Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:The long-recognized association of brain injury with increased risk of dementia has undergone significant refinement and more detailed study in recent decades. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a specific neurodegenerative tauopathy related to prior exposure to repetitive head impacts (RHI). We aim to contextualize CTE within a historical perspective and among emerging data which highlights the scientific and conceptual evolution of CTE-related research in parallel with the broader field of neurodegenerative disease and dementia. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We provide a narrative state-of-the-science update on CTE neuropathology, clinical manifestations, biomarkers, different types and patterns of head impact exposure relevant for CTE, and the complicated influence of neurodegenerative co-pathology on symptoms. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Now almost 20 years since the initial case report of CTE in a former American football player, the field of CTE continues evolving with increasing clarity but also several ongoing controversies. Our understanding of CTE neuropathology outpaces that of disease-specific clinical correlates or the development of in-vivo biomarkers. Diagnostic criteria for symptoms attributable to CTE are still being validated, but leveraging increasingly available biomarkers for other conditions like Alzheimer's disease may be helpful for informing the CTE differential diagnosis. As diagnostic refinement efforts advance, clinicians should provide care and/or referrals to providers best suited to treat an individual patient's clinical symptoms, many of which have evidence-based behavioral treatment options that are etiologically agnostic. Several ongoing research initiatives and the gradual accrual of gold standard clinico-pathological data will pay dividends for advancing the many existing gaps in the field of CTE.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is managed with speech-language therapy (SLT) to slow language decline. Pairing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with SLT can enhance its effects. However, further research is needed to confirm these findings and guide its clinical use. We evaluated the feasibility of providing an intervention combining tDCS with SLT as a home-based and remotely supervised intervention. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Participants with confirmed PPA who had word-finding difficulties were recruited for an open-label observational study. The intervention consisted of 20 daily sessions over 1 month, each with 45-min of personalized word retrieval training. During the first 30-min, participants received tDCS over the left inferior frontal gyrus (anode F7, cathode O1) at 2.0 mA. Language measures were remotely administered at baseline and intervention end. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:= 0.016) from baseline to intervention end. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Our case series demonstrates that home-based tDCS added to SLT is feasible for patients with PPA. However, larger controlled studies are required to confirm its effectiveness in slowing language decline and to fully determine the benefits of this approach. This approach not only facilitates broader access to participation but also enables the extended treatment necessary to evaluate its clinical benefits, moving this treatment closer to clinical availability as a telehealth treatment.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Blood-based biomarkers offer a promising approach for the detection of neuropathologies from repetitive head impacts (RHI). We evaluated plasma biomarkers of amyloid, tau, neurodegeneration, and inflammation in former football players. METHODS:The sample included 180 former football players and 60 asymptomatic, unexposed male participants (aged 45-74). Plasma assays were conducted for beta-amyloid (Aβ) 40, Aβ42, hyper-phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 181+231, total tau (t-tau), neurofilament light (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), Aβ42/p-tau181 and Aβ42/Aβ40 ratios. We evaluated their ability to differentiate the groups and associations with RHI proxies and traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES). RESULTS:= 0.008). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Plasma p-tau181 and p-tau231, GFAP, and NfL may offer some usefulness for the characterization of RHI-related neuropathologies. HIGHLIGHTS/CONCLUSIONS:Former football players had higher plasma p-tau181 and p-tau231 and lower Aβ42/ptau-181 compared to asymptomatic, unexposed men. Younger age of first exposure was associated with increased plasma NfL and GFAP in older but not younger participants. Plasma GFAP was higher in participants with TES-CTE possible/probable compared to TES-CTE no/suggestive.

OBJECTIVE:The Human Epilepsy Project (HEP) is a large multinational cohort study of people with newly diagnosed and treated focal epilepsy. HEP utilized the Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB) as a self-directed online assessment to examine cognitive outcomes in study participants. The CBB has previously been validated in healthy individuals and people with various brain disorders, but its use in adults participating in HEP has not been assessed. In this study, we describe how the CBB was used in the HEP cohort and assess factors associated with test completion among study participants. METHODS:Enrollment data for HEP included 408 participants with comprehensive enrollment records, of whom 249 completed CBB assessments. HEP enrolled cognitively normal-range participants between the ages of 12 and 60 from June 29, 2012, to November 7, 2017, with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy and within 4 months of initial treatment. Baseline participant characteristics were analyzed, including demographics, pre-treatment seizure histories, MRI abnormalities, and the presence of any learning difficulties while in school, including formal learning disability diagnoses, repeated grades, and remediation. HEP participant characteristics for those who completed CBB testing were compared to those who did not using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS:The analysis of HEP participants who completed CBB testing showed that, after controlling for other factors, male participants were more likely to engage in testing (OR 2.14, 95 % CI 1.29 to 3.5, p < 0.01), Black subjects were less likely (OR 0.45, 95 % CI 0.22 to 0.9, p = 0.02), primary English speakers were more likely (OR 3.1, 95 % CI 1.21 to 7.96, p = 0.02), and those with a history of learning challenges were less likely (OR 0.69, 95 % CI 0.49 to 0.97, p = 0.03). There were no significant associations between completing CBB testing and age, employment (employed or student vs not), education (higher education vs not), diagnostic delay, pre-diagnostic seizure burden, or initial seizure semiology (motor vs non-motor). SIGNIFICANCE/CONCLUSIONS:The findings from this study highlight factors associated with the application of remote and unsupervised assessments of cognition in a prospective cohort of adults with focal epilepsy. These factors can be considered when interpreting performance on the CBB in HEP, as well as assisting the design of future studies that use similar approaches.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Many individuals with progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) are challenged by reduced manual dexterity and limited rehabilitation options. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) during motor training can improve rehabilitation outcomes. We developed a protocol for remotely supervising tDCS to deliver sessions of stimulation paired with training at home. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:This study evaluated the effectiveness of at-home tDCS paired with manual dexterity training for individuals with PMS. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Sixty-five right-hand dominant participants with PMS and hand impairment were randomized to receive either active or sham M1-SO tDCS paired with manual dexterity training over 4 weeks. Clinical outcomes were measured by the changes in Nine-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) and Dellon-Modified-Moberg-Pick-Up Test (DMMPUT). RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:= 0.04). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:At-home tDCS paired with manual dexterity training is effective for individuals with PMS, with M1-SO tDCS enhancing training outcomes and offering a promising intervention for improving and preserving hand dexterity.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Psychosocial adversity and stress, known to predispose adults to neurodegenerative and inflammatory immune disorders, are widespread among children who experience socioeconomic disadvantage, and the associated neurotoxicity and proinflammatory profile may predispose these children to multiple sclerosis (MS). We sought to determine associations of socioeconomic disadvantage and psychosocial adversity with odds of pediatric-onset MS (POMS), age at POMS onset, and POMS disease activity. METHODS:This case-control study used data collected across 17 sites in the United States by the Environmental and Genetic Risk Factors for Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Study. Cases (n = 381) were youth aged 3-21 years diagnosed with POMS or a clinically isolated demyelinating syndrome indicating high risk of MS. Frequency-matched controls (n = 611) aged 3-21 years were recruited from the same institutions. Prenatal and postnatal adversity and postnatal socioeconomic factors were assessed using retrospective questionnaires and zip code data. The primary outcome was MS diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were age at onset, relapse rate, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Predictors were maternal education, maternal prenatal stress events, child separation from caregivers during infancy and childhood, parental death during childhood, and childhood neighborhood disadvantage. RESULTS:= 0.025). There were no associations of the socioeconomic variables with age at onset, relapse rate, or EDSS, or of prenatal or postnatal adverse events with risk of POMS, age at onset, relapse rate, or EDSS. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Low socioeconomic status at the neighborhood level may increase the risk of POMS while high parental education may be protective against POMS. Although we did not find associations of other evaluated prenatal or postnatal adversities with POMS, future research should explore such associations further by assessing a broader range of stressful childhood experiences.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:When administered in repeated daily doses, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) directed to the prefrontal cortex has cumulative efficacy for the treatment of depression. Depression can be marked by altered processing of emotionally salient information. An acute marker of response to tDCS may be measured as an immediate change in emotional information processing. Using an easily administered web-based task, we tested immediate changes in emotional information processing in acute response to tDCS in participants with and without depression. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:We enrolled n = 21 women with mild-to-moderate depression and n = 20 controls without depression to complete a web-based visual search task before and after 30 minutes of tDCS directed to the prefrontal cortex. The timed task required participants to identify a target face among arrays showing sad, neutral, or mixed (distractor) expressions. RESULTS:At baseline, as predicted, the participants with depression differed from those without in emotional processing speed (mean z score difference -0.66 ± 0.27, p = 0.022) and accuracy in identifying sad stimuli (error rate: 4.4% vs 1.8%, p = 0.039). In response to tDCS, the participants with depression became significantly faster on the distractor condition (pre- vs post-tDCS z scores: -0.45 ± 0.65 vs -0.85 ± 0.65, p = 0.009), suggesting a specific reduction in bias toward negative emotional information. In response to tDCS, the depressed group also had significant improvements in self-reported mood (increased happy, decreased sad and anxious mood). CONCLUSIONS:Participants with depression vs those without were differentiated by their performance of the visual search task at baseline and in response to tDCS. Given that measurable effects on depression scales may require weeks of tDCS treatments, acute change in emotional information processing can serve as an easily obtainable marker of depression and its response to tDCS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT05188248.