Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To assess efficacy and adverse outcomes of misoprostol 200mcg versus 400mcg every three hours buccal or vaginal for medication abortion (MAb) from 24-27 weeks' gestation. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:This retrospective cohort study included MAbs from 24 0/7-27 0/7 weeks' gestation at Bellevue Hospital from 7/2022-6/2025. All patients received digoxin 2mg intraamniotic injection and mifepristone 200mg oral followed at 24-48hrs by misoprostol 200mcg or 400mcg every three hours buccal or vaginal based on hospital policy at time of admission. The primary outcome was time from first misoprostol dose to placental expulsion. Secondary outcomes were procedural complications. Primary statistical analysis was performed with Fisher's exact and Wilcox rank-sum tests. RESULTS:Of 55 patients, 27 (49%) received 200mcg doses of misoprostol and 28 (51%) received 400mcg doses of misoprostol. Median time to expulsion was 13hrs in the 200mcg group versus 9.5hrs in the 400mcg group (p=0.144). More patients in the 200mcg group versus the 400mcg group had blood loss ≥500mL (11.1% vs 0%, p=0.11) and retained placenta at four hours (3.7% vs 0%, p=0.49). No patients in either group had uterine rupture. CONCLUSIONS:Misoprostol 200mcg versus 400mcg every three hours buccal or vaginal for MAb from 24-27 weeks' gestation had overall similar outcomes. Although this single site retrospective study is underpowered to significantly differentiate between the two regimens, we observe that 200mcg dosing may be associated with higher risk of complications. Larger studies are needed to clarify optimal misoprostol dosing for 24-27 week MAb. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:For medication abortion from 24-27 weeks' gestation, serial doses of misoprostol 200mcg versus 400mcg every three hours have similar rates of complications, though there is a signal that 200mcg dosing may be associated with longer time to expulsion, higher blood loss, and more incidences of retained placenta.

OBJECTIVE:To examine current Complex Family Planning (CFP) fellows' experience with induction of fetal asystole. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Cross-sectional web-based survey of trainees enrolled in United States accredited CFP fellowships. RESULTS:Of the 52/66 (79%) of fellows who responded, 36/52 (69%) plan to provide induction of fetal asystole post-fellowship. Thirty-six (69%) received training, most commonly by digoxin (31/52, 60%) transabdominal (31/31, 100%) intrafetal (26/31, 83%) injections. Twenty-four (46%) predicted competence upon graduation. CONCLUSIONS:CFP fellowship programs can expand availability and comprehensiveness of training to support graduates in independent practice of induction of fetal asystole.

Abortion Care in the United StatesAbortion services are a vital component of reproductive health care. Jung and colleagues review medication abortion and procedural abortion as well as implications of increasing restrictions on access in the United States.

Self-managed abortion (SMA) is ending a pregnancy without medical supervision, either by obtaining medications (known as self-managed medication abortion) or through other means. Many factors influence a person's decision to pursue self-managed abortion, such as time constraints, financial considerations, and local availability of abortion services. We present on the prevalence, methods and best practices for clinicians in the United States who may interface with individuals undergoing self-managed medication abortion at any point in the process through a harm reduction approach.

We present a patient who experienced an unintended pregnancy after transitioning from the copper intrauterine device to the etonogestrel subdermal implant. When switching from contraceptive methods that do not reliably suppress ovulation, clinicians should consider backup contraception and additional counseling, depending on the specific timing of removal.