Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND CONTEXT/BACKGROUND:While the treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD) has increasingly favored surgical correction, the incidence of revision surgery remains high. Yet, little has been explored on the association between the etiology of reoperation and patient outcomes. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To assess the impact of the etiology of revision surgery on postoperative outcomes. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING/METHODS:Retrospective cohort analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE/METHODS:891 ASD patients. OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Complications, radiographic parameters, disability metrics. METHODS:Operative ASD patients with at least 1 revision stratified by etiology (mechanical [Mech] -pseudoarthrosis, thoracic decompensation without junctional failure, x-ray malalignment, implant failure, implant malposition, PJK ± major malalignment; infection [Infx]-early vs late onset, major vs minor; wound [Wound]; SI pain [SI Pain]). Excluded multiple etiologies, and intraoperative or medical complications. Data from the immediate visit prior to the final revision was used as baseline (rBL). Follow-up based on visits best aligned to time points after final revision. Radiographic parameters SVA, PI-LL, and PT were used to assess alignment post-revision via ANOVA. Multivariate analysis controlling for relevant covariates assessed outcome differences after final revision surgery. RESULTS:891 MET INCLUSION (AGE: 60.40±14.17, 77% F, BMI: 27.97±5.87 KG/M2, CCI: : 1.80±1.73). Etiology groups were as follows: Mech: 432; Infx: 296; Wound: 65; SI Pain: 98. Surgically, Infx had lower rates of osteotomy, interbody fusion, and decompression (p<.05). Infx and SI Pain demonstrated similar correction in radiographics SVA, PI-LL, and PT (p>.05), whereas Mech had significantly less improvement by 2 years (p<.003) that improved by 5 years. Compared to without revision, the odds of MCID in ODI were 48.6% lower across groups (OR: 0.514 [.280, .945], p=.032). Indications of x-ray malalignment were 93.0% less likely to reach MCID (OR: 0.071, [.006, .866], p=.038). Similarly, implant failure negatively impacted rates of MCID (40% vs. 15.2%, p=.029). Those with PJK had 57% lower odds of MCID (33% vs 54%, OR: .43, [0.2, 0.9] p= 0.023), further negated by major malalignment (OR: 0.05, [.07, .97], p=.02). Indications of pseudarthrosis, thoracic decompensation, implant malposition were not significant. Major sepsis had lower rates of MCID compared to minor (6.4% vs. 21.2%), and early onset infection improved compared to late (OR: 1.43, [1.17, 2.98], p<.001). In the early follow-up period, the Mech group has significantly worse SRS Pain and Mental Health scores compared to other groups (1-year: Mech 1.56 vs Infx 0.83 vs SI Pain 0.72, p<0.001; 2-year: 1.88 vs 0.71 vs 0.76, p=0.034). Complication rates increased with the number of revisions and with mechanical indication (all p<.05). At 5 years, patient satisfaction was significantly more likely to improve compared to early follow-up (OR: 1.22, p=.011), along with improved pain score, in Mech group (0.89 vs 0.49 vs 0.56, p=.081). CONCLUSIONS:This study focused on the impact of revision as it varies with etiology and time of occurrence postoperatively. Compared to other etiologies, revision surgery due to mechanical complications had less radiographic improvement and worsening patient-reported scores in the early postoperative period despite stabilization at 5 years. The depth of impact of mechanical complication, particularly with the addition of malalignment, merits greater focus during surgical planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III.

BACKGROUND:Tranexamic acid (TXA) is commonly utilized to reduce blood loss in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Despite its widespread use, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal dosing regimen. The aim of this study was to assess differences in blood loss and complications between high, medium, and low-dose TXA regimens among patients undergoing surgery for complex ASD. METHODS:A multicenter database was retrospectively analyzed to identify 265 patients with complex ASD. Patients were separated into 3 groups by TXA regimen: (1) low dose (<20-mg/kg loading dose with ≤2-mg/kg/hr maintenance dose), (2) medium dose (20 to 50-mg/kg loading dose with 2 to 5-mg/kg/hr maintenance dose), and (3) high dose (>50-mg/kg loading dose with ≥5-mg/kg/hr maintenance dose). The measured outcomes included blood loss, complications, and red blood cell (RBC) units transfused intraoperatively and perioperatively. The multivariable analysis controlled for TXA dosing regimen, levels fused, operating room time, preoperative hemoglobin, 3-column osteotomy, and posterior interbody fusion. RESULTS:The cohort was predominantly White (91.3%) and female (69.1%) and had a mean age of 61.6 years. Of the 265 patients, 54 (20.4%) received low-dose, 131 (49.4%) received medium-dose, and 80 (30.2%) received high-dose TXA. The median blood loss was 1,200 mL (interquartile range [IQR], 750 to 2,000). The median RBC units transfused intraoperatively was 1.0 (IQR, 0.0 to 2.0), and the median RBC units transfused perioperatively was 2.0 (IQR, 1.0 to 4.0). Compared with the high-dose group, the low-dose group had increased blood loss (by 513.0 mL; p = 0.022) as well as increased RBC units transfused intraoperatively (by 0.6 units; p < 0.001) and perioperatively (by 0.3 units; p = 0.024). The medium-dose group had increased blood loss (by 491.8 mL; p = 0.006) as well as increased RBC units transfused intraoperatively (by 0.7 units; p < 0.001) and perioperatively (by 0.5 units; p < 0.001) compared with the high-dose group. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with ASD who received high-dose intraoperative TXA had fewer RBC transfusions intraoperatively, fewer RBC transfusions perioperatively, and less blood loss than those who received low or medium-dose TXA, with no differences in the rates of seizure or thromboembolic complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

BACKGROUND:The association of Hounsfield units (HU) and junctional pathologies in adult cervical deformity (ACD) surgery has not been elucidated. OBJECTIVE:Assess if the bone mineral density of the LIV, as assessed by HUs, is prognostic for the risk of complications after ACD surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. METHODS:HUs were measured on preoperative CT scans. Means comparison test assessed differences in HUs based on the occurrence of complications, linear regression assessed the correlation of HUs with risk factors, and multivariable logistic regression followed by a conditional inference tree derived a threshold for HUs based on the increased likelihood of developing a complication. RESULTS:In all, 107 ACD patients were included. Thirty-one patients (29.0%) developed a complication (18.7% perioperative), with 20.6% developing DJK and 11.2% developing DJF. There was a significant correlation between lower LIVs and lower HUs (r=0.351, P=0.01), as well as age and HUs at the LIV. Age did not correlate with change in the DJK angle (P>0.2). HUs were lower at the LIV for patients who developed a complication and an LIV threshold of 190 HUs was predictive of complications (OR: 4.2, [1.2-7.6]; P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS:Low bone mineral density at the lowest instrumented vertebra, as assessed by a threshold lower than 190 Hounsfield units, may be a crucial risk factor for the development of complications after cervical deformity surgery. Preoperative CT scans should be routinely considered in at-risk patients to mitigate this modifiable risk factor during surgical planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level-III.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Understanding the mechanism and extent of preoperative deformity in revision procedures may provide data to prevent future failures in lumbar spinal fusion patients. METHODS:ASD patients without prior spine surgery (PRIMARY) and with prior short (SHORT) and long (LONG) fusions were included. SHORT patients were stratified into modes of failure: implant, junctional, malalignment, and neurologic. Baseline demographics, spinopelvic alignment, offset from alignment targets, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared across PRIMARY and SHORT cohorts. Segmental lordosis analyses, assessing under-, match, or over-correction to segmental and global lordosis targets, were performed by SRS-Schwab coronal curve type and construct length. RESULTS:Among 785 patients, 430 (55%) were PRIMARY and 355 (45%) were revisions. Revision procedures included 181 (23%) LONG and 174 (22%) SHORT corrections. SHORT modes of failure included 27% implant, 40% junctional, 73% malalignment, and/or 28% neurologic. SHORT patients were older, frailer, and had worse baseline deformity (PT, PI-LL, SVA) and PROMs (NRS, ODI, VR-12, SRS-22) compared to primary patients (p < 0.001). Segmental lordosis analysis identified 93%, 88%, and 62% undercorrected patients at LL, L1-L4, and L4-S1, respectively. SHORT patients more often underwent 3-column osteotomies (30% vs. 12%, p < 0.001) and had higher ISSG Surgical Invasiveness Score (87.8 vs. 78.3, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS:Nearly half of adult spinal deformity surgeries were revision fusions. Revision short fusions were associated with sagittal malalignment, often due to undercorrection of segmental lordosis goals, and frequently required more invasive procedures. Further initiatives to optimize alignment in lumbar fusions are needed to avoid costly and invasive deformity corrections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:IV: Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

BACKGROUND:Adult cervical deformity (ACD) surgery is more frequently being performed in frail patients. Although surgical outcomes are largely successful, there remains significant risk of poor outcomes. The ideal length of fusion constructs in these patients remains debatable. METHODS:Patients undergoing cervical fusion for ACD with lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) at T4-or-above, with clinical and radiographic data from baseline (BL) to 2 years (2Y) were stratified by CD-modified frailty index into not frail (NF), frail (F) and severely frail (SF) categories. Deformity was classified by Kim et al. criteria. Means comparisons tests were used to assess differences between both groups. Logistic regression analyses were used to analyze associations between frailty categories, lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) and outcomes. RESULTS:286 patients (Age: 57.3 ± 10.9 years, BMI: 28.9 ± 6.4 kg/m2, CCI: 0.84 ± 1.26). 47% of patients were female. 32.2% of patients were NF, 50.3% F and 17.5% SF. By deformity, 66% were focal kyphosis (FK), 12% were flatneck, and 22% were cervicothoracic. Only FK type differed between NF and F/SF patients (39.2 vs 73.6%, p = 0.005). At baseline (BL), differences in age, BMI, CCI and deformity were not significant. F/SF patients had longer LOS (p = 0.018) and higher rates of distal junctional kyphosis/failure (DJK/F) at 2 years. Controlling for baseline disability, F and SF patients were more likely to experience poor outcomes at 2 years with C7 compared with more distal LIVs. The risk for poorer outcomes was not significant when comparing LIVs within the upper thoracic spine. Similar trends were seen performing sub-analyses specifically comparing F vs SF patients. CONCLUSIONS:Frail patients are at risk for poor outcomes following ACD surgery due to their comorbidities. These patients appear to be at even greater risk for poor outcomes with a lower instrumented vertebra proximal to T1.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study of a prospectively collected single-center database. OBJECTIVE:Distal Junctional Kyphosis (DJK) is one of the most common complications in adult cervical deformity (ACD) correction. The utility of radiographic alignment alone in predicting and minimizing DJK occurrence warrants further study. To investigate the impact of post-operative radiographic alignment on development of DJK in ACD patients. METHODS:ACD patients (≥18 yrs) with complete baseline (BL) and two-year (2Y) radiographic data were included. DJF was defined as DJK greater than 15° (Passias et al) or DJK with reop. Multivariable logistic regression (MVA) identified 3-month predictors of DJK. Conditional inference tree (CIT) machine learning analysis determined threshold cutoffs. Radiographic predictors were combined in a model to determine predictive value using area under the curve (AUC) methodology. "Match" refers to ideal age-adjusted alignment. RESULTS:< .05) were significant predictors of a lower likelihood of DJK. Receiver operator curve AUC using age, T1S match, TS-CL match, LL-TK match, cSVA <3.7 cm, and T4-T12 <50 predicted DJK with an AUC of .91 for DJK by 2Y, and .88 for DJF by 2Y. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:These findings suggest post-operative radiographic alignment is strongly associated with distal junctional kyphosis. When utilizing age-adjusted realignment in addition to newly developed thresholds, a suggested post-operative cSVA target of 3.7 cm and thoracic kyphosis less than 50, it is possible to substantially reduce the occurrence of distal junctional kyphosis and distal junctional failure.

OBJECTIVE:The goal of this study was to assess the impact of fractional curve (FC) severity on curve progression and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing adult idiopathic scoliosis (AdIS) correction. METHODS:Patients with AdIS who had preoperative coronal plane deformity and who had undergone thoracolumbar fusion with a lowermost instrumented vertebra (LIV) between L1 and L4 were included. Patients were stratified by 6-week postoperative FC severity (small FC, ≤ 40th percentile, large FC, ≥ 60th percentile of the entire cohort; calculated as the Cobb angle between LIV and S1) and age groups. Preoperative to 2-year postoperative changes in FC were evaluated using Student t-tests. Demographics, spinopelvic alignment, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and complications were compared using chi-square tests for categorical variables and Student t-tests for quantitative variables. Multivariate regression analyses, accounting for age, sex, frailty, and 6-week postoperative LIV, were also performed when feasible to assess the impact of FC on 2-year postoperative outcomes. RESULTS:In total, 86 patients, with 34 in the group with small FCs and 34 in the group with large FCs, were examined (18 were in the group with medium FC). The mean age (36.4 years for those with small FCs vs 36.0 years for those with large FCs, p > 0.05) was similar. Preoperatively, spinopelvic parameters and PROMs were comparable (p > 0.05). Two years postoperatively, higher postoperative FC was associated with larger thoracolumbar deformity (i.e., higher thoracolumbar/lumbar/lumbosacral Cobb angles) and lower perceived lumbar stiffness (p < 0.05); however, other PROMs and complications, including revisions, were comparable (p > 0.05). Bidirectional change in postoperative FC was associated with a lower C7 pelvic angle and lower C7 plumb line (R2 = -0.03, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.00, p = 0.050). Across all patients, the mean FC improved from baseline to 6 weeks postoperatively (from 18.1° to 6.5°, p < 0.001) but changed minimally from 6 weeks to 2 years postoperatively (from 6.5° to 6.5°, p = 0.942). After stratification, the cohort with small FCs exhibited a relative increase (from 1.6° to 3.5°, p < 0.001), whereas the cohort with large FCs noted a nonsignificant change (from 11.9° to 9.8°, p = 0.121) in FC over time. CONCLUSIONS:Following surgery for AdIS, larger residual lumbosacral FCs were not correlated with adverse events or poor outcomes at 2 years postoperatively. FCs may improve or worsen over time to drive improvement in global coronal balance surgery, but are not associated with adverse outcomes or reoperation during the first 2 years after surgery.

UNLABELLED:BACKGROUND  : The use of bone morphogenic protein (BMP-2) in adult spine deformity (ASD) surgery remains controversial more than two decades following its approval for clinical application in spine surgery. This study was performed to assess outcomes in patients undergoing ASD surgery with BMP application compared with a combination of bone marrow aspirate, cancellous bone chips and i-Factor. METHODS:This was a retrospective cohort study. ASD patients were stratified by use of intra-operative BMP (BMP +) or not (BMA + I) and surveyed for the development of complications and mechanical failure. Quality of life gained following the procedure was evaluated using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Cost was calculated using the PearlDiver database and CMS definitions. Multivariable analyses (ANCOVA) and logistic regression were used to adjust for confounding. RESULTS:512 patients were included (60% BMP +). At baseline, BMP + patients were older (62.5 vs 60.8 years, p < 0.010). Radiographic and quality-of-life metrics did not differ at follow up timepoints (all p > 0.05). BMP use was associated with higher supplemental rod use (OR: 7.0, 1.9 - 26.2, p = 0.004), greater number of levels fused (OR: 1.1, 1.03 - 1.17, p = 0.003) and greater neurological complications (OR: 5.0, 1.3 - 18.7, p = 0.017). Controlling for rod use and levels fused, BMP use was not associated with a lower risk of mechanical complications (OR 0.3, 95% CI: 0.2 - 3.0, p = 0.353), rod breakage (OR: 3.3, 0.6 - 18.7, p = 0.182) or implant failure (OR: 0.3, 0.04 - 1.51). At 2 years, the BMP + cohort exhibited higher overall costs ($108,062 vs $95,144, p = 0.002), comparable QALYs (0.163 vs 0.171, p = 0.65) and higher cost per QALY (p = 0.001) at two years. CONCLUSIONS:In this analysis, BMP-2 application was not associated with superior outcomes when compared to a less costly biologic alternative (bone marrow aspirate + cancellous bone chips + i-Factor) following ASD surgery. The use of BMP-2 in ASD surgery appears to have reduced cost-efficacy at two years postoperatively.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE:This study evaluates the impact of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and knee arthroplasty on alignments and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMS) of patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) corrective surgery. BACKGROUND:The relationship between knee OA and spinal alignment in patients with ASD is incompletely understood. It is also unknown how patients with knee arthroplasty and ASD compare to ASD patients with native knees. METHODS:Baseline full-body radiographs were used, and hip and knee OA were graded by two independent reviewers using the KL classification. Spinopelvic parameters and PROMs were compared across the different knee OA groups and compared between patients with knee replacement and native knees. RESULTS:199 patients with bilateral non severe OA (G1), 31 patients with unilateral severe knee OA (G2), and 60 patients with bilateral severe knee OA (G3). Patients with severe knee OA presented with worse spinopelvic parameters. However, after multivariable regression analysis controlling for age, frailty, PI, T1PA, knee OA was an independent predictor of knee flexion (G1:-0.02±7.3, G2: 7.8±9.4, G3: 4.5±8.7, P<0.001), and ankle dorsiflexion (G1: 2.3±4.0, G2: 6.6±4.5, G3: 5.1±4.1, P<0.001). There was no difference in PROMs (P>0.05). Secondary analysis included 96 patients: 48 patients (50%) with non-severe knee OA, and 48 patients (50%) with knee replacement. There was no difference in radiographic parameters or PROMs between the groups. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this study of complex ASD patients, patients with worse spinal deformity were more likely to have concomitant knee OA. Knee OA was shown to be a predictor of knee flexion and ankle dorsiflexion angles, but was not associated with worse PROMs in this study population. Patients with knee arthroplasty, however, had comparable spinal alignment and PROMs relative to those with mild OA.