Faculty Bibliography

Background: Rodent model and in vitro studies suggest brain temperature has the potential to bidirectionally interact with tau pathology in Alzheimer's Disease (AD): tau phosphorylation is robustly increased by small (<1degreeC) reductions in temperature within the human physiological range, and lower brain thermoregulatory areas may be among those first affected by AD pathology. Here, we evaluated the cross-sectional association between body temperature (Tb), as a proxy for brain temperature, and clinically accessible markers of tau pathology in cognitively normal older adults.
Method(s): Tb was measured continuously over 48 hours with ingestible telemetry combined with a novel pre-processing algorithm. This period included 2 nights of nocturnal polysomnography to facilitate delineation of Tb-tau pathology relationships according to waking vs sleeping time intervals. Tau pathology was assessed with both soluble markers including plasma P-tau (P-tau 181) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) P-tau, both sampled the following day, and aggregated tau, namely neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) burden in early (I-III) Braak stage areas imaged with MR-PET using the [18F]MK-6240 radio tracer on average ~ one month later Results: Plasma and CSF P-tau levels were highly correlated with one another and with tau tangle radio tracer uptake (NFT burden), p < 0.05 for all comparisons. Lower Tb (quantified by lower mean Tb and a greater proportion of time Tb was under 37.0degreeC) was associated with increased NFT burden and increased plasma and CSF P-tau levels, p < 0.05 all comparisons. For aggregated tau, lower Tb - tau pathology associations were seen during for Tb recorded during waking, but not during sleeping intervals.
Conclusion(s): Preliminary results suggest that lower body temperature in older adults may be associated with increased aggregated and soluble tau pathology

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers in cognitively normal (CN) and mild cognitive impaired (MCI) participants. However, independent and combined effects of OSA, amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau-accumulation on AD time-dependent progression risk is unclear. METHODS:Study participants grouped by biomarker profile, as described by the A/T/N scheme, where "A" refers to aggregated Aβ, "T" aggregated tau, and "N" to neurodegeneration, included 258 CN (OSA-positive [OSA+] [A+TN+ n = 10, A+/TN- n = 6, A-/TN+ n = 10, A-/TN- n = 6 and OSA-negative [OSA-] [A+TN+ n = 84, A+/TN- n = 11, A-/TN+ n = 96, A-/TN- n = 36]) and 785 MCI (OSA+ [A+TN+ n = 35, A+/TN- n = 15, A-/TN+ n = 25, A-/TN- n = 16] and OSA- [A+TN+ n = 388, A+/TN- n = 28, A-/TN+ n = 164, A-/TN- n = 114]) older-adults from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort. Cox proportional hazards regression models estimated the relative hazard of progression from CN-to-MCI and MCI-to-AD, among baseline OSA CN and MCI patients, respectively. Multi-level logistic mixed-effects models with random intercept and slope investigated the synergistic associations of self-reported OSA, Aβ, and tau burden with prospective cognitive decline. RESULTS:Independent of TN-status (CN and MCI), OSA+/Aβ+ participants were approximately two to four times more likely to progress to MCI/AD (P < .001) and progressed 6 to 18 months earlier (P < .001), compared to other participants combined (ie, OSA+/Aβ-, OSA-/Aβ+, and OSA-/Aβ-). Notably, OSA+/Aβ- versus OSA-/Aβ- (CN and MCI) and OSA+/TN- versus OSA-/TN- (CN) participants showed no difference in the risk and time-to-MCI/AD progression. Mixed effects models demonstrated OSA synergism with Aβ (CN and MCI [β = 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74 to 1.52, and β = 1.18, 95%CI, 0.82 to 1.54]) respectively, and with tau (MCI [β = 1.31, 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.47]), P < .001 for all. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:OSA acts in synergism with Aβ and with tau, and all three acting together result in synergistic neurodegenerative mechanisms especially as Aβ and tau accumulation becomes increasingly abnormal, thus leading to shorter progression time to MCI/AD in CN and MCI-OSA patients, respectively.

STUDY OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:In a randomized controlled trial, we compared the effect of the Tailored Approach to Sleep Health Education (TASHE) on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) self-efficacy among community-dwelling blacks in New York City. METHODS:Study participants were 194 blacks at high risk for OSA based on the Apnea Risk Evaluation System. TASHE intervention was delivered via a Wi-Fi-enabled tablet, programmed to provide online access to culturally and linguistically tailored information designed to address unique barriers to OSA care among blacks. Blacks in the attention-controlled arm received standard sleep information via the National Sleep Foundation website. Blacks in both arms accessed online sleep information for 2 months. Outcomes (OSA health literacy, self-efficacy, knowledge and beliefs and sleep hygiene) were assessed at baseline, at 2 months, and at 6 months. RESULTS:We compared outcomes in both arms based on intention-to-treat analysis using adjusted Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling. TASHE exposure significantly increased OSA self-efficacy (OSA outcome expectation [ß = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.1-0.9] and OSA treatment efficacy [ß = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.0-0.8]) at 2 months, but not at 6 months. Additionally, TASHE exposure improved sleep hygiene at 6 months (ß = 6.7, 95% CI: 2.2-11.3), but not at 2 months. CONCLUSIONS:Community-dwelling blacks exposed to TASHE materials reported increased OSA self-efficacy compared to standard sleep health education. Stakeholder-engaged, theory-based approaches, as demonstrated in the TASHE intervention, can be used successfully to deliver effective sleep health messages. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02507089.

Narcolepsy is a sleep disorder marked by chronic, debilitating excessive daytime sleepiness and can be associated with cataplexy, sleep paralysis and sleep-related hallucinations. Pharmacological therapy for narcolepsy primarily aims to increase wakefulness and reduce cataplexy attacks. Pitolisant is a first-in-class agent utilizing histamine to improve wakefulness by acting as an antagonist/inverse agonist of the presynaptic histamine 3 receptor. This review summarizes the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of pitolisant in treating the symptoms of narcolepsy. Randomized and observational studies demonstrate pitolisant to be effective in treating both hypersomnolence and cataplexy while generally being well tolerated at prescribed doses. The most common adverse reactions include headache, insomnia and nausea.

Introduction: The phenomena of a 'first-night effect' (worse sleep) or the 'reverse first-night' effect (better sleep) has ensured that many sleep research protocols employ multiple nights' of in-lab polysomnography (PSG), at the cost of increased financial and participant burden. Although previous investigations in healthy and sleep disordered populations show high night-to-night variability of PSG macrostructure metrics, it is suggested that there is considerable stability in EEG microstructure and respiratory measures. Findings relating NREM EEG microstructure measures to Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology (tau and beta-amyloid burden) make sleep a potential biomarker of AD risk. Given that variability is always a major concern, we assessed the night-to-night variability of sleep macro and microstructure, respiratory and psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) measures in a group of normal elderly participating in aging and memory studies.
Material(s) and Method(s): 39 participants (66+/- 6.4 years-old and 72% female) attended 2 consecutive nights PSG and completed a 20-minute morning time PVT. 78 PSGs were scored according to AASM guidelines for sleep staging and sleep disordered breathing (S

STUDY OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To determine the effect of self-reported clinical diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) on longitudinal changes in brain amyloid-PET and CSF-biomarkers (Aβ42, T-tau and P-tau) in cognitively normal (NL), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's Disease (AD) elderly. METHODS:Longitudinal study with mean follow-up time of 2.52±0.51 years. Data was obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. Participants included 516 NL, 798 MCI and 325 AD elderly. Main Outcomes were annual rate-of-change in brain amyloid-burden (i.e. longitudinal increases in florbetapir-PET uptake or decreases in CSF-Aβ42 levels); and tau-protein aggregation (i.e. longitudinal increases in CSF total-tau (T-tau) and phosphorylated-tau (P-tau)). Adjusted multi-level mixed effects linear regression models with randomly varying intercepts and slopes was used to test whether the rate-of-biomarker-change differed between participants with and without OSA. RESULTS:In NL and MCI groups, OSA+ subjects experienced faster annual increase in florbetapir uptake (B=.06, 95% CI .02, .11 and B=.08, 95% CI .05, .12 respectively) and decrease in CSF-Aβ42 levels (B=-2.71, 95% CI -3.11, -2.35 and B=-2.62, 95% CI -3.23, -2.03, respectively); as well as increases in CSF T-tau (B=3.68, 95% CI 3.31, 4.07 and B=2.21, 95% CI 1.58, 2.86, respectively) and P-tau (B=1.221, 95% CI, 1.02, 1.42 and, B=1.74, 95% CI 1.22, 2.27, respectively); compared to OSA- participants. No significant variations in the biomarker changes over time were seen in the AD group. CONCLUSIONS:In both NL and MCI, elderly, clinical interventions aimed to treat OSA are needed to test if OSA treatment may affect the progression of cognitive impairment due to AD.