Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: To describe pediatricians' self-reported experiences with health literacy, use of basic and enhanced communication techniques, and perceived barriers to effective communication during office visits. DESIGN/METHODS: A national, random sample of 1605 nonretired, posttraining American Academy of Pediatrics members were surveyed in 2007 about health literacy and patient communication as part of the Periodic Survey of Fellows. The response rate was 56% (N = 900). RESULTS: Eight-one percent of the pediatricians were aware of a situation in the previous 12 months in which a parent had not sufficiently understood health information that had been delivered to him or her. In addition, 44% of all pediatricians were aware of a communication-related error in patient care within the previous 12 months. Using simple language (99%), repeating key information (92%), and presenting only 2 or 3 concepts at a time (76%) were the most commonly used communication strategies. Enhanced communication techniques recommended by health literacy experts such as teach-back and indicating key points on written educational materials were used less often (23% and 28%, respectively). The most common reported barriers to effective communication were limited time to discuss information (73%), volume of information (65%), and complexity of information (64%). The majority of physicians rated themselves highly in their ability to identify caregiver understanding (64%), but only 21% rated themselves as very good or excellent in identifying a parent with a literacy problem. Fifty-seven percent of the respondents were interested in training to improve communication skills, and 58% reported that they would be very likely to use easy-to-read written materials, if available from the American Academy of Pediatrics. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatricians are aware of health literacy-related problems and the need for good communication with families but struggle with time demands to implement these skills. Despite awareness of communication-related errors in patient care, pediatricians report underutilizing enhanced techniques known to improve communication

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether maternal literacy level accounts for associations between educational level and the cognitive home environment in low-income families. DESIGN: Analysis of 369 mother-infant dyads participating in a long-term study related to early child development. SETTING: Urban public hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Low-income mothers of 6-month-old infants. MAIN EXPOSURE: Maternal literacy level was assessed using the Woodcock-Johnson III/Bateria III Woodcock-Munoz Tests of Achievement, Letter-Word Identification Test. Maternal educational level was assessed by determining the last grade that had been completed by the mother. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The cognitive home environment (provision of learning materials, verbal responsivity, teaching, and shared reading) was assessed using StimQ, an office-based interview measure. RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses, a maternal literacy level of ninth grade or higher was associated with increases in scores for the overall StimQ and each of 4 subscales, whereas a maternal educational level of ninth grade or higher was associated with increases in scores for the overall StimQ and 3 of 4 subscales. In simultaneous multiple linear regression models including both literacy and educational levels, literacy continued to be associated with scores for the overall StimQ (adjusted mean difference, 3.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-5.7) and all subscales except teaching, whereas maternal educational level was no longer significantly associated with scores for the StimQ (1.8; 0.5-4.0) or any of its subscales. CONCLUSIONS: Literacy level may be a more specific indicator of risk than educational level in low-income families. Studies of low-income families should include direct measures of literacy. Pediatricians should develop strategies to identify mothers with low literacy levels and promote parenting behaviors to foster cognitive development in these at-risk families

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of low health literacy among adolescents, young adults, and child caregivers in the United States, the readability of common child-health information, and the relationship between literacy and child health. DATA SOURCES: MedLine, Educational Resources Information Center, National Library of Medicine, PsychInfo, Harvard Health Literacy Bibliography, and peer-reviewed abstracts from the Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meetings. STUDY SELECTION: A systematic review using the following key words: health literacy, literacy, reading skill, numeracy, and Wide Range Achievement Test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive studies that used at least 1 valid measure of health literacy, studies that assessed the readability of child health information, and observational or experimental studies that included a validated measure of health literacy, literacy, or numeracy skills and an assessment of child health-related outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1267 articles were reviewed, and 215 met inclusion and exclusion criteria. At least 1 in 3 adolescents and young adults had low health literacy; most child health information was written above the tenth-grade level. Adjusted for socioeconomic status, adults with low literacy are 1.2 to 4 times more likely to exhibit negative health behaviors that affect child health, adolescents with low literacy are at least twice as likely to exhibit aggressive or antisocial behavior, and chronically ill children who have caregivers with low literacy are twice as likely to use more health services. CONCLUSIONS: Low caregiver literacy is common and is associated with poor preventive care behaviors and poor child health outcomes. Future research should aim to ameliorate literacy-associated child health disparities

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a pictogram-based health literacy intervention to decrease liquid medication administration errors by caregivers of young children. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Urban public hospital pediatric emergency department. PARTICIPANTS: Parents and caregivers (N = 245) of children aged 30 days to 8 years who were prescribed liquid medications (daily dose or 'as needed'). INTERVENTION: Medication counseling using plain language, pictogram-based medication instruction sheets. Control subjects received standard medication counseling. OUTCOME MEASURES: Medication knowledge and practice, dosing accuracy, and adherence. RESULTS: Of 245 randomized caregivers, 227 underwent follow-up assessments (intervention group, 113; control group, 114). Of these, 99 were prescribed a daily dose medication, and 158 were prescribed medication taken as needed. Intervention caregivers had fewer errors in observed dosing accuracy (>20% deviation from prescribed dose) compared with caregivers who received routine counseling (daily dose: 5.4% vs 47.8%; absolute risk reduction [ARR], 42.4% [95% confidence interval, 24.0%-57.0%]; number needed to treat [NNT], 2 [2-4]; as needed: 15.6% vs 40.0%; ARR, 24.4% (8.7%-38.8%); NNT, 4 [3-12]). Of intervention caregivers, 9.3% were nonadherent (ie, did not give within 20% of the total prescribed doses) compared with 38.0% of controls (ARR, 28.7% [11.4%-43.7%]; NNT, 3 [2-9]). Improvements were also seen for knowledge of appropriate preparation for both medication types, as well as knowledge of frequency for those prescribed daily dose medications. CONCLUSION: A plain language, pictogram-based intervention used as part of medication counseling resulted in decreased medication dosing errors and improved adherence among multiethnic, low socioeconomic status caregivers whose children were treated at an urban pediatric emergency department. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00537433

A large-scale disaster may separate children from their parents or guardians and may strand many children in the care of temporary caregivers, including physicians and nurses. In general, unless a physician or nurse is a member of a public sector emergency response program (a 'VHP'), parental consent is required for the treatment of minors outside of an emergency department unless the minor is suffering from an imminently life-threatening condition. Physicians or nurses who are not VHP's may be held liable (civilly, criminally and administratively) if they provide care without parental consent outside of an emergency room to a child who is not suffering from an imminently life-threatening condition. The existing rules regarding parental consent would, in many cases, limit (or at least discourage) the provision of optimal health care to children in a large-scale disaster by restricting care aimed to alleviate pain, the treatment of chronic conditions as well as the treatment of conditions, or potential conditions, that could worsen or develop in the absence of treatment.Additionally, 'Good Samaritan' laws that generally limit the liability of health care providers who voluntarily provide care in an emergency may not apply when care is provided in a crude or makeshift clinic or when care is not provided at the scene of the emergency. Thus, benevolent physicians and nurses who voluntarily provide care during a large-scale disaster unjustly risk liability. The prospect of such liability may substantially deter the provision of optimal medical care to children in a disaster. This article discusses the shortcomings of current laws and proposes revisions to existing state laws. These revisions would create reasonable and appropriate liability rules for physicians and nurses providing gratuitous care in emergencies and thus would create reasonable incentives for health care providers to deliver such care. ('Gratuitous care' is the legal term for care provided voluntarily and without expectation of payment.)