Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: Brain metastasis is the major cause of mortality among melanoma patients. A molecular prognostic test that can reliably stratify patients at initial melanoma diagnosis by risk of developing brain metastasis may inform the clinical management of these patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We performed a retrospective, cohort-based study analyzing genome-wide and targeted microRNA expression profiling of primary melanoma tumors of three patient cohorts (n= 92, n= 119, n= 45) with extensive clinical follow up. We used Cox regression analysis to establish a microRNA-based signature that improves the ability of the current clinicopathologic staging system to predict the development of brain metastasis. RESULTS: Our analyses identified a 4-microRNA (miR-150-5p, miR-15b-5p, miR-16-5p, and miR-374b-3p) prognostic signature that, in combination with stage, distinguished primary melanomas that metastasized to the brain from non-recurrent and non-brain-metastatic primary tumors (training cohort: C-index=81.4%, validation cohort: C-index=67.4%, independent cohort: C-index=76.9%). Corresponding Kaplan-Meier curves of high- vs. low-risk patients displayed a clear separation in brain-metastasis-free and overall survival (training: p<0.001, p<0.001, validation: p=0.033, p=0.007, independent: p=0.021, p=0.022, respectively). Finally, of the microRNA in the prognostic model, we found that the expression of a key lymphocyte miRNA, miR-150-5p, which is less abundant in primary melanomas metastatic to brain, correlated with presence of CD45+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. CONCLUSIONS: A prognostic assay based on the described miRNA expression signature combined with the currently used staging criteria may improve accuracy of primary melanoma patient prognoses and aid clinical management of patients, including selection for adjuvant treatment or clinical trials of adjuvant therapies.

Background In a phase 1 dose-escalation study, combined inhibition of T-cell checkpoint pathways by nivolumab and ipilimumab was associated with a high rate of objective response, including complete responses, among patients with advanced melanoma. Methods In this double-blind study involving 142 patients with metastatic melanoma who had not previously received treatment, we randomly assigned patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive ipilimumab (3 mg per kilogram of body weight) combined with either nivolumab (1 mg per kilogram) or placebo once every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram) or placebo every 2 weeks until the occurrence of disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. The primary end point was the rate of investigator-assessed, confirmed objective response among patients with BRAF V600 wild-type tumors. Results Among patients with BRAF wild-type tumors, the rate of confirmed objective response was 61% (44 of 72 patients) in the group that received both ipilimumab and nivolumab (combination group) versus 11% (4 of 37 patients) in the group that received ipilimumab and placebo (ipilimumab-monotherapy group) (P<0.001), with complete responses reported in 16 patients (22%) in the combination group and no patients in the ipilimumab-monotherapy group. The median duration of response was not reached in either group. The median progression-free survival was not reached with the combination therapy and was 4.4 months with ipilimumab monotherapy (hazard ratio associated with combination therapy as compared with ipilimumab monotherapy for disease progression or death, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.68; P<0.001). Similar results for response rate and progression-free survival were observed in 33 patients with BRAF mutation-positive tumors. Drug-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were reported in 54% of the patients who received the combination therapy as compared with 24% of the patients who received ipilimumab monotherapy. Select adverse events with potential immunologic causes were consistent with those in a phase 1 study, and most of these events resolved with immune-modulating medication. Conclusions The objective-response rate and the progression-free survival among patients with advanced melanoma who had not previously received treatment were significantly greater with nivolumab combined with ipilimumab than with ipilimumab monotherapy. Combination therapy had an acceptable safety profile. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01927419 .).

The incidence of cutaneous melanoma is rising faster than that of almost any other cancer in the United States. Acral lentiginous melanoma is a subtype of melanoma that involves the palms, soles, and nail beds. Although it is one of the rarer types of melanoma, it has a poorer prognosis than other more common subtypes. We describe a case of plantar acral melanoma in a 66-year-old woman that was initially misdiagnosed as a traumatic foot ulcer. We highlight this case to emphasize the importance of close observation and biopsy of ulcerative lesions of the foot that have atypical features or are refractory to standard treatment.

A 78-year-old man with metastatic malignant melanoma underwent a restaging 18F-FDG PET/CT after initiation of ipilimumab therapy, a Food and Drug Administration-approved human monoclonal antibody targeting CTLA-4. PET/CT demonstrated intense FDG uptake fusing to poorly circumscribed hypodensities throughout the liver. Patient was experiencing high-grade fever, chills, and generalized fatigue at the time of imaging, as well as mildly elevated liver function tests. Patient was subsequently treated with corticosteroids for suspected ipilimumab-induced hepatitis, and the patient rapidly improved clinically. Follow-up PET/CT 2 months later revealed complete resolution of abnormal FDG uptake in the liver, confirming the diagnosis of ipilimumab-induced hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of primary melanoma is curative for most patients with clinically localized disease at diagnosis; however, a substantial number of patients recur and progress to advanced disease. Understanding molecular alterations that influence differential tumor progression of histopathologically similar lesions may lead to improved prognosis and therapies to slow or prevent metastasis. METHODS: We examined microRNA dysregulation by expression profiling of primary melanoma tumors from 92 patients. We screened candidate microRNAs selected by differential expression between recurrent and nonrecurrent tumors or associated with primary tumor thickness (Student's t test, Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate [FDR] < 0.05), in in vitro invasion assays. We performed in vivo metastasis assays, matrix remodeling experiments, and molecular studies to identify metastasis-regulating microRNAs and their cellular and molecular mechanisms. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: We identified two microRNAs (hsa-miR-382, hsa-miR-516b) whose expression was lower in aggressive vs nonaggressive primary tumors, which suppressed invasion in vitro and metastasis in vivo (mean metastatic foci: control: 37.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 25.6 to 50.2; miR-382: 19.5, 95% CI = 12.2 to 26.9, P = .009; miR-516b: 12.5, 95% CI = 7.7 to 17.4, P < .001, Student's t test). Mechanistically, miR-382 overexpression inhibits extracellular matrix degradation by melanoma cells. Moreover, we identified actin regulators CTTN, RAC1, and ARPC2 as direct targets of miR-382. Depletion of CTTN partially recapitulates miR-382 effects on matrix remodeling, invasion, and metastasis. Inhibition of miR-382 in a weakly tumorigenic melanoma cell line increased tumor progression and metastasis in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Aberrant expression of specific microRNAs that can functionally impact progression of primary melanoma occurs as an early event of melanomagenesis.

The TLR7/8 agonist, Resiquimod has been used as an immune adjuvant in cancer vaccines. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of the cancer testis antigen NY-ESO-1 given in combination with Montanide with or without Resiquimod in high risk melanoma patients. In Part I of the study, patients received 100ug full length NY-ESO-1 protein emulsified in 1.25mL Montanide (day 1) followed by topical application of 1000mg of 0.2% Resiquimod gel on days 1 and 3 (Cohort 1) versus days 1, 3, and 5 (Cohort 2) of a 21 day cycle. In Part II, patients were randomized to receive 100ug NY-ESO-1 protein plus Montanide (day 1) followed by topical application of placebo gel (Arm-A; N=8) or 1000mg of 0.2% Resiquimod gel (Arm-B; N=12) using the dosing regimen established in Part I. The vaccine regimens were generally well-tolerated. NY-ESO-1 specific humoral responses were induced or boosted in all patients, many with high titers. In Part II, 16 of 20 patients in both arms had NY-ESO-1-specific CD4+ T cell responses. CD8+ T cell responses were only seen in 3 of 12 patients in Arm B. Patients with TLR7 SNP rs179008 had a greater likelihood of developing NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ responses. In conclusion, NY-ESO-1 protein in combination with Montanide with or without topical Resiquimod is safe and induces both antibody and CD4+ cell responses in the majority of patients; the small proportion of CD8+ cell responses suggests that the addition of topical Resiquimod to Montanide is not sufficient to induce consistent NY-ESO-1 specific CD8+ cell responses.

BACKGROUND: Due to high melanoma immunogenicity, germline genetic variants in immune pathways have been studied for association with melanoma prognosis. However, limited candidate selection, inadequate power, or lack of independent validation have hampered the reproducibility of these prior findings, preventing personalised clinical applicability in melanoma prognostication. Our objective was to assess the prognostic utility of genetic variants in immunomodulatory pathways for prediction of melanoma clinical outcomes. METHODS: We genotyped 72 tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 44 immunomodulatory genes in a population sample of 1022 melanoma patients and performed Cox regression analysis to test the association between SNPs and melanoma recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). We have further investigated the most significant associations using a fine mapping strategy and followed with functional analyses in CD4+ T cells in a subset of 75 melanoma patients. RESULTS: The most significant associations were found with melanoma OS for rs3024493 in IL10 at chromosome 1q32.1 (heterozygous HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.86; p=0.0006), a variant previously shown to be linked with autoimmune conditions. Multiple additional SNPs at 1q32.1 were also nominally associated with OS confirming at least two independent association signals in this locus. In addition, we found rs3024493 associated with the downregulation of interleukin 10 (IL10) secretion in CD4+ T cells. CONCLUSIONS: We discovered novel associations of IL10 with melanoma survival at 1q32.1, suggesting this locus should be considered as a novel melanoma prognostic biomarker with potential for aiding melanoma patient management. Our findings also provide further support for an alternative role of IL10 in stimulation of anti-tumour immune response.

Background: BRIM7 is a phase 1B study evaluating the safety and efficacy of combined BRAF and MEK inhibition with vemurafenib + cobimetinib. The utility of FDG-PET as an early predictor of clinical benefit was also evaluated in this study. Materials and methods: Eligible patients (pts) had advanced BRAF^V600-mutated melanoma and ECOG PS 0-1 and were either naive to BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi-naive) or had disease progression on vemurafenib (vem-progressor). Pts in the dose-escalation portion received vemurafenib 720 or 960 mg BID continuously and cobimetinib 60, 80, or 100 mg QD 14 days (d) on/14 d off (14/14); 21 d on/7 d off (21/7); or continuously (28/0). Two dose levels were expanded: vemurafenib (720 mg and 960 mg BID) + cobimetinib 60 mg QD 21/7. FDG-PET scans were performed at baseline and on Day 15 of Cycles 1 and 2. Correlation between tumor glucose metabolism changes, baseline tumor burden and target lesion responses were evaluated. Results: 128 pts were treated with vemurafenib + cobimetinib as of 21 June 2013; male 60%, median age 55 y (19-88), stage M1c 76% and BRAFi-naive 49%. Median duration of follow-up in vem-progressor and BRAFi-naive pts was 3 and 10 months, respectively. Most adverse events (AE) were mild to moderate in severity and vem-progressor pts reported fewer AEs compared to BRAFi-naive pts. Most common AEs in BRAFi-naive pts (n=63) were nonacneiform rash (89%), diarrhea (81%), photosensitivity/sunburn (70%), fatigue (67%) and liver test abnormality (59%). Most frequent grade >3 AEs in BRAFi-naive pts were liver test abnormality (19%), non-acneiform rash (13%), arthralgia (11%) and fatigue (10%). BRAFi-naive pts attained 85% confirmed response rate (RR), including 10% complete responses; median PFS was not reached at 10 months follow-up. Vem-progressor pts attained 15% confirmed RR, stable disease of 43%, and median PFS of 2.8 months. Preliminary FDG-PET analysis showed that the magnitude of reduction in tumor glucose uptake correlated with maximal tumor reduction, but the degree of correlation varied across time and in BRAFi-naive and Vem-progressor pts. Conclusions: Vemurafenib + cobimetinib can be safely administered at the respective single-agent MTDs of vemurafenib (960 mg BID) and cobimetinib (60 mg 21/7). Preliminary efficacy of the combination is encouraging in BRAFi-naive patients. FDG-PET is a potentially useful marker of early biologic response to the combination