Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Chronic non-specific lower back pain (cNSLBP) is a prevalent and disabling condition, imposing a substantial socioeconomic burden due to high healthcare costs and productivity losses, with limited accessible and effective long-term treatment options. Automated Thermo-mechanical Therapy (ATT) is a promising, non-drug intervention that leverages innovative technical advances to provide multimodal pain relief, offering accessibility and low-cost delivery. This study tested ATT for immediate pain relief in individuals with cNSLBP in a single-session, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:= 20) in a 40-min session with urn randomization. The active device applied heated cylindrical rollers along the spine, using far-infrared heat and mechanical tissue stimulation tailored to spinal alignment. In the control condition, the device used minimal mechanical therapy intensity without heat, targeting only the cervical area to avoid lower back therapeutic effects. Pre- and post-intervention assessments measured changes in pain intensity (primary outcome) via a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS-P100), alongside secondary outcomes assessing pain characteristics, anxiety, and functional mobility. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:= 0.0031). No adverse events were reported, and all participants tolerated the intervention well. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:A single session of ATT provides immediate, significant pain relief in individuals with cNSLBP, supporting its potential as a safe, non-invasive option for managing chronic back pain. Future studies should examine the long-term benefits of repeated ATT sessions and explore mechanistic insights into thermo-mechanical stimulation's effects on pain and function. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT06769321.

This guideline summarizes updated safety data (2017-2025) and provides expert recommendations on the use of low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) in humans. tES encompasses several techniques including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (otDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS), and their combinations or variations. Across over 300,000 sessions involving healthy individuals, patients with neuropsychiatric conditions, and other clinical populations, no tES-related serious adverse events (AEs) have been reported. Moderate AEs are rare and limited to a small range of specific applications. Mild AEs are common and include transient symptoms such as localized sensations (e.g., tingling or burning), headaches, and fatigue. Similar mild AEs are also reported by individuals receiving placebo stimulation. The frequency, magnitude, and type of AEs are comparable across healthy, clinical, and vulnerable groups, including children, elderly, or pregnant women. Combined interventions (e.g., co-application with EEG, TMS, or neuroimaging) have not shown increased safety risks. Safety is well-established for both bipolar and multichannel tES when applied up to 4 mA and up to 60 min per day. Higher intensities and longer stimulation durations may also be safe. Nevertheless, the number of studies using intensities above 4 mA or stimulating longer than 60 min is low. Home-based use of treatments is growing rapidly, leveraging remote supervision to provide patients with greater access and enable repeated, sustained dosing paradigms. We recommend using screening and AE questionnaires in future controlled studies, in particular when planning to extend the stimulation parameters applied. We discuss recent regulatory and ethical issues.

BACKGROUND:In vivo biomarkers that can detect long-term neuropathologies from repetitive head impact (RHI) exposure are needed, especially for the neurodegenerative tauopathy chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). Here, we evaluated plasma p-tau217 as a potential biomarker for CTE p-tau pathology, and examined the concordance between plasma p-tau217 and Aβ pathology in an at-risk for CTE sample. METHOD/METHODS:The sample included 180 male former football players (120 professional, 60 college), and 56 asymptomatic men without RHI (i.e., controls). Participants completed blood draws, 18F-florbetapir (Aβ+=SUVR≥1.10), and 18F-flortaucipir PET. Traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES) diagnoses were made. Single molecule array for plasma p-tau217 (ALZpath) was performed (≥0.6 cutoff used to maximize sensitivity). Nine participants had post-mortem tissue. ANCOVA examined group differences in p-tau217 (football vs controls; TES-CTE no, TES-CTE suggestive, TES-CTE possible/probable). Multivariable regression models tested associations between p-tau217 and florbetapir/flortaucipir PET. Covariates included age, race and APOE e4. RESULT/RESULTS:Sample characteristics are in Table 1. p-tau217 concentrations were higher in former football players compared to controls (est. marginal mean difference=-0.217, p = 0.005). There were no group differences in Aβ-PET SUVR. No differences were found across TES-CTE certainty levels. In football players, higher p-tau217 was associated with higher Aβ-PET SUVR (B=1.380, 95%CI[0.597-2.155], p = 0.001) but not when Aβ+ (n = 17) participants and those with kidney/liver disease (n = 5) were excluded. Aβ+ participants had the highest p-tau217 (Figure 1). When compared against Aβ-PET, several false Aβ-positives (high p-tau217, Aβ-) were identified, including one extreme outlier (assay related) and a cluster of Aβ- participants with p-tau217 between 0.60-1.0. There were no associations with flortaucipir SUVR (frontal, mesial temporal, left parietal). Two extreme p-tau217 outliers had autopsy-confirmed CTE stage III (AD-, Table 2). Of the remaining donors, all were AD- and four had CTE (stages II-IV) with ptau217 between 0.125-0.449. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Plasma p-tau217 has usefulness in quantifying Aβ pathology but restricted utility for detection of CTE. In this at-risk for CTE sample, p-tau217 and Aβ-PET were associated at the group level. At the individual level, false Aβ-positives (and negatives) existed, including Aβ- participants with high p-tau217. We will explore whether this discrepancy is due to disease or peripheral interference with the N-terminal binding in p-tau assays.

OBJECTIVE:People with focal epilepsy experience one or more seizures prior to diagnosis. The Human Epilepsy Project (HEP) was a prospective study enrolling people with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. It collected information including cognitive testing at the time of enrollment. This was completed utilizing a computerized test battery called the Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB). A prior analysis found that enrollment CBB test scores were below that of age matched controls and that performance on testing was not independently associated with the longer-term development of treatment resistance over the course of the HEP study. The present study assesses the impact of pretreatment seizures on cognition at time of diagnosis, considering time-to-treatment initiation in relation to seizure onset, pre-treatment seizure frequency, and pretreatment seizure classification. METHODS:Participants with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy and no other major medical comorbidities or intellectual disability (estimated IQ > 70) were enrolled between June 29, 2012, and September 1, 2019. A subset of the 448 enrolled participants (N = 183) were over 18 years old, had complete HEP enrollment data that included pre-treatment seizure histories, and complete enrollment CBB testing for analysis in this study. Performance on enrollment CBB testing was modeled using multiple linear regression with pre-treatment seizure characteristics including seizure type and duration between seizure onset and treatment initiation, controlling for other key baseline participant characteristics. RESULTS:There were no independent associations between cognitive measures on the CBB at the time of enrollment and pre-treatment seizures after correcting for potentially confounding variables. Z-scores for the attention composite on CBB (an average of Identification and Detection tests) were not associated with a global pre-treatment seizure score that quantified time with seizures (days) and seizure count by seizure type (motor, non-motor, bilateral tonic clonic) (p = 0.29). Similarly, z-scores for the memory composite (an average of the One Card Learning test and One Back tests) were not associated with the pre-treatment seizure score (p = 0.1). No additional independent associations were found to be significant between z-scores for attention or memory composites and other potential explanatory variables. SIGNIFICANCE/CONCLUSIONS:This study highlights an important finding for people who develop focal epilepsy and otherwise are in good health: pre-treatment time-limited seizures do not have an independent impact on cognition early on, as measured by a brief validated cognitive screening test. This suggests that that cognition at the time of epilepsy diagnosis may be more strongly related to underlying etiology, chronic disease, and comorbidities.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) affects children and adolescents at an important time for neurologic and cognitive development. Although cognitive impairment has been described, few longitudinal studies of cognitive functioning in pediatric MS with matched controls are available. Here, we report the 2-year follow-up cognitive results of a cohort of participants with MS and healthy controls (HCs) recruited from multiple regions of the United States. METHODS:Three cohorts-participants with pediatric MS, age-matched pediatric HC, and adults with early-onset MS-were recruited across 7 sites through the United States Network of Pediatric MS Centers. Two cognitive batteries, Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB) and Brief International Cognition Assessment for MS (BICAMS), were administered at baseline and follow-up. The primary outcome was the change in CBB composite z-score compared between groups. Change in BICAMS composite z-score was also compared, as were change in z-scores of individual measures. Reliable change indices (RCIs) were calculated to determine meaningful change over time. RESULTS:= 0.022. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Most individuals with pediatric MS early in their disease showed stable cognitive function over a 2-year period and had longitudinal changes that were largely similar to pediatric controls. A subset of participants with pediatric MS declined in cognitive processing speed relative to pediatric controls.

BACKGROUND:Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) is characterized by persistent cognitive deficits alongside anxiety and depression symptoms that adversely affect quality of life. Cognitive training (CT) programs and non-invasive neuromodulation, specifically transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have each shown promise for alleviating similar deficits in non-clinical populations. However, their combined efficacy has not yet been evaluated in PASC patients. Therefore, this study aimed to determine whether the combination of CT and tDCS produces benefits for cognitive and mood-related symptoms in individuals with PASC. METHODS:We conducted a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial in adults aged 18-75 with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within the past six months and persisting cognitive complaints. They were randomized to a 4-week in-person intervention of 20 weekday sessions of either active (2 mA anodal-left, cathodal-right prefrontal stimulation) or sham tDCS paired with an app-based CT program. Primary outcomes were six standardized neuropsychological tests assessing verbal memory, working memory, executive functioning, attention, and language, administered at baseline and immediately post-intervention. As secondary outcomes, we assessed changes in depression and anxiety symptoms over the treatment period. RESULTS:Sixty participants (mean age 43.8 ± 13.2 years, 71.7 % women) were randomized to active tDCS + CT or sham tDCS + CT groups, and 52 finished the trial. Compared to sham, tDCS + CT resulted in significantly greater improvement in tests evaluating inhibitory control (effect size [ES] = 0.07, 95 % CI 0 to 0.23, p = 0.046), processing speed (ES = 0.08, 95 % CI 0 to 0.25, p = 0.034), and divided attention (ES = 0.08, 95 % CI 0 to 0.24, p = 0.039), but not in tests evaluating other domains. Both groups improved similarly in depression and anxiety symptoms. Participant's and rater's active guess rates did not differ between groups (ps > 0.20). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:An intervention with prefrontal targeted tDCS + CT in patients with PASC with cognitive complaints might be effective in improving attention, processing speed and inhibitory control, although further studies are warranted to prospectively confirm these findings. CLINICALTRIALS/RESULTS:GOV: NCT05389592.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Gait is a critical indicator of neurological health, with changes often signaling underlying decline. We developed a remote gait monitoring protocol using off-the-shelf shoe-based sensors (RunScribe) to assess gait parameters in real-world home settings. This protocol, known as Gait Assessment with Innovative Technologies - Home-based Use and Benefit (GAIT-HUB), was tested in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS), a population at high risk for gait impairment due to the disease's variable progression. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Participants with MS completed an in-clinic baseline gait assessment using a validated sensor (G-Sensor®) and three weekly, remotely supervised gait assessments at home using the RunScribe sensors. Gait parameters were compared across devices using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analyses. Longitudinal reliability of remote assessments and system usability score (SUS) were evaluated. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Twenty-nine participants (76% women, ages 19-67, PDDS range 0-5) successfully completed the home-based assessments. High agreement between devices was observed for gait speed, stride length, and cadence (ICCs >0.90), though phases like stance and swing showed more variability. Bland-Altman analyses indicated minimal bias in most parameters. Longitudinal assessments demonstrated strong reliability (ICCs >0.87) for key metrics, and SUS indicated good-to-excellent usability of the remote protocol. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:The GAIT-HUB protocol enables reliable and feasible home-based gait monitoring using wearable sensors that patients can easily self-apply. This approach provides valuable insights into daily mobility patterns beyond clinical visits, supporting more precise and timely assessments of functional status between appointments and offering the potential for seamless integration into telemedicine routine care.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Cognitive impairment is common in multiple sclerosis (MS). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with adaptive cognitive training (aCT) may improve clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To evaluate the effect of active vs. sham home-based tDCS + aCT on cognitive function. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:-scores. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = .411). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Active vs. sham tDCS + aCT resulted in significantly better cognitive outcomes, with the greatest benefit in those with high neurologic disability.CLINICALTRIALS.GOV; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03838770; IDENTIFIER: NCT03838770.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Cannabis use is rising in the United States. Up to 30 % of individuals who use cannabis develop cannabis use disorder (CUD), for which there are no FDA-approved treatments. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of a novel, one-month telehealth intervention of remotely supervised tDCS (RS-tDCS) paired with mindfulness meditation. This home-based telehealth intervention was evaluated in a cohort of women with multiple sclerosis (MS), a vulnerable subpopulation of adults with high rates of CUD. METHODS:The intervention included 20 home-based RS-tDCS sessions targeting the left DLPFC, delivering 2.0mA for 20minutes, paired with guided mindfulness meditation. Sessions were conducted 5 days per week for four weeks. Fifty-two women with MS and CUD (age: 44 ± 10 years) consented to participate; 47 were randomized 2:1 to active or sham tDCS. Feasibility was assessed via retention and adherence, while preliminary efficacy was measured by cannabis use, withdrawal symptoms, and MS-related symptom scales. RESULTS:Of 47 randomized participants (31 active, 16 sham), 39 (83 %) completed the intervention. The active tDCS group showed significant reductions in weekly cannabis use (Daily Sessions, Frequency, Age of Onset, and Quantity of Cannabis Use Inventory, DFAQ-CU: 5.3 ± 2.4 vs. 3.9 ± 2.7 days, p = 0.014) and withdrawal symptoms (CWS: p < 0.001). A trend toward reduced MS-related symptoms was observed (SymptoMScreen: p = 0.031). Cognitive performance improvement at the end of the intervention was significant in the active group (p = 0.011 vs. p = 0.172), supporting functional benefits of reduced cannabis use. CONCLUSIONS:This pilot RCT supports the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of telehealth tDCS in a medical subpopulation. Studying women with MS highlights its potential for large-scale RCTs and clinical use.