Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Fixed-dose combination (FDC) antihypertensives combine two or more agents. Compared with non-FDC antihypertensives of multiple classes (multi-pill therapy), combination-pill therapy using FDC antihypertensives may improve hypertension control. However, combination-pill therapy remains low. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:This study aims to assess: 1) the association between combination-pill therapy and medication adherence, health care utilization, and costs; and 2) the potential to mitigate racial and ethnic differences in medication adherence. METHODS:A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the 2017-2021 Merative MarketScan Medicaid database. The study sample included adults aged 18 to 64 years with hypertension, continuously enrolled 1 year before and after a random index date of prescription. The propensity score overlap weighting method was used to balance characteristics between individuals using combination- and multi-pill therapy. Logistic models were used for medication adherence (defined as medication possession ratio [MPR] ≥80%), linear models for continuous MPRs, negative binomial models for health care utilization, and generalized linear models for costs. RESULTS:Compared with multi-pill therapy, combination-pill therapy was associated with higher medication adherence (3.17 in MPR; 95% CI: 2.79-3.55), fewer hypertension-related emergency department visits (220 per 1,000 individuals; 95% CI: -235 to -204), fewer hospitalizations (153 per 1,000 individuals, 95% CI: -160 to -146), and lower costs ($2,862 per person, 95% CI: -$3,035 to -$2,689). However, differences in medication adherence persisted, with non-Hispanic Black adults demonstrating lower adherence than non-Hispanic White adults. CONCLUSIONS:Combination-pill therapy could improve hypertension management and save costs for the Medicaid program and beneficiaries. However, persistent racial and ethnic differences in adherence highlight the need for tailored interventions.

OBJECTIVE:To examine the associations between patient out-of-pocket (OOP) costs and nonadherence to glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1a), and the consequent impact on adverse outcomes, including hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS/METHODS:This retrospective cohort study used MarketScan Commercial data (2016-2021). The cohort included nonpregnant adults aged 18-64 years with type 2 diabetes who initiated GLP-1a therapy. Participants were continuously enrolled in the same private insurance plan for 6 months before the prescription date and 1 year thereafter. Exposures included average first 30-day OOP costs for GLP-1a, categorized into quartiles (lowest [Q1] to highest [Q4]). Primary outcomes were the annual proportion of days covered (PDC) for GLP-1a and nonadherence, defined as PDC <0.8. Secondary outcomes included diabetes-related and all-cause hospitalizations and ED visits 1 year post-GLP-1a initiation. RESULTS:Among 61,907 adults who initiated GLP-1a, higher 30-day OOP costs were associated with decreased adherence. Patients in the highest OOP cost quartile (Q4: $80-$3,375) had significantly higher odds of nonadherence (odds ratio [OR]1.25; 95% CI 1.19-1.31) compared with those in Q1 ($0-$21). Nonadherence was linked to increased incidence rates of diabetes-related hospitalizations or ED visits (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.86; 95% CI 1.43-2.42), cumulative length of hospitalization (IRR 1.56; 95% CI 1.41-1.72), all-cause ED visits (IRR 1.38; 95% CI 1.32-1.45), and increased ED-related costs ($69.81, 95% CI $53.54-$86.08). CONCLUSIONS:Higher OOP costs for GLP-1a were associated with reduced adherence and increased rates of adverse outcomes among type 2 diabetes patients.

OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study is to examine real-world dose titration patterns of semaglutide for weight management (Wegovy, Novo Nordisk A/S) in US adults and identify characteristics associated with early discontinuation. METHODS:We identified 15,811 commercially insured adults who started semaglutide for weight management (administrated through single-dose prefilled pens) between June 2021 and December 2023. We depicted dose-titration patterns over 5 months and identified factors associated with discontinuation using multivariable Cox regression. Sensitivity analyses examined patterns after supply shortage resolution (after October 2023). RESULTS:Most semaglutide users deviated from the recommended monthly dose-escalation schedule within the first 5 months. By the fifth month, nearly one-half (46%) had discontinued the treatment, with similar rates (48%) among those initiating after supply stabilization. Discontinuation was strongly associated with copayment amount, with rates increased from 41% in the lowest quintile ($1-$54 per month) to 51% in the highest quintile ($161-$1460 per month). Higher discontinuation rates were also associated with lower household income and education level. CONCLUSIONS:The deviations from the recommended dose-escalation schedule and high discontinuation rate among real-world semaglutide users indicate important challenges in the delivery of evidence-based care. Policy interventions that reduce financial barriers to the persistence of semaglutide are needed.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Telehealth has emerged as an effective tool for managing common chronic conditions such as hypertension, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the impact of state telehealth payment and coverage parity laws on hypertension medication adherence remains uncertain. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Data from the 2016 to 2021 Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database were used to construct the study cohort, which included nonpregnant individuals aged 25 to 64 years with hypertension. We coded telehealth parity laws related to hypertension management in all 50 US states and the District of Columbia, distinguishing between payment and coverage parity laws. The primary outcomes were measures of antihypertension medication adherence: the average medication possession ratio; medication adherence (medication possession ratio ≥80%); and average number of days of drug supply. We used a generalized difference-in-differences design to examine the impact of these laws. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among 353 220 individuals (mean [SD] age, 49.5 (7.1) years; female, 45.55%), states with payment parity laws were significantly linked to increased average medication possession ratio by 0.43 percentage point (95% CI, 0.07-0.79), and an increase of 0.46 percentage point (95% CI, 0.06-0.92) in the probability of medication adherence. Payment parity laws also led to an average increase of 2.14 days (95% CI, 0.11-4.17) in prescription supply, after controlling for state-fixed effects, year-fixed effects, individual sociodemographic characteristics and state time-varying covariates including unemployment rates, gross domestic product per capita, and poverty rates. In contrast, coverage parity laws were associated with a 2.13-day increase (95% CI, 0.19-4.07) in days of prescription supply but did not significantly increase the average medication possession ratio or probability of medication adherence. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:State telehealth payment parity laws were significantly associated with greater medication adherence, whereas coverage parity laws were not. With the increasing adoption of telehealth parity laws across states, these findings may support policymakers in understanding potential implications on management of hypertension.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Economic policies have the potential to impact management and control of hypertension. OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:To review the evidence on the association between economic policies and hypertension management and control among adults with hypertension in the US. EVIDENCE REVIEW/UNASSIGNED:A search was carried out of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EconLit, Sociological Abstracts, and Scopus from January 1, 2000, through November 1, 2023. Included were randomized clinical trials, difference-in-differences, and interrupted time series studies that evaluated the association of economic policies with hypertension management. Economic policies were grouped into 3 categories: insurance coverage expansion such as Medicaid expansion, cost sharing in health care such as increased drug copayments, and financial incentives for quality such as pay-for-performance. Antihypertensive treatment was measured as taking antihypertensive medications or medication adherence among those who have a hypertension diagnosis; and hypertension control, measured as blood pressure (BP) lower than  140/90 mm Hg or a reduction in BP. Evidence was extracted and synthesized through dual review of titles, abstracts, full-text articles, study quality, and policy effects. FINDINGS/UNASSIGNED:In total, 31 articles were included. None of the studies examined economic policies outside of the health care system. Of these, 16 (52%) assessed policies for insurance coverage expansion, 8 (26%) evaluated policies related to patient cost sharing for prescription drugs, and 7 (22%) evaluated financial incentive programs for improving health care quality. Of the 16 studies that evaluated coverage expansion policies, all but 1 found that policies such as Medicare Part D and Medicaid expansion were associated with significant improvement in antihypertensive treatment and BP control. Among the 8 studies that examined patient cost sharing, 4 found that measures such as prior authorization and increased copayments were associated with decreased adherence to antihypertensive medication. Finally, all 7 studies evaluating financial incentives aimed at improving quality found that they were associated with improved antihypertensive treatment and BP control. Overall, most studies had a moderate or low risk of bias in their policy evaluation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:The findings of this systematic review suggest that economic policies aimed at expanding insurance coverage or improving health care quality successfully improved medication use and BP control among US adults with hypertension. Future research is needed to investigate the potential effects of non-health care economic policies on hypertension control.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Home blood pressure monitoring is more convenient and effective than clinic-based monitoring in diagnosing and managing hypertension. Despite its effectiveness, there is limited evidence of the economic impact of home blood pressure monitoring. This study aims to fill this research gap by assessing the health and economic impact of adopting home blood pressure monitoring among adults with hypertension in the U.S. METHODS:A previously developed microsimulation model of cardiovascular disease was used to estimate the long-term impact of adopting home blood pressure monitoring versus usual care on myocardial infarction, stroke, and healthcare costs. Data from the 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and the published literature were used to estimate model parameters. The averted cases of myocardial infarction and stroke and healthcare cost savings were estimated among the U.S. adult population with hypertension and in subpopulations defined by sex, race, ethnicity, and rural/urban area. The simulation analyses were conducted between February and August 2022. RESULTS:Compared with usual care, adopting home blood pressure monitoring was estimated to reduce myocardial infarction cases by 4.9% and stroke cases by 3.8% as well as saving an average of $7,794 in healthcare costs per person over 20 years. Non-Hispanic Blacks, women, and rural residents had more averted cardiovascular events and greater cost savings related to adopting home blood pressure monitoring compared with non-Hispanic Whites, men, and urban residents. CONCLUSIONS:Home blood pressure monitoring could substantially reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease and save healthcare costs in the long term, and the benefits could be more pronounced in racial and ethnic minority groups and those living in rural areas. These findings have important implications in expanding home blood pressure monitoring for improving population health and reducing health disparities.