Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose, recommended phase II dose (RPTD) and toxicities of the FOG regimen (infusional 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, gemcitabine). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors were treated in an accelerated titration scheme. 5-Fluorouracil was administered intravenously at 200 mg/m(2)/day for 14 days and repeated every 21 days (one cycle). Gemcitabine was administered on days 1 and 8 over 30 min at 450-650 mg/m(2). Oxaliplatin was administered on day 1 over 2 h at 85-130 mg/m(2). For cycles 1, 3 and beyond, gemcitabine followed oxaliplatin; for cycle 2, gemcitabine preceded oxaliplatin. RESULTS: Forty-five and 39 patients were assessable for toxicity and response, respectively. Cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and diarrhea. No DLT was observed in cycle 1 at the first four dose levels (DL). At DL-5, two of four (50%) patients experienced DLT in cycle 1. Expanding DL-4, nine of 26 (35%) patients experienced DLT in cycle 1. Because recurrent grade 3 toxicities were observed in three of six (50%) patients at DL-3, DL-2 was considered the RPTD. At the RPTD, three patients had a partial response (response rate 23%). CONCLUSIONS: The RPTD for the 5-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin-gemcitabine combination is 200/100/450 mg/m(2). This novel regimen has demonstrated activity in advanced solid tumors and merits further investigation

First-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer during the past decade has evolved toward the use of carboplatin and paclitaxel combinations. This has been based on randomized trials showing that combinations of these two drugs lead to a outcome similar to that obtained using cisplatin and paclitaxel (that had, in turn, proven superior in progression-free survival and overall survival to cisplatin and cyclophosphamide) but with less toxicity. Surprisingly, taxane-platinum combinations were not superior to control arms in two studies (ICON3 and GOG-132) utilizing carboplatin or cisplatin as the comparators. This has renewed interest in the role of single agents in first-line chemotherapy - a concept also supported by a number of prior clinical trials with single-agent platinum compounds yielding results not inferior to combinations. Early 'pre-emptive' crossover (prior to the stipulated clinical progression) to paclitaxel or a paclitaxel-containing regimen, however, occurred in 24% of patients initially treated with cisplatin on GOG-132. This has led to the interpretation of this trial as a combination versus sequential design. Although not subscribing to this interpretation, the results of GOG-132 and ICON3 not only raise doubts over a clear superiority of combinations over single agents but also lead to a consideration of sequential treatment designs for first line. Advantages of such designs are: (a) ability to provide 'dose-dense' platinums followed by 'dose-dense' paclitaxel and, perhaps, other drugs; and (b) the potential of acquiring biological data linked to the antitumor effects of a specific drug. Mathematical modeling and recent positive results in breast cancer adjuvant therapy support the use of 'dose-dense' strategies, and these should be considered in the design of future trials in ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) has been reported to cause immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) that cannot be explained as IgE-mediated (type I) allergy. Previous in vitro and animal studies indicated that activation of the complement (C) system might play a causal role in the process, a proposal that has not been tested in humans to date. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with solid tumors (n = 29) treated for the first time with Doxil were evaluated for HSRs and concurrent C activation. HSRs were classified from mild to severe, while C activation was estimated by serial measurement of plasma C terminal complex (SC5b-9) levels. Increases in SC5b-9 were compared in patients with or without reactions, and were correlated with Doxil dose rate. RESULTS: Moderate to severe HSRs occurred in 45% of patients. Plasma SC5b-9 at 10 min after infusion was significantly elevated in 92% of reactor patients versus 56% in the non-reactor group, and the rise was greater in reactors than in non-reactors. We found significant association between C activation and HSRs, both showing direct correlation with the initial Doxil dose rate. CONCLUSIONS: C activation may play a key role in HSRs to Doxil. However, low-level C activation does not necessarily entail clinical symptoms, highlighting the probable involvement of further, as yet unidentified, amplification factors

Although three large phase III trials have documented the benefit of IP chemotherapy, this therapy as consolidation has been studied in only a few pilot studies. These small studies have included patients with a variety of baseline prognostic characteristics, and only one series had a comparator group of surgically documented pathologic complete response to uniform systemic chemotherapy. No randomized trials have been done to assess the impact of IP consolidation on progression-free survival or survival in either positively or negatively reassessed patients. It is hoped that the current experience will trigger further consideration of future phase III trials to assess the value of IP consolidation after initial induction with chemotherapy (ie, chemical debulking)

PURPOSE: To determine the activity of biweekly oxaliplatin, combined with weekly bolus fluorouracil (FU) and low-dose leucovorin (LV) chemotherapy (bFOL), as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer; no previous therapy for advanced disease (adjuvant therapy allowed if >6 months since completion); and performance status 0, 1, or 2 were eligible and were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 days 1 and 15 plus LV 20 mg/m2 over 10 to 20 minutes, followed by a 500 mg/m2 bolus dose of FU on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Patients underwent response evaluation by computed tomographic scan every 2 months. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were entered, and 41 patients were treated, including 20 men and 22 women, nine with previous adjuvant chemotherapy and four with radiation therapy. Three patients achieved complete response, and 23 patients achieved partial response, for a response rate of 63% (95% CI, 49% to 78%). Major toxicities included cumulative neuropathy grade 2 (24%) and grade 3 (12%; requiring discontinuation of oxaliplatin), diarrhea grade 3 to 4 (29%) and grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity (10%). Median time to progression was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval, 7.1 to 10.8 months) with median survival of 15.9 months (95% confidence interval, 11.4 to 19.7 months). CONCLUSION: The bFOL regimen seems to have activity comparable to be infusional programs of FU combined with oxaliplatin. Prospective trials are warranted to determine the relative merits of this schedule compared with the currently indicated schedules

The survival at 5 years, of patients with ovarian cancer, has steadily improved since 1960, when surgery and alkylating agents were the only initial modalities employed to cope with the usual late presentation of the disease. In the 1980s, cisplatin and then carboplatin became established as the most active drugs, alone or in combination with other drugs. In the last decade, the antimicrotubulin drug paclitaxel, and the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan were noted to be active after failure of platinum drugs. These drugs, as well as others with known activity in the second-line setting, such as the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, gemcitabine and oral etoposide, all play a role in the treatment of these patients and likely prolong survival without eradicating the disease. The plight of these patients has stimulated new areas of drug development. Here, the evolution of the current therapeutic strategy, the scientific rationale for cytotoxic and non-cytotoxic agents and their status at present are reviewed. 'Targeted' drug trials, in contrast to trials studying cytotoxic drug analogues, currently represent only a minor portion of clinical trials in ovarian cancer