Faculty Bibliography

In cases of chronic distal biceps ruptures, the combination of muscle atrophy, distal tendon retraction, and fibrosis makes primary anatomic reattachment of the tendon particularly challenging. To regain tendon length and avoid flexion contractures, reconstruction with graft augmentation has been proposed as an alternative for cases not amenable to primary repair. We describe our technique using an Achilles allograft through a modified Henry approach to reconstruct the distal biceps tendon to regain length as well as restore flexion and supination strength. With proper and detailed exposure, chronic distal biceps injuries can be reconstructed safely and efficaciously using an Achilles allograft.

Purpose: iBalance high tibial osteotomy, (iHTO, Arthrex Inc, Naples, Florida), is a recently introduced surgical procedure for correction of knee varus malalignment. iHTO, utilizing a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implant and osteoinductive compounds (OIC), presents challenging post operative radiographs which can easily be misinterpreted as infection. Our purpose is to report, based on review of 24 cases, the previously undescribed to the best of our knowledge, radiographic features of iHTO and its complications. Materials and Methods: Retrospective query of our digital database was performed to identify iHTO cases. The clinical and postsurgical images in all cases with > 1-month follow up imaging were reviewed with attention to 1. Correction of varus malalignment, 2. Healing at the osteotomy site, 3. Changes in the OIC, and 4. Complications. Results: There were 24 iHTOs in 23 patients (17 men, 6 women, ages 21-59, mean 44, median 46), imaged 1 to 29 months post-surgery, with angle of correction, when available, ranging from 5 to 14degree. Immediate post-surgical correction of varus malalignment was seen in 100 % of patients. 100 % depicted oval radiolucencies, at bone PEEK interface simulating erosions and infection. Four, often overlapping, signs of healing were noted: 1. Blurring of bony margins at the osteotomy site, noted within 2 weeks post surgery, 2. Blurring of sharp interface between OIC and host bone, 3. Anterior, posterior and less commonly medial bridging callus, 4. Resorption of OIC, noted as early as 4 months. Complications, seen in 7 cases (29 %), included genu varum recurrence (n = 2), painful exuberant bone formation, (n = 1), and propagation of the osteotomy through the lateral tibial cortex (n = 4). In patients with >6 months follow-up, nonunion and possible infection was seen in 1 patient. 2 patients required total knee arthroplasty due to iHTO failure. Conclusion: iBalance HTO typically depicts oval radiolucencies at the PEEK bone interface not to be mistaken for infection. Familiarity with this features, as well as with other signs of healing, should aid the radiologist in accurate interpretation of post operative films of iHTO patients

OBJECTIVE: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) depends on proper healing of the graft or bone plug at the cellular level. The effect of cigarette smoke on ACLR was not commonly reported until recently. The primary purpose of this review was to determine if smoking has a negative effect on subjective or objective outcome scores after ACLR. The secondary purpose was to identify any increased risk of complications, infection, ACL re-tear, or revision procedures. METHODS: A systematic literature review of the MEDLINE, SCOPUS and PubMed databases was performed to identify all studies that compared outcomes of ACLR surgery between smokers and nonsmokers. The frequency-weighted mean was calculated for outcome measures that were similar across several studies. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were identified that met inclusion criteria for patients undergoing ACLR (mean age, 26.8 years) with a mean follow-up of 37 months. Smokers had significantly worse subjective outcome measures and worse side-to-side difference in anterior translation compared to non-smokers (2.68mm vs 1.89mm, respectively). In 2 studies, smokers were found to have a significantly higher risk of developing an infection and VTE (venous thromboembolism) post-operatively. The evidence for the effect of smoking on risk for subsequent re-tear is mixed. No study reported a higher rate of development of radiographic knee osteoarthritis among smokers compared to nonsmokers. CONCLUSIONS: Cigarette smoke is associated with significantly worse clinical outcome scores, an increase in anterior translation, and increased complication rates after ACL reconstruction. These findings may help orthopaedic surgeons better inform their patients about the potential negative effects of smoking on the outcomes of ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common among all participants in sports, occurring in approximately 1 in 3,000 individuals yearly in the USA. Epidemiological studies of ACL injuries have demonstrated that females are at higher risk for injury than males. When compared to male athletes participating in the same sports, the risk of ACL injury is two to eight times greater in females.1-3 A significant research effort has been directed at identifying risk factors that may predispose females to ACL injury. Female athletes likely have an increased incidence of ACL injury due to anatomic, hormonal, biomechanical, and neuromuscular differences between the sexes. Extrinsic factors may also play a role. As the number of girls and women participating in athletics continues to increase, understanding risk factors and developing prevention strategies will have profound physical, psychological, and financial implications for female athletes and the medical system.

Injuries to the pectoralis major muscle are relatively rare but result in pain, weakness, cosmetic deformity and in many cases, inability to return to previous levels of function. The most common cause of this injury is bench-pressing, as it places the muscle fibers in a position of mechanical disadvantage while under heavy load. The ability to detect and appropriately treat each patient with this injury is essential to restoring not only strength and function but also cosmesis. This article reviews the diagnostic workup of this injury and examines both the outcomes and techniques of non-operative and operative management.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common injury that mostly affects young adults. The mechanisms of injury and surgical treatment have been extensively studied in both the laboratory and clinical arenas; however, great controversy still exists in regards to the best surgical technique, graft choice, and graft fixation device. In the area graft fixation, multiple breakthroughs have occurred in terms of fixation devices. These devices generally fall within the broad categories of interference screw, cross-pins, or cortical-based devices. Furthermore, some of these devices are available in either metal or bioabsorbable materials, which adds to the already great variety of options. Although biomechanically these devices have been shown to be able to withstand the typical forces experienced by the ACL graft during the early phases of rehabilitation before the graft has fully incorporated into the bone, little is known about the clinical outcomes. It is well recognized that graft fixation is the weakest link in the early postoperative period after ACL reconstruction. This review of the outcomes of ACL fixation devices explores some of the evidence available for the different devices.

OBJECTIVE: A discoid meniscus is more prone to tears than a normal meniscus. Patients with a torn discoid lateral meniscus are at increased risk for early onset osteoarthritis requiring total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Optimal management for this condition is controversial given the up-front cost difference between the two treatment options: the more expensive meniscal allograft transplantation compared with standard partial meniscectomy. We hypothesize that meniscal allograft transplantation following excision of a torn discoid lateral meniscus is more cost-effective compared with partial meniscectomy alone because allografts will extend the time to TKA. METHODS: A decision analytic Markov model was created to compare the cost effectiveness of two treatments for symptomatic, torn discoid lateral meniscus: meniscal allograft and partial meniscectomy. Probability estimates and event rates were derived from the scientific literature, and costs and benefits were discounted by 3%. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed to test model robustness. RESULTS: Over 25 years, the partial meniscectomy strategy cost $10,430, whereas meniscal allograft cost on average $4040 more, at $14,470. Partial meniscectomy postponed TKA an average of 12.5 years, compared with 17.30 years for meniscal allograft, an increase of 4.8 years. Allograft cost $842 per-year-gained in time to TKA. CONCLUSION: Meniscal allografts have been shown to reduce pain and improve function in patients with discoid lateral meniscus tears. Though more costly, meniscal allografts may be more effective than partial meniscectomy in delaying TKA in this model. Additional future long term clinical studies will provide more insight into optimal surgical options.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the current study was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of femoral and tibial tunnel placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using independent anteromedial portal (AMP) drilling over a three-year observation period. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of 161 consecutive primary ACL reconstructions from a single surgeon over his first 36-months in practice. Femoral and tibial tunnel angulation measurements were made on anteroposterior radiographs by a single observer utilizing the assessment method described by Aglietti et al. The accuracy and precision of tunnel placement across the three-year period were assessed with comparisons made. RESULTS: Significantly improved accuracy was demonstrated toward the cadaveric ideal femoral tunnel angle of 33.5 degrees over time. Improved precision of tunnel placement was also demonstrated evidenced by declining standard deviations across each year. Statistically significant improvement in femoral tunnel placement was seen between the first and second cohorts of 32 cases. No significant change was seen with respect to tibial tunnel angle across the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: A learning curve in developing accuracy and precision in ACL femoral tunnel placement using the AMP technique exists; our study indicates this to be somewhere between 32 and 64 cases. Tibial tunnel placement does not share the same learning curve using this surgical technique.