Faculty Bibliography

Background/Purpose: Treacher Collins (TC) and Robin Sequence (RS) are both associated with a retrognathic mandible, glossoptosis, and airway obstruction. TC is associated with aberrations of the lower jaw, upper jaw and nasal airway in a manner distinct from RS. Although in both TC and RS, airway obstructions in severe cases may benefit from mandibular distraction (MDO), the different pathophysiology suggests MDO to be less successful in TC compared to the current literature on RS. The purpose of this study is to report on the clinical outcomes of tracheostomy removal utilizing MDO in the TC patient population. Methods/Descriptions: A single center, twenty-year retrospective review (1991-2010) was conducted of all patients with TC treated with MDO. Recorded variables included: age of MDO, number of MDO procedures, presence of tracheostomy and complications. Literature review of clinical outcomes of MDO in the RS population demonstrates age of MDO of under one year, average on distraction per patient and avoidance of tracheostomy in over 90% of patients. Results: 24 patients with TC who underwent MDO were included in our analysis. The follow up time was 9.2 years (range1.7-17 years). The mean age of the first MDO was 4.97 years. The mean number of distractions was 1.42 with 46% of patients who had more than onedistraction attempted. The distraction devices used were external in 67% and internal in 33% of cases. 19 patients (79%) had a tracheostomy prior to MDO and only 9 (47%) patients were decannulated within one year of distraction. An additional 5 patients were decannulated several years later after further distraction and other airway procedures. Complications were divided into major (ankylosis, device failure) moderate and minor (pin infection, hypertrophic scar). Overall, 67% of TC patients had at least one complication with 41% having major complications. There was a 20% incidence of TMJ ankylosis. Conclusions: Compared to the RS population, TC patients undergo MDO at a later age, require more distraction and have less successful decannulation. Further surgery is required to effectively treat airway obstruction. The incidence of major complications

The management of patients with cleft lip and cleft palate requires prolonged orthodontic and surgical treatment and an interdisciplinary approach in providing them with optimal esthetics, function, and stability. This article describes an update on the current concepts and principles in the treatment of patients with cleft lip and palate. Sequencing and timing of orthodontic/ orthopedic and surgical treatment in infancy, early mixed dentition, early permanent dentition, and after the completion of facial growth will be discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Agnathia-otocephaly complex (AOC) is characterized by mandibular hypo- or aplasia, ear abnormalities, microstomia, and microglossia. Though rare and often fatal, this is the first report detailing various reconstructive strategies beyond infancy as well as longitudinal follow-up into adulthood.All patients with AOC treated at our institution over a 30 year period were reviewed. Four patients were identified, one with agnathia, one with micrognathia. Two males with nanognathia (defined as a symphyseal remnant without body nor ramus) were also included. The mean follow-up was 17 years. All four underwent perinatal tracheostomy and gastrostomy-tube placement. Commissuroplasties were typically performed before 3 years of age and repeated as necessary to allow for oral hygiene. Mandibular reconstruction was most successful with rib between ages 3 and 8, after which time, free fibula transfer was utilized. Due to some resoprtion or extrusion, all patients underwent repeated bone grafting procedures. Tissue expansion of the neck was used to restore the lower third of the face, but was most successful in the teenage years. At last follow-up of the eldest patients, one was in college while another was pursuing graduate education.AOC need not be a fatal nor untreatable condition; a reasonable quality of life can be achieved. Although the lower-facial contour may be improved, and a stoma created, the lack of musculature make deglutition virtually impossible with current therapies. Just as transplantation has emerged as a modality for facial restoration following severe trauma, so too may it be a future option for congenital deformities.

The Asher-McDade system is a 5-point ordinal scale frequently used to rate the components of nasolabial appearance, including nasal form and nasal symmetry, in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Although reference photographs illustrating this scale have been identified for the frontal and right profile view, no reference photographs exist for the basal view. The aim of this study was to identify reference photographs for nasal form and nasal symmetry from the basal view to illustrate this scale and facilitate its use. Four raters assessed nasolabial appearance (form and symmetry) on basal view photographs of 50 children (average age 8 years) with a repaired cleft lip. Intraclass correlation coefficients show fair to moderate inter-rater reliability. Cronbach alpha indicated strong agreement between raters (0.77 nasal form; 0.78 nasal symmetry; 0.80 overall), along with low duplicate measurement error and strong internal consistency between the measures. The photographs with the highest agreement among raters were selected to illustrate each point on the 5-point scale for nasal form and for nasal symmetry, resulting in the selection of 10 reference photographs. The basal view reference photograph set developed from this study may complement existing reference photograph sets for other views and facilitate rating tasks.

Background & Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare 3D symmetry of the nose in patients with UCLP, subsequent to rotation advancement (Millard) without primary nasal repair and the NAM/Cutting primary nasal repair. Methods & Description: Nasal casts were made for 12 consecutively appearing patients with UCLP, in each of two groups. Group 1 patients had a Millard repair without primary nasal repair (Bardach) while Group 2 patients had NAM and primary nasal repair. Patients were 6 to 18 years of age (mean=12.04). Surgery was performed at the mean age of 3.8 months. None of patients in Group 1 had primary nasal surgery as it was believed at the time by the surgeon that nasal growth might be inhibited. A two flap palatoplasty was performed at 12-24 months (mean age 19.75). All operations were performed by one surgeon in Group 1 and another surgeon in Group 2. Nasal casts were scanned using the 3Shape e scanner. All noses were scaled to the same size prior to evaluation. Procrustes analysis of 3D nasal symmetry was performed using 3dMD Vultus software. The Procrustes technique, determines nasal symmetry by performing a superimposition of its surface with its mirror image (ref Maull 1999). 4 linear measurements including columellar height, nasal dome height, alar base and nasal projections were performed on cleft and non-cleft side in both groups (ref Cutting 1984). For 3D analysis, student's t-test was used to determine the difference between the mean asymmetry index for each group. If symmetry is perfect the asymmetry index is zero. For linear analysis, student's T test was utilized to compare the differences. SPSS was used to perform a descriptive analysis of the groups. Results: The mean asymmetry index in the Millard rotation advancement repair was 4.41 and the NAM plus primary nasal repair was 2.45. The difference was statistically significant (P=0.006). In linear measurements, columellar length and alar base were significantly different when cleft side was compared to non-cleft side in Millard group (P=0.04 and 0.005). There was no significant difference in columellar length, nasal dome height, alar base and nasal projection in cleft versus non-cleft side in NAM group. Inter-group analysis showed that alar base in cleft and non-cleft side is significantly different in Millard versus NAM group (P=0.02). Conclusions: To our knowledge this is the first long-term, quantitative 3D study to analyze the asymmetry of the nose in the Millard rotation advancement versus NAM plus primary nasal repair in patients with complete UCLP. This study shows that the NAM plus primary nasal repair results in significantly less asymmetry of the nose compared to the Millard rotation advancement without nasal correction

The present study aims to determine the risk of early secondary nasal revisions in patients with complete unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate (U/BCLP) treated with and without nasoalveolar molding (NAM) and examine the associated costs of care. A retrospective cohort study from 1990 to 1999 was performed comparing the risk of early secondary nasal revision surgery in patients with a CLP treated with NAM and surgery (cleft lip repair and primary surgical nasal reconstruction) versus surgery alone in a private practice and tertiary level clinic. The NAM treatment group consisted of 172 patients with UCLP and 71 patients with BCLP, whereas the non-NAM-prepared group consisted of 28 patients with UCLP and 5 with BCLP. The risk of secondary nasal revision for patients with UCLP was 3% in the NAM group and 21% in the non-NAM group. The risk of secondary nasal revision for patients with BCLP was 7% in the NAM group compared with 40% in the non-NAM group. Using multicenter averages, the non-NAM revision rates were calculated at 37.8% and 48.5% for U/BCLP, respectively. Applying these risks of revision, NAM treatment led to an estimated savings of between $491 and $4893 depending on the type of cleft. In conclusion, NAM can reduce the number of early secondary nasal revision surgeries and, therefore, reduce the overall cost of care.

Bilateral craniofacial microsomia causes obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We hypothesize that unilateral craniofacial microsomia (UCFM) is an underappreciated cause of OSA. The records of all pediatric UCFM patients from 1990 to 2010 were reviewed; only complete records were included in the study. UCFM patients with OSA (apnea hypopnea index >1/hr) were compared to UCFM patients without OSA. Univariate and multivariate Fisher and chi tests were performed. Of the 62 UCFM patients, 7 (11.3%) had OSA. All OSA patients had Pruzansky IIB or III mandibles. OSA patients presented with snoring (71.4%), failure to thrive (FTT) (57.1%), and chronic respiratory infections (42.8%). Snoring (P < 0.001), Goldenhar syndrome (P = 0.001), and FTT (P = 0.004) were significantly associated with OSA, but race, obesity, clefts, respiratory anomalies, adenotonsillar hypertrophy, and laterality were not. The prevalence of OSA in UCFM patients is up to 10 times greater than in the general population. Snoring, Goldenhar syndrome, and FTT are significantly associated with the presence of OSA.

Obtaining an esthetic and functional primary surgical repair in patients with complete cleft lip and palate (CLP) can be challenging because of tissue deficiencies and alveolar ridge displacement. This study aimed to describe surgeons' assessments of presurgical deformity and predicted surgical outcomes in patients with complete unilateral and bilateral CLP (UCLP and BCLP, respectively) treated with and without nasoalveolar molding (NAM). Cleft surgeon members of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association completed online surveys to evaluate 20 presurgical photograph sets (frontal and basal views) of patients with UCLP (n = 10) and BCLP (n = 10) for severity of cleft deformity, quality of predicted surgical outcome, and likelihood of early surgical revision. Five patients in each group (UCLP and BCLP) received NAM, and 5 patients did not receive NAM. Surgeons were masked to patient group. Twenty-four percent (176/731) of surgeons with valid e-mail addresses responded to the survey. For patients with UCLP, surgeons reported that, for NAM-prepared patients, 53.3% had minimum severity clefts, 58.9% were anticipated to be among their best surgical outcomes, and 82.9% were unlikely to need revision surgery. For patients with BCLP, these percentages were 29.8%, 38.6%, and 59.9%, respectively. Comparing NAM-prepared with non-NAM-prepared patients showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.001), favoring NAM-prepared patients. This study suggests that cleft surgeons assess NAM-prepared patients as more likely to have less severe clefts, to be among the best of their surgical outcomes, and to be less likely to need revision surgery when compared with patients not prepared with NAM.