Faculty Bibliography

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of droxidopa on symptoms of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) and activities of daily living using the Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire (OHQ) in patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA). Background: Droxidopa is an oral prodrug of norepinephrine with demonstrated efficacy in patients with primary autonomic failure (pure autonomic failure, MSA, and Parkinson disease) who have nOH. Design/Methods: We conducted a subset analysis of data from three droxidopa (Studies NOH301, NOH302, NOH303) clinical trials which enrolled over 400 patients with primary autonomic failure, including 95 patients with MSA, 56 of which were randomized into double-blind treatment periods of the studies. Changes in symptoms of nOH and in symptom impact on activities of daily living were measured via the OHQ. Safety was measured via the incidence and severity of adverse events. Results: There were statistically significant (P<=0.05) improvements in OHQ composite score after droxidopa treatment versus placebo in the combined analysis of Studies NOH301 and NOH302, although the total number of MSA patients was relatively small. Patients treated with droxidopa demonstrated numerically greater improvements than placebo-treated patients in nine of ten OHQ items. Standing systolic blood pressure improved with droxidopa treatment. Data suggests that 4-6 weeks of treatment may be required to reach full symptomatic benefit with the drug. Importantly, despite the progressive nature of MSA, the symptomatic and blood pressure benefits were maintained through 3 months of open label extension treatment. Droxidopa was well tolerated and safe in MSA patients and the overall population. Conclusions: Droxidopa was shown in this post hoc, subset analysis to be a useful therapy for the treatment and management of nOH in MSA patients, providing symptomatic relief associated with improvement in standing blood pressure and an excellent safety profile

Objective: To define which factors predict the pressor response to droxidopa in patients with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH). Background: Droxidopa, a synthetic norepinephrine precursor, was recently approved to treat symptomatic nOH. The pressor response is variable with some patients responding to doses of 100 mg while others requiring up to 600 mg three times/day. It is not known which factors predict the magnitude of the pressor response to droxidopa. Methods: We prospectively evaluated the BP response to increasing doses of droxidopa in patients with nOH in an outpatient setting. BP supine and after 3-min standing was measured before and 1-h after oral administration of 100 mg of droxidopa. Droxidopa was progressively increased until (1) complete relief of symptoms, (2) supine systolic BP[180 mmHg, (3) occurrence of side effects, or (4) the maximum dose of 600 mg was reached. Results: Sixteen subjects with nOH (6 with Parkinson disease, 5 with pure autonomic failure-PAF-, 3 with autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy-AAG-, and 2 with multiple system atrophy) were evaluated. Mean BP was 126 +/- 28/72 +/- 11 mmHg supine, and 89 +/- 19/53 +/- 15 mmHg after 3-min standing (fall of 37/18 mmHg). Mean plasma norepinephrine while supine was 192 +/- 216 pg/ml. Maximum droxidopa dose during the titration was 212 +/- 102 mg (range 100-400 mg). Droxidopa increased BP to an average of 148 +/- 53/90 +/- 13 mmHg supine and 135 +/- 38/66 +/- 16 mmHg after 3-min standing (p<=0.001). Plasma norepinephrine levels were inversely correlated with higher systolic BP after-3 min standing following droxidopa treatment (R2 = 0.42; p = 0.023). Four patients (3 with AAG and 1 with PAF) with very low plasma norepinephrine levels (<=90 pg/ml) experienced transient nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain during titration with dosages of 200 mg. In these patients, treatment with 100 mg/day was effective and well tolerated. Diagnostic categories did not predict response to droxidopa. Conclusions: In patients with nOH, lower plasma norepinephrine levels are associated with a greater pressor response to droxidopa. This response is probably related to the degree of denervation supersensitivity. Supine norepinephrine levels may be useful to predict appropriate dosing of droxidopa in the clinical setting

Objective: The Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-endorsed MSA study group (MODIMSA) identified a need to develop a systematic review on diagnostic tests in patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA). Background: The diagnosis of MSA is a primarily clinical exercise, despite development of numerous ancillary tests that differ in their diagnostic performance, availability and costs. Design/methods: We systematically reviewed original reports published before December 2016 with at least 10 MSA subjects per study defined by post-mortem verification, clinically probable, or clinically probable plus possible MSA according to consensus criteria and at least one reference group of diseased subjects. Results: A total of 363 relevant citations on diagnostic tests in MSA were critically analyzed. Cardiovascular autonomic tests and bladder ultrasonography contribute to the diagnosis of autonomic failure. None of the fluid biomarkers is sufficiently robust for the diagnosis of MSA, since most of the assays are not standardized and commercially available for wider testing. CoQ2 mutation testing is recommended in familial Japanese MSA-cerebellar cases. Screening for MSA mimic genes should be considered to refine clinical diagnosis. Visual interpretation of conventional MRI by experts, quantitative assessment of regional cerebral atrophy, diffusion imaging, iron sensitive sequences and automated techniques for quantitative MRI analysis are useful, but diagnostic accuracy of different MRI abnormalities across the studies is highly variable. [18F]FDG-PET, [123I]IBZM-SPECT, cardiac [123I]MIBG-SPECT and certain neuropsychological tests may also aid, but are not sufficient for the diagnosis of MSA. Reported data regarding neuroendocrine tests, external sphincter electromyography, transcranial parenchymal sonography, video polysomnography, levodopa challenge test, olfactory testing and skin and enteric biopsy are inconsistent. Conclusion: Based on this comprehensive literature review, several investigative measures may assist in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected MSA. The best current guidelines for MSA diagnosis are still clinical phenotype and inexorable progression

Objective: A 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study assessed the safety, changes in glia marker translocator protein (TSPO, PET examinations), and efficacy of two doses of AZD3241 and placebo in patients with Multiple System Atrophy (MSA). Background: AZD3241 is a potent, selective, brain-permeable myeloperoxidase (MPO) inhibitor being investigated for potential utility in modifying the course of multiple system atrophy. Design/Methods: Patients with MSA and mixed/high affinity binding to TSPO were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio (placebo, 300 and 600 mg BID). The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability during the trial. The primary imaging endpoint was within-group change in the total distribution volume (VT) of the radioligand [11C]PBR28 binding to TSPO in the striatum. The effect of AZD3241 on symptoms was examined using the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS). Results: 59 MSA patients were randomized at 17 sites and received study treatment (20 placebo, 19 300 mg BID AZD3241, 20 600 mg BID AZD3241). AZD3241 was safe and well tolerated. AZD3241 treatment with either dose regimen had no statistically significant effect on VT at 12 weeks compared to baseline. Placebo-treated patients had a numerically larger increase in the UMSARS from baseline to week 12 compared to either treatment group; betweengroup differences, though small, were consistent and dose-related. Conclusion: Overall, the study PET results do not support the hypothesis that inhibition of myeloperoxidase by AZD3241 in MSA patients has an effect on glia function in the brain, but further studies should explore the potential clinical efficacy of this compound

Objective: The Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) Criteria Revision Steering Group identified the weaknesses of current set of diagnostic criteria for MSA and discussed a need for its revision. Background: Typically MSA is diagnosed half way through its clinical disease course. However, early diagnosis is critical if any diseasemodifying treatment is to be applied. Methods: The Steering Group includes investigators experienced in Parkinsonian, cerebellar, autonomic, neuroimaging, sleep, genetic and postmortem aspects of MSA. Shortcomings of the current diagnostic criteria for MSA were addressed through the personal communication. Results: The first criteria for MSA diagnosis were published in 1989, the first Consensus Criteria in 1998, and the second Consensus Criteria in 2008. A study of "red flags" was also published in 2008 but the results not incorporated into the criteria. In a recent large autopsy study by Koga et al., 2015 38% of cases diagnosed in life with MSA did not have it, the largest misdiagnosed group having dementia with Lewy bodies. In a study examining validity of Consensus Criteria (Osaki et al., 2009), sensitivity for MSA diagnosis was 41% for possible and 18% for probable at first visit, whereas at last visit these figures were 92 and 63% respectively. There is clearly a need for improved sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis of MSA, especially at its earliest stages. Conclusions: It is time in 2018 to revisit and revise the Consensus Criteria for the diagnosis of MSA

Dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system afflicts most patients with Parkinson disease and other synucleinopathies such as dementia with Lewy bodies, multiple system atrophy, and pure autonomic failure, reducing quality of life and increasing mortality. For example, gastrointestinal dysfunction can lead to impaired drug pharmacodynamics causing a worsening in motor symptoms, and neurogenic orthostatic hypotension can cause syncope, falls, and fractures. When recognized, autonomic problems can be treated, sometimes successfully. Discontinuation of potentially causative/aggravating drugs, patient education, and nonpharmacological approaches are useful and should be tried first. Pathophysiology-based pharmacological treatments that have shown efficacy in controlled trials of patients with synucleinopathies have been approved in many countries and are key to an effective management. Here, we review the treatment of autonomic dysfunction in patients with Parkinson disease and other synucleinopathies, summarize the nonpharmacological and current pharmacological therapeutic strategies including recently approved drugs, and provide practical advice and management algorithms for clinicians, with focus on neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, supine hypertension, dysphagia, sialorrhea, gastroparesis, constipation, neurogenic overactive bladder, underactive bladder, and sexual dysfunction. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

OBJECTIVE:Blunted tachycardia during hypotension is a characteristic feature of patients with autonomic failure, but the range has not been defined. This study reports the range of orthostatic heart rate (HR) changes in patients with autonomic failure caused by neurodegenerative synucleinopathies. METHODS:Patients evaluated at sites of the U.S. Autonomic Consortium (NCT01799915) underwent standardized autonomic function tests and full neurological evaluation. RESULTS:We identified 402 patients with orthostatic hypotension (OH) who had normal sinus rhythm. Of these, 378 had impaired sympathetic activation, i.e., neurogenic OH, and based on their neurological examination were diagnosed with Parkinson disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, pure autonomic failure or multiple system atrophy. The remaining 24 patients had preserved sympathetic activation and their OH was classified as non-neurogenic, due to volume depletion, anemia or polypharmacy. Patients with neurogenic OH had twice the fall in systolic blood pressure (SBP) [-44±25 vs. -21±14 mmHg (mean±SD), p<0.0001] but only one third of the increase in HR than those with non-neurogenic OH (8±8 vs. 25±11 bpm, p<0.0001). A ΔHR/ΔSBP ratio of 0.492 bpm/mmHg had excellent sensitivity (91.3%) and specificity (88.4%) to distinguish between patients with neurogenic vs. non-neurogenic OH (AUC=0.96, p<0.0001). Within patients with neurogenic OH, HR increased more in those with multiple system atrophy (p=0.0003), but there was considerable overlap with patients with Lewy body disorders. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:A blunted HR increase during hypotension suggests a neurogenic cause. A ΔHR/ΔSBP ratio lower than 0.5 bpm/mmHg is diagnostic of neurogenic OH.