Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) is a self-report instrument, previously shown to differentiate patients with epileptic seizures (ES) and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES). At present, the odds of MMPI-2-RF scale elevations in PNES patients, as well as the diagnostic predictive value of such scale elevations, remain largely unexplored. This can be of clinical utility, particularly when a diagnosis is uncertain. METHOD: After looking at mean group differences, we applied contingency table derived odds ratios to a sample of ES (n=92) and PNES (n=77) patients from a video EEG (vEEG) monitoring unit. We also looked at the positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), as well as the false discovery rate (FDR) and false omission rate (FOR) for scales found to have increased odds of elevation in PNES patients. This was completed for the overall sample, as well as the sample stratified by sex. RESULTS: The odds of elevations related to somatic concerns, negative mood, and suicidal ideation in the PNES sample ranged from 2 to 5 times more likely. Female PNES patients had 3-6 times greater odds of such scale elevations, while male PNES patients had odds of 5-15 times more likely. PPV rates ranged from 53.66% to 84.62%, while NPV rates ranged from 47.52% to 90.91%. FDR across scales ranged from 15.38% to 50%, while the FOR ranged from 9.09% to 52.47%. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with prior research, PNES patients have greater odds of MMPI-2-RF scale elevations, particularly related to somatic concerns and mood disturbance. Female PNES patients endorsed greater emotional distress, including endorsement of suicide related items. Elevations of these scales could aid in differentiating PNES from ES patients, although caution is warranted due to the possibility of both false positives and the incorrect omissions of PNES cases.

The differential contribution of medial-temporal lobe regions to verbal declarative memory is debated within the neuroscience, neuropsychology, and cognitive psychology communities. We evaluate whether the extent of surgical resection within medial-temporal regions predicts longitudinal verbal learning and memory outcomes. This single-center retrospective observational study involved patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy undergoing unilateral anterior temporal lobe resection from 2007 to 2015. Thirty-two participants with Engel Classes 1 and 2 outcomes were included (14 left, 18 right) and followed for a mean of 2.3 years after surgery (+/-1.5 years). Participants had baseline and postsurgical neuropsychological testing and high-resolution T1-weighted MRI scans. Postsurgical lesions were manually traced and coregistered to presurgical scans to precisely quantify resection extent of medial-temporal regions. Verbal learning and memory change scores were regressed on hippocampal, entorhinal, and parahippocampal resection volume after accounting for baseline performance. Overall, there were no significant differences in learning and memory change between patients who received left and right anterior temporal lobe resection. After controlling for baseline performance, the extent of left parahippocampal resection accounted for 27% (p = .021) of the variance in verbal short delay free recall. The extent of left entorhinal resection accounted for 37% (p = .004) of the variance in verbal short delay free recall. Our findings highlight the critical role that the left parahippocampal and entorhinal regions play in recall for verbal material.

Objective: To test the relation between intra-individual variability (IIV) and cognition across the lifespan in multiple sclerosis (MS). Background: The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a widely-used screen of cognitive functioning in MS across the lifespan. IIV in reaction time is a novel index of consistency across sustained performance. IIV been shown to be highly sensitive to general CNS integrity and global morbidity, and may serve as a cognitive biomarker in MS. Design/Methods: Patients with clinically-definite MS were recruited through the Lourie Center for Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis and the NYU Langone MS Comprehensive Care Center. Healthy controls were recruited for comparison purposes and utilized for the creation of the linear model that is necessary to calculate IIV scores. The SDMT and Cogstate Brief Battery were administered to all participants. The Cogstate Brief Battery consists of simple and choice reaction time tasks from which reaction time IIV was calculated. Results: A total of 187 MS participants completed the assessments ranging in age from 8 to 68 years (mean 32.9+/-17.6 years). Mean detection and identification IIV was calculated across the Cogstate reaction time measures, and predicted performance on the SDMT (r= -0.394, p<0.001). When compared to healthy controls, the effect sizes were nearly equivalent (Cohen's d = 0.53 and SDMT = 0.55, respectively). Conclusions: IIV in reaction time tasks may be used as a sensitive measure of performance variability in patients with MS and is related to cognitive performance as well. IIV is impaired in MS across the lifespan, including pediatric patients. IIV is a novel and sensitive marker of cognitive involvement in patients with MS, and may predict future cognitive decline as in other diseases

Objective: To test whether changes in fine motor speed predict change in cognitive functioning in pediatric onset MS (POMS). Background: Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune demyelinating disease that has a pediatric (<18 years) onset in 3-5% of all cases. Cognitive impairment is a frequent and disabling symptom for approximately 30% of POMS patients. As in adults, the earliest cognitive involvement can be measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test or SDMT, a measure of speeded information processing. Fine motor slowing occurs frequently in both adult and pediatric patients, but its relation to cognitive functioning remains unclear. The Lafayette grooved pegboard serves as a measure of fine motor functioning and has previously been shown to be sensitive in MS samples. Design/Methods: POMS patients were consecutively recruited through the Lourie Center for Pediatric MS and the NYU Langone MS Comprehensive Care Center. All participants completed the SDMT and the Lafayette grooved pegboard (dominant and non-dominant hand conditions) at two separate visits (using an alternate form for the SDMT). Both SDMT and pegboard performances were transformed to age-normative z scores for comparison. Results: A total of n=26 POMS participants completed both assessments. The mean age was 16.5+/-3.08 years and 58% were female. The mean time between study visits was 193+/-148 days. Both measures improved at repeat administration, with mean SDMT and pegboard z scores improving from 0.11+/-1.39 to 0.34+/-1.41 and -1.56+/-1.68 to -1.21+/-2.55, respectively. Change in pegboard performance significantly predicted change in the SDMT (r=0.58, p=0.002)

Objective: Speeded Saccadic Eye Movement Predicts Symbol Digit Modalities Test Performance in Multiple Sclerosis Background: Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune demyelinating disease with estimates of cognitive impairment above 30% in pediatric and 50% in adult patients. The SDMT, a widely-used screening tool that measures speeded information processing, has been used to track cognitive decline in MS. The K-D test is a brief measure of saccadic eye movement speed using a timed number naming test, commonly used for the detection of mild traumatic brain injury. Here, we tested the sensitivity of the K-D test in MS and its association with performance on the SDMT. Design/Methods: Adult and pediatric patients with clinically-definite MS were consecutively recruited through the NYU Langone MS Comprehensive Care Center. All participants completed the SDMT and K-D at a single visit. Results: A total of 30 participants completed the assessments ranging in age from 13 to 72 years (mean 38 +/- 19 years), were 74% female, and with an EDSS range 0.0 to 6.5. Relative to age normative data, the K-D indicated greater impairment than the SDMT (74% vs. 48%, respectively). Controlling for age, both tests were significantly correlated (r=0.44, p =0.02), demonstrating a close contribution of oculomotor function to SDMT performance. Conclusions: The K-D test is sensitive to detecting impairment in MS across the lifespan. Performance on the SDMT is closely associated with oculomotor function in MS

Objective: To test whether the Brief International Cognitive Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) predicts real-world functioning as measured by timed instrumental activities of daily living (ADLs). Background: The BICAMS is a cognitive screen that is widely-used in clinical practice and research to assess cognitive impairment in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). It is important for cognitive measures to predict daily functioning. We compared performance on the BICAMS to a test consisting of ten timed instrumental activities of daily living, called the Test of Everyday Cognitive Ability or TECA. Design/Methods: All participants were administered the TECA along with three BICAMS measures: Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R), and either the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) or substituted with the Selective Reminding Test (SRT). The TECA items were scored according to time and errors and averaged for one representative score, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. BICAMS measures were transformed to age-normative z scores for comparison, with scores of <-1.5 considered impaired, and one or more impaired scores indicating overall BICAMS impairment. Results: A total of n=177 MS patients (mean age 45+/- 14 years, 73% female) with a median EDSS=3.0 (range of 0.0 to 8.0) completed the study. Overall, 37% met BICAMS impairment criteria. Each of the individual BICAMS measures significantly predicted performance on the TECA: SDMT, r=-.53, p<.001, BVMT-R r= -0.32, p <0.001, and Verbal Learning r= -.34, p <0.001. Worse TECA scores were associated with poorer performance on the BICAMS. Conclusions: The TECA is a measure of timed instrumental activities of daily living that is valid for use in a diverse MS population. BICAMS significantly predicts performance on the TECA, indicating that it is a useful indicator of real-world functioning

Objective: To test whether home delivery of tDCS paired with cognitive training can improve cognitive outcomes in participants with multiple sclerosis (MS). Background: Cognitive impairment is a common debilitating MS symptom. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) paired with cognitive training presents itself as a possible option for those with cognitive impairment, but requires daily sessions, placing strain on patients. Here we explore the feasibility and efficacy of a remotely- supervised tDCS protocol (RS-tDCS) paired with cognitive training for patients with MS. Design/Methods: MS participants completed 10 sessions of tDCS paired with cognitive training (1.5 mA x 20 minutes, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex montage). RS-tDCS participants were compared to a control group of adults with MS who underwent ten 20-minute cognitive training sessions through the same remotely-supervised procedures. Cognitive outcomes were tested by composite scores measuring change in performance on standard measures (Brief International Cognitive Assessment in MS or BICAMS), basic attention (Attention Network Test-Interaction (ANT-I) Orienting and Attention Networks, Cogstate Detection), complex attention (ANT-I Executive Network, Cogstate Identification and One-Back), and intra-individual response variability (ANT-I and Cogstate identification). Results: After ten sessions, the RS-tDCS group (n=25) compared to the control group (n=20) had significant improvements in complex attention (p = 0.01) and response variability (p = 0.01) composites. The groups did not differ in change of measures of basic attention (p = 0.95) or standard BICAMS cognitive measures (p = 0.99). Conclusions: RS-tDCS paired with cognitive training is effective for enhancing complex attention and reducing response variability. The benefit of telerehabilitation using RS-tDCS combined with cognitive training may be generalizable to other conditions

Objective: To evaluate whether tDCS improves fatigue in MS and the role of baseline affect in response, using a remotely-supervised telerehabilitation protocol. Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that alters cortical excitability through low amplitude currents. Previous work suggests tDCS as a method for symptomatic management in MS. However, these initial studies have been limited due to small sample sizes and few active treatment sessions. Design/Methods: Participants completed ten 20 minute sessions of tDCS (1.5 mA, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, left anodal) paired with cognitive training. Sessions were completed from home using our RS-tDCS protocol. All participants completed baseline and follow-up mood and fatigue self-report measures including the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Baseline positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA) were z-transformed and averaged into a representative affect score. Results: Participants (n=25) aged 30 to 69 years with a range of impairment (Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores of 1.0 to 8.0) and all subtypes were enrolled. RS-tDCS treatment led to clear improvements in both dimensions of affect (PA, Cohen's d = 0.32 and NA, d = -0.66) and fatigue (MFIS, d = -0.59). Participants' baseline affect score correlated with change in NA (r = 0.61, p < 0.01) and MFIS (r = 0.39, p = 0.06). Among participants who had a baseline affect z-score less than 0 (n=17) indicating affect disturbance, there was a greater magnitude of improvement and significant change from baseline (PA, d = 0.57, p=0.02; NA d = -1.07, p < 0.001; and MFIS d = -0.84, p<0.01). Conclusions: Telerehabilitation using RS-tDCS improves mood and fatigue in MS patients treated at home, with greater effects found in those with baseline features of mood or anxiety

Objective: To explore the feasibility and safety of remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation RS-tDCS) paired with computerized cognitive training exercises in participants with Parkinson's disease (PD). Background: tDCS is a recent therapeutic development with potential to ameliorate symptoms of PD including motor, sensory, mood, and cognition.. However, multiple treatment sessions are necessary for a cumulative benefit. The requirement to travel to the clinic for daily clinic treatment sessions has limited the design of clinical trials in PD to date. Here, we used a RS-tDCS protocol validated for use in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), a condition that shares with PD significant impairment in mobility, cognition, and high prevalence of fatigue. Design/Methods: Each participant completed 10 tDCS sessions (20-minute each, 1.5-2.0-mA, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex montage) using the remotely-supervised protocol. Feasibility of the approach was assessed based on a series of checkpoints, addressing attendance and tolerability and safety of the 40 sessions paired with simultaneous CT. Results: A total of 40 sessions were completed with 100% compliance. All participants were able to quickly learn self-administration and the set up time decreased through the 10 sessions for those who struggled with set up in the beginning. No serious adverse events were reported. Most commonly reported side effects were skin tingling and burning sensation. The most intense side effect was burning sensation at intensity of 4, which qualifies as "mild" on scale from 1 [minimal] to 10 [severe]. Time that these side effects were noticed by participants throughout the duration of the study also tended to decrease. RS-tDCS range of 1.5-2.0mA was tolerable for all participants Conclusions: RS-tDCS was feasible and safe in PD participants and can be paired with tele-rehabilitation. This study encourages using this innovative protocol for larger studies and clinical trials in PD patients

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of three computerized neurocognitive assessment tools (CNTs; i.e., ANAM, DANA, and ImPACT) for assessing mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in patients recruited through a level I trauma center emergency department (ED). METHODS: mTBI (n=94) and matched trauma control (n=80) subjects recruited from a level I trauma center emergency department completed symptom and neurocognitive assessments within 72 hr of injury and at 15 and 45 days post-injury. Concussion symptoms were also assessed via phone at 8 days post-injury. RESULTS: CNTs did not differentiate between groups at any time point (e.g., M 72-hr Cohen's d=-.16, .02, and .00 for ANAM, DANA, and ImPACT, respectively; negative values reflect greater impairment in the mTBI group). Roughly a quarter of stability coefficients were over .70 across measures and test-retest intervals in controls. In contrast, concussion symptom score differentiated mTBI vs. control groups acutely), with this effect size diminished over time (72-hr and day 8, 15, and 45 Cohen's d=-.78, -.60, -.49, and -.35, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The CNTs evaluated, developed and widely used to assess sport-related concussion, did not yield significant differences between patients with mTBI versus other injuries. Symptom scores better differentiated groups than CNTs, with effect sizes weaker than those reported in sport-related concussion studies. Nonspecific injury factors, and other characteristics common in ED settings, likely affect CNT performance across trauma patients as a whole and thereby diminish the validity of CNTs for assessing mTBI in this patient population. (JINS, 2017, 23, 293-303).