Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the control of oral-nasal balance by pediatric cochlear implant (CI) users, with and without auditory feedback. DESIGN: Five CI users read lists of sentences in two conditions: with their devices on and with their devices off. Their oral-nasal balance (ratio of energy radiated from the oral and nasal cavities) was measured in both conditions and compared with values obtained from children with normal hearing. RESULTS: CI users showed different patterns of abnormal oral-nasal balance with their devices off, but they generally achieved values that were closer to normal when their devices were on. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that children with CIs use the auditory signal provided by their device to improve their control of nasalization. It is also possible that at least part of the changes in oral-nasal balance were driven by changes in related articulatory parameters

The present investigation expanded on an earlier study by Miyamoto, Osberger, Todd, Robbins, Karasek, et al. (1994) who compared the speech perception skills of two groups of children with profound prelingual hearing loss. The first group had received the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant and was tested longitudinally. The second group, who were not implanted and used conventional hearing aids, was tested at a single point in time. In the present study, speech perception scores were examined over time for both groups of children as a function of communication mode of the child. Separate linear regressions of speech perception scores as a function of age were computed to estimate the rate of improvement in speech perception abilities that might be expected due to maturation for the hearing aid users (n=58) within each communication mode. The resulting regression lines were used to compare the estimated rate of speech perception growth for each hearing aid group to the observed gains in speech perception made by the children with multichannel cochlear implants. A large number of children using cochlear implants (n=74) were tested over a long period of implant use (m=3.5 years) that ranged from zero to 8.5 years. In general, speech perception scores for the children using cochlear implants were higher than those predicted for a group of children with 101-110 dB HL of hearing loss using hearing aids, and they approached the scores predicted for a group of children with 90-100 dB HL of hearing loss using hearing aids

OBJECTIVE:The present investigation examined the speech perception skills of pediatric cochlear implant users who changed from their original speech processors and strategies to the Spectral Peak (SPEAK) strategy. DESIGN/METHODS:A within-subjects design was used to compare individual subject's performance using the SPEAK strategy with that obtained with their previous speech strategy (FOF1F2 or Multipeak) in this retrospective study. The subjects demonstrated a wide range of perceptual abilities and had used a cochlear implant for varying lengths of time before converting to the SPEAK strategy. RESULTS:Nine of the 11 subjects showed significant improvement on at least one of the open-set word recognition measures, whereas two subjects showed no change on any of the open-set measures when using the SPEAK strategy. CONCLUSIONS:The present results suggest that the majority of pediatric cochlear implant users are likely to show improved speech perception performance when converting to the new SPEAK processing strategy.

OBJECTIVE:To examine changes over time in consonant feature production by children with profound hearing impairments who used either the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant or the multichannel vibrotactile aid, Tactaid 7. DESIGN/METHODS:Imitative consonant productions of children with prelingual deafness were elicited and transcribed at two intervals: 1) before receiving their respective devices (predevice interval), and 2) after an average of 1.5 yr of device use (postdevice interval). The consonant productions were analyzed in terms of the percentage of consonant features (manner, place, and voicing) produced by the child that matched the features of the examiner's target. The percentage of features produced correctly was then averaged across repetitions, vowel environments, and participants within each group. RESULTS:At the predevice interval, the cochlear implant and Tactaid 7 participants demonstrated similar imitative consonant production abilities. After an average of 1.5 yr of device use, the cochlear implant participants demonstrated significantly greater gains than did the Tactaid 7 participants for the features of voicing and place of articulation. Although the cochlear implant participants showed a trend towards better production of the consonant manner features, this difference failed to reach significance. CONCLUSIONS:The current results suggest that the use of a multichannel sensory aid yields improvements in consonant feature production. Furthermore, use of a cochlear implant appears to promote the production of consonant voicing and place features to a greater degree than does the use of a multichannel tactile aid.

The objective of this study was to determine whether insertion length and number of active channels remained the same after reimplantation of a cochlear implant. A retrospective case review of 170 consecutively implanted multichannedl cochlear implants was conducted. Seventeen of these devices had to be replaced. Data were analyzed for the Nucleus cochlear implant users who were reimplanted in the same ear. For most subjects, insertion length and number of channels remained unchanged, but a few subjects experienced substantial decreases. When the whole group was considered, a small but statistically significant drop was noted for both parameters. In conclusion, although reimplantation is technically possible, the first procedure provides the optimal surgical environment

English-language skills were evaluated in two groups of profoundly hearing-impaired children with the Reynell Developmental Language Scales, Revised. The first group consisted of 89 deaf children who had not received cochlear implants. The second group consisted of 23 children wearing Nucleus multichannel cochlear implants. The subjects without implants provided cross-sectional language data used to estimate the amount of language gains expected on the basis of maturation. The Reynell data from the group without implants were subjected to a regression by age. On the basis of this analysis, deaf children were predicted to make half or less of the language gains of their peers with normal hearing. Predicted language scores were then generated for the subjects with implants by using the children's preimplant Reynell Developmental Language Scale scores. The predicted scores were then compared with actual scores achieved by the subjects with implants 6 and 12 months after implantation. Twelve months after implantation, the subjects demonstrated gains in receptive and expressive language skills that exceeded by 7 months the predictions made on the basis of maturation alone. Moreover, the average language-development rate of the subjects with implants in the first year of device use was equivalent to that of children with normal hearing. These effects were observed for children with implants using both the oral and total-communication methods

The goals of this study were to characterize tongue surface displacement during production of bilabial stops and to refine current estimates of vocal-tract wall impedance using direct measurements of displacement in the vocal tract during closure. In addition, evidence was obtained to test the competing claims of passive and active enlargement of the vocal tract during voicing. Tongue displacement was measured and tongue compliance was estimated in four subjects during production of /aba/ and /apa/. All subjects showed more tongue displacement during /aba/ than during /apa/, even though peak intraoral pressure is lower for /aba/. In consequence, compliance estimates were much higher for /aba/, ranging from 5.1 to 8.5 x 10(-5) cm3/dyn. Compliance values for /apa/ ranged from 0.8 to 2.3 x 10(-5) cm3/dyn for the tongue body, and 0.52 x 10(-5) for the single tongue tip point that was measured. From combined analyses of tongue displacement and intraoral pressure waveforms for one subject, it was concluded that smaller tongue displacements for /p/ than for /b/ may be due to active stiffening of the tongue during /p/, or to intentional relaxation of tongue muscles during /b/ (in conjunction with active tongue displacement during /b/)