Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Disturbances in brain catecholamine activity may be associated with symptoms after exposure to repetitive head impacts (RHIs) or related chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). In this article, we studied CSF catecholamines in former professional and college American football players and examined the relationship with football proxies of RHI exposure, CTE probability, cognitive performance, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and parkinsonism. METHODS:In this observational cross-sectional study, we examined male former American football players, professional ("PRO") or college ("COL") level, and asymptomatic unexposed male ("UE") individuals from the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project. Catecholamines-norepinephrine (NE) and its metabolite, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG), and dopamine (DA) and its precursor, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (l-DOPA), and metabolite, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC)-were measured in CSF with high-performance liquid chromatography and compared across groups with analysis of covariance. Multivariable linear regression models tested the relationship between CSF catecholamines and proxies of RHI exposure (e.g., total years of playing American football), factor scores for cognition, and neurobehavioral dysregulation (explosivity, emotional dyscontrol, impulsivity, affective lability), as well as depressive/anxiety symptoms, measured with the Beck Depression/Anxiety Inventories. CTE probability and parkinsonism were assessed using the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke consensus diagnostic criteria for traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES), and biomarkers were compared among different diagnostic groups. RESULTS:The cohort consisted of 120 former American football players (85 PRO players, 35 COL players) and 35 UE participants (age 45-75). Former players had significantly lower levels of NE (mean difference = -0.114, 95% CI -0.190 to -0.038), l-DOPA (-0.121, 95% CI -0.109 to -0.027), and DOPAC (-0.116, 95% CI -0.177 to -0.054) than UE participants. For NE and DOPAC, these overall group differences were primarily due to differences between the PRO and UE cohorts. No significant differences were found across TES-CTE probability subgroups or TES-parkinsonism diagnostic groups. Within the COL cohort, tested as post hoc analyses, higher CSF NE and l-DOPA were associated with higher neurobehavioral dysregulation factor scores, BAI total score, and worse executive functioning and processing speed. CSF DHPG and DOPAC were associated with impulsivity only in this subgroup. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:We observed reduced CSF catecholamine concentrations in former elite American football players, although the relationship with degree of RHI exposure and the clinical impact needs further study.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Cannabis use is rising in the United States. Up to 30 % of individuals who use cannabis develop cannabis use disorder (CUD), for which there are no FDA-approved treatments. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of a novel, one-month telehealth intervention of remotely supervised tDCS (RS-tDCS) paired with mindfulness meditation. This home-based telehealth intervention was evaluated in a cohort of women with multiple sclerosis (MS), a vulnerable subpopulation of adults with high rates of CUD. METHODS:The intervention included 20 home-based RS-tDCS sessions targeting the left DLPFC, delivering 2.0mA for 20minutes, paired with guided mindfulness meditation. Sessions were conducted 5 days per week for four weeks. Fifty-two women with MS and CUD (age: 44 ± 10 years) consented to participate; 47 were randomized 2:1 to active or sham tDCS. Feasibility was assessed via retention and adherence, while preliminary efficacy was measured by cannabis use, withdrawal symptoms, and MS-related symptom scales. RESULTS:Of 47 randomized participants (31 active, 16 sham), 39 (83 %) completed the intervention. The active tDCS group showed significant reductions in weekly cannabis use (Daily Sessions, Frequency, Age of Onset, and Quantity of Cannabis Use Inventory, DFAQ-CU: 5.3 ± 2.4 vs. 3.9 ± 2.7 days, p = 0.014) and withdrawal symptoms (CWS: p < 0.001). A trend toward reduced MS-related symptoms was observed (SymptoMScreen: p = 0.031). Cognitive performance improvement at the end of the intervention was significant in the active group (p = 0.011 vs. p = 0.172), supporting functional benefits of reduced cannabis use. CONCLUSIONS:This pilot RCT supports the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of telehealth tDCS in a medical subpopulation. Studying women with MS highlights its potential for large-scale RCTs and clinical use.

OBJECTIVE:The application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at home for the treatment of depression and other neuropsychiatric disorders presents both significant opportunities and inherent challenges. Ensuring safety and maintaining high-quality stimulation are paramount for the efficacy and safety of at-home tDCS. This study investigates tDCS quality based on its technical parameters as well as safety of at-home and in-clinic tDCS applications comparing the data from two randomized controlled trials in patients with major depressive disorder. METHODS:We analyzed 229 active stimulation sessions from the HomeDC study (at-home tDCS) and 835 sessions from the DepressionDC study (in-clinic tDCS). Notably, five adverse events (skin lesions) were reported exclusively in the at-home cohort, highlighting the critical need for enhanced safety protocols in unsupervised environments. RESULTS:= .097). The at-home tDCS sessions exhibited higher impedance variability (M = 837, SD = 328) compared to in-clinic sessions (M = 579, SD = 309). Furthermore, at-home tDCS sessions resulting in adverse events (AEs) were associated with significantly higher average impedances than sessions without such issues. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The study demonstrates that monitoring the technical parameters of at-home tDCS used in this study is essential. However, it may be not sufficient for ensuring safety and promptly detecting or preventing adverse events. Quality control protocols including digital training and monitoring techniques should be systematically developed and tested for a reliable and safe application of at-home tDCS therapies.

More than half of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) use cannabis, with up to 20 % at risk of cannabis use disorder (CUD). While some individuals with MS report symptom relief from cannabis use, particularly for pain, sleep, and mood, there is limited support for its evidence-based therapeutic use. In contrast, long-term use has been associated with poorer cognitive and emotional functioning, fatigue, and reduced quality of life. Although reducing or stopping cannabis use has shown benefits, there is a lack of accessible interventions. We recruited nationally for a pilot study of a remotely supervised home-based intervention to reduce cannabis use among women with MS and CUD. The trial response provided critical insights into cannabis use patterns and the significant demand for accessible, effective interventions, highlighting an urgent unmet need within the MS community.

BACKGROUND:Childhood environmental factors back to the prenatal environment can contribute to MS risk. Childhood adversity, which causes biological, behavioral, and epigenetic changes that can be passed down through families, has been understudied in MS. Here, we emphasize the need to understand the role that intergenerational adversity may play among families affected by MS. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the frequency and types of adverse childhood experiences among parents of children with MS. METHODS:Individuals with pediatric MS (n = 68) were enrolled in a longitudinal study of cognition. At enrollment, the patient and one caregiver or parent completed questionnaires. As the pediatric participants were under age 18 at time of enrollment, one parent completed the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs, a 10-item self-report measure) about the parents' own childhood. Results from the ACE questionnaire among parents of pediatric healthy controls (n = 96) and adults in a national cohort are also reported for comparison. RESULTS:Over half of pediatric MS parents reported at least one ACE exposure. Of parents that did have ACE exposures, the exposures were broad in terms of abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction. Over 10 % of parents reported total ACE scores of 7 or above. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Over half of pediatric MS parents experienced some degree of childhood adversity. The impact of intergenerational adversity on the development of pediatric onset MS warrants further study.

Depression is a common and debilitating disorder affecting millions. First-line treatments fail to achieve remission in about one-third of patients, highlighting a critical treatment need. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a novel treatment for depression. Therefore, the aim of this review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the last decade of tDCS trials for depression and propose future research directions. To compile studies of the past decade, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of tDCS for depression. A total of 21 RCTs were included, presenting a moderate effect for active tDCS compared to placebo. We also provided a description of study designs, stimulation parameters, and patients' characteristics. Following, we proposed possible strategies to enhance clinical effectiveness and reduce variability in results, including 1) optimization/personalization of tDCS via spatial and temporal target localization; 2) optimized methodological strategies, including home-based, accelerated tDCS protocols and novel trial designs; and 3) investigate patient profile to identify features that can predict treatment response. In conclusion, tDCS holds promise as a treatment for depression, but variability in trial parameters and outcomes underscores the need for its further optimization. Refining and standardizing protocols may enhance its effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE:Seizures can impact cognition both acutely and chronically. However, among those without significant comorbidities and broadly average cognition at epilepsy onset, the relationship between cognitive function at the time of diagnosis and long-term seizure control has been relatively unexplored. This analysis investigated associations between participant characteristics including specific aspects of cognitive performance at the time of focal epilepsy diagnosis and antiseizure medication (ASM) treatment resistance. METHODS:This was a secondary analysis of Human Epilepsy Project (HEP) data, which enrolled people with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy and broadly average cognition (estimated IQ ≥ 70) from June 29, 2012, to September 1, 2019. Participants analyzed in this study were between 18 and 60 years old, and scored within an acceptable range (i.e., Standard Score of ≥80) on measures estimating premorbid cognitive ability were offered the Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB). Participant characteristics were analyzed, including the presence of any anxiety disorders or depression, and summary CBB scores. HEP participants who were classified by the study as treatment resistant if they had experienced failure to achieve seizure freedom after two adequate trials of ASMs. Treatment resistance was modeled using multiple logistic regression to assess for independent associations between attention and working memory after correcting for the presence of the other potentially explanatory variables. RESULTS:200 HEP participants had comprehensive enrollment records including CBB results and complete seizure outcome data for analysis in this study. After correcting for potentially confounding variables, there were no independent associations between cognitive measures on the CBB at the time of enrollment and subsequent development of ASM treatment resistance. Specifically, z-scores for reaction time on the CBB (an average of the CBB Identification and Detection tests) were not associated with treatment resistance (p = 0.51) and z-scores for memory performance (an average of the CBB One Card Learning test and One Back tests) were not associated with treatment resistance (p = 0.24). There were no significant independent associations between age or the presence of depression or anxiety disorders at the time of CBB testing and treatment resistance. However, there was an independent association between employment status and treatment resistance, with those who were employed or students (>18 years old) at the time of enrollment and CBB testing having 0.35 times lower odds of treatment resistance (95 %CI 0.15-0.81, p = 0.01). SIGNIFICANCE/CONCLUSIONS:The findings from this study suggest that in otherwise healthy people with new onset focal epilepsy who have broadly average intelligence, attention and working memory as measured by the CBB at the time of diagnosis is not associated with treatment resistance. Although performance on cognitive testing at epilepsy onset may not be predictive of risk of treatment resistance in this population, other individual characteristics such as employment status at the time of diagnosis may be indirect markers of long-term seizure outcomes and require further investigation.

Fatigue is a common and often debilitating feature of multiple sclerosis (MS) that lacks reliably effective treatment options for most patients. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a safe and well-tolerated type of noninvasive brain stimulation, is a low-cost and home-based approach with the potential to reduce fatigue in MS. We conducted a double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized clinical trial to compare active vs. low-dose (sham) tDCS paired with computer-based cognitive training, delivered as a home-based intervention, to reduce MS-related fatigue. Participants with MS-related fatigue, but without depression, were stratified by neurologic disability using the Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and randomized to complete 30 daily sessions over six weeks of either active or sham tDCS paired with online cognitive training (BrainHQ). The primary outcome was the change in PROMIS Fatigue score from baseline to the end of the intervention. A total of 117 participants were randomized, with 92% completing all treatment sessions. Both groups showed significant reductions in fatigue, with no significant difference between them. This suggests that tDCS does not provide any additional benefit over cognitive training alone in reducing fatigue, but confirms the feasibility and tolerance of this home-based intervention.

OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to externally validate the Memory Assessment Clinics Scale for Epilepsy (MAC-E), a brief self-report measure of subjective memory complaints in adults with epilepsy. METHODS:A cross-sectional study was conducted including adults with focal pharmacoresistant epilepsy from three Level 4 epilepsy centers in the U.S., who completed the MAC-E as part of a clinical neuropsychological evaluation. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted, and goodness-of-fit criteria were calculated to assess model fit: comparative fit index (CFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and standardized root mean residual (SRMR). Item response theory models were constructed, and Mokken analysis was used to assess discrimination and unidimensionality. Internal consistency was evaluated with McDonald's Omega. RESULTS:values for each of the 5 factors (0.58-0.91 and 0.34-0.82, respectively). MAC-E items demonstrated high levels of discrimination as well as the ability to evaluate across the entirety of each latent trait. Score responses were uniformly distributed across latent traits, and unidimensionality was established by factor (all H coefficients > 0.4). Internal consistency was high across factors (omega range: 0.77-0.88). CONCLUSIONS:Results of this study demonstrate good external validation of the MAC-E in an independent, multicenter cohort of adults with epilepsy. These findings provide further support that the MAC-E is a psychometrically valid, self-report instrument to assess every-day memory abilities in adults with epilepsy in both clinical and research settings.