Faculty Bibliography

The purpose of this study was to examine mandibular morphology and growth in patients with Crouzon, Pfeiffer, and Apert syndromes using posteroanterior cephalograms. Fifteen patients with Apert (n = 2), Crouzon (n = 11), and Pfeiffer (n = 2) (11 female, 4 male) syndrome were included in this study. All patients had serial posteroanterior cephalograms at 5, 10, and 15 years of age. The bicondylar width, bigonial width, bicondylar/bigonial ratio, and ramus to intercondylar plane angle for each patient were measured on the cephalograms and compared with age-match controls. An analysis of variance analysis was carried out to detect differences between patients and controls and sex differences between patients. In both male and female patients, there was a statistically significant reduction in bicondylar width compared with age-matched controls. Male patients also had a statistically significant increase in bigonial width compared with controls and female patients at 10 and 15 years. The resulting bicondylar/bigonial ratios were significantly reduced, and the ramus to intercondylar plane angles were significantly increased in both male and female patients compared with controls. Unlike previous reports of patients with syndromic synostosis, this study demonstrates that the mandible has significant morphologic and growth abnormalities, including constriction of bicondylar width with near normal bigonial width in female patients. These findings suggest a narrowing at the cranial base with resulting restriction of normal transverse mandibular growth at the condyle. The secondary nature of the mandibular finding is suggested by the near normal or increased transverse growth at the gonion in females and males, respectively. Consequently, the ramus appears torqued inward, forming a greater angle with the cranial base.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term mandibular skeletal stability and growth following unilateral mandibular distraction in growing children. METHODS: This retrospective longitudinal study of 12 consecutive patients with unilateral craniofacial microsomia who underwent mandibular distraction had a range of 5 years of postdistraction follow-up; five patients were followed for 10 years. Records included clinical photographs, dental study models, lateral and posteroanterior cephalograms, and panoramic radiographs obtained before distraction, at the time of device removal, and 1, 5, and 10 years after distraction. The mean patient age at the time of distraction was 48 months. The device was activated an average of 21.7 mm at the rate of 1 mm per day. The mean latency period was 6.1 days, and the mean consolidation period was 60.6 days. Fifty-two parameters were examined at each of the five time intervals. RESULTS: On average, the ramal length (condylion to gonion) increased 13.04 mm in the distracted rami. At 1 year after distraction, this dimension decreased by 3.46 mm. At 5 and 10 years after distraction, the average condylion-gonion dimension increased by 3.83 and 4 mm, respectively, with an average growth rate of 0.87 mm per year; during the same period, the unaffected ramus grew 1.15 mm per year. CONCLUSIONS: The distraction technique does not eliminate the inherent growth potential of the affected mandibular side. Facial asymmetry is significantly improved after distraction, and despite mild relapse observed during the first year, surgical correction is stable in the later years of follow-up

OBJECTIVE: To examine lateral cephalometric radiographs of adult unoperated cleft lip and palate patients for the purpose of clarifying whether maxillary deficiencies observed in treated cleft patients result from intrinsic defects or surgical intervention early in life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study examined lateral cephalograms of 30 adult patients with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CUCLP). The lateral cephalograms were traced and evaluated for size and position of the cranial base, maxilla, maxillary dentition, mandible, and mandibular dentition as well as for vertical relationships. Comparisons with 30 adult noncleft individuals were made. RESULTS: In unoperated adult cleft lip and palate patients, the cranial base angle was increased with the anterior cranial base reduced in length. The maxilla was found to be normal in size and somewhat prognathic in position. Both the maxillary and mandibular incisors were relatively upright. The mandible was smaller in size and posteriorly positioned. CONCLUSIONS: The potential for normal growth of the maxilla exists in patients with CUCLP. It is likely that disturbances of maxillary growth in surgically operated cleft patients are related primarily to the surgical intervention

We present a 26-year-old patient with juvenile-onset arthritis, Alagille's syndrome, micrognathia, and progressive sleep apnea. Despite the presence of significant temporomandibular joint pathology, mandibular distraction was indicated to correct life-threatening sleep apnea. Before distraction, the patient had only 10 mm of maximal interincisal opening and bilateral temporomandibular joint symptomatology. After distraction, the patient's sleep apnea resolved. There was slight improvement in her maximal incisal opening (12 mm) with neither exacerbation nor improvement of her temporomandibular joint symptomatology

Studies of adult patients with unoperated complete unilateral cleft lip and palate indicate that there is normal potential for maxillary growth. The maxilla in the unoperated patient is normally positioned or protruded. The protrusion of maxilla in the unoperated adult cleft patient is limited to the non-cleft side, contributing to hemifacial maxillary prognathism. Surgical scar tissue is known to interfere with the growth of the midface. Palatal surgery has more significant influence on the growth of the mid-face than the lip surgery; therefore, it is important to reduce the effect of surgery by delaying the timing of palatal surgery or changing the location of the surgical scar from the sutural areas. Delaying palatal surgery until the maxillary growth is complete is desirable but could lead to poor speech development. Therefore, it is essential to perform the palatal surgery before speech development. The other variables that affect the midface are the development genetic make-up of the cleft child, the amount of tissue deficiency, timing of surgery, surgical technique, and the skill of the surgeon. Surgeries continue to have some inhibitory effect on maxillary growth, but it is essential to recognize and perform those surgical procedures that have the least effect on growth of the maxilla. This will help minimize extensive orthodontic treatment and eliminate major secondary orthognathic surgery for correction of the abnormal growth of the maxilla