). Internal consistency was high across all subscales (α = 0.85-0.96) and for the overall scale (α = 0.87). Attribution analysis revealed drug use, physical appearance, and income level as the most common perceived reasons for anticipated stigma. The SU-APSS offers a practical tool for identifying provider-specific stigma, informing stigma-reduction interventions, and evaluating implementation strategies to improve HIV prevention and care engagement among PWID.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Hazardous working conditions fuel inequities in accidental-poisoning, suicide, and chronic-liver-disease mortality. Relational theories suggest such hazards flow from power imbalances between workers, managers, and employers - social classes demarcated by power over property and labor. However, to our knowledge, no US studies using relational measures have analyzed class inequities in the cause-specific mortality. METHODS:We used the Mortality Disparities in American Communities dataset, which links the 2008 American Community Survey to the National Death Index through December 31, 2019. We classified respondents as incorporated business owners, unincorporated business owners, managers, workers, or not in the labor force based on their employment, occupational, and business-ownership status. Then, using an inverse-probability-weighted Aalen-Johansen estimator, we estimated risk differences in the cause-specific mortality across classes at the end of follow-up, including by sex, race/ethnicity, and education. RESULTS:Our sample included 2,304,500 respondents and 10,870 accidental-poisoning, suicide, and chronic-liver-disease deaths. Compared to incorporated business owners, those not in the labor force, workers, and unincorporated business owners had, respectively, 8.9 (95 % CI: 8.0, 9.7), 0.9 (95 % CI: 0.4, 1.5), and 1.1 (95 % CI: 0.3, 1.9) greater 12-year age- and sex-adjusted risks of the cause-specific mortality per 1000. Managers' risks resembled incorporated business owners'. Inequities largely persisted after thorough sociodemographic adjustment. Among workers, risks were elevated among the unemployed and those with blue-collar or service occupations. Finally, inequities were greater among men and less-educated respondents than among women and more-educated respondents. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:We estimated considerable class inequities in the cause-specific mortality, adding to research connecting class relations to mortality inequities and worsening population health.

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:Understanding the types of individuals and their position in the network may improve interventions for people who inject drugs (PWID). METHODS/UNASSIGNED:From the Transmission Reduction Intervention Project (TRIP), which enrolled PWID and their contacts in Athens, Greece, from 2013 to 2015, we extracted the largest connected component of the network (i.e., the largest group of connected individuals) and identified members who were in the top quartile of the distribution for three network centrality measures: closeness, betweenness, and eigenvector. Using logistic regression, we evaluated associations between high centrality measures and individual sociodemographic characteristics and behaviors. We also varied the definition for high centrality. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among 231 individuals, 80% were male and between the ages of 25-40 years. Over half of the individuals injected at least once per day, compared to less than daily. Individuals who injected at least once per day were more likely to have high closeness (odds ratio (OR) = 3.36; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.57, 8.42), high betweenness (OR = 2.22; 95% CI = 1.06, 4.67), and eigenvector centrality (OR = 4.50; 95% CI = 1.89,10.68). Individuals who engaged in sex without a condom were less likely to have high closeness (OR = 0.18; 95% CI = 0.07, 0.45) or eigenvector (OR = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.07, 0.49) centrality. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Individual characteristics and behaviors were associated with centrality and may impact an individual's position in the network. These associations could be useful in identifying important community members to engage as part of public health initiatives.

The social determinants of health (SDOH) framework has proven useful for research and practice in addressing the social causes of many health outcomes. However, its limitations may restrict its value as the world undergoes rapid ecological and social change. We argue that SDOH does not adequately incorporate rapidly changing or "far upstream" social processes (particularly social movements), the dialectics of social conflict and creative social innovation, or bidirectional causation. Ecosocial theory addresses some of these issues, yet dialectical frameworks offer additional insights during periods of rapid social change and disruption. The implications for research methods and practice are discussed. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print September 18, 2025:e1-e9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308239).

Between May 2020 and December 2021, there were 159,872 drug overdose deaths in the US. Higher eviction rates have been associated with higher overdose mortality. Amid the economic turmoil caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, 43 states and Washington, DC, implemented eviction moratoria of varying durations. These moratoria reduced eviction filing rates, but their impact on fatal drug overdoses remains unexplored. We evaluated the effect of these policies on county-level overdose death rates by focusing on the dates the state eviction moratoria were lifted. We obtained mortality data from NCHS and eviction moratoria dates from the COVID-19 US State Policy Database. We employed a longitudinal targeted minimum-loss-based estimation with Super Learner to flexibly estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) of never lifting the moratoria. Lifting state eviction moratoria was associated with a 0.14 per 100,000 higher rate of monthly overdose mortality (95%CI: -0.03, 0.32), although confidence intervals were wide and included zero. Eviction moratoria may not be sufficient to prevent overdose mortality during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:People who use drugs (PWUD) are at risk of HIV infection, but the frequency and distribution of transmission-associated behaviors within rural communities is not well understood. Further, while interventions designed to more explicitly affirm individuals' sexual orientation and behaviors may be more effective, descriptions of behavior variability by orientation are lacking. We sought to describe how disease transmission behaviors and overdose risk vary by sexual orientation and activity among rural PWUD. METHODS:From 01/2018-03/2020, rural PWUD participating in the Rural Opioid Initiative were surveyed across 8 sites. Collected data included: demographics; experiences with drug use, overdose, and healthcare; stigma; gender identity; and sexual orientation and partners. Participants were categorized as: monosexual by orientation and behavior (Mono-only), monosexual by orientation but behaviorally bisexual (Mono/Bi), and bisexual by orientation (Bi+). Analyses included descriptive summaries, bivariate examination (chi-square), and logistic regression (relative risk [RR] and 95 % confidence interval [CI]). RESULTS:The 1455 participants were 84.8 % Mono-only, 3.2 % Mono/Bi, and 12.0 % Bi+. Compared to Mono-only men, Mono/Bi and Bi+ men had greater risk of transactional sex (RR = 9.71, CI = 6.66-14.2 and RR = 5.09, CI = 2.79-9.27, respectively) and sharing syringes for injection (RR = 1.58, CI = 1.06-2.35 and RR = 1.85, CI = 1.38-2.47). Compared to Mono-only women, Mono-Bi and Bi+ women had greater risk of transactional sex (RR = 4.47, CI = 2.68-7.47 and RR = 2.63, CI = 1.81-3.81); and Bi+ women had greater risk of sharing syringes for injection (RR = 1.49, CI = 1.23-1.81), sharing syringes to mix drugs (RR = 1.44, CI = 1.23-1.69), and experiencing an overdose (RR = 1.32, CI = 1.12-1.56). Bi+ men and women both more frequently reported selling sex as a source of income (versus Mono-only, both p < 0.050) and measures of perceived stigma (all p < 0.050). CONCLUSIONS:Rural PWUD who are bisexual by orientation or behavior are significantly more likely to engage in behaviors associated with infectious disease transmission and to experience stigma and drug overdose. Given the growing recognition of bisexuality as a distinct orientation that warrants individualized consideration, interventions that are specifically acknowledging and affirming to the circumstances of this group are needed.

People who inject drugs (PWID) have an increased risk of HIV infection partly due to injection behaviors often related to opioid use. Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) have been shown to reduce HIV infection risk, possibly by reducing injection risk behaviors. MOUD may benefit individuals who do not receive it themselves but are connected through social, sexual, or drug use networks with individuals who are treated. This is known as spillover. Valid estimation of spillover in network studies requires considering the network's community structure. Communities are groups of densely connected individuals with sparse connections to other groups. We analyzed a network of 277 PWID and their contacts from the Transmission Reduction Intervention Project. We assessed the effect of MOUD on reductions in injection risk behaviors and the possible benefit for network contacts of participants treated with MOUD. We identified communities using modularity-based methods and employed inverse probability weighting with community-level propensity scores to adjust for measured confounding. We found that MOUD may have beneficial spillover effects on reducing injection risk behaviors. The magnitudes of estimated effects were sensitive to the community detection method. Careful consideration should be paid to the significance of community structure in network studies evaluating spillover.