Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: This was a phase I study of AG 331 to determine systemic tolerance and pharmacokinetics following single and multiple escalating intravenous doses. METHODS: The study was an open-label phase I trial that was divided into two components. In phase IA (single dose), six dose levels from 12.5 to 225 mg/m2 were administered to 18 patients (3 at each dose level) and serial blood samples were collected for 72 h. Upon achieving satisfactory pharmacologic parameters, the multiple dosing component (phase IB) was initiated. Six dose levels from 50 to 800 mg/m2 per day were administered for 5 consecutive days to 18 patients. Pre- and postdose blood samples were obtained on days 1-4 and serial blood samples were collected over 24 h following dose 5. Nonhematologic and hepatic toxicities were assessed, serum AG 331 concentrations were measured and pharmacokinetic parameters determined. RESULTS: Other than fatigue, no severe toxicities were encountered in phase IA. Liver toxicity was manifested by elevations in transaminase first noted at multiple doses of 200 mg/m2 per day for 5 days. Fever and malaise but no myelosuppression were noted. The mean terminal t1/2 following single doses was significantly shorter than the t1/2 following multiple dosing (6.8 vs 9.9 h) and clearance was significantly faster following single doses than following multiple dosing (81.7 vs 30.4 l/h), but no significant difference in Vd was noted. CONCLUSIONS: The dose-related toxicity profile precludes further clinical development at this time. The pharmacokinetics of AG 331 following single and multiple doses showed significant differences.

BACKGROUND: Liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx, Doxil) delivers doxorubicin to a tumor, but has a vastly altered pharmacology and attenuated acute and chronic toxicities. Therefore, its efficacy in soft tissue sarcomas is worth exploring. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with recurrent or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas who had not failed prior doxorubicin were accrued into this phase II study. Patients were treated with Doxil at a dose of 50 mg/m2 every four weeks. RESULTS: No responses were seen but three patients were removed from study after only one cycle of treatment. Moreover, leiomyosarcoma was the most common histology and most patients had low grade, and bulky, disseminated tumors. Treatment was well tolerated with no episodes of grade 4 toxicity and only five episodes of grade 3 toxicities: two episodes of neutropenia and one each of stomatitis, dermatologic toxicity and nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: Doxil's lack of activity in this study of patients with adult soft tissue sarcoma may be related to the poor prognostic features of our population. We confirm its favorable toxicity profile and suggest that additional studies be done in patients with other characteristics.

Lometrexol inhibits the first folate-dependent enzyme in de novo purine biosynthesis and is avidly polyglutamated and retained in tissues expressing folylpolyglutamate synthetase. Although clinical studies have been limited by cumulative toxicity, preclinical studies show that pretreatment with folic acid can protect normal tissue while maintaining tumor cytotoxicity. Therefore, a Phase I study of lometrexol every 21 days preceded by i.v. folic acid was initiated. Lometrexol was studied in six patients at 15 mg/m2, in six patients at 20 mg/m2, in three patients at 25 mg/m2, and in nine patients at 30 mg/m2. Patients received either 5 mg of folic acid 1 h before or 25 mg/m2 3 h before lometrexol. Blood samples were obtained around the first course and weekly thereafter for determination of plasma and erythrocyte (RBC) lometrexol concentrations. Bioactive folates in plasma and RBCs were determined in a subset of patients. Lometrexol pharmacokinetics were best described by a three-compartment model. Mean clearance and volume of distribution were 1.6 +/- 0.6 liters/h/m2 and 8.9 +/- 4.1 liters/m2. Mean half-lives were 0.23 +/- 0.1, 2.9 +/- 1.4, and 25.0 +/- 48.7 h. Pharmacokinetics were independent of either lometrexol or folic acid dose. In the weekly blood samples, RBC lometrexol levels rose, long after plasma lometrexol was undetectable. RBC lometrexol levels were independent of folic acid or lometrexol dose. Bioactive folates measured in plasma and RBCs during this same time period did not accumulate. Rising RBC levels were correlated with a fall in hematocrit, hemoglobin, and platelet count. This study indicates that the cumulative toxicity of lometrexol is related to tissue concentration and not plasma pharmacokinetics. RBC lometrexol may be an indicator of cumulative drug exposure and effect.

Used for centuries in traditional Chinese medicine, camptothecin was rediscovered in the 1950s during a search for compounds that could be used as a source for steroid synthesis. Due to its limited water solubility, a sodium salt was used in the early clinical trials. The severe toxicity and erratic absorption relegated this compound to the research laboratory until the 1980s when the topoisomerase enzyme was identified as the cellular target of camptothecin, the topoisomerase enzyme was found to be overexpressed in cancer cells and a structure-activity relationship was determined for camptothecin. These new developments brought the camptothecins back to the clinical setting for further testing. The various analogues that have been most studied to date include: irinotecan (CPT-11), and its derivative SN-38, topotecan, and 9-aminocamptothecin. Numerous trials have been conducted in an attempt to establish the efficacy in various tumour types, to determine the dose-limiting toxicity and to define the optimal schedule of administration. It seems that large doses of these drugs given on intermittent schedules are not effective. Our hypothesis is that the camptothecins require a prolonged schedule of administration given continuously at low doses or frequent intermittent dosing schedules to be most effective. With these schedules, normal haematopoietic cells and mucosal progenitor cells with low topoisomerase I levels may be spared, while efficacy is preserved

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the tolerance of estramustine phosphate (EMP) combined with a 3-hour paclitaxel infusion in women with solid paclitaxel-pretreated solid tumors. Paclitaxel pharmacology was to be studied at the recommended phase II dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paclitaxel was administered to cohorts of at least three assessable patients at doses of 150, 180, 210, and 225 mg/m2, while EMP was given at 900 and 1,200 mg/m2/d in divided doses orally for 2 days preceding and on the day of paclitaxel. The pharmacologic study was performed at 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel given in the absence and 3 weeks later in the presence of EMP 900 mg/m2/d. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients received a total of 178 courses. Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were common at EMP 1,200 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 225 mg/ m2; this was considered the maximum-tolerated dose. Since these toxicities appeared related to EMP, the pharmacologic study used a dose of 900 mg/m2 of this agent with 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel. Antitumor activity was documented against breast and ovarian cancers at all levels. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics without and with EMP did not differ. CONCLUSION: EMP 900 mg/m2 for 3 days and 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion are well tolerated; antitumor activity was seen in women with paclitaxel-pretreated solid tumors. This apparent enhancement of antitumor effects is unlikely to be mediated by P-glycoprotein