Faculty Bibliography

Cutaneous involvement of the scalp is a common manifestation of dermatomyositis (DM), occurring in up to 82% of adults with DM. Scalp DM predominantly affects women and is characterized by dermatitis, alopecia, pruritus, and/or burning. While cutaneous DM negatively impacts quality-of-life, scalp symptoms in particular are often severe, debilitating, and recalcitrant to standard DM therapies. Currently, there is a paucity of guidelines to inform management of scalp symptoms in patients with cutaneous DM. In this narrative review, we summarize the treatments utilized to manage scalp DM and highlight potential areas for future research. We identified eight studies that reported on 27 treatments focused on cutaneous DM and described outcomes on scalp symptoms. A majority of the treatments were standard therapies for cutaneous DM and resulted in no or minimal improvement in scalp symptoms. Five therapies did result in complete resolution of scalp symptoms and were recommended as potential areas of future research. These included low-dose naltrexone and platelet-rich plasma, as well as two frequent and one less common therapy for cutaneous DM respectively: intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab, and apremilast. Though the literature was not systematically assessed in this review, these findings illustrate not only that strategies for refractory scalp DM are lacking, but also that those demonstrating potential efficacy are limited by low levels of evidence. Additional studies, especially randomized controlled trials, are needed to better inform management of scalp DM.

Lichen planopilaris is a primary lymphocytic cicatricial alopecia that commonly presents with hair loss at the vertex or parietal scalp. Patients may also have associated scalp itching, burning or tenderness. Due to scarring, hair loss is typically permanent. The main goals of treatment are reducing symptoms and preventing disease progression and further hair loss. Currently, the literature has limited evidence on treatments for this difficult condition, and most available evidence is from case reports and case series. Furthermore, the evidence shows a varied response to therapy, with frequent reports of poor response. This article reviews the diagnosis of this rare disease, summarize the currently available treatments, and provide insights and practices from alopecia experts.

Evaluation of alopecia often includes laboratory testing for ferritin, thyroid stimulating hormone, vitamin D, and zinc as previous studies have found associations between non-scarring alopecia and vitamin deficiencies. These studies are limited by small sample sizes, and subsequent analyses showed conflicting results. This study aims to explore laboratory abnormalities in non-scarring alopecia and examine whether supplementation is associated with increased hair growth. A total of 131 patients completed at least two visits by a hair specialist at NYU’s Faculty Group Practice. They had quantitative hair measurements taken at each visit and laboratory tests performed at the first visit. There were 20 (15.3%) patients with abnormal lab results. The most common vitamin deficiency was ferritin (6.5%). Forty-two (32%) patients received supplementations that specifically addressed their vitamin or hormone deficiency. Multivariate regression analysis showed that supplementation did not significantly impact hair density or diameter (P=0.73; P=0.96, respectively). Baseline hair density and diameter were positively associated with change in hair density and diameter, respectively (standardized coefficient [β] 0.57, P<0.01; β 0.61, P<0.01). The number of prescribed oral medications was negatively associated with change in hair diameter (β -6.60, P=0.04). Limitations of this study include the single-center, retrospective design and the short followup interval. However, our findings suggest that vitamin supplementation may not lead to improved outcomes in non-scarring alopecia, thus limiting the utility of laboratory testing. Additional large-scale prospective studies are needed to improve our management of alopecia. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(7):807-809. doi:10.36849/JDD.5886.

BACKGROUND:We previously reported The Alopecia Areata Consensus of Experts (ACE) Study: Results of an International Expert Opinion on Treatments for Alopecia Areata (AA). OBJECTIVE:To report the results of the ACE international expert opinion on diagnosis and laboratory evaluation for AA. METHODS:Fifty hair experts from 5 continents were invited to participate in a 3 round Delphi process. Consensus threshold was set at >66%. RESULTS:Of 148 questions, expert consensus was achieved in 82 (55%) questions. Following round 1 consensus was achieved in 10 of 148 (7%) questions. Round 2 achieved consensus in 47 of 77 questions (61%). The final face-to-face achieved consensus in 25 of 32 (78%) questions. Consensus was greatest for laboratory evaluation (12 of 14 (86%) questions), followed by diagnosis (11 of 14 (79%) questions) of AA. Overall, etiopathogenesis achieved the least category consensus (31 of 68 (46%) questions). LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:The study had low representation from Africa, South America and Asia. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:There is expert consensus on aspects of epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, laboratory evaluation and prognostic indicators of AA. The study also highlights areas where future clinical research could be directed to address unresolved hypotheses in AA patient care.

BACKGROUND:The major concern regarding the use of low-dose oral minoxidil (LDOM) for the treatment of hair loss is the potential risk of systemic adverse effects. OBJECTIVE:To describe the safety of LDOM for the treatment of hair loss in a large cohort of patients. METHODS:Retrospective multicenter study of patients treated with LDOM for at least 3 months for any type of alopecia. RESULTS:A total of 1404 patients (943 women [67.2%] and 461 men [32.8%]) with a mean age of 43 years (range 8-86) were included. The dose of LDOM was titrated in 1065 patients, allowing the analysis of 2469 different cases. The most frequent adverse effect was hypertrichosis (15.1%), which led to treatment withdrawal in 14 patients (0.5%). Systemic adverse effects included lightheadedness (1.7%), fluid retention (1.3%), tachycardia (0.9%), headache (0.4%), periorbital edema (0.3%), and insomnia (0.2%), leading to drug discontinuation in 29 patients (1.2%). No life-threatening adverse effects were observed. LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Retrospective design and lack of a control group. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:LDOM has a good safety profile as a treatment for hair loss. Systemic adverse effects were infrequent and only 1.7% of patients discontinued treatment owing to adverse effects.

Importance/UNASSIGNED:A recent expert consensus exercise emphasized the importance of developing a global network of patient registries for alopecia areata to redress the paucity of comparable, real-world data regarding the effectiveness and safety of existing and emerging therapies for alopecia areata. Objective/UNASSIGNED:To generate core domains and domain items for a global network of alopecia areata patient registries. Evidence Review/UNASSIGNED:Sixty-six participants, representing physicians, patient organizations, scientists, the pharmaceutical industry, and pharmacoeconomic experts, participated in a 3-round eDelphi process, culminating in a face-to-face meeting at the World Congress of Dermatology, Milan, Italy, June 14, 2019. Findings/UNASSIGNED:Ninety-two core data items, across 25 domains, achieved consensus agreement. Twenty further noncore items were retained to facilitate data harmonization in centers that wish to record them. Broad representation across multiple stakeholder groups was sought; however, the opinion of physicians was overrepresented. Conclusions and Relevance/UNASSIGNED:This study identifies the domains and domain items required to develop a global network of alopecia areata registries. These domains will facilitate a standardized approach that will enable the recording of a comprehensive, comparable data set required to oversee the introduction of new therapies and harness real-world evidence from existing therapies at a time when the alopecia areata treatment paradigm is being radically and positively disrupted. Reuse of similar, existing frameworks in atopic dermatitis, produced by the Treatment of Atopic Eczema (TREAT) Registry Taskforce, increases the potential to reuse existing resources, creates opportunities for comparison of data across dermatology subspecialty disease areas, and supports the concept of data harmonization.

Telogen effluvium (TE) – a common cause of non- scarring hair loss – is managed with varying clinical protocols given the paucity of evidence-based practices.