Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:The long-recognized association of brain injury with increased risk of dementia has undergone significant refinement and more detailed study in recent decades. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a specific neurodegenerative tauopathy related to prior exposure to repetitive head impacts (RHI). We aim to contextualize CTE within a historical perspective and among emerging data which highlights the scientific and conceptual evolution of CTE-related research in parallel with the broader field of neurodegenerative disease and dementia. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We provide a narrative state-of-the-science update on CTE neuropathology, clinical manifestations, biomarkers, different types and patterns of head impact exposure relevant for CTE, and the complicated influence of neurodegenerative co-pathology on symptoms. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Now almost 20 years since the initial case report of CTE in a former American football player, the field of CTE continues evolving with increasing clarity but also several ongoing controversies. Our understanding of CTE neuropathology outpaces that of disease-specific clinical correlates or the development of in-vivo biomarkers. Diagnostic criteria for symptoms attributable to CTE are still being validated, but leveraging increasingly available biomarkers for other conditions like Alzheimer's disease may be helpful for informing the CTE differential diagnosis. As diagnostic refinement efforts advance, clinicians should provide care and/or referrals to providers best suited to treat an individual patient's clinical symptoms, many of which have evidence-based behavioral treatment options that are etiologically agnostic. Several ongoing research initiatives and the gradual accrual of gold standard clinico-pathological data will pay dividends for advancing the many existing gaps in the field of CTE.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Cognitive impairment is common in multiple sclerosis (MS). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with adaptive cognitive training (aCT) may improve clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To evaluate the effect of active vs. sham home-based tDCS + aCT on cognitive function. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:-scores. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = .411). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Active vs. sham tDCS + aCT resulted in significantly better cognitive outcomes, with the greatest benefit in those with high neurologic disability.CLINICALTRIALS.GOV; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03838770; IDENTIFIER: NCT03838770.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Chronic non-specific lower back pain (cNSLBP) is a prevalent and disabling condition, imposing a substantial socioeconomic burden due to high healthcare costs and productivity losses, with limited accessible and effective long-term treatment options. Automated Thermo-mechanical Therapy (ATT) is a promising, non-drug intervention that leverages innovative technical advances to provide multimodal pain relief, offering accessibility and low-cost delivery. This study tested ATT for immediate pain relief in individuals with cNSLBP in a single-session, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:= 20) in a 40-min session with urn randomization. The active device applied heated cylindrical rollers along the spine, using far-infrared heat and mechanical tissue stimulation tailored to spinal alignment. In the control condition, the device used minimal mechanical therapy intensity without heat, targeting only the cervical area to avoid lower back therapeutic effects. Pre- and post-intervention assessments measured changes in pain intensity (primary outcome) via a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS-P100), alongside secondary outcomes assessing pain characteristics, anxiety, and functional mobility. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:= 0.0031). No adverse events were reported, and all participants tolerated the intervention well. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:A single session of ATT provides immediate, significant pain relief in individuals with cNSLBP, supporting its potential as a safe, non-invasive option for managing chronic back pain. Future studies should examine the long-term benefits of repeated ATT sessions and explore mechanistic insights into thermo-mechanical stimulation's effects on pain and function. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT06769321.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Gait is a critical indicator of neurological health, with changes often signaling underlying decline. We developed a remote gait monitoring protocol using off-the-shelf shoe-based sensors (RunScribe) to assess gait parameters in real-world home settings. This protocol, known as Gait Assessment with Innovative Technologies - Home-based Use and Benefit (GAIT-HUB), was tested in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS), a population at high risk for gait impairment due to the disease's variable progression. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Participants with MS completed an in-clinic baseline gait assessment using a validated sensor (G-Sensor®) and three weekly, remotely supervised gait assessments at home using the RunScribe sensors. Gait parameters were compared across devices using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analyses. Longitudinal reliability of remote assessments and system usability score (SUS) were evaluated. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Twenty-nine participants (76% women, ages 19-67, PDDS range 0-5) successfully completed the home-based assessments. High agreement between devices was observed for gait speed, stride length, and cadence (ICCs >0.90), though phases like stance and swing showed more variability. Bland-Altman analyses indicated minimal bias in most parameters. Longitudinal assessments demonstrated strong reliability (ICCs >0.87) for key metrics, and SUS indicated good-to-excellent usability of the remote protocol. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:The GAIT-HUB protocol enables reliable and feasible home-based gait monitoring using wearable sensors that patients can easily self-apply. This approach provides valuable insights into daily mobility patterns beyond clinical visits, supporting more precise and timely assessments of functional status between appointments and offering the potential for seamless integration into telemedicine routine care.

Depression is a common and debilitating disorder affecting millions. First-line treatments fail to achieve remission in about one-third of patients, highlighting a critical treatment need. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a novel treatment for depression. Therefore, the aim of this review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the last decade of tDCS trials for depression and propose future research directions. To compile studies of the past decade, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of tDCS for depression. A total of 21 RCTs were included, presenting a moderate effect for active tDCS compared to placebo. We also provided a description of study designs, stimulation parameters, and patients' characteristics. Following, we proposed possible strategies to enhance clinical effectiveness and reduce variability in results, including 1) optimization/personalization of tDCS via spatial and temporal target localization; 2) optimized methodological strategies, including home-based, accelerated tDCS protocols and novel trial designs; and 3) investigate patient profile to identify features that can predict treatment response. In conclusion, tDCS holds promise as a treatment for depression, but variability in trial parameters and outcomes underscores the need for its further optimization. Refining and standardizing protocols may enhance its effectiveness.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is managed with speech-language therapy (SLT) to slow language decline. Pairing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with SLT can enhance its effects. However, further research is needed to confirm these findings and guide its clinical use. We evaluated the feasibility of providing an intervention combining tDCS with SLT as a home-based and remotely supervised intervention. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Participants with confirmed PPA who had word-finding difficulties were recruited for an open-label observational study. The intervention consisted of 20 daily sessions over 1 month, each with 45-min of personalized word retrieval training. During the first 30-min, participants received tDCS over the left inferior frontal gyrus (anode F7, cathode O1) at 2.0 mA. Language measures were remotely administered at baseline and intervention end. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:= 0.016) from baseline to intervention end. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Our case series demonstrates that home-based tDCS added to SLT is feasible for patients with PPA. However, larger controlled studies are required to confirm its effectiveness in slowing language decline and to fully determine the benefits of this approach. This approach not only facilitates broader access to participation but also enables the extended treatment necessary to evaluate its clinical benefits, moving this treatment closer to clinical availability as a telehealth treatment.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Blood-based biomarkers offer a promising approach for the detection of neuropathologies from repetitive head impacts (RHI). We evaluated plasma biomarkers of amyloid, tau, neurodegeneration, and inflammation in former football players. METHODS:The sample included 180 former football players and 60 asymptomatic, unexposed male participants (aged 45-74). Plasma assays were conducted for beta-amyloid (Aβ) 40, Aβ42, hyper-phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 181+231, total tau (t-tau), neurofilament light (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), Aβ42/p-tau181 and Aβ42/Aβ40 ratios. We evaluated their ability to differentiate the groups and associations with RHI proxies and traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES). RESULTS:= 0.008). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Plasma p-tau181 and p-tau231, GFAP, and NfL may offer some usefulness for the characterization of RHI-related neuropathologies. HIGHLIGHTS/CONCLUSIONS:Former football players had higher plasma p-tau181 and p-tau231 and lower Aβ42/ptau-181 compared to asymptomatic, unexposed men. Younger age of first exposure was associated with increased plasma NfL and GFAP in older but not younger participants. Plasma GFAP was higher in participants with TES-CTE possible/probable compared to TES-CTE no/suggestive.

OBJECTIVE:The Human Epilepsy Project (HEP) is a large multinational cohort study of people with newly diagnosed and treated focal epilepsy. HEP utilized the Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB) as a self-directed online assessment to examine cognitive outcomes in study participants. The CBB has previously been validated in healthy individuals and people with various brain disorders, but its use in adults participating in HEP has not been assessed. In this study, we describe how the CBB was used in the HEP cohort and assess factors associated with test completion among study participants. METHODS:Enrollment data for HEP included 408 participants with comprehensive enrollment records, of whom 249 completed CBB assessments. HEP enrolled cognitively normal-range participants between the ages of 12 and 60 from June 29, 2012, to November 7, 2017, with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy and within 4 months of initial treatment. Baseline participant characteristics were analyzed, including demographics, pre-treatment seizure histories, MRI abnormalities, and the presence of any learning difficulties while in school, including formal learning disability diagnoses, repeated grades, and remediation. HEP participant characteristics for those who completed CBB testing were compared to those who did not using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS:The analysis of HEP participants who completed CBB testing showed that, after controlling for other factors, male participants were more likely to engage in testing (OR 2.14, 95 % CI 1.29 to 3.5, p < 0.01), Black subjects were less likely (OR 0.45, 95 % CI 0.22 to 0.9, p = 0.02), primary English speakers were more likely (OR 3.1, 95 % CI 1.21 to 7.96, p = 0.02), and those with a history of learning challenges were less likely (OR 0.69, 95 % CI 0.49 to 0.97, p = 0.03). There were no significant associations between completing CBB testing and age, employment (employed or student vs not), education (higher education vs not), diagnostic delay, pre-diagnostic seizure burden, or initial seizure semiology (motor vs non-motor). SIGNIFICANCE/CONCLUSIONS:The findings from this study highlight factors associated with the application of remote and unsupervised assessments of cognition in a prospective cohort of adults with focal epilepsy. These factors can be considered when interpreting performance on the CBB in HEP, as well as assisting the design of future studies that use similar approaches.