Faculty Bibliography

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Neighborhood segregation, a mechanism of structural racism, is associated with racial and ethnic disparities in health care access and outcomes. Live donor liver transplant (LDLT) is the ideal treatment for cirrhosis, improving survival and quality of life. Understanding the role of segregation in LDLT access is important to address disparities. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To assess the associations between residential and transplant center neighborhood segregation and LDLT access. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This cohort study used data from a US national transplant registry on adult candidates (age ≥18 years) for first-time liver transplant between February 1, 2016, and June 30, 2025, at centers that performed 1 or more LDLT annually during that time. EXPOSURE/UNASSIGNED:Residential and transplant center neighborhood segregation, measured using the Thiel H method at the zip code tabulation area level and dichotomized at the respective median values. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:A Cox proportional hazards regression model quantified the adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) of LDLT and included interactions with race and ethnicity and insurance. LDLT access within high-segregation residential neighborhoods by racial and ethnic composition (predominantly White or predominantly racial and ethnic minoritized population) was also quantified. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among 22 223 adult liver transplant candidates, mean (SD) age was 55.3 (11.2) years, 13 518 (60.8%) were male, 1476 (6.6%) were Black, 5097 (22.9%) were Hispanic or Latino, and 15 650 (70.4%) were White. Most (11 669 [52.5%]) had private insurance. After adjustment, candidates residing in high-segregation neighborhoods had lower likelihood of LDLT access (AHR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.74-0.88). Hispanic or Latino candidates in high-segregation neighborhoods had lower likelihood of LDLT access than their counterparts in low-segregation neighborhoods (AHR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.49-0.72; P < .001 for interaction), but associations between neighborhood segregation and LDLT did not vary significantly by insurance type (P = .52 for interaction). Candidates wait-listed at transplant centers in high-segregation neighborhoods had lower likelihood of LDLT access (AHR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.59-0.70). Candidates with Medicare or Medicaid wait-listed at centers in high-segregation neighborhoods had lower likelihood of LDLT access than their counterparts in low-segregation neighborhoods (AHR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.45-0.51; P < .001 for interaction). Within high-segregation residential neighborhoods, candidates in neighborhoods with a larger racial and ethnic population had lower likelihood of LDLT access than those living in neighborhoods with a larger White population (AHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.59-0.78). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:In this national cohort study, living in or being wait-listed at centers in high-segregation neighborhoods was associated with lower likelihood of LDLT access and candidates living in high-segregation neighborhoods with a larger racial and ethnic minority population compared with a larger White population had lower likelihood of LDLT. Investing in high-segregation neighborhoods to address these structural disadvantages may help improve equity in LDLT access.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Although technology usage is steadily increasing among older adults, adoption and confidence greatly lag behind their younger counterparts. Sociocultural and health disparities intersect with aging to present distinct structural and psychosocial barriers to the adoption of newer technologies. Digital health literacy interventions can improve task-specific skills, technological self-efficacy, and use frequency, but most do not systematically incorporate older adults' values and goals, which are key drivers of sustained behavior change. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:The proposed study aims to develop and evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of a person-directed, values-based, in-home digital literacy intervention for older adults, entitled values-informed solutions for technology adoption (VISTA). METHODS/UNASSIGNED:VISTA begins with a values and goals discussion rather than a skills test, mapping "What Matters Most" to individualized, SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound) technology goals. Over 8 to 12 weeks, interventionists co-developed personalized learning plans with participants, delivering up to 6 in-home biweekly visits and interim phone calls. The study provided a tablet and assistance with obtaining home internet when needed. Outcomes included digital literacy (Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire), technology and chronic disease self-efficacy, social networks, multimorbidity, and frailty (Fried Frailty Phenotype). Feasibility was assessed via recruitment, retention or completion, data collection rates, survey administration time, withdrawal, intervention fidelity, and per-person cost; acceptability was assessed via a postintervention satisfaction survey (Likert and open-ended items) and willingness to recommend. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Funding was secured in November 2023. Institutional review board approval, intervention development, and focus groups were completed throughout 2024. Recruitment and baseline assessments occurred from January 2025 to July 2025, enrolling 21 participants and randomizing 11 to immediate intervention and 10 to waitlist control (waitlist participants received the intervention after a 3-month control period). One consented participant was unable to participate early in the intervention and is not included in analyses. Inclusion criteria included being aged 65 years and older, having English proficiency, and demonstrating a willingness to improve digital literacy. Exclusion criteria involved severe cognitive impairment. At baseline, participants had a mean age of 75.7 (SD 7.74) years and were predominantly female (n=13, 65%) and Black (n=19, 95%); most reported having a low income (10/12, 83%), living alone (12/14, 85.7%), and multimorbidity (mean disease count 3.95, SD 2.46). Follow-up assessments concluded in March 2026; data cleaning and analysis are ongoing, with primary feasibility and acceptability findings anticipated for fall 2026. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:This protocol offers a unique model centering on the values and goals of older adults to improve access, use, and understanding of technology. Tapping into the motivators of older adults may provide a more beneficial way to encourage older adult technology use. VISTA could be useful in many general contexts, more specifically for older adults who are homebound or have serious illnesses, or as a preintervention for interventions involving advanced technology understanding.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Hyperparathyroidism (HPT) commonly persists following kidney transplant (KT) and can result in bone alterations. However, the association between persistent HPT post-KT and fracture risk is not well-understood. We sought to quantify the association between persistent HPT at 1-year post-KT and fracture risk among KT recipients. METHODS:We leveraged a longitudinal prospective cohort of 344 adult KT recipients who underwent KT at a single institution (12/2008-07/2019). PTH levels were retroactively abstracted, and fractures after 1-year-post-KT were ascertained using ICD-9/ICD-10 codes. Competing risk models were used to estimate the association between persistent HPT (PTH ≥ 70 pg/mL) at 1-year post-KT and the risk of fracture, with death treated as a competing event. RESULTS:Among 344 KT recipients, 227 (66.0%) had persistent HPT at 1-year post-KT. After adjusting for confounders, HPT 1-year after KT was associated with a 3.11-fold increased risk of fractures (95% CI: 1.08-8.91). There were no differences in this association by age, sex, race, eGFR at 1-year-post-KT, osteoporosis at KT, or dialysis vintage. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Recipients with HPT 1-year after KT had a significantly higher risk of fractures than those without persistent HPT. Future studies should establish standardized practice guidelines for the treatment of persistent HPT to mitigate fracture-related morbidity and mortality.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Losses of functional reserve across multiple physiological systems have been identified in frail patients, yet the exact aetiology of frailty remains unclear. Although strongly associated with chronological age, frailty often develops at a younger age in patients with organ failure. Frailty is prevalent in patients with kidney failure; however, individuals experience improvements in physical frailty measures following kidney transplantation. This makes younger patients with kidney failure a unique population for studying both the accelerated onset of frailty and its reversal. This research project aims to test the hypothesis that frailty secondary to organ failure and age-related frailty are associated with similar molecular and physiological measures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS/METHODS:Gbp/sample). Circulating cell-free DNA/mitochondrial DNA will be quantified through droplet digital PCR. Microcirculation will be assessed via sublingual dark field videomicroscopy with glycocalyx markers measured by ELISA. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION/BACKGROUND:This study will be conducted with all stipulations of this protocol, and the conditions of the ethics committee approval. Ethical principles have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki, all Australian and local regulations and in the spirit of the standard of Good Clinical Practice (as defined by the International Conference on Harmonisation). Organs/tissues will be sourced ethically and will not be sourced from executed prisoners or prisoners of conscience or other vulnerable groups.Ethics approval was received by the Metro South Health Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2023/QMS/95392) and ratified by the University of Queensland.Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, academic conferences, participant newsletters and health organisation collaboration.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:There is a critical need for interventions that help improve outcomes for individuals requiring a kidney transplant but are waitlisted as inactive. We explored the perspectives of dialysis patients and clinicians to develop community aging in place-advancing better living for elders (CAPABLE)-transplant. CAPABLE utilizes a home-visiting registered nurse, occupational therapist, and handy worker who work with older adults to create action plans that change behaviors to improve safety, independence, and health. STUDY DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Qualitative semi-structured interviews. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:Individuals treated with dialysis and inactive on the transplant list (n = 20) and transplant clinicians (n = 6) from an urban transplant center. OUTCOMES/UNASSIGNED:The adaptation of CAPABLE into CAPABLE-transplant. ANALYTICAL APPROACH/UNASSIGNED:Following Braun and Clark's method of thematic analysis to inform intervention adaptation. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Three major themes were identified: (1) mismatch of expectations with subthemes: communication keeps breaking down; high volume at center impedes follow-up; (2) agency: from fragmentation to functionality with subthemes: patient agency needs enhancing; digital literacy is key to improving communication capacity; preposttransplant education needs to be ongoing; (3) "You gotta keep climbing that mountain 'till you reach the goal" with a subtheme of navigating compliance while struggling with symptom burden. LIMITATIONS/UNASSIGNED:A single-center perspective and small sample size. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:By comparing the patient and clinician experience, specific adaptations for CAPABLE-transplant that address modifiable factors to decrease time inactive on the kidney transplant waitlist were identified. These included adding a digital literacy component to the home-visiting team to improve patient-clinician communication, ongoing education about the transplant process to improve health literacy, and activities to strengthen mental fortitude, self-efficacy, and agency. The core components of CAPABLE remain important to improve physical function, medication management, pain, and depressive symptoms. Patients and clinicians expressed support for CAPABLE-transplant to help improve self-efficacy, agency, and engagement along the transplant continuum.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused unprecedented disruptions to healthcare systems worldwide, significantly affecting patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). In this study, we evaluated the impact of the pandemic on healthcare-seeking behavior and CKD progression among patients in New York City. METHODS:Using electronic health records from PCORnet's INSIGHT Clinical Research Network, we conducted a retrospective cohort study focused on 84,062 patients with CKD aged 50 years or older with multiple chronic conditions seen between 2017 and 2022. Patients were identified using pre-pandemic CKD diagnostic codes, and confirmed by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements. Care disruption was defined as receiving fewer visits than recommended by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines. We used linear mixed-effects models to estimate annual eGFR changes and analyze trends in care visits stratified by CKD stage and care disruption. RESULTS:. Care visits declined sharply in 2020 across patients at all but the end stage, with incomplete recovery by 2022. Patients with adequate pre-pandemic care maintained their visits above KDIGO levels, while those with inadequate care increased visits during the pandemic. Pronounced eGFR decline occurred in 2020 (10.6%), with slower declines observed thereafter. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted CKD care, potentially leading to reduced healthcare-seeking behavior and accelerated kidney function decline in 2020. Slower decline post-2020 may reflect improved healthcare utilization, better medication adherence, and new therapies, and other factors.

UNLABELLED:<p>Introduction: Patients with end-stage kidney disease develop cognitive impairment due to comorbidities and dialysis dependence. Among community-dwelling older adults, cognitive (CT) and exercise training (ET) are promising interventions to preserve cognition; these interventions may be tailored for adults undergoing in-center hemodialysis. METHODS:Adult (≥18 years) English-speaking patients undergoing hemodialysis (within 3 months to 3 years of initiation) were enrolled in a 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial: Interventions Made to Preserve Cognitive Function Trial (IMPCT). Participants (n = 121) were block-randomized (September, 2018-February, 2023) into 4 arms: control (SC) (n = 26), intradialytic web-based CT (n = 31), ET using foot peddler (n = 29), and combined CT+ET (n = 35). Participants underwent assessments at baseline and 3 months for executive function, global cognitive function, clinical outcomes, and patient-centered outcomes. We estimated 3-month executive function change (primary outcome) and secondary outcomes using linear regression. RESULTS:There were no differences in 3-month executive function change by arm. Participants exhibited improvement in 3-month global cognitive function in CT+ET arm (Montreal Cognitive Assessment score difference = 2.1, 95% CI: 0.4-3.9), and self-reported 3-month improvement in perceived health change (score difference = 0.8, 95% CI: 0.2-1.4) in ET arm. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Clinicians may encourage CT+ET for hemodialysis patients to improve short-term global cognitive function and perceived health. The long-term benefits of these interventions warrant further study. </p>.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Kidney transplant recipients are at risk for adverse health outcomes. Digital health tools such as wearable accelerometers and continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) can provide detailed, noninvasive tracking of health behaviors and measures, such as physical activity, sleep, and glucose levels, that may offer insights into future health concerns, such as posttransplant diabetes mellitus, cognitive health, and transplant rejection. However, there is limited evidence on the feasibility and acceptability of these devices in kidney transplant candidates older than 50 y. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This observational cross-sectional pilot study aimed to examine the feasibility of 2 digital health tools: an accelerometer and a continuous glucose monitor. Participants were eligible for the study if they were living donor kidney transplant candidates, aged 50 y or older, had no known cognitive impairments, and could provide informed consent. Participants were asked to wear a CGM and an accelerometer for up to 14 d before their kidney transplant surgery. Device feasibility was quantified by (1) the total time the devices were worn, and (2) the validated System Usability Scale survey administered after the devices were returned. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:20 participants enrolled in the study (mean age 64 ± 9 y, 25% women, 40% with type 2 diabetes). The median number of days of accelerometer and CGM wear were 7 (interquartile range, 6-10) d and 7 (interquartile range, 7-10) d, respectively. Ninety percent of participants reported a favorable opinion of both devices. Participants wore the CGM 100% of the time and the accelerometer 90% of the time, indicating high adherence. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:The use of digital devices was acceptable among kidney transplant candidates aged older than 50 y, paving the way for larger studies to identify early digital biomarkers of health outcomes in this high-risk population.