Faculty Bibliography

Ocular misalignment and nystagmus result in the visual symptoms of binocular diplopia and oscillopsia, and are frequently encountered in neurological practice. Correct localization of the underlying problem is the first step to accurate diagnosis, and requires a systematic approach and knowledge of the ocular motor pathways and actions of the extraocular muscles. This article contains three segments: The first outlines the diagnostic approach with attention to fine historical and examination details helpful in localization; the second describes common localizations of diplopia including extraocular muscle, neuromuscular junction, cranial nerve and nuclei, and supranuclear structures with attention to examination features characteristic for each location; and the third describes the types of acquired nystagmus and their treatments.

We present hypothesized ocular motor mechanisms of unique "staircase-like" sequences of saccadic intrusions in one direction that we have named, "staircase saccadic intrusions (SSI)," square-wave jerks/oscillations (SWJ/SWO), and transient failures of yoking and neural integrators in a patient with severe hypotonia, ataxic speech, motor and language developmental delays, and torticollis (Joubert syndrome). Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed hypoplasia of the cerebellar vermis and inferior cerebellar peduncles, abnormal superior cerebellar peduncles with deepening of the interpeduncular fossa, and enlargement of the fourth ventricle. During far and near fixation and smooth pursuit (rightward markedly better than leftward), the subject exhibited conjugate SSI (rightward more than leftward, with intersaccadic intervals equivalent to the normal 250 msec visual latency), SWJ, SWO, and uniocular, convergent and divergent saccades (including double saccades). Simulations using a behavioral ocular motor system model identified hypothetical mechanisms for SWJ, SWO, and SSI and ruled out the loss of efference copy as the cause. SSI may result from simultaneous dysfunctions: 1) a transient loss of accurate retinal-error information and/or sampled, reconstructed error; plus 2) a constant sampled, reconstructed retinal error that drives saccades.

The ocular following response (OFR) is a measure of motion vision elicited at ultra-short latencies by sudden movement of a large visual stimulus. We compared the OFR to vertical sinusoidal gratings (spatial frequency 0.153 cycles/ degrees or 0.458 cycles/ degrees) of each eye in a subject with evidence of left optic nerve demyelination due to multiple sclerosis (MS). The subject showed substantial differences in vision measured with stationary low-contrast Sloan letters (20/63 OD and 20/200 OS at 2.5% contrast) and the Lanthony Desaturated 15-hue color test (Color Confusion Index 1.11 OD and 2.14 OS). Compared with controls, all of the subject's OFR to increasing contrast showed a higher threshold. The OFR of each of the subject's eyes were similar for the 0.153 cycles/ degrees stimulus, and psychophysical measurements of his ability to detect these moving gratings were also similar for each eye. However, with the 0.458 cycles/ degrees stimulus, the subject's OFR was asymmetric and the affected eye showed decreased responses (smaller slope constant as estimated by the Naka-Rushton equation). These results suggest that, in this case, optic neuritis caused a selective deficit that affected parvocellular pathways mediating higher spatial frequencies, lower-contrast, and color vision, but spared the field-holding mechanism underlying the OFR to lower spatial frequencies. The OFR may provide a useful method to study motion vision in individuals with disorders affecting anterior visual pathways.

BACKGROUND: Eye movements are clinically normal in most patients with motor neuron disorders until late in the disease course. Rare patients are reported to show slow vertical saccades, impaired smooth pursuit, and gaze-evoked nystagmus. We report clinical and oculomotor findings in three patients with motor neuronopathy and downbeat nystagmus, a classic sign of vestibulocerebellar disease. CASE PRESENTATION: All patients had clinical and electrodiagnostic features of anterior horn cell disease. Involvement of finger and wrist extensors predominated, causing finger and wrist drop. Bulbar or respiratory dysfunction did not occur. All three had clinically evident downbeat nystagmus worse on lateral and downgaze, confirmed on eye movement recordings using the magnetic search coil technique in two patients. Additional oculomotor findings included alternating skew deviation and intermittent horizontal saccadic oscillations, in one patient each. One patient had mild cerebellar atrophy, while the other two had no cerebellar or brainstem abnormality on neuroimaging. The disorder is slowly progressive, with survival up to 30 years from the time of onset. CONCLUSION: The combination of motor neuronopathy, characterized by early and prominent wrist and finger extensor weakness, and downbeat nystagmus with or without other cerebellar eye movement abnormalities may represent a novel motor neuron syndrome.

The oxazolidinone antimicrobial linezolid is effective against gram-positive bacteria. Although maximal recommended therapy is 28 days, treatment durations greater than this are common. Linezolid may cause reversible optic neuropathy and irreversible peripheral neuropathy after months of treatment. Three cases of linezolid-induced optic and peripheral neuropathy are described, and previously reported cases of linezolid-induced optic neuropathy are reviewed. The mechanism of neural toxicity may be impairment of mitochondrial protein synthesis.

Two patients sharing a novel mutation of the CACNA1A gene for P/Q calcium channels showed significant slowing of adducting saccades compared with normal subjects or patients with cerebellar disease. Internuclear ophthalmoparesis (INO) was clinically evident in one. While these findings might be specific to this mutation, INO in our patients with episodic ataxia type 2 suggested involvement outside the cerebellum, either in the brain-stem internuclear pathway or at the neuromuscular junction.

We conducted a two-year follow-up study of 40 patients with MS in whom we had reported that abnormal eye movements (AEM) were associated with greater general disability. AEM patients (17/40) remained significantly (p < .001) more disabled (median EDSS of 7.0) than those with normal eye movements (median EDSS of 5.0). AEM and great disability were associated with abnormal MRI signals in brainstem or cerebellum, where disease may involve control circuits for eye movements as well as descending motor pathways.

Clinicians conventionally test saccades at the bedside by noting the accuracy, initiation time, and speed of large movements, with the patient's head stationary. Partly for methodological reasons, laboratory analysis of saccades has mainly focused on movements of 20 degrees or less. By measuring the velocity waveform of large saccades, it is possible to examine more closely the way in which brain stem and cerebellum guide the eye to the target. Large saccades made by healthy humans show a positively skewed velocity profile. Slow saccades made by patients with brain-stem disorders show a prolonged plateau of low velocity. Some patients with cerebellar disorders may show increased acceleration and deceleration of saccades. Each of these velocity waveforms can be modeled by changing the parameters that describe medium-lead burst neuron firing. In certain other brain-stem and cerebellar disorders, transient decelerations or premature terminations of saccades occur; such velocity waveforms cannot be modeled solely by changing the parameters that describe burst neuron firing. Instead, it is necessary to postulate dysfunction of the mechanism that normally inhibits pontine omnipause neurons, thereby permitting burst neurons to discharge until the saccade is completed. Analysis of large, abnormal saccades calls for application of novel techniques to identify the beginning and end of the saccadic pulse command.

BACKGROUND: Diplopia is a common complaint in both inpatient and outpatient neurologic practice. Its causes are many, and special historical and examination features are important to localization and accurate diagnosis. REVIEW SUMMARY: This review is divided into 2 sections: the first related to diagnosis and the second to treatment of binocular diplopia. In the diagnostic section, emphasis is placed on identification of historical and examination features that can help to differentiate diplopia caused by dysfunction of cranial nerves versus neuromuscular junction, or orbital extraocular muscle. Techniques available to the neurologist for examining ocular motility and ocular misalignment and focused laboratory testing to evaluate diplopia are discussed in detail. The final section covers the various treatments for binocular diplopia, with recommendations regarding the utility of each treatment for different types of diplopia. CONCLUSIONS: A logical step-by-step approach applied to each patient with diplopia will help prevent misdiagnosis and improve patient care.