Faculty Bibliography

Purpose: To characterize Medicare services billed by current SSR members. Materials and Methods: With SSR Executive Committee permission, national provider identifiers (NPIs) were manually identified for all SSR members (who had all attested to >50% of one's practice in musculoskeletal [MSK] radiology). NPIs permitted member cross-linking to the 2015 CMS Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File to then identify all services each billed Medicare. Service codes were mapped to seven mapping-validated subspecialties (MSK, abdominal, breast, cardiothoracic, neuroradiology, nuclear medicine, and vascular-interventional radiology [VIR]) using the Neiman Imaging Types of Service classification system. Radiologists' percentages of work RVUs (wRVU) in each subspecialty were computed. Various subgroup analyses were performed. Results: Of 1,014 SSR members, 49.5% performed >=50% of their wRVUs in MSK. In terms of billed wRVUs, 53.4% of these radiologists mapped to a secondary subspecialty of neuroradiology in terms of billed wRVUs, 16.3% to abdominal, 11.8% to cardiothoracic, and 5.2% to VIR. Of all SSR members, 45.6% were generalists (i.e., no subspecialty crossed the majority wRVU threshold), but 37.4% of them performed a plurality of work in MSK. No other subspecialty accounted for greater than 2% of SSR members. A higher percentage of MSK wRVUs was significantly associated (p<0.001) with an academic affiliation (66.8% vs. 44.5%) as well as two different markers of greater SSR engagement: 1) attending the 2014 SSR meeting (63.5% vs. 49.9%) and 2) serving as an SSR committee member (75.7% vs. 51.6%). Of all other 27,618Medicare-participating radiologists nationally meeting inclusion criteria, 3.2% (879) had >=50% of their wRVUs in MSK but are not SSR members. Conclusion: Medicare claims-based practice classification provides unique insight into SSR membership. This information may help better understand current membership needs, plan future meeting content, and guide further society growth

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:In March 2017, the ACGME relaxed resident duty-hour restrictions to allow first-year residents to work 24-hour shifts, affecting the internship experience of incoming radiology residents. The aim of this study was to assess the media response to this duty-hour change, comparing news articles with favorable and unfavorable views. METHODS:Google News was used to identify 36 relevant unique news articles published over a 4-week period after the announcement. Articles' stance was categorized as favorable, unfavorable, or neutral. Additional article characteristics were explored. RESULTS:Article sources were 58% national, 22% local, and 20% medical news. Article stance was most commonly unfavorable for national news sources (48%), compared with neutral for local (62%) and medical (72%) news sources. Most common reasons for unfavorable stance were sleep deprivation (n = 11), medical errors (n = 11), residents' health (n = 9), risk for car accidents (n = 9), a patriarchal hazing system (n = 6), and work-life balance (n = 5). Most common reasons for favorable stance were impact on resident education (n = 7) and continuity of care (n = 7). Supporting data were cited by 38% of unfavorable and 100% of favorable articles. Unfavorable articles most commonly quoted physicians affiliated with resident advocacy groups; favorable articles most commonly quoted physicians affiliated with the ACGME. CONCLUSIONS:The relaxed duty-hour restrictions received an overall unfavorable media response, particularly in nonmedical news sources, driven by concerns regarding sleep-deprived doctors. Favorable articles ubiquitously cited data supporting the safety of relaxed duty hour restrictions. Further research is warranted to better understand the impact of relaxed resident duty-hour limits on sleep deprivation, residents' health and education, and the quality of patient care.

Background: Traditional pathology reports of prostate biopsy mainly focus on presence of carcinoma but ignore other pathologic findings such as inflammation or hyperplasia. In the era of MRI-ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy (MRF-TB), where specific MRI regions of interest (ROI) are targeted for biopsy, these benign findings should be reported as they may guide decisions on when to repeat imaging or prostate biopsy. In this study, we reviewed MRF-TB prostate biopsies reported as negative for carcinoma to identify pathologic correlates to visible ROI on prostate MRI. Design: From 2012 to2016, 1595 men underwent a total of 1813 prebiopsy prostate MRI, followed by MRF-TB at our institution. We rereviewed the prostate biopsy cores for all patients with PI-RADS 4 or 5 (PI-RADS 4/5) ROI but had no cancer detected on MRF-TB. Pathologic findings were separated into two groups: significant pathologic findings (SPF, such as inflammation, hyperplasia, ASAP/HGPIN) and no significant pathologic findings (NSPF) with or without cancer in same/adjacent site on systematic biopsy (SB). Patients with repeat MRI and follow-up MRF-TB evaluation. Results: 497 men had PI-RADS 4/5 lesions out of 1595 initial biopsies. Of these 497 men, 101 (20%) had MRF-TB negative for carcinoma. Upon review, 54 had SPF and 47 had NSPF on MRF-TB. Of 54 men with SPF on initial MRF-TB, 31 had repeat MRI, 23 of 31 men downgraded in which 16 had repeat MRF-TB with 1 had cancer detect. The other 8 of 31 men had persistent PI-RADS 4/5 lesions, 3 were detected cancer on repeat MRF-TB. Of 47 men with NSPF on initial MRF-TB, 19 had PCa in the same/ adjacent site on SB and were considered as missed on MRF-TB; of the other 28, 13 underwent repeat MRI. 8 of 13 downgraded with 0 had PCa in the repeat MRF-TB and 5 of 13 men with persistent PI-RADS 4/5 lesions, 3 had PCa detect on repeat MRF-TB. Altogether, 22/47 (47%) of the cases with NSPF in the initial MRF-TB were missed cancer. Conclusions: 1/5 of the target biopsy cases on PI-RADS 4/5 ROI had negative cancer detection. Inflammation, nodular hyperplasia and HGPIN can account for some of the cases, and those were downgraded in followup MRI usually had a negative repeat biopsy. Cases with NSPF on MRF-TB for PI-RADS 4/5 lesions are likely (47%) missed PCa, high likelihood of persistent PI-RADS 4/5 ROI on repeat MRI and PCa detection on repeat biopsy. We suggest pathology findings beside cancer should be reported on MRF-TB biopsy as they can guide decisions on repeat imagine and biopsy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) provides CMS flexibility to evaluate radiologists using hospital outpatient quality measures in place of conventional physician measures. We explore radiologist characteristics associated with variation in performance in two such measures: abdomen and chest CT "double scan" rates (percentage of total examinations performed both with and without intravenous contrast). METHODS:Radiologists' claims for abdomen and chest CT examinations in a facility setting were identified using 2014 Medicare Physician and Other Supplier data. Individual radiologist double scan rates were computed. Associations were explored between rates and radiologist characteristics extracted from the CMS public data sets using multivariable regression with cross-validation. RESULTS:Radiologists' double scan rates averaged 5.9% ± 10.0% (0.0% for 52.8% of radiologists) for abdomen CT (19,867 radiologists) and 1.0% ± 4.7% (0.0% for 91.3% of radiologists) for chest CT (18,684). At multivariable analysis, abdomen rates were best predicted by geography (lowest in Northeast, greatest in West), practice size (greatest for small practices), and specialty practice pattern (lowest for general radiologists; greatest for nuclear medicine physicians). Agreement for double scan rates among radiologists within the same practice was moderate, though slightly higher for chest (intraclass correlation = 0.70) than abdomen (0.59). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Radiologists' facility double scan rates vary systematically based on an array of professional characteristics. MACRA grants CMS the authority to use these measures for evaluating radiologists, thereby aligning Medicare's hospital and physician performance programs and better incentivizing population radiation dose and cost reduction. Greater variation in abdomen CT double scan rates, compared with ubiquitously excellent chest CT performance, supports a particular role for abdomen rates in distinguishing disparities in radiologist performance.

Purpose To assess subspecialty practice characteristics of the U.S. radiologist workforce. Materials and Methods This study used the Medicare Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File and did not constitute human subject research. The authors identified 33 090 radiologists who billed for professional services between 2012 and 2014 and used a validated classification system to map services to seven subspecialties and quantify subspecialty-focused effort on the basis of work relative value units (RVUs). Radiologists with more than half of their billed work RVUs in a single subspecialty were designated subspecialists; the remainder were classified as generalists. Matching radiologists with various characteristics extracted from other publicly available data sets, associations were explored through use of analysis of variance and multivariable logistic regression. Results More than half (55.3%) of U.S. radiologists practice predominantly as generalists but dedicate on average 36.0% effort to one subspecialty. Among radiologists practicing as majority subspecialists, neuroradiologists (10.1% of all radiologists) and breast imagers (8.4%) are most common. Subspecialization is more common (P < .001) among radiologists who are female, are earlier in their career, work in larger practices, have academic affiliations, and practice in the Northeast. By subspecialty, female representation varies from 8.6% (interventional radiology) to 63.1% (breast imaging); cardiothoracic imagers were more commonly early career radiologists, and nuclear medicine physicians were later career radiologists. Subspecialization is considerably more common in larger (>/=100 members) practices (63.1%). An academic affiliation is the strongest independent predictor of subspecialization (odds ratio, 3.56; 95% confidence interval: 3.30, 3.84). Conclusion Despite an increased focus on radiology subspecialization, most U.S. radiologists are majority general radiologists on the basis of their work RVUs. Subspecialization is by far more prevalent in larger and academic practices. ((c)) RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to explore associations between CT and MRI utilization and cost savings achieved by Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP)-participating accountable care organizations (ACOs). METHODS:Summary data were obtained for all MSSP-participating ACOs (n = 214 in 2013; n = 333 in 2014). Multivariable regressions were performed to assess associations of CT and MRI utilization with ACOs' total savings and reaching minimum savings rates to share in Medicare savings. RESULTS:In 2014, 54.4% of ACOs achieved savings, meeting minimum rates to share in savings in 27.6%. Independent positive predictors of total savings included beneficiary risk scores (β = +20,265,720, P = .003) and MRI events (β = +19,964, P = .018) but not CT events (β = +2,084, P = .635). Independent positive predictors of meeting minimum savings rates included beneficiary risk scores (odds ratio = 2108, P = .001) and MRI events (odds ratio = 1.008, P = .002), but not CT events (odds ratio = 1.002, P = .289). Measures not independently associated with savings were total beneficiaries; beneficiaries' gender, age, race or ethnicity; and Medicare enrollment type (P > .05). For ACOs with 2013 and 2014 data, neither increases nor decreases in CT and MRI events between years were associated with 2014 total savings or meeting savings thresholds (P ≥ .466). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Higher MRI utilization rates were independently associated with small but significant MSSP ACO savings. The value of MRI might relate to the favorable impact of appropriate advanced imaging utilization on downstream outcomes and other resource utilization. Because MSSP ACOs represent a highly select group of sophisticated organizations subject to rigorous quality and care coordination standards, further research will be necessary to determine if these associations are generalizable to other health care settings.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Meaningfully measuring physician outcomes and resource utilization requires appropriate patient risk adjustment. We aimed to assess Medicare patient complexity by physician specialty and to further identify radiologist characteristics associated with higher patient complexity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The average beneficiary Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) risk scores (Medicare's preferred measure of clinical complexity) were identified for all physicians using 2014 Medicare claims data. HCC scores were compared among physician specialties and further stratified for radiologists based on a range of characteristics. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 549,194 physicians across 54 specialties, the mean HCC risk score was 1.62 +/- 0.75. Of the 54 specialties, interventional radiology ranked 4th (2.60 +/- 1.29), nuclear medicine ranked 16th (1.87 +/- 0.45), and diagnostic radiology ranked 21st (1.75 +/- 0.61). Among 31,175 radiologists, risk scores were higher (P < 0.001) for those with teaching (2.03 +/- 0.74) vs nonteaching affiliations (1.72 +/- 0.61), practice size >/=100 (1.94 +/- 0.70) vs